Pages:
1
..
3
4
5
6 |
jjgoh
Harmless
Posts: 24
Registered: 24-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Kclo3 cost me around usd60 for 1kilo! Wtf! Expensive
|
|
jjgoh
Harmless
Posts: 24
Registered: 24-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
NHN, I read about it before, it's produce phygene gas which is deadly!
I would not like to touch these hazardous chemical
|
|
Ral123
National Hazard
Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by jjgoh | NHN, I read about it before, it's produce phygene gas which is deadly!
I would not like to touch these hazardous chemical |
What did you expect from nickel and hydrazine? Or you think azides or mercury salts are somewhat friendly?
Develop interest in another hobby. Most of the materials will be able to harm you in some way.
|
|
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Ral123 | "very safe primary" I hold a firm believe that the safety is in your head.
I'm pretty sure LA won't be a very good primary at all, if it's not in contact with the secondary. If there would be some separation between the
primary and let's say RDX base charge. Then you need good explosive properties, rather then initiating properties. And LA doesn't cope well with the
decomposition products of storage of most base charge materials.
In other words, if it's not a compound cap, why would the azide shine? |
I thought almost all commercial and military caps were now compound caps, for many years, for many good reasons. I use compound caps for just about
everything, even though they aren't necessarily needed at all for things like dynamite. They are used because they provide increased initiating
ability and safety for starters. I am not an expert, I only pretend to be one on the internet as they say, but what makes a good initiator is
complicated and is often not always intuitive. Initiating ability is about how the energy is delivered, in real life, with real materials and in real
life practical quantities. For instance, if the specifications given for a primary are based on high order steady state conditions, and in reality it
takes 20 g or so to reach those conditions, it really doesn't matter (in practically terms) if it's VOD (at those conditions) is 1000 m/s more than
say lead azide.
Lead azide has proven to have good storage stable in compound caps. It can be degraded by CO2 in the air, but in a hermetically sealed cap casing that
isn't an issue. One of the main reasons for it's popularity was storage stability. Storage stability is not perfect, however, according to "Primary
Explosives by Matyas" much more LA than is needed to initiate the base charge in caps is apparently used to ensure reliability even after years of
storage.
As far as NHN goes, I haven't actually worked with it yet. It was advertised in journals, etc, as being very safe (relatively, from an explosive
perspective). There is of course significant risk of poisoning, when dealing with hydrazine and nickel salts.
[Edited on 4-1-2014 by Hennig Brand]
"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
|
|
DubaiAmateurRocketry
National Hazard
Posts: 841
Registered: 10-5-2013
Location: LA, CA, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: In research
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by jjgoh | NHN, I read about it before, it's produce phygene gas which is deadly!
I would not like to touch these hazardous chemical |
What is phygene gas ? NHN is alright. The starting material is toxic, the final product is alright.
|
|
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This makes TATP seem much friendlier as a primary than its reputation indicates. Maybe it really is just all the inexperienced kids making it, and in
really large quantities, which has given TATP such a bad reputation. I am still hesitant to trust it though (not that any primary should be trusted).
Attachment: TATP Mass Loss and Friction Sensitivity During Ageing Matyas.pdf (840kB) This file has been downloaded 846 times
[Edited on 4-1-2014 by Hennig Brand]
"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
|
|
Etanol
Hazard to Others
Posts: 188
Registered: 27-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Dany | Quote: Originally posted by Etanol |
This is not a deflagration. More like a low-velocity detonation.
Explosion passed through metal barriers. Due to the pressure. No heat transfer or hot particles.
All mixes fuel - oxidizer explode in this mode.
another example:
33% Pb (H2PO2) 2 + 67% Pb (NO3) 2
in 4.8mm plastic tube
1.4 g/cm3 238 +/- 5 m/s
2.0 g/cm3 304 +/- 6 m/s
This is less than the speed of sound in air! (330 m/s). But the explosion did not fit the definition of deflagration.
[Edited on 27-12-2013 by Etanol] |
Can you explain to me what do you mean by "This is less than the speed of sound in air! (330 m/s). But the explosion did not fit the
definition of deflagration"?
Dany. |
" Deflagration is a term describing subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material
and ignites it. "
" Detonation is the supersonic spread of combustion by shock compression. "
Explosion mixture Armstrong and nitrofosfit lead:
1. Explosive reaction is transferred between the material layers by using pressure (shock compression)
2. Velocity propagation reaction coincides with the velocity of sound in the starting material
I worked with HN. NHN difficult in practical use. Detonator need at least 0.4-0.5 g NHN in a hard metal casing. Otherwise he would not detonate.
He really is not very sensitive to friction. Impact sensitivity like PETN.
PS Sorry for the machine English
[Edited on 5-1-2014 by Etanol]
|
|
Scientwisted
Harmless
Posts: 21
Registered: 6-12-2013
Location: Penn USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: mellow
|
|
This is a good topic as primaries are the starting point of all explosions and a strong reliable one is essential. Primaries are unfortunately where
many people injure themselves. While they are inherently dangerous safety should be one of the deciding factors when choosing one. I have several
criteria for primaries to judge which one I want to make next. These criteria are
-cost and availability of starting materials
-toxicity and hazards of starting materials
-is the procedure of synthesis within my abilities and do I have the necessary lab equipment
-stability and storage (if applicable)
-and finally power (ie. brisance/VOD/etc.)
As far as my involvement goes in EM I wish only to use primaries as initiators and maybe do some standard small scale test as to get an idea of the
properties of the material. Personally I do not see any reason to mess with exotic primaries with sketchy and toxic starting materials and over
elaborate synthesis. I was (and still am) using HMTD and while it has a bad rep. of being unstable due to the weak oxygen to oxygen bond I have never
had trouble. IMO while it is clearly not the best choice I use very pure analytical lab grade starting materials, I have my own procedure which I
follow to the letter (I have extra steps in there to make an extra pure product) and taking special care in handling and short term storage. Never the
less I want to make a more stable initiator that was not sensitive to metals, UV rays and everything else so I decided on LA. I have heard good things
about it and it fits all my criteria with the exception of the lead and it can be set off with an electric match.
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Scientwisted | Never the less I want to make a more stable initiator that was not sensitive to metals, UV rays and everything else so I decided on LA. I have heard
good things about it and it fits all my criteria with the exception of the lead and it can be set off with an electric match. |
Good call....LA is the industry standard with decades of practical use, reliable research data and proven performance.
But the experiment is the criterion of truth....therefore I began the construction of testing hardware for essential criteria:
Impact sensitivity tester
Roto-friction tester
Electrical discharge sensitivity tester
Getting lucky is going to wear thin with time and without proper quality control system this hobby is bound to take a piece of us.....as a quality
control manager I should know
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
Pard
Harmless
Posts: 38
Registered: 29-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I know LA is considered very stable, but how safe for storage exactly is the dextrinated lead azide? What about when it's pressed in caps? I imagine
it'd be quite storage safe, since it's not like the people who use it professionally make their own as they go, but that's the industry quality stuff.
What about in a compound cap with double salts
I've read conflicting things on whether it is best stored dry or under water or alcohol
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by jjgoh | So what should I do right now? Read more information on safety?
Oh god! That's seriously freaking dangerous!
[Edited on 26-12-2013 by jjgoh] |
Yes, you should read more information on safety.
Quote: |
THE FORGOTTEN BIT OF FULMINATE
IN experimenting with high explosives and in their
manufacture, a little absent-mindedness, a very
slight lack of exact caution, a seemingly insignificant
inadvertence for a moment, may cost one limb or
his life. The incident that cost me my left hand is
a case in point.
On the day preceding that accident, I had a gold
cap put on a tooth. In consequence, the tooth
ached and kept me awake the grater part of the
night. Next morning I rose early and went down
to my factory at Maxim, New Jersey. In order to test
the dryness of some fulminate compound I took
a little piece of it, about the size of an English penny,
broke off a small particle, placed it on a stand
outside the laboratory, and, lighting a match, touched
it off. Owing to my loss of sleep the night before, my
mind was not so alert as usual, and I forgot to lay
aside the remaining piece of fulminate compound,
but, instead, held it in my left hand. A spark from
the ignited piece entered my left hand between my
fingers, igniting the piece there, with the result that
my hand was blown off to the wrist, and the next
thing I saw was the bare end of the wrist bone. My
face and clothes were bespattered with flesh and filled
with slivers of bone. . . . The following day, my thumb
was found on the top of a building a couple of hundred
feet away, with a sinew attached to it, which had
been pulled out from the elbow.
A tourniquet was immediately tightened around
my wrist to prevent the flow of blood, and I and
two of my assistants walked half a mile down to
the railroad, where we tried to stop an upgoing
train with a red flag. But it ran the flag down
and went on, the engineering thinking, perhaps,
from our wild gesticulations that we were highwaymen.
We then walked another half-mile to a farmhouse,
where a horse and wagon were procured. Thence
I was driven to Farmingdale, four and a half miles
distant, where I had to wait two hours for the next
train to New York.
The only physician in the town was an invalid, ill with
tuberculosis. I called on him while waiting, and condoled
with him, as he was much worse off then was I.
On arrival in New York, I was taken in a carriage
to the elevated station at the Brooklyn Bridge.
On reaching my station at Eighty-fourth Street,
I walked four blocks, and then up four flights of
stairs to my apartments on Eighty-second
street, where the surgeon was awaiting me.
It was now evening, and the accident has occurred
at half-past ten o'clock in the morning. That was
a pretty hard day!
As I had no electric lights in the apartments, only gas,
the surgeon declared that it would be dangerous to
administer ether, and the must, therefore, chloroform
me. He added that there was no danger in using
chloroform, if the patient had a strong heart. Thereupon
I asked him to examine my heart, since, if there should
be the least danger of my dying under the influence of the
anesthetic, I wanted to make my will.
"Heart!" exclaimed the surgeon, with emphasis.
"A man who has gone through what you have gone
through today hasn't any heart!" The next day I
dictated letters to answer my correspondence as
usual. The young woman stenographer, who took
my dictation, remarked with a sardonic smile:
"You, too, have now become a shorthanded writer."
The grim jest appealed to my sense of humor.
On the third day I was genuinely ill and had no
wish to do business. Within ten days, however,
I was out again, attending to my affairs.
Hudson Maxim Dynamite Stories 1916
|
Hudson Maxim had a serious case of hard ass going on.
Another story tells of how his house maid saw him use pieces of gelignite from the factory to light the kitchen wood stove- And tried it with a whole
stick. They needed a new girl AND a new stove after that one.
Then there was a story about an Irish immigrant worker who took a wooden barrel that was contaminated with nitroglycerin from the nitro washing
building over to the industrial oven where the Sodium nitrate for dynamite was dried, and dumped the HOT (RATHER over 100 C!) nitrate into the NG
soaked barrel to move it on to the dynamite mixing building... Title is: "Discharging Pat". (Anglo Americans were pretty prejudiced against the Irish
back then
[Edited on 31-3-2014 by Bert]
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
FeRe
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 14-4-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Someone can help me in this question
I wrote this question to other section but I didn't take answer satisfactory
For example Tatp is a static sensitive explosives. For its is able to go off through static discharge, a human is needed ?(can it just go off through
a human who has enough static electricity) I mean can it go off itself through static discharge when it is in a tube.
Little note : I didn't synthesize tatp I can explain myself with this question you can change tatp with other static sensitive primaries
|
|
Dany
Hazard to Others
Posts: 482
Registered: 3-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
FeRe, you are asking this question because you synthesized TATP and you are afraid that the tube will go off by itself or between your hand...wright?
a small advice boy, stay away from peroxide and sensitive explosive, your parent need you and you need to keep your hand safe...
Dany.
|
|
FeRe
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 14-4-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Dany | FeRe, you are asking this question because you synthesized TATP and you are afraid that the tube will go off by itself or between your hand...wright?
a small advice boy, stay away from peroxide and sensitive explosive, your parent need you and you need to keep your hand safe...
Dany. |
I said this on the top "Little note : I didn't synthesize tatp I can explain myself with this question you can change tatp with other static sensitive
primaries"
I didn't synthesize tatp why you say that everytime I explained this I didn't make tatp
Why you say me "boy" I am 25 years old
[Edited on 15-4-2014 by FeRe]
|
|
Dany
Hazard to Others
Posts: 482
Registered: 3-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
because your childish question shows that you didn't search well on the net to see if probable answer can be found. Here's something that can help you
on how static charge can build up.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070413074632A...
Dany.
[Edited on 15-4-2014 by Dany]
|
|
FeRe
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 14-4-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I know how it is building up I just want to learn that a explosive which sensitive to static discharge build up static, can it discharge (by itself)
when there is a no human and no conductive metal ? what we need to occur a discharge ? a human right or conductive thing ? I just want to know this
[Edited on 15-4-2014 by FeRe]
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Static electricity basics
Here is a VERY basic introduction to static electricity concepts.
Once you know what static electricity even IS, (Apparently you DO NOT) look at the relative sensitivities of some primary explosives to static
discharge:
Look here, pp. 31-32. Then read the rest of the PDF.
If you want to be treated as an adult, read and follow these procedures
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
I use a mix of nickel (II) trihydrazino nitrate complex with silver acetylide nitrate complex in the ratio 2/1 by weight in a way to boost up the
power of the SAN complex and to improve the explosivity/detonativity of the NHN with less confinment and quantity.
The two unsoluble complexes are tolerant to each other in the dry state.
The mix of the pink-lilac (Ni(N2H4)3(NO3)2) and of the white-grey (Ag2C2.xHNO3) powders look like the first powder but slightly lighter in color. The
VOD of the mix is between 6500 and 7000 m/s.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
Stortulling
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 24-6-2014
Location: North Pole
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Something unexpected happened today. I would make a few grams of silver acetylide double salt, and got a remarkable result. This was the way I did it.
First I dissolved 5.08 g of silver (99.9% Ag) in 25.0 ml of HNO3 (~ 68%) and ~ 25 ml d.H2O. Heated to 61 °C to dissolve the
last remnants of silver. Then I added ~ 50 ml d.H2O and began to bubble acetylene gas through the solution. After about 30 minutes it had
precipitated snow white crystals. I filtered and was quite pleased. For safety's sake, I took the filtered liquid back into the measuring cylinder and
bubbled more acetylene through. To my amazement, I got now a reddish brown precipitate!
What is what?
I have not dried crystals yet so I do not know how much there is of each type.
Pictures are coming when I have dried and weighed crystals.
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Stortulling | Something unexpected happened today. I would make a few grams of silver acetylide double salt, and got a remarkable result. This was the way I did it.
First I dissolved 5.08 g of silver (99.9% Ag) in 25.0 ml of HNO3 (~ 68%) and ~ 25 ml d.H2O. Heated to 61 °C to dissolve the
last remnants of silver. Then I added ~ 50 ml d.H2O and began to bubble acetylene gas through the solution. After about 30 minutes it had
precipitated snow white crystals. I filtered and was quite pleased. For safety's sake, I took the filtered liquid back into the measuring cylinder and
bubbled more acetylene through. To my amazement, I got now a reddish brown precipitate!
What is what?
I have not dried crystals yet so I do not know how much there is of each type.
Pictures are coming when I have dried and weighed crystals. |
You used distillated water or tap water? The second contains chloride, sulfate, carbonate and are no good for stability.
Solution must be exhausted several times with acetylen to get all the silver out. Usually I wash the precipitate with distillated water and put the
filtrate back with the initial filtrate for second and third acetylen pass.
If you made your acetylen via CaC2/H2O in the case some of the mist/foam contains Ca(OH)2 and pass into the AgNO3 reactor via the pipe...AgOH forms
and decompose to Ag2O what colors the acetylide precipitate in red-brown-black precipitate.
Same occurs if you dry your precipitate or let the AgNO3 solution exposed to bright light (especially sunlight)
This precipitate is more sensitive to shock and friction than the white one.
Best to do the reaction indoor with moderate light...drying in the same conditions or in the dark.
Storage in closed opaque soft recipient (I use PE photo film canisher but those are harder and harder to get )
That way the complex last for years without decomposition or darkening!
[Edited on 4-7-2014 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
Stortulling
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 24-6-2014
Location: North Pole
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I used distilled water, indoors and with minimal lighting.
It could be that there were some contaminants in the filter paper I used (bleached paper). The first precipitate I filtered as I wrote was snow white
(almost looks like titanium dioxide), but it was after I had filtered that I got the brownish precipitate. There are the few types of silver
acetylide, Ag2C2.AgNO3 -> Ag2C2.6AgNO3 if I do not remember completely wrong.
What I am sure about is whether they have the same color of the crystals. I am also unsure if Ag2C2 excites without double salt.
So it's most likely contaminants from the paper that has created discoloration, and not another kind of double salt ..?
Just another little thing, is it possible to carbonated tetra amine copper nitrate (TACN) with acetylene? If one can get something like tetra amine
copper carbide? If so would it be stable, and could it be used as a primery?
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1392
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Online
Mood: old jew
|
|
Cu2C2 (?)
Yes, use solution from TACN reaction is possible. Respectively: 1g TACN is dissolved in 20 - 40 g NH4OH 10-25% in aq + 1 g solid piece of calcium
carbide was put into a jar with a solution. Reaction at 30 Celsius running slow and stabile (solid one piece carbide). In the glass are precipitated
cuprous acetylide, about 1 g. It is necessary to dissolve all carbides, of course. The solution was filtered. Black very fine powder (dark red) is
filtered off under vacuum Buchner. Little damp, almost dry acetylide is stored under alcohol level. At one gram acetylide 30 grams of alcohol. The
stability of this substance (?Cu2C2 + XY ??) will soon be examined on Laboratory of Liptakov.........LL
Do I add, this is a very sensitive substance. And to all suggestions. When handling dry always work with a maximum of 1 gram. However, detonation has
no large mechanical effects. Effects on human hearing at 1 gram (in bulk pile) detonation of 50 cm distance has not any consequences. HMTD under the
same conditions has a devastating effect on hearing.
[Edited on 1-4-2016 by Laboratory of Liptakov]
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov | Yes, use solution from TACN reaction is possible. Respectively: 1g TACN is dissolved in 20 - 40 g NH4OH 10-25% in aq + 1 g solid piece of calcium
carbide was put into a jar with a solution. Reaction at 30 Celsius running slow and stabile (solid one piece carbide). In the glass are precipitated
cuprous acetylide, about 1 g. It is necessary to dissolve all carbides, of course. The solution was filtered. Black very fine powder (dark red) is
filtered off under vacuum Buchner. Little damp, almost dry acetylide is stored under alcohol level. At one gram acetylide 30 grams of alcohol. The
stability of this substance (?Cu2C2 + XY ??) will soon be examined on Laboratory of Liptakov.........LL
Do I add, this is a very sensitive substance. And to all suggestions. When handling dry always work with a maximum of 1 gram. However, detonation has
no large mechanical effects. Effects on human hearing at 1 gram (in bulk pile) detonation of 50 cm distance has not any consequences. HMTD under the
same conditions has a devastating effect on hearing.
[Edited on 1-4-2016 by Laboratory of Liptakov] |
If you started from TACN (tetramine copper (II) nitrate) aka Cu(NH3)4(NO3)2, then you may get CuC2 (Cu(II) acetylide) instead of Cu2C2 (Cu(I)
acetylide)...
CuC2 is more stable than Cu2C2 but also much less interesting...because weakly or not explosive at all.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
a nitrogen rich explosive
Banned troll
Posts: 176
Registered: 28-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: Repentant
|
|
Speaking of tetramines...
I just synthesised tetramine zinc permanganate through the reaction of KMnO4 with a solution of liquid ammonia and ZnO and ammonium chloride. It is
unusable - it decomposes into manganese dioxide with the moisture in the air.
Does anyone know whether aluminium oxide would react in the same way (see reactivity series,) because copper is too stable to react and I am worried
about the sensitivity of tetramine magnesium permanganate if it formed at all.
Any ideas?
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1392
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Online
Mood: old jew
|
|
CuC2
Thanks Philou, very important answer about different between CuC2 and Cu2C2. But last attempts friction and impact test indicate characteristic some
between both compounds. Anyway, it is sensitive material. Detonation is usually weak, with weakly sound and weak (nothing) mechanics effect on
aluminium 0,1 mm surface plate. At amount 0,1g of Cu x C2. ...LL...
P.S. : During next a lot attempts is clearly, that Philou has truth in every in word. From TACN liquid, arises CuC2, with very weak properties for
deminers using.
[Edited on 2-4-2016 by Laboratory of Liptakov]
|
|
Pages:
1
..
3
4
5
6 |