Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Is K-40 ever enriched ?
metalresearcher
National Hazard
****




Posts: 757
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Reactive

[*] posted on 21-6-2016 at 11:02
Is K-40 ever enriched ?


One in 8600 parts of K is K-40 which is radioactive and even more than U-235. Due to its abundancy, K-40 is the most abundant source of background radiation in nature.

But is it ever enriched ?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
careysub
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline

Mood: Lowest quantum state

[*] posted on 21-6-2016 at 11:25


Quote: Originally posted by metalresearcher  
One in 8600 parts of K is K-40 which is radioactive and even more than U-235. Due to its abundancy, K-40 is the most abundant source of background radiation in nature.

But is it ever enriched ?


Sure:
https://www.isotopes.gov/catalog/product.php?element=Potassi...

Oak Ridge isotope sales used to list prices for the isotopes they prepare (using Calutron technology mostly) but now you have to ask for quotes for everything.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-6-2016 at 03:25


Some chemical reaction favor one isotope or another.. Given how easy it is to access KOH for example it shouldn't be overly difficult .
But why K40? It has petty penetrating gamma why would you want to concentrate it? Just for curiosity?




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-6-2016 at 10:29


Quote: Originally posted by neptunium  
Some chemical reaction favor one isotope or another.. Given how easy it is to access KOH for example it shouldn't be overly difficult .


The differences in chemical properties of isotopes of the same element ar vanishingly small. Which is why mostly physical separation is used, based on small AW differences.

If you have any references on chemical separation of K-40 I'd be interested in seeing them. :)

[Edited on 22-6-2016 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-6-2016 at 11:06


This was the first one I found by googling potassium " isotope effect.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FB%3AJRNC.00000117...
there are stacks.
Of course, the effect isn't very big...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-6-2016 at 17:34


Quote: Originally posted by unionised  
This was the first one I found by googling potassium " isotope effect.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FB%3AJRNC.00000117...
there are stacks.
Of course, the effect isn't very big...


Ok, thanks.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1694
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-6-2016 at 19:08


Here's a tidbit on potassium 41 concentration although not the topic at hand.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1024913110182...
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top