idrbur
Hazard to Self
Posts: 88
Registered: 23-6-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How can i convert HPO4 salt to PO4 salt
Hello friends, i want to make some elemental phosphorous and i found some text about making it from Ca3(PO4)2 but i dont have any phosphate salt
available near me from which i can prepare it , the only salt of phosphorous i have is diammonium phosphate. So plz tell me how can i convert HPO4
salt to PO4 salt or how can i prepare elemental phosphorous from CaHPO4 or other HPO4 salt.
|
|
|
Meltonium
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Home in pajamas
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorinated
|
|
Can you get Calcium hydroxide? I believe adding 3 equivalents of Ca(OH)2 to a solution of 2 equivalents (NH4)2HPO4 would yield calcium phosphate.
3Ca(OH)2 + 2(NH4)2HPO4 -> Ca3(PO4)2 + 4NH4OH + 2H2O
Then the ammonium hydroxide would decompose into water and ammonia gas. The calcium phosphate would precipitate out of solution and you would
essentially have only calcium phosphate and water left.
"If at first you don't succeed, fail, fail again."
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3247
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Of note regarding the calcium phosphate method is that you are not actually going to be looking for calcium phosphate as the starting material. The
'wet method' starts from bone ash which can be found at some stores for use in gardening. The bone ash is treated with sulfuric acid, filtered, then
concentrated. I made the mistake during my attempt of using bone meal which made for a stinky, floaty precipitate along with very low yields of my
target phosphate salt. You may know all of this already but I thought it might be worth repeating since bone ash is not what would be regarded as a
standard starting material.
At one time I also tried diammonium phosphate. Looking into the MSDS sheets and such I found that the material 'decomposed' at relatively low
temperatures. I was hoping that the decomposition route would results in loss of ammonia leaving behind phosphoric acid. Instead it left a sold
strangely colored mass.
[Edited on 2/19/2017 by BromicAcid]
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
If you're starting with (NH4)2HPO4, there's an easier way than the calcium phosphate method.
Refer to patent 3,619,133:
Attachment: US3619133.pdf (617kB)
This file has been downloaded 334 times
Different sodium salts can be used; here I show sodium carbonate, but the patent refers to sodium chloride as well. The resulting ammonium carbonate
is volatile, and easily driven from the mixture with heating:
2(NH4)2HPO4 + Na2CO3 --> 2Na(NH4)HPO4 +
(NH4)2CO3
Upon further heating ammonia is driven off, leaving sodium hexametaphosphate behind in the molten state.
Na(NH4)HPO4 --> NaPO3 + (NH4)OH
The cooled glassy NaPO3 is then smashed to a powder (quickly, keeping moisture away). At this point, refer to page one of this awesome
thread:
https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=65
There's a method outlined there that uses aluminum powder and SiO2 with the NaPO3; that information should get you started.
I've made a small amount of phosphorus in a borosilicate test tube this way. I didn't isolate it, it was more just to say that I did it. However, I
performed the reaction under a vacuum. The reaction seemed to proceed more easily than under an inert gas. Perhaps this is because of the lack of
convective heat loss from the reaction mixture. The phosphorus condensed in the tube right above the reaction mixture.
Take care because of the implosion risk when working with a vacuum. I never had a problem with the stopper getting pulled into the tube, but that
risk is there if the stopper isn't sized correctly (or regardless, for that matter). Also, borosilicate was needed rather than sodalime glass. The
boro could barely hold up to the heat provided by the propane torch while under a vacuum. In fact, it was caving in at places. A sodalime tube would
be too soft under the same conditions. A better way would be to place the evacuated tube itself into a larger vacuum chamber, that way the pressure
is more or less equalized on both sides of the hot tube. Of course in that case, one would probably need electric heating.
Another idea is to place the reaction mixture in a steel thimble, and place this inside some firebrick sitting inside a glass tube, and then heat this
evacuated tube underwater inductively. The water would keep the glass tube and the inductor cool, while the reaction zone would remain very hot.
It's the same idea as running a light bulb underwater, the filament would be very hot, while the glass would stay cool. If the tube imploded, the
water would prevent glass shards from flying, and also protect the phosphorous from air exposure.
[Edited on 2-20-2017 by WGTR]
|
|
|
idrbur
Hazard to Self
Posts: 88
Registered: 23-6-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks guys that was very helpful. Now i'm gonna try that making phosphorous from NaPO3.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
