chornedsnorkack
National Hazard
Posts: 566
Registered: 16-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Gases from sulphuric acid
It is generally stated that "dilute" sulphuric acid reacts with metals giving off hydrogen, whereas "concentrated" sulphuric acid is itself reduced.
The options to be formed on reduction of H2SO4 include SO2, S8 and H2S.
How easy is it to produce "pure" gases by reaction between metals and sulphuric acid? How wide is the concentration range where sulphuric acid forms
appreciable admixture of both hydrogen and some reduced sulphur gases?
If SO2 contains even a few % of hydrogen, it can burn in admixture with air (which pure SO2 would not). If hydrogen contains even a few tens of ppm of
either H2S or SO2 then it is smelly and poisonous, which pure hydrogen is not. So I am speaking of a six orders of magnitude range in terms of the
speed ratio between competing reaction.
So any data as to the concentration of sulphuric acid? And does it depend on the temperature, or on the metal involved?
[Edited on 29-4-2013 by chornedsnorkack]
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Producing 'pure' gases from sulphuric acid will be quite hard, I'd imagine. In one industrial reaction I studied (at the plant), the digestion of
Ilmenite [FeTiO3] with 98 % H2SO4, produced SO2, sometimes a bit of H2S and sometimes a bit of S. It was fairly unpredictable what each batch yielded.
It appeared to depend on the composition of the ore.
To make pure SO2 at the lab level there are many other, better possibilities.
|
|
|
weiming1998
National Hazard
Posts: 616
Registered: 13-1-2012
Location: Western Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Amphoteric
|
|
To generate SO2, copper is a good metal to react with concentrated sulfuric acid. The reaction is non-existent at room temperature, but quite rapid at
the boiling point of sulfuric acid. Due to how inert copper is, it is unlikely that much SO2 will become reduced further to other sulfurous products.
No hydrogen will be formed. Due to the high heat, significant amounts of sulfuric acid mist will be mixed in with your SO2, but that can be condensed,
with difficulty, leaving behind SO2 of a good purity.
Other metals however, are not as good. Magnesium metal (coarsely powdered) reacts violently on contact with concentrated sulfuric acid, producing
enough heat to partially vaporise the acid within seconds. Some metals like aluminium (powder) will not appear to react with the acid at room
temperature. However, when a slight heat is applied, the reaction suddenly starts and quickly gets out of hand, again vaporising the acid, producing
solid (aluminium) sulfate. Mixed gases will be produced, due to the reactivity of these metals. So go for relatively inert metals like copper and
avoid reactive metals if pure SO2 is what you want.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8071
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
If you want pure hydrogen, then use HCl instead of H2SO4 and use Al-metal or coarse Mg-metal (NO POWDER!!). Bubble the gas through water to get rid of
traces of HCl.
If you want pure SO2, then use sodium metabisulfite or sodium sulfite (the first is preferred) and add appr. 50% H2SO4 and slightly heat. The
copper/H2SO4 method also works, but requires very high temperatures and is much more dangerous than the metabisulfite/50% acid reaction which runs
already at 50 C or 60 C.
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1682
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
i have heard conc. H2SO4 + Cu should produce SO2, but again this leads to not knowing the purity..
what uses of SO2 do you have anyways..?
if it is for NaHCO3 + SO2 to make sodium bisulfite i think it should be decent enough
for pure hydrogen theres many better alternatives, but dont try breathing this stuff as theres usually tiny particles of acid / base or whatever you
decide to use for it
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's an expensive way of making SO2 when you can simply burn sulphur.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination! 
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Antiswat  | i have heard conc. H2SO4 + Cu should produce SO2, but again this leads to not knowing the purity..
what uses of SO2 do you have anyways..?
if it is for NaHCO3 + SO2 to make sodium bisulfite i think it should be decent enough
for pure hydrogen theres many better alternatives, but dont try breathing this stuff as theres usually tiny particles of acid / base or whatever you
decide to use for it
|
You can buy sodium metabisulphite from home brew shops almost everywhere.
|
|
|
Eddygp
National Hazard
Posts: 858
Registered: 31-3-2012
Location: University of York, UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organometallic
|
|
SO2 from conc. H2SO4 is not something I'd try. Also, you can get so many impurities that it's not worth the trouble.
there may be bugs in gfind
[ˌɛdidʒiˈpiː] IPA pronunciation for my Username |
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
