Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: cyclopentadiene to pentamethyl-cyclopentadiene (Cp to Cp*)
Antwain
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 252
Registered: 21-7-2007
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Supersaturated

[*] posted on 3-11-2007 at 22:11
cyclopentadiene to pentamethyl-cyclopentadiene (Cp to Cp*)


Soon I will be getting a small amount of dicyclopentdiene. I was wondering if there was an easy way to convert this to pentmethyl-cyclopentadiene?

The only way I can think of that I can actually do is:

1) crack the dimer

2) dissolve in xylene and add sodium to form the cyclopentadienyl ion.

3) react with methyl iodide

4) repeat steps 2 and 3 four more times.

This is doable, but hardy a nice solution and with losses in each step, especially a side reaction during the deprotonation, the yield will not be great. Any ideas?

Edit- changed the name of the thread to something more understandable.

[Edited on 5-11-2007 by Antwain]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Antwain
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 252
Registered: 21-7-2007
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Supersaturated

[*] posted on 4-11-2007 at 15:27


And, nudge! :)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
trilobite
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 152
Registered: 25-2-2004
Location: The Palaeozoic Ocean
Member Is Offline

Mood: lonely

[*] posted on 4-11-2007 at 17:47


Using a strong non-nucleophilic base would be a good idea. Maybe LDA, t-BuOK or something like that. Then your methyl iodide would be preferentially reacting with cyclopentadienyl anions instead of the base and you could be using five equivalents of the base from the beginning.

Another possibility is the org. synth. way: http://www.orgsyn.org/orgsyn/orgsyn/prepContent.asp?prep=cv8...
Maybe there is a reason why it isn't made of cyclopentadiene.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
yan123
Harmless
*




Posts: 5
Registered: 4-10-2007
Location: china
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-11-2007 at 02:59


i think it is too hard!!
:mad:
View user's profile View All Posts By User
garage chemist
chemical wizard
*****




Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-11-2007 at 03:44


What is your interest in such an obscure material? Does it have some unique properties or applications?



www.versuchschemie.de
Das aktivste deutsche Chemieforum!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Antwain
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 252
Registered: 21-7-2007
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Supersaturated

[*] posted on 5-11-2007 at 03:49


it forms complexes related to ferrocene. When I get back to lab work proper I will be attempting a major campaign of synthesising sandwich compounds, but first I need to get the reagents.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nerro
National Hazard
****




Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Whatever...

[*] posted on 5-11-2007 at 05:55


The penta-Me variety is not a very interesting compound I think. It will have a higher molar mass than ferrocene but otherwise I don't really see it.

Have you considered Cp-(CH<sub>2</sub>;)<sub>n</sub>-Cp (n = 3, 4, 5, 6)? Sidegroups might be added to facilitate the dissociation of only one of the Cp's.

[Edited on 5-11-2007 by Nerro]




#261501 +(11351)- [X]

the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally

courtesy of bash
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Antwain
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 252
Registered: 21-7-2007
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Supersaturated

[*] posted on 5-11-2007 at 23:40


@ Nerro- From my learning, it is the second most important cyclic pi donor, after Cp. The methyl groups add steric bulk and donate electrons, allowing stronger bonding. From a wiki article about cyclopenadieneyl complexes:

Quote:
Cp* is an important ligand in organometallic compounds arising from the binding of the five ring-carbon atoms in C5Me5-, or Cp*-, to metals. Relative to the more common cyclopentadiene (Cp) ligand, pentamethylcyclopentadiene (Cp*) offers certain features that are often advantageous.

Being more electron-rich, Cp* is a stronger donor and is less easily removed from the metal. Consequently its complexes exhibit increased thermal stability. Its steric bulk allows the isolation of complexes with fragile ligands. Its bulk also attenuates intermolecular interactions, decreasing the tendency to form polymeric structures. Its complexes also tend to be highly soluble in non-polar solvents.


It is also interesting that wiki (admittedly an unreliable source) only digresses to this ligand and no other substituted cyclopentadienes

The only downside is that the higher electron density of the ligand also makes the complexes more susceptible to air oxidation.

And what do you mean by the dissociation of only one ligand? Why would I want either of them to dissociate?

I have made ferrocene before at uni which was vaguely interesting. I have never purified a metal complex by sublimation before :P. We also did a friedel-crafts acylation with Ac2O, which changed its colour from orange to very deep red. Apparently Cp*2Fe is yellow :).

The only shame is that iron is the very best metal for this, and basically the only one that isn't air sensitive. I don't know about ruthenium, but I think its too big to fit snugly between the rings. It is still probably the second best metal but I don't have any. Its not exactly cheap either, but its better than the element next to it :D

[Edited on 6-11-2007 by Antwain]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nerro
National Hazard
****




Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Whatever...

[*] posted on 6-11-2007 at 14:16


You'd want one of the CP's to dissociate if you're going to use the complex as a catalyst. I have no idea why you'd want that but I was just basically thinking out loud.

It's true that with Cp* the complex is more stable but why exactly do you want the complex to be more stable? It's already one of the most stable complexes I've ever made. I have a four year old plastic bottle of it standing here without any signs of degradation or formation of oxides. Like you said, it survived being sublimated!

Actually polymeric complexes sound very interesting! Fe's linked by linked Cp rings! Interesting!




#261501 +(11351)- [X]

the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally

courtesy of bash
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Antwain
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 252
Registered: 21-7-2007
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Supersaturated

[*] posted on 6-11-2007 at 15:07


Quote:
Actually polymeric complexes sound very interesting! Fe's linked by linked Cp rings! Interesting!


Such things do exist, though that is further down the road than I am looking. There are some interesting ones based on diphenyl, or perhaps more technically these days phenyl-benzene and benzene on chromium(1).

Well I have done the ferrocene before as I mentioned but I had to hand that in for assessment, I want it to look pretty in a jar for the moment. Part of the fun is making it and part is having it afterwards. Perhaps I will find a use for it one day.... there are reactions I have seen for displacing Cp with various things. And in that sense, Cp* is less useful. But I will make some anyway, if I can.

There is a great one called the 'club sandwich' [Ni2Cp3]+ :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
nitroglycol
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 56
Registered: 28-10-2005
Location: close to the centre of North America
Member Is Offline

Mood: curious

[*] posted on 6-11-2007 at 19:08


Quote:
Originally posted by Nerro
The penta-Me variety is not a very interesting compound I think. It will have a higher molar mass than ferrocene but otherwise I don't really see it.

I imagine the penta-CF3 would be interesting. The simple compound, without the iron, is reportedly more acidic than nitric acid, according to March's Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed.




WARNING: Do not urinate on distributor while engine is in operation.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top