guy
National Hazard
Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic!
|
|
Melting Point & Lattice energy
I was taught that as lattice energy increases, melting point increases. Lattice energy goes down when going down a group.
So what's the deal with this?
Compound Melting Point (°C)
MgCl2 ...........................712
CaCl2 ...........................772
SrCl2 ............................868
BaCl2 ............................963
Group I chlorides follow the "expected" trend quite nicely for chlorides except for LiCl. It should have the highest melting point but its almost as
low as CsCl!
Is there some factor that is missing here?
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Yes. Chemistry is an art, not a science. 
With the alkaline earths, it's probably like the page about decomposition temperature of the carbonates -- the intense charge of a small magnesium ion
tends to stress the anion, whereas the fatter Ba(2+) has a more diffuse field.
Tim
|
|
|
turd
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | | I was taught that as lattice energy increases, melting point increases. Lattice energy goes down when going down a group. |
Common sense should tell you that how well the ions fit in the lattice will have a big impact on the stability of the crystal phase.
| Quote: | Compound Melting Point (°C)
MgCl2 ...........................712
CaCl2 ...........................772
SrCl2 ............................868
BaCl2 ............................963 |
These do not even have the same crystal structure! Comparing their m.p. is useless.
|
|
|
guy
National Hazard
Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic!
|
|
turd can you elaborate? I understand now about crystal structure. So what makes a crystal stronger?
|
|
|
turd
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm not exactly sure what you mean with stronger, but if you consider that melting/solidifying is a chemical reaction
A(s) <---> A(l)
then it is no surprise that it is driven by the (minimisation of the) free energy G=H-TS. In the solid phase the entropy S is lower (more ordered
system) as is the enthalpy H (bonding energy). In other words, once you reach a temperature where the entropy gain in the liquid phase multiplied by T
surpasses the energy lost by weaker bonding, the substance melts.
For purely ionic compounds you can model them by a force field approach (balls and springs), for realistic compounds you have to compute their
electronic structure with methods like DFT, which are approximations too and have the disadvantage of simulating T=0K. For T>0K, you would have to
consider things like the Boltzmann distribution and phonons, which is out of the question at the moment, AFAIK.
But I'm not a physical chemist, so take with a grain of salt.
|
|
|
Engager
Hazard to Others
Posts: 295
Registered: 8-1-2006
Location: Moscow, Russia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lagrangian
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by guy
I was taught that as lattice energy increases, melting point increases. Lattice energy goes down when going down a group.
So what's the deal with this?
Compound Melting Point (œC)
MgCl2 ...........................712
CaCl2 ...........................772
SrCl2 ............................868
BaCl2 ............................963
Group I chlorides follow the "expected" trend quite nicely for chlorides except for LiCl. It should have the highest melting point but its almost as
low as CsCl!
Is there some factor that is missing here? |
Melting point is not only based on lattice energy, it also depends from molecular mass of compound. Heavier molecules require more thermal energy to
reach speeds that reqired to escape from crystall cage. The general rule is - higher molecular weight - higher melting and boiling points are.
|
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
But for the alkali metals, excluding lithium, the melting and boiling points of the halides and chalcogens all go down as the atomic number goes up.
Within those halides the melting and boiling points go down as the atomic number goes up.
I think that with Ca-Sr-Ba, Sr halides have the higher melting points, but I'm too lazy to look it up.
|
|
|
turd
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | | Melting point is not only based on lattice energy, it also depends from molecular mass of compound. Heavier molecules require more thermal energy to
reach speeds that reqired to escape from crystall cage. The general rule is - higher molecular weight - higher melting and boiling points are.
|
First of all this thread is not about organic molecules, but inorganic solids - a different kettle of fish. And then the notion of molecules having to
reach a certain speed to leave the crystal is ridiculous. It's probably got more to do with the fact that in crystals of big molecules you have more
contribution of covalent bonds vs. VdW-interaction.
Stop spreading misinformation.
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
No kiddin'. Ever notice that stearic acid melts *higher* than its triglyceride? Unsaturated fatty acids (and their glycerides) have even lower
melting points (hence are mostly oils rather than fats).
Tim
|
|
|
guy
National Hazard
Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic!
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by turd
| Quote: | | Melting point is not only based on lattice energy, it also depends from molecular mass of compound. Heavier molecules require more thermal energy to
reach speeds that reqired to escape from crystall cage. The general rule is - higher molecular weight - higher melting and boiling points are.
|
First of all this thread is not about organic molecules, but inorganic solids - a different kettle of fish. And then the notion of molecules having to
reach a certain speed to leave the crystal is ridiculous. It's probably got more to do with the fact that in crystals of big molecules you have more
contribution of covalent bonds vs. VdW-interaction.
Stop spreading misinformation. |
Wouldn't more intermolecular interaction show in the Lattice energy?
I think the matter is entropy, so what factors will affect entropy?
[Edited on 8/24/2006 by guy]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
