Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
New electrolysis using CuCl2
Hello, im very new here, first thread, and ive wanted to write about this idea for some time now..
not sure how i got onto it but anyways here it goes..
the idea is fairly simple..
what you need is CuCl2 which can be made easily with a copper salt and HCl
Copper metal
a source of electricity
water
what you simply do, by my idea is that you dissolve a given quanity of CuCl2 in water, to then electrolyse it..
the whole new smart thing with this is, to use copper metal as cathode / anode..
i bought myself a nice shiny piece of copper, 500 x 40 x 5mm
you then insert the copper into the solution, and run electricity through this..
what should be formed would be (possibly) CuO
more CuCl2 (as the electrodes dissolve during electrolysis)
also possibly CuCl
anyways, the great about this isnt just one thing.. it should be a relatively clean process with OTC electrodes
also one more thing: Cu(ClO3)2 for use in TACC electrolysis
as i understand you need to boil the solution at last to make it go from hypochlorite to chlorate, when this process is done you should be left with
relatively clean copper chlorate..
it can easily be further purified by converting into potassium chlorate (also most preferred i guess)
by a double displacement reaction..
Cu(ClO3)2 + K2CO3 > CuCO3 (s) + KClO3 (s)
i do realise theyre both precipitating, but as copper carbonate is so incredibly insoluble the KClO3 you would end up with by dissolving and
recrystallization would be VERY pure as copper carbonate is nearly completely insoluble
(0.0001462g / 100mL)
others might prefer a quicker version where less recrystallization would be needed, where the copper salt would be more soluble than the KClO3
2KNO3 + Cu(ClO3)2 > Cu(NO3)2 (aq) + 2KClO3 (s)
another thing on this would be that Cu(NO3)2 isnt a bad thing either, and shouldnt be thrown away as it will upon heating towards around 200*C (less
if im not wrong) make pure NO2 gas, if you cant see what this could be useful for then you wouldnt need it anyways (;
for this method you could possibly electroplate copper metal onto some other metal via CuSO4, but it would probably tear away relatively quickly
please be critical, im having a hard time understanding how much easier this is than the normal KCl electrolysis, and usually stuff like this have
some little unseen reaction that ruins it all.
i really hope some of you guys are able to use this..
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | . . . the whole new smart thing with this is, to use copper metal as cathode / anode.. |
Electrooxidation requires an insoluble anode in order to evolve Cl2 at the interface ─ your set-up will simply plate copper from the
electrolyte onto the cathode, and not much else . . .
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by hissingnoise  | | Quote: | | . . . the whole new smart thing with this is, to use copper metal as cathode / anode.. |
Electrooxidation requires an insoluble anode in order to evolve Cl2 at the interface ─ your set-up will simply plate copper from the
electrolyte onto the cathode, and not much else . . .
|
hah i knew there was something impossible in this.. 
but i guess platinum could be used for this?? also ive heard that a graphite rod covered in microfiber cloth shouldnt react directly with the chlorine
gas..
so basically not use the same anode as cathode?
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Pt is ideal, especially for perchlorate but good-quality graphite will produce chlorate and doesn't (no diaphragm) react with chlorine!
It will, however, disintegrate somewhat as the electrolysis proceeds and while this is less than convenient it's still a cheap, easy route . . .
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by hissingnoise | Pt is ideal, especially for perchlorate but good-quality graphite will produce chlorate and doesn't (no diaphragm) react with chlorine!
It will, however, disintegrate somewhat as the electrolysis proceeds and while this is less than convenient it's still a cheap, easy route . . .
|
so .. if it doesnt react in any way, would it mean that wrapping a fibercloth around it would make it last instead of disintegrating into a sort of
insoluble powder??
also i once saw that some plastics (i believe it was PVC) are able to lead electricity.. do you think using plastic for electrolysis could make
soluble impurities?
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Suggested further reading ─ chlorates, etc!
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
well thanks alot.. do you know if other types of oil would do the same as linseed oil, or if its specific good??
also about platinum, do you know where its possible to buy one? ive seen that theres been abit of sale on here, but its not very often as i see it..
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Conductivity of Pt is significantly lower than that of Cu or Al and more of this costly metal is required to allow for the high current densities used
in electrolysis!
A good soak in linseed oil does offer some limited protection to graphite anodes . . .
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
