Dr.Felix Strausser
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 15-11-2013
Location: Peenemünde
Member Is Offline
Mood: Monoclinic
|
|
Bond energy and Hybridisation
I was going through some reference material and came across something confusing.
According to it;
Bond length decreases with increase in s-character, since the s-orbital is smaller than the p-orbital.
Shorter the bond length, the greater the bond energy/strength.
I was pretty fine with those, as it didn't conflict with anything I came across earlier [as a matter of fact, it supports it], but what came up later
utterly confused me.....
Bond energy increases in the following order:
s<p<sp<sp2<sp3
But this completely contradicts the earlier two points, according to which the bond energy should have increased as:
p<sp3<sp2<sp<s
Have they printed it wrong or is there something I've overlooked about this?
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4334
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
The more s-character in the bond, the shorter and stronger the bond. I'm not sure what they printed "for the following order"...was there more than
just the one letter?
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Dr.Felix Strausser  | I was going through some reference material and came across something confusing.
According to it;
Bond length decreases with increase in s-character, since the s-orbital is smaller than the p-orbital.
Shorter the bond length, the greater the bond energy/strength.
I was pretty fine with those, as it didn't conflict with anything I came across earlier [as a matter of fact, it supports it], but what came up later
utterly confused me.....
Bond energy increases in the following order:
s < p < sp < sp2 < sp3
But this completely contradicts the earlier two points, according to which the bond energy should have increased as:
p < sp3 < sp2 < sp < s
Have they printed it wrong or is there something I've overlooked about this? |
I've edited your post a bit: the angular brackets were fouling it.
[Edited on 2-9-2015 by blogfast25]
But these bonds should be called σ bonds: for example σ<sub>ss</sub>, σ<sub>pp</sub>,
σ<sub>sp</sub>, σ<sub>sp2</sub> etc...
[Edited on 2-9-2015 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
How is σ pronounced please.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"sigma".
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Lower case Sigma.
ThanQ
O-flick was begging to embed itself, which was worrying.
[Edited on 2-9-2015 by aga]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
