Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: studying the borohydrate anion
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 2-7-2014 at 14:16
studying the borohydrate anion


I am trying to understand the borohydrate ion, BH4(-)

Boron, the atomic number = 5, so elemental electronic configuration is 1s2 2s2 2p1

molecular sp hybridization can allow averaging the 2s2 + 2p1 = 2sp3 and so there are 3 unfilled MO's that can act as bonds

How does the fourth hydrogen possibly get in there?

I can imagine if you bring an H with an attached electron and
cram it into the hybridized valence (like a Lewis diagram because it has four spots) you get BH4(-). This is an argument for the correct charge on the ion, but not for how or why the boron accepted the 4th hydrogen and electron.

I can't get my head around how the sp3 hybrid subshell gets extended from the three MO bonds to four. Why does this happen?

It seems the energy state would strongly lean to BH3 and it would be a difficult, if impossible to have BH4(-).

How can BH4(-) even exist?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-7-2014 at 14:50


Maybe this helps?
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qUucAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA98&...

And this:
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2RgbAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA357...

[Edited on 2-7-2014 by forgottenpassword]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
NexusDNA
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 104
Registered: 23-11-2013
Location: Brazil, under an umbrella
Member Is Offline

Mood: Liberated from cocoon

[*] posted on 2-7-2014 at 15:11


Please correct me if I'm wrong, but borohydride works by accepting the 2 electrons of a H- into the unoccupied 2pz orbital of borane.



Bromine, definitely bromine.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 2-7-2014 at 15:19
very helpful - yes borohydride


Thanks forgotten password! I hope you remember your password.

[Edited on 2-7-2014 by quantime]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
NexusDNA
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 104
Registered: 23-11-2013
Location: Brazil, under an umbrella
Member Is Offline

Mood: Liberated from cocoon

[*] posted on 2-7-2014 at 15:59


Oh, and btw, welcome to Science Madness! :D



Bromine, definitely bromine.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 4-7-2014 at 00:16
still not right yet


The question is why in hell does an H(-) anion stick into a borane BH3 to form borohydride? It seems the molecular orbitals of borane somehow attracts a proton and two electrons which is neither electrophilic nor nucleophilic so that makes no sense, and flips from trigonal planar into trigonal tetrahedral configuration. What makes that happen? Borohydride seems like the higher energy configuration. It seems like borohydride would not happen.

But obviously it does, so

I don't understand something basic about molecular orbitals, and I can't make sense of those weird energy diagrams after staring at them for hours over several days.

Please I just want to understand what is going on here. This is a beginnings chemistry question that I can't find any answer to.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-7-2014 at 04:56


Read the commentary under figure 7.6 in the first book I linked to.

Now look at figure 7.5. The HOMO of LiH and the LUMO of BH3 can combine to form bonding and anti-bonding orbitals, shown by the two energy levels. Since the bonding orbital is of lower energy than the starting materials, the product is more stable than the reactants.

[Edited on 4-7-2014 by forgottenpassword]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DraconicAcetate
Harmless
*




Posts: 5
Registered: 3-7-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-7-2014 at 10:21


Look at it this way. BH3 has a boron which is sp2 hybridized and has an empty p orbital. It is electron-deficient, since it only has six shared valence electrons instead of a full octet. If it reacts with a hydride ion (which doesn't have a strong hold on its electrons anyway), it can have a full octet with an sp3 hybridization.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 5-7-2014 at 15:36
very interesting


DraconicAcetate - Please, yes, BH3 has 2spx 2spy 2spz hybridized valence orbitals. All three valence orbitals are full. No orbitals are available for bonding. That is where I break down.

In general is there some property where molecules want four valence orbitals? I thought it was the s + 3p that makes atoms want the four orbitals.

A full sp3 hybridization would have four hybridized degenerate orbitals. What could possibly be the four directions of a full sp3 hybridization?

sp(x) sp(y) sp(z) sp(*)
* - points into the 4th dimension? :P

Does this story sound accurate? A BH4(-1) anion does not form by itself in isolation. The formation of this ion requires a mechanism. A typical mechanism is LiH + BH3 whereby the LUMO of LiH and the HOMO of BH3 crash together to create a new covalent bond. The crash results in the positive ionization of Li, the negative ionization of Li's H, the creation of a bonding MO, and the transfer of the hydronium into the new bond. The result is an ionic compound with Li(+) on one side and a BH4(-) on the other side of the dipole. All of this crazy scary not intuitive stuff has to happen in order to make a BH4(-) ion. Chemistry is absurdly complicated.:o

[Edited on 6-7-2014 by quantime]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 4334
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-victorious.

[*] posted on 5-7-2014 at 17:29


Quote:
DraconicAcetate - Please, yes, BH3 has 2spx 2spy 2spz hybridized valence orbitals. All three valence orbitals are full. No orbitals are available for bonding. That is where I break down.


No, it has three hybrid orbitals (three sp2) and an empty p orbital. That's four valence orbitals.

Quote:
A full sp3 hybridization would have four hybridized degenerate orbitals. What could possibly be the four directions of a full sp3 hybridization?

sp(x) sp(y) sp(z) sp(*)
* - points into the 4th dimention?


The four sp3 orbitals are 109.5 degrees apart, not 90. Molecules are three-dimensional objects, not four.




Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 5-7-2014 at 17:46
does an orbital exist if there are no eletrons in it?


No, it has three hybrid orbitals (three sp2) and an empty p orbital. That's four valence orbitals

I am amazed. How can an orbital exist that has no electrons in it? Do all possible orbitals exist then? All possible orbitals are also empty.

Please, I am missing something important.

[Edited on 6-7-2014 by quantime]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
*****




Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline

Mood: Incommensurately modulated

[*] posted on 5-7-2014 at 17:48




It's a tetrahedral shape, isoelectronic with methane.

Good to see you've got your account back, Draconic...um...(insert creative ending here)! It's great to be an international hazard again ;)

[Edited on 6.7.2014 by Brain&Force]




At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 5-7-2014 at 18:03
sz2 + px + py = sp3?


sz2 what is that?, two s orbitals along the z-axis?

is sz2 one orbital or two?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
kmno4
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1497
Registered: 1-6-2005
Location: Silly, stupid country
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 05:34


First thing: "hybridization" is only mathematical trick, most chemists use this therm so often, that they soon start to belive that it is reality :P
Second thing: "BH3" is very unstable molecule, far less stable than BH4(-) ion. There is "dimeric" molecule, well described, namely B2H6.
But there is no any equilibrium BH3↔B2H6 in gas phase (for example).

Quote:
How can an orbital exist that has no electrons in it?

And what is the orbital ? Mathematical calculation.

[Edited on 6-7-2014 by kmno4]




Слава Україні !
Героям слава !
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 05:50


Quote:
Quote: Originally posted by kmno4  
First thing: "hybridization" is only mathematical trick, most chemists use this therm so often, that they soon start to belive that it is reality :P



[Edited on 6-7-2014 by kmno4]


You're oversimplifying, to the extent of coming across as simplistic as the people you accuse.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 08:51


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
You're oversimplifying, to the extent of coming across as simplistic as the people you accuse.

Actually, he is not oversimplifying anything. The hybrid orbitals are a pretty much mathematical simplifications (just models, they don't represent reality, but can be useful to some limited extent to predict empirical observations). For some reason they are still commonly wrongly presented to students as some definitive model instead of a mathematical approximation. In scientific articles it is still common to describe the bonding geometry using the spx and related terms, but this is only due to lack of better terminology. The model can be used to predict certain spectroscopic measurements to some extent, but it is way less useful than students are made to believe. It is best avoided to invoke such models without a deeper understanding of the mathematics behind it. Unfortunately, the ones who know least about it, tend to invoke it the most.

For a better explanation, see DOI: 10.1021/ed100155c and the follow-ups DOI: 10.1021/ed200615j and DOI: 10.1021/ed200746n.




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 09:02


Hmm... what I see in these sources is a debate. Not quite cut and dried.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
quantime
Harmless
*




Posts: 18
Registered: 26-6-2014
Location: divergent
Member Is Offline

Mood: purple

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 09:16
hybridized orbitals math tricks


I read chapter 6 and 7 of the first link again last night, and I came to a similar conclusion. The hybrid orbitals are a linear combination of orbitals, like vectors in a vector space, that point towards the tetrahedral angles. The hybrid orbitals don't really exist. By employing hybrid orbitals one is making the assumption of tetrahedral angles and thus the assumption of four orbitals.

Working theory for the moment:

Hybrid orbitals help when you already know the configuration, but don't help describe the dynamics of why a molecule gets into a configuration.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top