forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Chemicals in feces
I have been looking for information on the chemical composition of feces with a view to extracting any interesting organic chemicals that may be
present in sufficient quantity to make it worthwhile. Surprisingly I have been unable to find very much information of this subject, the best source
being the following from the Encyclopedia Britannica:
"Normally, feces are made up of 75 percent water and 25 percent solid matter. About 30 percent of the solid matter consists of dead bacteria; about 30
percent consists of indigestible food matter such as cellulose; 10 to 20 percent is cholesterol and other fats; 10 to 20 percent is inorganic
substances such as calcium phosphate and iron phosphate; and 2 to 3 percent is protein. Cell debris shed from the mucous membrane of the intestinal
tract also passes in the waste material, as do bile pigments (bilirubin) and dead leukocytes (white blood cells). The brown colour of feces is due to
the action of bacteria on bilirubin, which is the end product of the breakdown of hemoglobin (red blood cells). The odour of feces is caused by the
chemicals indole, skatole, hydrogen sulfide, and mercaptans, which are produced by bacterial action."
I haven't been able to find a review of the chemical constituents of human or animal feces, but I found a paper on the extraction of nuceic acids
which is interesting: http://www.biotechniques.com/multimedia/archive/00010/00282s...
What I would like to find out is the viability of extracting simple organic chemicals, such as skatole, from feces in non-miniscle amounts. If anyone
could assist in providing information I would appreciate it.
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There are so many different chemicals that it would be nearly impossible to extract just a single one. You could try if you really have a lot of time
available. This would also probably be a serious health hazard so I wouldn't try.
Even at that, if you really want to and have proper protection, you could try. I doubt it would be worth it, though.
|
|
DrAldehyde
Hazard to Self
Posts: 82
Registered: 12-1-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This thread is so ripe for juvenile humor, that I simply could not walk away. If I understand you correctly, you want to extract the smell out of
poop? A chemical that could only be named skatole. Well, I wouldn't be talking out my arse if I said I think the whole idea stinks, but, I wish you
luck in your endeavor.
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by DrAldehyde | This thread is so ripe for juvenile humor, that I simply could not walk away. If I understand you correctly, you want to extract the smell out of
poop? A chemical that could only be named skatole. Well, I wouldn't be talking out my arse if I said I think the whole idea stinks, but, I wish you
luck in your endeavor. |
I'm glad you made me look that up. It seems he could get much more of it from tar, so I'm just going to assume this is a joke.
|
|
papaya
National Hazard
Posts: 615
Registered: 4-4-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: reactive
|
|
What about nitrates, I've heard ancients extracted them (to make blackpowder), is this true?
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Maybe. Do you know about how they went about extracting them?
|
|
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't know about nitrates. I am more interested in extracing organic chemicals. Skatole and indole are useful chemicals. Odor is a rather silly
thing to judge the usefulness of a chemical by. The structure of indole makes it chemically useful, its odor is just its odor.
I think that with selective solvent extractions and chromatography it would be relatively easy to obtain pure products, and feces would likely contain
a more concentrated source and range of organic chemicals than the plant and animal products that went into its production. It seems a sensible choice
to extract chemicals from a concentrated source. I shall continue to research it anyway.
|
|
thebean
Hazard to Others
Posts: 116
Registered: 26-9-2013
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline
Mood: Deprotonated
|
|
Indole gives feces it's odor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indole#General_properties_and_o...
"You need a little bit of insanity to do great things."
-Henry Rollins
|
|
subsecret
Hazard to Others
Posts: 424
Registered: 8-6-2013
Location: NW SC, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Human Sadness - Julian Casablancas & the Voidz
|
|
Chicken feces were used for nitrates, IIRC.
Fear is what you get when caution wasn't enough.
|
|
hyfalcon
International Hazard
Posts: 1003
Registered: 29-3-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Chicken feces makes sense. It's the hottest manure, nitrogen wise, that is readily available on the farm.
|
|
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I found this citation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8081474 which states that indole and skatole may be extracted with chloroform, and that they are present in the
amount of 100 mg per kg of fecal matter. I'm not sure if that is wet or dry but regardless it seems like a good quantity to me. Steeping the feces in
chloroform or DCM then decanting and repeating the process seems like a good way to get a concentrated extract, which could then be concentrated and
separated on a silica column. I may try it on a small scale using DCM and chloroform separately, and test the extract with TLC. Solvent systems and Rf
values for indole and skatole should be easy to find, and would confirm the efficiency of the extraction with each solvent.
Update: I have prepared a sample and have it soaking in DCM. I will let it sit until tomorrow and then do a TLC with whatever I have extracted. The
DCM has remained clear so I am hopeful of a fairly selective extraction of skatole and indole. I only have iodine to visualize the TLC plate. If I
manage to detect anything with iodine I shall buy some p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde to prepare Ehrlich's reagent, which will enable me to differentiate
the indole from skatole based on the different colors that they produce, along with the Rf values that I found in my TLC handbook. I was only able to
prepare one sample due to an unacceptable risk of contaminating the second sample with vomit.
[Edited on 24-2-2014 by forgottenpassword]
[Edited on 24-2-2014 by forgottenpassword]
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
Shouldn't this be in Biochemistry?
|
|
Random
International Hazard
Posts: 1120
Registered: 7-5-2010
Location: In ur closet
Member Is Online
Mood: Energetic
|
|
Damn you are doin some really shitty experiments. For a gram of indole you would need to process 10kg of feces. That's sort of A LOT considering how
bad they are. Any pics? I mean handling that will be really hard.
|
|
Pickardjr
Harmless
Posts: 45
Registered: 27-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: vapor state
|
|
Oh man, shaking my head and holding my nose. Why in gods name would you want to do-do
a fecal analysis ? You can buy indole if thats what you are after. Other than that there isn't anything else , other than fertilizer for plants
(non-edibale). When I was but a mere bottle washer, I would dream of the array of chemical sources. However now with some bench time under my belt
have learned that, one can buy almost anything now days.
|
|
SM2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 359
Registered: 8-5-2012
Location: the Irish Springs
Member Is Offline
Mood: Affect
|
|
forgotten password,
Skatole, I seem to remember, has a synthesis reference listing in 10th edition of MSD Index. I think the 10th is the 1st one where P2P disappeared
mysteriously. It's back in later editions, and I think was in the previous 9th maroon colored cover one.
Apparently, your shitty smelling Skatole (this one, even in dilutions AFAIK), is mentioned to be made by "fusing egg albumin and KOH". So, many
health stores sell egg white powder I believe. There is surprisingly no ref. given to the synth I mentioned...it's compound 8388 in the classic 10th
(Green) edition of Merck Index.
But why not go with milk instead of eggs. Go with a pure amino acid, instead brute pyrolizing a whole protein. Best of luck.
[Edited on 24-2-2014 by SM2]
"Old men who speak of victory
shed light upon their stolen life
they - drive by night- and act as if they're
moved by unheard music." B. Currie
|
|
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
On a small scale extraction would not be worthwhile, I agree. However on the scale of waste processing then many hundreds of kilograms could be
processed and indole and skatole extracted and purified. For my TLC analysis I only need about a microgam, so the experiment that I am doing at the
moment is only to see how cleanly indole and skatole may be extracted. I suspect that a shorter time than the 24 hours that I am leaving it would
probably be better, but for the first extraction I shall see how many compounds are extracted into the DCM, and if the two target compounds are easily
separated from the other compounds with a simple chromatographic separation. I wil see how the TLC looks tomorrow. I know the expected Rf values for
each so I am hoping that they will be clearly identifiable.
Removal of the malodorous compounds from human waste is an interesting strategy in waste disposal. The fact that some of these chemicals are useful
industrial chemicals makes it interesting to explore the idea of large scale extraction. The raw material is free and infinitely abundant, and could
easily be more economical than synthesis. Anyway it is just a test at this stage.
[Edited on 24-2-2014 by forgottenpassword]
|
|
Random
International Hazard
Posts: 1120
Registered: 7-5-2010
Location: In ur closet
Member Is Online
Mood: Energetic
|
|
I dunno I read that one vitamin b is produced from sewage somewhere but still I think it's one of the worst things you could recycle. Full of bacteria
too. Could also contain dangerous ones depends from whom the feces are. Fermented feces will probably have no skatole left too.
|
|
gatewaycityca
Harmless
Posts: 27
Registered: 8-2-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I've often wondered if there was a way to completely eliminate the 'biological' component of waste so that it could no longer carry bacteria or other
harmful pathogens, it might be interesting to see what useful chemicals there could be in it.
I remember reading and seeing on tv a while back about a battery that actually used pee lol. If there was a way to process it so that it was just a
chemical and didn't carry bacteria anymore...imagine a waste treatment plant also generating electricity!
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by gatewaycityca | I've often wondered if there was a way to completely eliminate the 'biological' component of waste so that it could no longer carry bacteria or other
harmful pathogens, it might be interesting to see what useful chemicals there could be in it.
I remember reading and seeing on tv a while back about a battery that actually used pee lol. If there was a way to process it so that it was just a
chemical and didn't carry bacteria anymore...imagine a waste treatment plant also generating electricity! |
Waste treatment plants use a complex method documented here:
http://www.cleanwaterservices.org/AboutUs/WastewaterAndStorm...
If you want you could attempt to autoclave it (which probably isn't going to work) or dissolve it into solution and disinfect it through any number of
disinfection means.
[edit] Here's a direct quote from that page:
Quote: |
Our Durham and Rock Creek Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facilities use Sodium Hypochlorite (~12% Bleach) dosed at a controlled level to kill any
remaining bacteria. Instrumentation monitors the chlorine residual attained, with an eye toward providing the minimal dosage for complete
disinfection. By monitoring a slight excess of dosage, (residual), we ensure that all reactive material in the effluent has been exposed to the
disinfecting agent.
Thirty years ago, a chlorine residual of 2 to 3 mg/l was considered good insurance for a proper disinfection of a treatment plant stream. Stream
health, however, is not enhanced by the introduction of any chlorine residual into the environment. For this reason, Sodium BiSulfite is now dosed in
sufficient quantities to remove residual chlorine before discharge.
At our two smaller plants, Hillsboro and Forest Grove, disinfection is accomplished by means of ultraviolet rays. The cleaned wastewater flow is
routed through banks of UV lights, whose intensity is controlled to minimize electrical consumption while maximizing bacterial kill. This system has
no need for neutralizing the disinfecting agent before discharge.
|
[Edited on 2/25/14 by thesmug]
|
|