Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: MTBE vs. NM as an octane booster
scourge
Harmless
*




Posts: 2
Registered: 8-10-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-10-2005 at 13:11
MTBE vs. NM as an octane booster


Why is MTBE which is under scrutiny for drinking water contamination preferred as an octane enhancer? Why not nitromethane-methanol blends? Is there any less contamination risks with it?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
*********




Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline

Mood: Waiting for spring

[*] posted on 9-10-2005 at 13:35


MTBE has been used because it is inexpensive, has relatively low volatility, can be shipped through existing pipelines, and is of fairly low toxicity. Unfortunately, it also turns out that low (non-toxic) levels of MTBE can give water a disgusting taste. I suppose this was not discovered before widespread MTBE use began because standard testing protocols rarely have humans evaluate chemicals on flavor.

Nitromethane is far more expensive and methanol is far more toxic. Even if MTBE use is eliminated, I imagine that ethanol would be preferred over the nitromethane/methanol combination.




PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top