akrnfl
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 11-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
why SnCl4 is liquid?
SnCl2 is solid but SnCl4 is liquid, why?
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Low binding energy. See also TiCl4.
Tim
|
|
|
akrnfl
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 11-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Could you please tell more
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Not really. It doesn't gain enough energy by sticking together...so it doesn't.
This is generally viewed as a comparison of covalent (think stick-and-ball molecule model) to ionic (positive and negative charges locked in a
crystal) bonding. Covalent bonds are localized and tend to form discrete molecules (CH4, SiCl4, etc.), whereas ionic bonds are between ions, discrete
spheres of some charge (positive and negative), stuck together on all sides by their mutual attraction to opposites, in a regular pattern due to their
size difference (and shape, for compound ions like carbonate) and mutual repulsion of like charges.
In short, charges (that is, ions) stick together in the pattern they do because it's the pattern of highest energy. Go ahead and calculate it for a
variety of crystal shapes, using coulomb's law. Whereas covalent molecules don't stick together very well because their bonds are inward holding the
molecule together, leaving little attention to the outside appearance. Polarization and dispersion forces provide the stiction that holds together
the liquids TiCl4 and SnCl4, but not enough (at room temperature) to form a solid.
No, it isn't a satisfactory answer to say "the most favorable energy state", but when you go through the adventure of discovering what's at work,
you'll eventually come right back to where you started, this time thinking "because it IS the most favorable energy state"!
Tim
|
|
|
guy
National Hazard
Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic!
|
|
Because it has a lot more covalent character. Also it has no dipole moment due to the symetrical shape (think carbon tetrachloride).
|
|
|
turd
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
CH2 (Polyethylene) is solid but CH4 is gaseous, why?
Yes, that analogy was bad, but you get the point.
|
|
|
Blind Angel
National Hazard
Posts: 845
Registered: 24-11-2002
Location: Québec
Member Is Offline
Mood: Meh!
|
|
CH2 is in fact (CH2)x where x is a very very big number, you end up with a gigantic molecule in fact, who are called polymers, CH4 on the contrary is
a single molecule.
| Code: |
H
|
CH4= H-C-H
|
H
H H H H H
| | | | |
Polymers = ...-C-C-C-C-C-...
| | | | |
H H H H H
|
[Edited on 12-11-2006 by Blind Angel]
/}/_//|//) /-\\/|//¬/=/_
My PGP Key Fingerprint: D4EA A609 55E4 7ADD 8529 359D D6E2 33F6 4C76 78ED |
|
|
turd
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Good, and now let's apply our knowledge on SnCl2 vs. SnCl4 (keyword: coordination polymer). 
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
