MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Melting Magnesium
I'm a big fan of molten metals (not quite sure why...) and recently cobbled together a very rudimentary furnace capable of melting aluminum. I want to
melt several different metals down and cast them into identical size and shape bars, to use as a nice presentation piece to show the physical
differences between them.
Anyways, one of these metals is magnesium. It melts at 650 C (lower than Al) so I should in theory be able to cast it. But, as we all know, Mg is
quite flammable. Several MSDS's list the autoignition temperature of Mg ribbon at around 500 C. If I were to try to melt several small chunks of Mg
metal, broken off of a firestarter block, are they likely to catch fire? I know that ribbon is much more flammable than the bulk metal, so I was
wondering if there would be a difference here. Any thoughts are appreciated.
EDIT: Actually, if i recall correctly, the reason that bulk Mg is much harder to ignite is because the metal acts as a heat sink and thus takes much
longer to heat to ignition temperature. If I'm melting it, that would certainly take the whole mass above this temperature and may doom this endeavor
 Would I need an inert atmosphere for such an operation? Probably argon - can't use
nitrogen for this one!
[Edited on 7-23-2013 by MrHomeScientist]
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2748
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It is pretty easy to light Mg, even bulk, and I would guess that trying to melt will almost certainly cause ignition. But if you want to try it, do
it outside, away from flammables, and wear cotton clothes. But if it catches, don't bother trying to put it out, just back away. You could put
some in a crucible and try in that, but it will not be easy to keep it from burning unless you can shield it from air. Argon or maybe helium, but
either is pricey.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
As an alternative to inert atmosphere, have you considered using a flux? I'm sorry to say that I can't think of a suitable flux at the moment, but I
will continue searching (thinking along the lines of MgCl/KCl). I had a similar dilemma to yours, some years ago, while trying to <a
href="viewthread.php?tid=11946#pid149155">fuse Ca</a> granules.
[Edited on 7/23/13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
NaCl-KCl eutectic (around equal parts by weight) is pretty close, and some CaCl2 added to that (not quite 1/3 (of total) by weight, I forget just how
much though; alas, the molten salt eutectic finder database has long since disappeared from the internets, so you'll have to search to find the exact
composition) is better still.
I suggest pre-melting the flux, as fresh crystals are full of moisture and explode like popcorn, and unless there is intimate contact, the combination
won't melt at the eutectic temperature. Melt in a steel vessel, cast bars or plates, break into manageable size pieces, and store away from moisture.
With magnesium, it might help to have a "heel" of molten salt, rather than adding it later.
Beware that steam and hydrogen have excellent solubility in molten salt, which tends to result in poor quality castings. I don't recall if magnesium
really has to be degassed, but aluminum certainly has some affinity for hydrogen, and my experience has always been that the melt dissolves quite a
bit of hydrogen when an excessive cover flux is used. Calcium hypochlorite or TCCA (pool chlorine) can be used as a degassing agent, for aluminum at
least; it must be administered to the bottom of the melt, inside something that helps form small bubbles. Chlorine reacts preferentially with
hydrogen over aluminum, removing it from the melt.
Besides inert gas (argon -- not nitrogen or CO2), it's my understanding that SO2 is a suitable cover. SO2 can be provided in-situ by adding a blob of
elemental sulfur.
Tim
|
|
|
Gearhead_Shem_Tov
Hazard to Others
Posts: 167
Registered: 22-8-2008
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You'll definitely need to use argon. It's a minimum three-person job: one to handle the argon wand, one to handle the crucible, and one with a shovel
ready to dump pre-dried silica sand on top of all the inevitable Mg flare-ups you'll have. It would probably be best to have two more additional
people: one to video the event and another well away from the action ready with a mobile phone to call for an ambulance and a heavy blanket to put
over anyone on fire until the ambulance comes.
-Bobby
|
|
|
DrSchnufflez
Hazard to Others
Posts: 114
Registered: 22-1-2013
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I remember reading about magnalium somewhere that you can use a calcium chloride flux to melt magnesium under before adding the alminium.
I also remember that you can use sulphur powder to stop the magnesium burning as the magnesium sulphide formed doesn't foam up as magnesium oxide and
nitride are purported to.
Memory verified Magnalium sulphur however it was for making magnalium.
<!-- bfesser_edit_tag -->[<a href="u2u.php?action=send&username=bfesser">bfesser</a>: merged
split posts, sorry]
[Edited on 7/24/13 by bfesser]
[Edited on 24-7-2013 by DrSchnufflez]
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
 Your suggestion of using S to stop a Mg fire is dangerously incorrect  Next time, verify your memory before posting.
[Edited on 7/24/13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
powdered carbon does work.
I never asked for this.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Could you please explain in a little more detail, plante1999?
[Edited on 7/24/13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3253
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Remember that in industry it's such a pain in the butt to prevent oxidation of molten magnesium and the like that they use precious sulfur
hexafluoride as the inert gas in the system instead of argon.
|
|
|
bfesser
|
Thread Split
24-7-2013 at 05:29 |
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for all the replies! I like the idea of a cover flux - that would be a lot easier to manage than an inert blanket (for me at least).
Quote: Originally posted by 12AX7  | With magnesium, it might help to have a "heel" of molten salt, rather than adding it later.
Beware that steam and hydrogen have excellent solubility in molten salt, which tends to result in poor quality castings. |
Could you elaborate on this a bit? What exactly is a "heel" of molten salt? How would one set up such a system? My first thought upon reading was:
chunks of pre-melted eutectic mixed with chunks of Mg metal, then upon heating all would melt and the salts would float to the top. Hopefully the
eutectic melts first, before the Mg ignites!
| Quote: Originally posted by 12AX7 | | Calcium hypochlorite or TCCA (pool chlorine) can be used as a degassing agent, for aluminum at least; it must be administered to the bottom of the
melt, inside something that helps form small bubbles. Chlorine reacts preferentially with hydrogen over aluminum, removing it from the melt.
|
Similar question here. Would you simply load the crucible with a layer of calcium hypochlorite at the bottom and aluminum bits on top? What are the
consequences of hydrogen infiltration of metals? I seem to recall it makes them much more brittle.
|
|
|
bfesser
|
Threads Merged
24-7-2013 at 06:28 |
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Well, yeah, when you go out of your way to make flash powder, you're gonna get flash powder...
Here's a cite for use of SO2. Seems odd (MgO and MgS are favorable reactions), but apparently it works.
http://www.epa.gov/magnesium-sf6/documents/tms_paper.pdf
Elemental sulfur bubbling away on top of a melt doesn't seem like a very good idea, but I've seen a picture or two of this use. May not be able to
find a cite, which might suggest it's a more dangerous method, but I know it's at least possible.
Ok... you'll want to familiarize yourself with foundry terminology and practice before doing this. "Heel" just means, liquid in the crucible, in this
case, some molten salt, to which you add clean metal. The metal is heated by, and melts under, the cover, so it doesn't have a chance to catch fire.
Melting chunks of both at the same time will probably lead to the salt eutectic melting first and covering the metal, but if the ignition temperature
of the alloy is particularly low for some reason, you'll have a bit of a mess.
| Quote: | | Similar question here. Would you simply load the crucible with a layer of calcium hypochlorite at the bottom and aluminum bits on top?
|
No, you need a degassing tool, which ensures that, as the compound decomposes, the gasses produced form small bubbles through the melt. The degassing
tool is loaded with a charge and thrust into the melt; it decomposes vigorously but not explosively or anything. (At least, when done right -- always
be on guard for conditions that may react explosively, like stray moisture on tools or molds. And that includes chemically combined moisture in rust,
etc.)
| Quote: | | What are the consequences of hydrogen infiltration of metals? I seem to recall it makes them much more brittle. |
Yes, there is hydrogen embrittlement in many metals, but more immediate is the effect of freezing a gas solution. Consider what happens when a soda
can gets frozen... all the CO2 comes out of solution. Very gassy metal will expand on freezing, leading to a "muffin topped" shape, and structurally
unsound metal that is full of bubbles. (Interestingly, copper is prone to dissolving molecular oxygen, independent of actual oxidation. A powdered
charcoal cover is used to treat this.)
Tim
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Tim,
That's excellent information, thanks a lot. As with most things, there's a lot more to this than I first thought! I'll have to practice melting the
salt eutectic mix alone, then salt plus a different metal (Al or a lower melting point metal), before progressing onto Mg. I'd melt the salt first and
then add the metal, as you suggested. Probably needless to say, but when melting the Mg I'd have to do that in the mold rather than a crucible since
pouring (and thus exposing to oxygen) would be out of the question.
That's very interesting about hydrogen being trapped in freezing metal. I'll have to cut one of my future castings in half and see what kind of
bubbles are present inside. So far all my aluminum blobs/ingots have shrunk after cooling, which is what I expected from thermal contraction.
I'm really going to need a better furnace to get serious with all this. The very rudimentary charcoal chimney I'm using loses a lot of heat, and the
fact that the crucible sits atop crumbling coals is no good for doing magnesium (wouldn't want it to tip over and ignite!).
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
im starting to understand that you have more than just ALOT of knowledge on how to treat metals as in melting them
infact i have a large rod of magnesium which will be cut, added to a can (when i someday happen to get a hold of something that doesnt blow up when
heated, lol)
as plante1999 said carbon can be used, to my knowledge this is used also when milling MgAl in which is one of the most dangerous parts of making
magnalium, aswell as magnesium powder, in order to coat surfaces so they cannot react with oxygen
carbon is suitable as it is easy to get a hold of, and by my understanding just doesnt blend into metals just like that (industrially graphite is used
as carbon..?)
so instead of salt (NaCl MP=801*C)
on a sidenot with the whole salt 'heel' thing, i cant seem to imagine magnesium metal not reacting in liquid state with NaCl to form MgCl2? im not
keen on reactivity on different compounds, i could be wrong, as it would be an other way of making Na metal, in which i havent heard about yet...
just seems too weird that an such reactive material would not react, not saying that this cannot be done, just a glitch in my mind i suppose
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by 12AX7 | | Yes, there is hydrogen embrittlement in many metals, but more immediate is the effect of freezing a gas solution. |
Hydrogen embrittlement is of particular importance for ferrous alloys, which is why there's a whole class of high-nickel alloys used
in, say, gas desulfurization plants.
Elaborating on what 12AX7 said, I want to point out that, practically, the main source of dissolved hydrogen in melts comes from moisture. Even if the
charge looks dry (and won't explode), adsorbed water can be significant, particularly for charges with high surface area (turnings, soda cans). The
oxygen will form oxides that become part of the slag, and the hydrogen will go into solution. Dealing with adsorbed water is rather easy: just preheat
the charge to drive off water and add it to the crucible hot.
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
An aluminum alloy with 57% (by weight) magnesium content melts at 437 ºC. So if making a magnalium alloy is acceptable, melting is much easier if
scraps of both aluminum and magnesium are heated together.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/aluminum-alloys-melting-po...
[Edited on 26-7-2013 by AndersHoveland]
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
true, anders.. but then you would need the metal to melt together at first
when you first have a blob of molten metal its very easy to proceed as the surface of contact with the hot stuff is very large
looking into it seemingly flux will remove this effect and remove the oxide layer to make it melt straight away
i suppose cryolite would work for this, as i can get this super cheaply (:
|
|
|
Pok
potassium Prometheus
Posts: 176
Registered: 5-12-2010
Member Is Offline
|
|
Forget about ideas with eutectic salts. Remember the low density of Mg! It's 1.584 g/cm³ in the liquid state according to wikipedia. Mg will always
float on top and not the salt! To avoid reaction of Mg with NaCl (or other salts), MgCl2 could be used. But this is too dense as well.
Charcoal might be good, as plante 1999 said.
A molten 50:50 mix of Al and Mg does not ignite if it's not heated much higher than the eutectic melting point.
[Edited on 27-7-2013 by Pok]
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Pok | | To avoid reaction of Mg with NaCl (or other salts), MgCl2 could be used. But this is too dense as well. |
Magnesium will not react with NaCl.
Mg and Al have more of an affinity for oxygen, they will not reduce the chloride salts of the alkali elements.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
