FrankMartin
Hazard to Self
Posts: 50
Registered: 30-5-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Super-dry ethanol: test for.
I am seeking a simple test to check if super-dry ethanol is not water contaminated.
Perhaps some added reagent, which will indicate a certain percentage of water (> 0.05%) is present?
Please help, Frank
|
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The Karl-Fischer test is the standard method, but it takes expensive equipment. There are lower cost instrumental methods, search for "moisture
analysis" or "water activity analyser". These are based on humidity sensors, conductivity measurements, or conductivity-capacitance measurements; you
might be able to build your own such device for not too much.
A simple way is to add a bit of the liquid to anhydrous CoCl2 or CuSO4, but I'm not remembering the eye-ball detection limits with these. A slightly
more complex related method is in the attached PDF, you could build a simple instrument using several LEDs and a visible light photosensor to measure
transmission at several wavelengths. It looks like it would work at the limit you give, but how you'll keep ethanol that dry without a gas blanket
would seem to be a problem.
Attachment: Spectrophotometric Determination of Water Content in Alcohol Organic Solvents.pdf (106kB)
This file has been downloaded 1169 times
|
|
|
FrankMartin
Hazard to Self
Posts: 50
Registered: 30-5-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thank you. Just now I have discovered a method in a very old Organic Reagent book, and this suggests to add to the suspect sample of ethanol a small
quantity of Aluminium Ethoxide in benzene. If the ethanol has more than 0.05% water a "fluffy and voluminous" precipitate of Aluminium hydroxide is
formed.
I will now buy some Al(OEt)3 and try this. I will advise if it works.
Regards, Frank
|
|
|
Vogelzang
Banned
Posts: 662
Registered: 26-4-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How effective would a refractometer be?
|
|
|
UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline
Mood: Nucleophilic
|
|
Not very. Consider how small a mole fraction say 0.5% water in ethanol would be. Then pretend the relationship between the refractive index and
composition is linear with respect to mole fraction (which it wont be). Water and ethanol have refractive indices of 1.333 and 1.361 respectively
according to wikipedia. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's about 'durned useless.
Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!
'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
|
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes, RI measurements just don't change fast enough with many common liquids to give high resolution of concentration. At 15 C going from 0% to 10%
EtOH changes the RI by less than 0.007, a 1% change would be a tenth of that.
Even some recent designs don't look as if they would give the needed resolution
Attachment: Micro_thermophy_eng.pdf (273kB)
This file has been downloaded 992 times
Note that aluminium alkoxides in solution a fairly difficult to keep from reacting with atmospheric moisture. If you plan on using the reagent
repeatedly, you may need to invest in at least some fine grade fritted filters to clean it up before use.
In fact a possible source of error is that the partial hydrolysis products are more soluble than pure (EtO)3Al until the amount of HO- groups gets
high enough. This can both mask low concentrations of water in the tested sample, and cause false positives if the reagent has reacted to a
sufficient degree to be near the point where solubility starts dropping again, so that only a small amount of extra water pushes it over the edge.
You may find it necessary to run calibration checks on the reagent.
|
|
|
UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline
Mood: Nucleophilic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by FrankMartin  | Thank you. Just now I have discovered a method in a very old Organic Reagent book, and this suggests to add to the suspect sample of ethanol a small
quantity of Aluminium Ethoxide in benzene. If the ethanol has more than 0.05% water a "fluffy and voluminous" precipitate of Aluminium hydroxide is
formed.
I will now buy some Al(OEt)3 and try this. I will advise if it works.
Regards, Frank |
Just a thought; we have a a thread on making your own aluminum isopropoxide. If you mean to simply test a sample of your reagent, this would probably
work fine. I imagine that alkoxide exchange is somewhat rapid since the aluminum is lewis acidic and can coordinate an ethanol oxygen, undergo a
(solvent mediated?) proton transfer and expel isopropanol.
If you have access to mostly dry ethanol as it is, you can probably just make the ethoxide by the same procedure.
Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!
'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
