| Pages:
1
2 |
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Calcium Nitrate
Hi,
I don't know if this is the place to ask the question, but I am curious with what happens to calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)2.4H2O] when I spread it
through my farm. I noticed the crystals dissolved without me needing to irrigate the fertiliser in.
I read that calcium nitrate is very hygroscopic, so I guess it absorbed moisture from the air. Any way, will the calcium nitrate be available to my
trees, or did it disappear, or become unavailable to the plant?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
JDP
Harmless
Posts: 43
Registered: 31-10-2003
Location: CA
Member Is Offline
Mood: |:booM
|
|
I would imagin that it probably just dissolved in the water formed from due, rain etc. so you have a solution of Ca(NO3), this means it should be
perfect for absorbtion into your plants.
[Edited on 28-2-2004 by JDP]
~JDP
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Lol, you should see how we "mad scientists" usually "abuse" your calciumnitrate. 
It's indeed VERY hygroscopic. It simply dissolves itself by absorbing moisture from the air and penetrates the soil.
As it is dissolved, it's also dissociated in it's ions, Ca<sup>2+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>
These can be easily absorbed by the plants.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3246
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Remember, the proper term for a solid that absorbs enough water from the air to put itself into solution, e.g. calcium nitrate, sodium hydroxide, etc.
is deliquescent. Of course deliquescent chemicals are also hygroscopic, it's just that diliquescence goes one step further in the description.
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
So, now that its been dissociated to Ca2+ and NO3- , can they be affected by our atmosphere and lost to the plant?
Also, if its fine for me to ask Vulture, what do you mean about the abuse?
Thanks again.
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
He means that Nitrates in general can be 'abused' ( I prefer the term 'use' for the production of nitric acid, other nitrates (which, coincidentially finds use in black powder), and organic nitro/nitrate compounds
- which happen to be rather unstable, under certain conditions, and happen to develop a vast amount of rapidly expanding heated gases once those
molecules break down...u figure the rest 
So what happens to the ions (Ca2+/NO3-) once in the soil? well, they are taken up by plants/bacteria/fungi, which convert the nitrate to lesser
oxidised forms, which then are used for making protein (mainly) - and no plant could survive without protein of course. The NO3- doesnt evaporate or
anything, it is just absorbed by those species that can utilise it. NO3- won't be affected by the atmosphere as such, no. It won't get
lost, unless you irrigate the soil too much and the nitrate is flushed into deep layers of the soil where the roots cant reach it, and the groundwater
carries it to the river. Hence, never fertilise your trees etc when a rainstorm is due, you might lose most and pollute the rivers/lakes (they will
grow excessive amounts of algae)
The calcium, in turn, is of course needed for plants/bacteria/fungi as well, for their survival. Just like humans need calcium - else your nerves will
go mad very soon.
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks heaps for all your information, I was worried when it started to 'melt', you have restored my confidence in the product.
In the research I have done to find stuff about calcium nitrate, I found that some people referred both [Ca(NO3)2.4h2O] and
[[5Ca(NO3)2].NH4NO3.10H2O]] as Calcium Nitrate, is that correct?
Also, some calcium nitrate products are marketed as 15.5%N 19%Ca, whilst some are 11.76%N and 23.4%Ca, why would there be such variance in the
production of the same product?
Thank you again for your intellectual support.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I found that some people referred both [Ca(NO3)2.4h2O] and [[5Ca(NO3)2].NH4NO3.10H2O]] as Calcium Nitrate, is that correct?
First of all, .H2O is a fancy way of indicating that you're buying stuff with alot of water in it. The first compound is indeed calciumnitrate,
the second one is a combination of ammoniumnitrate and calciumnitrate.
The latter has the advantage that ammoniumnitrate has more available nitrogen, but ammoniumnitrate is rather acidic. This is compensated for by the
neutral (almost) calciumnitrate.
Ammoniumnitrate fertilizer should not be used in alkaline soil, otherwise the ammonium will be converted to ammoniumgas which escapes into the
atmosphere.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks Vulture,
So, the latter is not pure calcium nitrate.
I know that nitrates can be leached out of the soil by heavy irrigation, some products use chelating agents to try any bind them to the soil / plant
tissue. I buy a liquid fertilizer from a specialist company that use lignosulphonate as the chelating agent. Has anyone heard of lignosulphonate?
would it work? Is it possible to chelate the calcium nitrate in a simple way (mix two solutions together)?
Maybe I should start a new thread since it looks like im going off the subject?
Thanks heaps.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
No let's keep it in this thread.
Chelating agents normally only keep metal ions from leaching out.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Chelating
The company suggests that their whole range of fertilizers are chelated with lignin to improve uptake and have excellent binding properties. So are
they chelated? if they are chelated, can the calcium nitrate be chelated?
If you would like to visit there site, go to http://www.sjbagnutri.com.au
Thanks
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
chelating agents
As vulture has stated chelants are normally used to sequester or remove heavy metals. However, I believe that there would be an equilbrium in wet
soil and if your soil was starved of zinc then a zinc chelate such as zinc lignosulphonate would release soluble zinc to the soil. I did a little
searching on Google and both an Australian and a Belgian company make lignosulfonate chelants, so my guess is that this is legitimate.
Lignosulfonate is of interest to me as it was a waste product at a sulfite process pulp mill I once worked for in Minnesota. They gave it away
(gladly) for use as a binder to keep down dust on roads. I see that it is now being used for just about everything. As an aside, that pulp mill is
now owned by SAPPI, a South African outfit that is a leader in lignosulfonate production.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This thread clearly shows that a little bit of basic chemistry would go a long way in improving the impact of fertilizing and reducing it's
effect to the environment.
Too much fertilizer harms the crop just as much as the environment. Excess ammoniumnitrate, for example, will cause the soil to become to acidic.
Governments should send their farmes on chemistry courses instead of imposing strict regulations.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'd be glad if they were still giving the lignosulphonates away, it costs me a fortune compared with standard chemical fertilizers.
Vultures right about making us farmers a little more educated with the products we deal with. We can do a lot of harm to the crops, soil and
environment just with a little miss-management.
So, back to using a chelant, would it make uptake of calcium nitrate more efficient? what about other options instead of lignins, I have also used
humates, and EDTA would they be more efficient?
How would the process be performed?
I can buy humic acid, i'm not sure where to get the others, if they work and will improve the effectiveness, then I'm for it.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
advantage of chelant
To quote from my freshman chemistry text: "Some complexing groups, when coordinated to certain metals, make the metal more easily assimilated by
plants; in other cases, they keep the metal from being effectively utilized by the plant. Hence complexes can be effective in soil treatment."
I can see where a chelant could act as a slow release agent. This would have the advantage of preventing the nutrient from being washed down to the
aquifer and away from the root zone where you want it to stay. As vulture says this should reduce chemical usage and prevent polution of the
groundwater. Whether this is economical to you, only you can say. The trouble with farming is that your testing cycles are so long, so you have to
take a gamble or at best an educated guess, as you are wisely doing. I would think that your govenment agricultural extension agent should be able to
give you good advice. But by all means get your own basic education. Then you know the questions to ask and whether the agent sounds creditable.
Answering your specific questions is difficult without being an expert in this area which I am not. The only experience I have is that I used to
help my uncle fertilize his wheat fields when I was in high school. For this he used "aqua ammonia" (ammonium hydroxide). He alternated
the wheat with peas to fix nitrogen, which was quite effective.
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for your inputs,
The way I need the chelant to work is by binding to the soil/plant tissue and to the nutrient, it sound like not every nutrient can be bound by the
same chelant.
Anyway, back to calcium nitrate, I was also wondering while I'm on the topic, I should learn how to measure the amounts of nitrogen and calcium
that is in the mixture, I just want to check to see if the rates on the label is correct, I think it will be a fun experiment for me to see your
science at work. It is possible right? you should be able to precipitate the calcium out?
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ca(NO3)2 + XSO4 ---> CaSO4 + X(NO3)2
Where XSO4 is any soluble sulfate salt.
CaSO4 will precipitate.
I can't name any easy nitrogen determination methods off the top of my head.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Ok, as to the choice of chelating agent, I would definitely go for the most natural one - lignosulphonate. There are bound to be pathways for the
uptake of polysaccharides/polyphenols (which is what lignin is), or degraded products thereof, and much less so for less natural agents such as EDTA.
I am speaking from a theoretical viewpoint here, as I have no quantitative data to back it up with.
Besides this, using lignosulphonates are bound to be more environmentally friendly than EDTA and similar.
As to the detection and quantification of NO3- there is this reaction:
NaNO3 + 4Zn (or Al) + 3 NaOH + 6 H2O --> 4 Na[Zn(OH)3] + NH3
I am sure Ca(NO3)2 can be used too.
The NH3 can be detected by smell of course, and there are ways to quantify the nascent gaseous NH3 with transition metals (i.e. by spectral
absorbance, precipitation and such).
Of course there are better ways to do this, such as with organic dyes - but I doubt anyone's got Lunges reagent, or Brucin...
Besides this, there are reasonably insoluble alkaline Hg and Bi -nitrates, which could be used for quantification. But not everyone's got Bi or
Hg I believe...
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks, I'll give those a try (If I can find the chemicals to use)
Chemoleo, so you say lignin is probably the best way to go, how would I go about chelating the calcium nitrate with the substance?
Do I just mix the two together?
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Yes, I *guess* you'd have to mix those two together. Make sure it's aqueous (in water), else the ions wont dissociate and mix (i.e. bind to
the chelator).
Personally I think best would be to simply spread your nitrate fertiliser during a period of draught (or, when the weather forcasters say there wont
be rain for the next three days). The moisture in the air will be enough to dissolve the hygroscopic nitrates, and after a few days at most, most of
the nitrate should have been absorbed by the plants/trees. Hence no leaching of fertiliser. Probably much cheaper than using chelators...
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
calcium nitrate
You already know that calcium nitrate is very soluble in water. So it would leach down to the aquifer after so much rain has occured. I suspect
that the lignosulfonate is only good for chelating metals, that is the nitrate may be unaffected, as it is not a metal. If it is the nitrate that
your plants are after then this chelant may not be any good for that.
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
So then the company marketing the products as chelated with lignosulfonate is not accurate. The link below is to a image of the label that is on one
of their products:
http://www.sjbagnutri.com.au/biglabels/vigor-ligplusbig.jpg
What do you make of it? They aren't all metals are they?
|
|
|
madfarmer
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 27-2-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think I might understand now, in the case of calcium nitrate, the calcium is Ca++ whilst the nitrate is NO3-. The + can be chelated, the -
can't. Is that right?
Is it possible to put nitrogen in a form that is +?
|
|
|
zestywesty
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 29-2-2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: Skeptical
|
|
actually, by oxidation state, the nitrogen atom in NO3- has a +5 charge.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
True, but it doesn't behave as a positive ion in solution, so no use chelating it.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
