UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline
Mood: Nucleophilic
|
|
Skraup Reaction- Preferred Workup?
So, yesterday I ran the widely disliked Skraup reaction, which is used to prepare quinolines from anilines. The conditions I used are covered in the
attached paper under General Procedure for quinolines, method B, except that I ran at 1/10th that scale. It went very smoothly with no hiccups
whatsoever. In a way, it was kind of boring- but I appreciate that when 140C sulfuric acid is involved.
What I'm not sure about, however, is the workup. I see numerous different techniques out there. Some go out of their way to destroy excess aniline
while others seem to not have any present.
The paper I followed simply makes the reaction mixture neutral and extracts with toluene, strips the solvent, and distills the product.
The preparation referenced here takes a slightly different route: http://orgprepdaily.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/8-bromoquinolin...
They make it strongly basic and extract with ether.
Orgsyn has a prep here: http://www.orgsyn.org/orgsyn/orgsyn/prepcontent.asp?print=1&...
They steam distill the product, diazotize, re-steam distill, and fractionate under vacuum.
Vogel (pages 828-829) advocates a similar procedure to orgsyn, but it utilizes the formation of a quinoline-zinc complex instead of the diazotization.
So, does anyone have experience with which workup (or combination thereof) is the least massive pain in the ass and is most amenable to small reaction
size?
Additionally, I have never run a steam distillation where steam is injected into the reaction mix, nor do I have glassware to carry it out (though I
could modify one piece if it's necessary). Would simply boiling the crude product in water (with addition of more water as needed work- even if it is
slower?
[Edited on 12-10-10 by UnintentionalChaos]
Attachment: Ozonolysis of Quinolines - A Versatile Synthesis of Polyfunctional Pyridines.pdf (179kB) This file has been downloaded 613 times
Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!
'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
I trust you've seen this?
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=8442#p...
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
DJF90
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Your procedure is very similar to one I have done, the main differences being that I used iodine as the catalyst and 98% H2SO4. In my preparation,
p-toluidine was used as the amine. Standard procedure in the lab book I was following was to add acetic anhydride and stir for a couple of hours, then
do an acid/base extraction. This supposedly works quite well. However I decided to follow another route, influenced by vogel. Here's what I did...
The apparatus was set up for downwards distillation with a claisen adapter. In the straight neck of the adaptor was an addition funnel containing
water. The water was added dropwise to the cooled reaction mixture with magnetic stirring. Once the reaction mixture/tar had been reasonably diluted,
the mixture was heated in an oil bath to ~180*C. A hot air gun was used to pre-heat the claisen head to speed up the steam distillation. Water was
added as necessary (dropwise) and the steam distillation continued until no more milky distillate was obtained. The steps in vogel were then followed
IIRC, and thankfully the zinc chloride-quinoline complex formed with my specific substrate (I dont know if its a general reaction?!). The precipitate
was a kind of rosy-peach colour. This was dissolved in excess 5M NaOH, the intermediate precipitate od Zznc hydroxide redisolving. This was then
subjected to extraction with ether, separation of the phases, a quick wash with water/brine, and then removal of solvent on the rotavap. The
quinoline was obtained as a pale yellow oil, with a pyridine-like odour, and the 2D NMR came out very clean! Yield was a bit on the low side however.
|
|
UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline
Mood: Nucleophilic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by DJF90 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Your procedure is very similar to one I have done, the main differences being that I used iodine as the catalyst and 98% H2SO4. In my preparation,
p-toluidine was used as the amine. Standard procedure in the lab book I was following was to add acetic anhydride and stir for a couple of hours, then
do an acid/base extraction. This supposedly works quite well. However I decided to follow another route, influenced by vogel. Here's what I did...
The apparatus was set up for downwards distillation with a claisen adapter. In the straight neck of the adaptor was an addition funnel containing
water. The water was added dropwise to the cooled reaction mixture with magnetic stirring. Once the reaction mixture/tar had been reasonably diluted,
the mixture was heated in an oil bath to ~180*C. A hot air gun was used to pre-heat the claisen head to speed up the steam distillation. Water was
added as necessary (dropwise) and the steam distillation continued until no more milky distillate was obtained. The steps in vogel were then followed
IIRC, and thankfully the zinc chloride-quinoline complex formed with my specific substrate (I dont know if its a general reaction?!). The precipitate
was a kind of rosy-peach colour. This was dissolved in excess 5M NaOH, the intermediate precipitate od Zznc hydroxide redisolving. This was then
subjected to extraction with ether, separation of the phases, a quick wash with water/brine, and then removal of solvent on the rotavap. The
quinoline was obtained as a pale yellow oil, with a pyridine-like odour, and the 2D NMR came out very clean! Yield was a bit on the low side however.
|
Thank you. The iodide in the procedure I followed is rapidly oxidized by the hot H2SO4. It crystallized on the roof of the reaction vessel before a
good amount of condensate on the walls started washing it down.
I'm guessing that you added NaOH to the reaction mix before the steam distillation, lest you be trying to steam distill quinolinium bisulfate.
I actually used p-toluidene as well for this preparation. The formation of an
analagous complex with zinc is not surprising. A methyl on the 6-position carbon should not change much over at the nitrogen. If it were a 2 or 8
position methyl (or larger), sterics might start mucking things up though.
I guess I'll steam distill by the method you mention, use a diazotization to kill off any aniline (I'm not confident that the zinc complex doesn't
lose significant product), make alkaline (to keep the phenolate in the aqueous layer), extract, and strip solvent. That should be pure enough for my
purposes.
How bad was the yield? (to prepare me for disappointment!)
[Edited on 12-10-10 by UnintentionalChaos]
Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!
'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
|
|
DJF90
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Starting with 750mg p-toluidine, the yield was about 10%. I recall alot of tarry material in the flask, which you may have circumvented by using less
concentrated sulfuric acid. The reaction mixture was of course basified before steam distillation, thanks for pointing this out. There seems to be a
large loss over the course of the workup - I'd suggest using the minimal amount of manipulations possible, especially if you're working on a small
scale in "standard" size glassware. The advised workup in the book is as follows:
Allow the reaction mix to cool and then add ice water (10ml). Transfer the viscous liquid to a 100ml conical flask and cool it in an ice bath. Wash
the reaction vessel with ice water (5ml), add the washings to the cold conical flask and make the reaction mixture basic with 5M sodium hydroxide. Add
ether (25ml) to the flask and vacuum filter the biphasic mixture with the aid of a celite pad. Wash the conical flask with ether (2x20ml) and pour the
organic solution through the filter pad. Separate the biphasic mixture, wash the aqueous layer with ether (20ml) and combine all the organic
fractions.
Dry the ethereal solution over magnesium sulfate, filter under suction and concentrate on the rotavap to obtain an oil. Add acetic anhydride (1ml) and
leave the remaining solution to react for 30min. Add 1M HCl (20ml) dropwise and stir for a further 10mins. Transfer to a sep funnel and wash the
reaction flask with ethyl acetate (20ml)., before adding the solvent to the funnel. Separate the layers, wash the aqueous layer with more ethyl
acetate (20ml) and neutralise the aqueous layer with 2M NaOH. Finnaly, extract the aqueous solution with ether (2x20ml) and retain the ethereal
solution.
Fill a small sintered funnel with an ethereal silica gel slurry (30ml). Carefully pour the ethereal solution of the product onto the silica and apply
suction until the level of liquid is just above the top of the silica. Add more ether (40ml) to the top of the silica and pass it through the filter
using suction. Remove the solvent from the filtrate to obtain the product as an oil.
|
|
garage chemist
chemical wizard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I have done this reaction together with a colleague on a substantial scale, yielding well over 250ml of quinoline (unsubstituted).
Making the zinc complex would have wasted a huge amount of ZnCl2, so we did it differently:
After the reaction, the mixture (still highly acidic) was diluted with water and steamdistilled until no more nitrobenzene came over (important!).
Then it was basified and the quinoline steamdistilled, together with small amounts of aniline. This took two full days of work and over 10 L of water
had to be distilled.
No steam was blown into the flask, just 1L water added, distilled off, another L added, and so on.
The aqueous phases were again subjected to steamdistillation, the depleted water in the flask discarded, more quinoline-bearing water distilled, and
so on, until there was no more water. This way, we elegantly circumvented extraction, which would have required more than 1L of ether.
The crude quinoline was dried and vacuum fractionated over a good column, which got rid of the aniline in the forerun.
|
|
DJF90
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Very elegant GC! Distillation is definately a good method if the scale is large enough. Steam distillation seems to give a clean quinoline-aniline
crude, at least in my experience. Removal of the nitrobenzene in your case, before basifying, is a neat trick.
One thing I did mean to ask UC. Did you notice any H2S or SO2 evolution from the top of your condenser? Both gases are formed in the oxidation of
iodide to iodine. How did you deal with it? I didn't bother to check when I did the experiment as I was working in a fume hood at the time...
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The couple of times I've done a Skraup I worked up similar to GC's method. Returned the condensed water to the still pot to reduce losses through the
slight water solubility of the product. Think we did a distillation just to drive off most of the aromatic amine, then treated the remainder with
succinic anhydride followed by extraction with base to remove the amide formed (Still has a free CO2H), finally fractionated the product.
|
|
UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline
Mood: Nucleophilic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by DJF90 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Very elegant GC! Distillation is definately a good method if the scale is large enough. Steam distillation seems to give a clean quinoline-aniline
crude, at least in my experience. Removal of the nitrobenzene in your case, before basifying, is a neat trick.
One thing I did mean to ask UC. Did you notice any H2S or SO2 evolution from the top of your condenser? Both gases are formed in the oxidation of
iodide to iodine. How did you deal with it? I didn't bother to check when I did the experiment as I was working in a fume hood at the time...
|
SO2 was evolved slowly, throughout the 4 hour reaction period. There was no detectable H2S, which 1) probably would not form with the excess of
sulfuric acid around and 2) would have been rapidly converted to sulfur in the presence of SO2 and water vapor (A pale film of solid did form on the
walls, but I think that was polyacrolein).
As I was working on a 100mmol scale, the amount of SO2 was rather small and it dispersed enough to not bother me. I did not use a condenser. Water was
continuously distilled off during the reaction through a 3-way adapter connected directly to a vacuum adapter and a small receiving flask. The 3C
ambient temperature did all the condensing I needed with that short bit of glass. The output from the vac adapter was connected to a hose which was
placed in a large erlenmeyer in case of catastrophic runaway.
Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!
'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
|
|
|