| Pages:
1
2 |
Dr.Q
Harmless
Posts: 24
Registered: 18-11-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Acetamide Synthesis
So i tried to make acetamide from the reaction of Ethyl acetate and NH3 .
I poured both of them in to the flask waited 3 days for mixng them. After that , i made a reflux and than distilled it.
First thing come from disttilation was amonnia . Than ethyl acetate came. It was still smells like amonnia too. After that water came it was also
smeell like amonnia. And in the there in the flask there was a Yellow colored chemical which i cant recognize. It was liquid so it is not acetamide.
It was more viscose than water and smells like acetic acid but not pungent as acetic acid.
Here is a picture from that yellow liquid.
From what i read , this reaction should reveal acetamide and ethanol. But thing i get was something different.
The thing that weird for me is , i tried different method to make acetamide , from heating amonnium acetate , i still get the same weird liquid .
What am i doing wrong ? Is that liquid a solution of acetamide with amonnia and water ???
[Edited on 25-2-2013 by Myeou]
|
|
|
bananaman
Harmless
Posts: 19
Registered: 29-1-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Acetic acid is one of the products from the reaction between ethyl acetate and ammonia.
CH3COOC2H5 + NH3 ---> CH3CONH2 + C2H5COOH
Try removing the acetic acid with a base + liquid-liquid extraction with a suitable organic solvent.
Collect the organic layer and dry down.
|
|
|
Dr.Q
Harmless
Posts: 24
Registered: 18-11-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by bananaman  | Acetic acid is one of the products from the reaction between ethyl acetate and ammonia.
CH3COOC2H5 + NH3 ---> CH3CONH2 + C2H5COOH
Try removing the acetic acid with a base + liquid-liquid extraction with a suitable organic solvent.
Collect the organic layer and dry down. |
wow that is suprising for me because i thought that the raction mechanism goes same as NaOH and CH3COOC2H5 .
Could you explain the mechanism to me ?
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination! 
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by bananaman | Acetic acid is one of the products from the reaction between ethyl acetate and ammonia.
CH3COOC2H5 + NH3 ---> CH3CONH2 + C2H5COOH
Try removing the acetic acid with a base + liquid-liquid extraction with a suitable organic solvent.
Collect the organic layer and dry down. |
No it is not.
You have just magicked up an extra carbon and two oxygen atoms.
|
|
|
Dr.Q
Harmless
Posts: 24
Registered: 18-11-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by ScienceSquirrel | | Quote: Originally posted by bananaman | Acetic acid is one of the products from the reaction between ethyl acetate and ammonia.
CH3COOC2H5 + NH3 ---> CH3CONH2 + C2H5COOH
Try removing the acetic acid with a base + liquid-liquid extraction with a suitable organic solvent.
Collect the organic layer and dry down. |
No it is not.
You have just magicked up an extra carbon and two oxygen atoms. |
Could we be clear that reaction between ethyl acetate and amonnia yields acetamide and ethanol..
If this is true why is the yellow solution smells like acetic acid ?
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
A competing reaction is hydrolysis of the ethyl acetate to yield ethanol and acetic acid. The acetamide will also hydrolyse.
What you have is an aqueous solution of acetamide with traces of acetic acid. Acetamide is extremely soluble in water, 2000g per litre, so even small
amounts of water will make it into a solution.
|
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It should be liquid. I can't see it possible to obtain pure and thus solid acetamide without a redistillation with a distillation column. Keep in mind
that water will form from the thermolysis of the ammonium acetate side product during the first distillation and it is thus not possible to obtain an
anhydrous acetamide this way. Also, ammonium acetate decomposes also to ammonia and acetic acid which is unlikely to condense in a 1:1 ratio, thus
causing contamination with acetic acid and ammonium acetate.
What is the reference of this procedure and how do the authors isolate acetamide? Are you sure they did not fractionate the crude product?
…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being
unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their
scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)
Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
|
|
|
bananaman
Harmless
Posts: 19
Registered: 29-1-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sorry for the mistakes previously. Attached is a relevant paper regarding the preparation of acetamide from ethyl acetate and ammonia.
Attachment: Preparation of Acetamide by the Action of Ammonium Hydroxide and Ethyl Aetate.pdf (738kB)
This file has been downloaded 3469 times
|
|
|
Polesch
Harmless
Posts: 23
Registered: 9-7-2011
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
So I did a very quick synthesis of acetamide this week following this discussion, by simply mixing aqueous ammonia (household grade, 9%) with what is
supposedly 99% ethyl acetate (dubious source). I simple mixed stoichiometric amounts, about 9.1 grams ethyl acetate with 20 mL 9% ammonia.
Approximately 100 mmol of both reagents. The solution initially forms two separate layers as the ethyl acetate has a low solubility in water (8.3
g/dL).
I left the solution on the magnetic stirrer for 24 hours, at about 700 rpm. At this point there were no longer two separate layers, so it's safe to
assume that a reaction had taken place. I simple poured the resulting solution into an evaporating dish and left it at room temperature for 3 days,
when crystals finally started forming. The crystals were collected and placed in a desiccator with phosphorus pentoxide for another 24 hours. A simple
melting-point test did give confirmation that the product is relatively pure acetamide with a melting point at ~80 C, all of the product melted to a
clear liquid not exceeding 90 C.
This procedure clearly seems like a success. I forgot to weigh my final product, so I don't know any yields at this moment, but I could do that if
anybody is interested.
|
|
|
Adas
National Hazard
Posts: 711
Registered: 21-9-2011
Location: Slovakia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sensitive to shock and friction
|
|
Very nice results, Polesch! Taking into consideration that you used just 9% ammonia... Nice 
Rest In Pieces!
|
|
|
Polesch
Harmless
Posts: 23
Registered: 9-7-2011
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
When I used what is 'most likely' a saturated solution of ammonia in ice-cold water, I did get a much higher yield, as I used about the same volume of
solution - but obtained much more crystals:
|
|
|
Nitro-esteban
Harmless
Posts: 39
Registered: 10-4-2013
Location: Fifth dimension
Member Is Offline
Mood: inert
|
|
I tried making acetamide with 30% ammonia and 98.5% ethyl acetate. After evaporating the solution at about 60C. The solution started turning yellow
and it smelled like acetic acid so I let it cool to room temperature and crystals started forming. I didn't weigh the crystals so I don't know the
yield but it certainly was very low.
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Usually the anhydrous ammonia gas is first dissolved in pure ethanol, and this is then reacted with the ethyl acetate. Otherwise, ammonia is not very
soluble in ethyl acetate.
Another method is to heat ammonium acetate in a sealed tube under flame.
|
|
|
Adas
National Hazard
Posts: 711
Registered: 21-9-2011
Location: Slovakia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sensitive to shock and friction
|
|
Would this also work with primary amines or their salts? Could anybody try this with ammonium chloride?
Rest In Pieces!
|
|
|
HgDinis25
Hazard to Others
Posts: 439
Registered: 14-3-2014
Location: Portugal
Member Is Offline
Mood: Who drank my mercury?
|
|
Acetamide is an interesting compound and making it from something so common as Ethyl Acetate would be excellent. However, I have serious doubts about
this procedure.
Polesch, how do you know that you don't simply have Ammonium Acetate crystals? Acetamide melts at 79ºC, Ammonium Acetate melts at 110ºC, I believe,
while starting to slowly decompose. How accurate was your melting point measurement?
We all know that Ethyl Acetate hydrolyzes readily in water, as follows:
Ethyl Acetate(l) + Water(l) --> Acetic Acid(aq) + Ethanol(aq)
Ammonia readily forms Ammonium Hydroxide in water:
NH3(aq) + H2O(l) <--> NH4+(aq) + OH-(aq)
Ammonium Hydroxide and Acetic Acid react to form Ammonium Acetate. The equilibrium of the hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate shifts to the right and proceeds
to completion. We should be left with Ammonium Acetate, Water and Ethanol.
I can't thing of a way this process could actually work.
|
|
|
gdflp
Super Moderator
Posts: 1320
Registered: 14-2-2014
Location: NY, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Staring at code
|
|
There is a procedure in Vogel, 3rd edition page 403. Ethyl acetate will not hydrolyze simply by placing it into water, it either needs refluxing with
an acid catalyst or the addition of a stoichiometric amount of base(typically hydroxide). The base acts by nucleophilically attacking the carbonyl in
ethyl acetate with the ethoxide then acting as a leaving group and being protonated by the now acidic hydrogen originally present on the hydroxide.
In ammonia, I doubt that the hydroxide concentration is high enough for this to happen at any appreciable rate. The free ammonia in solution can
instead act as a nucleophile itself, this still results in ethoxide as the leaving group, but it leaves acetamide rather than acetate as the final
product.
|
|
|
HgDinis25
Hazard to Others
Posts: 439
Registered: 14-3-2014
Location: Portugal
Member Is Offline
Mood: Who drank my mercury?
|
|
@gdflp,
| Quote: |
Ethyl acetate will not hydrolyze simply by placing it into water, it either needs refluxing with an acid catalyst or the addition of a stoichiometric
amount of base(typically hydroxide). |
The equilibrium constant for the hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate is around 0,25. So yes, Ethyl Acetate hydrolyzes just by coming in contact with water (of
course, only a part of it gets hydrolyzed).
Adding a stoichiometric amount of base will, as you said, make the equilibrium go into completion.
| Quote: |
The base acts by nucleophilically attacking the carbonyl in ethyl acetate with the ethoxide then acting as a leaving group and being protonated by the
now acidic hydrogen originally present on the hydroxide. In ammonia, I doubt that the hydroxide concentration is high enough for this to happen at any
appreciable rate |
The hydroxide concentration in ammonia is probably low, as you said:
NH3(aq) + H2O(l) <--> NH4+(aq) + OH-(aq)
However, the neutralization reaction between Acetic Acid and Ammonium Hydroxide (an acid/base reaction) happens much much much more easily than the
reaction between free ammonia and Ethyl Acetate.
As both Ammonium Hydroxide and Acetic Acid disappear, the ammonia equilibrium will shift to the right making more Ammonium Hydroxide and the
equilibrium of the hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate will also shift to the right, producing more Acetic Acid.
|
|
|
gdflp
Super Moderator
Posts: 1320
Registered: 14-2-2014
Location: NY, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Staring at code
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 |
| Quote: Originally posted by gdflp |
Ethyl acetate will not hydrolyze simply by placing it into water, it either needs refluxing with an acid catalyst or the addition of a stoichiometric
amount of base(typically hydroxide). |
The equilibrium constant for the hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate is around 0,25. So yes, Ethyl Acetate hydrolyzes just by coming in contact with water (of
course, only a part of it gets hydrolyzed).
Adding a stoichiometric amount of base will, as you said, make the equilibrium go into completion.
|
Where did you get this number? Also this gives no information about the rate of this uncatalyzed hydrolysis reaction, I would expect it to be
extremely slow.
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 |
| Quote: Originally posted by gdflp |
The base acts by nucleophilically attacking the carbonyl in ethyl acetate with the ethoxide then acting as a leaving group and being protonated by the
now acidic hydrogen originally present on the hydroxide. In ammonia, I doubt that the hydroxide concentration is high enough for this to happen at any
appreciable rate |
The hydroxide concentration in ammonia is probably low, as you said:
NH3(aq) + H2O(l) <--> NH4+(aq) + OH-(aq)
However, the neutralization reaction between Acetic Acid and Ammonium Hydroxide (an acid/base reaction) happens much much much more easily than the
reaction between free ammonia and Ethyl Acetate.
As both Ammonium Hydroxide and Acetic Acid disappear, the ammonia equilibrium will shift to the right making more Ammonium Hydroxide and the
equilibrium of the hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate will also shift to the right, producing more Acetic Acid.
|
The issue is that, as I explained above, not much free acetic acid will be present in the solution at any given time. In addition, the equilibrium
between acetic acid and ammonia, a weak acid and a weak base, is not overly favorable to begin with and ammonia acetate will decompose to acetic acid
and ammonia on prolonged standing, this is the reason that ammonium acetate can not simply be made by mixing ammonia and vinegar. No doubt, some
ammonium acetate will be formed but this is not a significant problem for the reaction as most of it will dehydrate to acetamide when the mixture is
distilled during workup.
[Edited on 4-11-2015 by gdflp]
|
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 | | The equilibrium constant for the hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate is around 0,25. So yes, Ethyl Acetate hydrolyzes just by coming in contact with water (of
course, only a part of it gets hydrolyzed). |
The equilibrium constant for the reaction of ethyl acetate with water is totally irrelevant for the ammonolysis of ethyl acetate. You are confusing
the kinetics with thermodynamics.
| Quote: | | Adding a stoichiometric amount of base will, as you said, make the equilibrium go into completion. |
Only if the base as such is non-nucleophilic in water, thus making only the hydroxide ions as the only relevant nucleophilic species present.
Otherwise, other reaction pathways could prevail. And the reaction rate would still be determined by the kinetics and not thermodynamics.
| Quote: | | The hydroxide concentration in ammonia is probably low, as you said:NH3(aq) + H2O(l) <--> NH4+(aq) + OH-(aq) |
It is not just about the hydroxide concentration being low, it is about it being very low in relation to the concentration of ammonia.
| Quote: | | However, the neutralization reaction between Acetic Acid and Ammonium Hydroxide (an acid/base reaction) happens much much much more easily than the
reaction between free ammonia and Ethyl Acetate. |
It takes acetic acid for deprotonating acetic acid. Since there is no acetic acid, the reaction cannot give a solution of ammonium acetate as the main
product. The acetate can only form by the hydrolysis of ethyl acetate, a reaction that is of minor importance considering the wast majority of the
nucleophiles in the system is ammonia molecules.
Consider it this way. You have plenty of ammonia and only very little of hydroxide. Both are comparably nucleophilic. So why would you expect the
acetate as the main product? It makes more logic for the acetamide to be the main product. (And experimentally acetamide is the main product!)
Essentially, you are using a faulty logic. Instead of looking at the entire system, you look just at one tiny component of the system (the hydroxide)
and misuse thermodynamic data by ignoring the kinetic aspects. In chemistry you need to evaluate every problem holistically, like evaluating the
entire system, not just parts of it.
Furthermore, reacting acyl chlorides by adding them to aqueous ammonia gives the corresponding carboxamides as main product in addition to ammonium
chloride byproduct. So why would you expect the way less reactive ethyl acetate undergoing the hydrolysis pathway rather than the ammonolysis? So even
without using any logical thinking, merely using deduction makes your conclusion that ammonium acetate should be the main product appear quite
unusual.
…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being
unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their
scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)
Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
|
|
|
gdflp
Super Moderator
Posts: 1320
Registered: 14-2-2014
Location: NY, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Staring at code
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Nicodem |
Consider it this way. You have plenty of ammonia and only very little of hydroxide. Both are comparably nucleophilic.
|
Are they? I was under the impression that since hydroxide was a negatively charged nucleophile, it was better nucleophile than neutral nucleophiles
such as ammonia, even though the nitrogen equivalent, amide, is a better nucleophile than hydroxide.
[Edited on 4-11-2015 by gdflp]
|
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by gdflp | | Are they? I was under the impression that since hydroxide was a negatively charged nucleophile, it was better nucleophile than neutral nucleophiles
such as ammonia, even though the nitrogen equivalent, amide, is a better nucleophile than hydroxide. |
Just because a nucleophile is charged, it does not mean that it is stronger that any neutral nucleophile. A negative charge here is merely a lone
electron pair. A charge on a poorly polarizable ion can even reduce the nucleophilicity in protic solvents. For example, the hydroxide ion is very
strongly solvated in water due to its excellent H-bonding ability. For this reason its nucleophilicity in water is not particularly high.
According to Meyr et al. measurements (see his database), hydroxide in water is just slightly more nucleophilic than ammonia in water:
ammonia in water
N Parameter: 9.48
SN Parameter: 0.59
OH- in water
N Parameter: 10.47
SN Parameter: 0.61
In addition, ammonia can react with ethyl acetate in both phases while hydroxide can only react with ethyl acetate in the aqueous phase. It would be
interesting to measure the kinetics of the ammonolysis in each phase.
…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being
unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their
scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)
Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
|
|
|
HgDinis25
Hazard to Others
Posts: 439
Registered: 14-3-2014
Location: Portugal
Member Is Offline
Mood: Who drank my mercury?
|
|
@Nicodem,
| Quote: | | The equilibrium constant for the reaction of ethyl acetate with water is totally irrelevant for the ammonolysis of ethyl acetate. You are confusing
the kinetics with thermodynamics. |
I was merely stating that Ethyl Acetate can hydrolyze just by coming in contact with water because of gdflp's claim "Ethyl acetate will not hydrolyze
simply by placing it into water"
Careful with your conclusions. Before saying I'm confusing kinetics with thermodynamics (I don't even know why you brought them up on such an easy
argument to understand):
Person 1 - Ethyl Acetate needs more than just water to hydrolyze.
Person 2 - Actually, the equilibrium constant is 0,25 (not 0,000001 for instance). Therefore the reaction happens. The rate may be slow but it is
there.
Everything else you said does make sense. However, I would expect the rate of reaction to form acetamide would be much slower than the acid/base
reaction between Acetic Acid and Ammonium Hydroxide.
| Quote: |
Essentially, you are using a faulty logic. Instead of looking at the entire system, you look just at one tiny component of the system (the hydroxide)
and misuse thermodynamic data by ignoring the kinetic aspects. In chemistry you need to evaluate every problem holistically, like evaluating the
entire system, not just parts of it. |
I was focusing on the hydroxide part, as you said, because I thought the rate of the acid/base reaction to be much greater than the rate of Acetamide
formation. I may be wrong, though. Anyway, let's elaborate on this:
misuse thermodynamic data by ignoring the kinetic aspects
Where did I misuse thermodynamic data, as you claim? And ignored kinteic aspects?
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4355
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Online
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 |
Careful with your conclusions. Before saying I'm confusing kinetics with thermodynamics (I don't even know why you brought them up on such an easy
argument to understand):
Person 1 - Ethyl Acetate needs more than just water to hydrolyze.
Person 2 - Actually, the equilibrium constant is 0,25 (not 0,000001 for instance). Therefore the reaction happens. The rate may be slow but it is
there.
...
Where did I misuse thermodynamic data, as you claim? And ignored kinteic aspects?
|
The equilibrium constant is thermodynamic data. Whether or not the reaction will occur at *any* rate in the absence of a catalyst is a kinetics
question.
There are many, many reactions that are thermodynamically favourable, but do not occur under standard conditions, even on the geological time scale.
Diamond converting to graphite has a favourable Gibb's Free Energy change (it has no eq'm constant), but it does not occur. Hydrogen mixed with
oxygen will not react in the absence of a spark or catalyst, despite its sky-high eq'm constant.
The reaction 2 Ag+(aq) + 2 I-(aq) = 2 Ag(s) + I2(s) has a very high eq'm constant, but that reaction also simply doesn't happen upon mixing the two
reactants, for obvious reasons, and no catalyst in the world will make it happen.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
gdflp
Super Moderator
Posts: 1320
Registered: 14-2-2014
Location: NY, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Staring at code
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 |
I was merely stating that Ethyl Acetate can hydrolyze just by coming in contact with water because of gdflp's claim "Ethyl acetate will not hydrolyze
simply by placing it into water"
Careful with your conclusions. Before saying I'm confusing kinetics with thermodynamics (I don't even know why you brought them up on such an easy
argument to understand):
Person 1 - Ethyl Acetate needs more than just water to hydrolyze.
Person 2 - Actually, the equilibrium constant is 0,25 (not 0,000001 for instance). Therefore the reaction happens. The rate may be slow but it is
there.
Everything else you said does make sense. However, I would expect the rate of reaction to form acetamide would be much slower than the acid/base
reaction between Acetic Acid and Ammonium Hydroxide.
|
I was talking about this instance, the ethyl acetate hydrolysis will not occur at a rate fast enough to introduce acetic acid and interfere with the
reaction. Again, the aminolysis in this case will be preferred because the ammonia is present in such a large concentration as compared to the
hydroxide, both of which have reasonably comparable nucleophilicity in water as shown by the data Nicodem provided.
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 |
I was focusing on the hydroxide part, as you said, because I thought the rate of the acid/base reaction to be much greater than the rate of Acetamide
formation. I may be wrong, though. Anyway, let's elaborate on this:
misuse thermodynamic data by ignoring the kinetic aspects
Where did I misuse thermodynamic data, as you claim? And ignored kinteic aspects?
|
By quoting equilibriums, you are using thermodynamic data which is less relevant in this case. When determining the favored product when dealing with
a mixture with competing reactions, kinetic data is often far more important, of which you provided none.
@Nicodem
Thank you for that data, my post wasn't intended to disagree with you, I was merely curious as I have always been taught that negatively charged
nucleophiles were better nucleophiles than neutral nucleophiles.
|
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by HgDinis25 | | Acetamide is an interesting compound and making it from something so common as Ethyl Acetate would be excellent. However, I have serious doubts about
this procedure. |
Here's a reference from 1907. They find only traces of ammonium salt.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
