bw4229x
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 15-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Starting out from scratch buliding a garage lab
So i know its probably been discussed here many times. Im not new to chemistry but ive never had a "safe" place to practice it, now that me and my
wife have purchased our first house i feel better about setting up a lab in the garage rather than the house we were renting before. So i have my
chemical supplier i typically use united nuclear, www.unitednuclear.com, (if anyone has a better one please let me know) im always looking for a better supplier, anyway the garage is a standard
one car garage with normal hook ups i plan on fabricating some sort of fire suppression system, not sure what im going to use in the system gas or
water im not thinking water would be the wisest choice at all but im very open to ideas on that, also im thinking about a vent hood i know the shopvac
method is tried and true from my earlier years but im trying to go pro so im wondering if anyone has routed a hood through their ceiling? and if so
what where the outcomes and drawbacks of it? safety is my first priority so im going to get the whole lab set up before i stock anything in it or
start buying my glassware, basically im starting from a empty canvas and im looking for as much input as i can get on the subject really the garage is
pretty much going to be my area despite the washer and dryer so im wondering what success has everyone else had with storage for chemicals? possibly a
climate control system?(i live in Florida humidity is a real problem) laying gas lines? mainly the top priority is safety once i figure out what im
going to do with all that the fun can begin.ill make sure to post pics of how it turns out when im finished
sorry again if im dredging up a old topic any input is greatly appreciated
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
UTFSE
Good point to start is:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=4777
Gsd
|
|
|
zenosx
Hazard to Others
Posts: 188
Registered: 7-7-2012
Location: East TN / Near Oak Ridge
Member Is Offline
Mood: Awaiting Results....
|
|
Yes I would say UTFSE, you have asked a LOT of questions, almost 100% of which are already answered multiple times on this forum.
However, looking back on my first building days there are a few things I found I wanted pretty quickly
A Sink, (UTF,,, naw just put in a sink if you can....)
A fume hood, build it (UTFSE), (No, a shop vac will not protect you from toxic fumes BTW>.....)
A vacuum source (UTFSE),
A distillation apparatus with vacuum capability (UTFSE),
Glassware (Ebay)
Common Sense (cannot be purchased, only earned.....)
A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?
Albert Einstein
|
|
|
Dariusrussell
Hazard to Self
Posts: 70
Registered: 27-6-2013
Location: Southie
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organometallics
|
|
I was U2U'ing with bw4229x and one thing he mentioned that might be appropriate for the thread is automatic gaseous fire suppression. He mentioned
halon (Probably halon 1301) as the suppressant. I would be interested in people's opinions on this safety measure for a home lab. I personally think
its a great idea, but would be impractical to implement (Too dangerous, expensive, hard to do right).
|
|
|
confused
Hazard to Others
Posts: 244
Registered: 17-3-2013
Location: Singapore
Member Is Offline
Mood: tired
|
|
what about CO2 or pressurized nitrogen as a fire suppressant?
|
|
|
bw4229x
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 15-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Fire suppression system using compressed gas
So i was thinking about putting in a fire suppression system into my new lab, as in my other post im just closing on my first house and the garage is
pretty much a open canvas.
Costs and labor aside, generally speaking. its my personal opinion that in the event of a emergency id rather stand clear hit a button and evacuate
rather than fumble around with a fire extinguisher, plus the advantages of using a "clean" extinguisher such as halon vs. foam or spray could reduce
some damage done to my work papers,chemicals,electronics,ect im not quite sure how to rig up the system but i have a pretty good idea. anyway halon is
still available for purchase where i live, quite a few different blends to select from, worst comes to worse i could always run water through the
ceiling lines, but as someone suggested it water can be a mixed blessing in a lab depending on what your working on
just a general question hoping for some input
We as a society seem to try and create something profound in our desperate struggle to be more than we are - clothed animals just 'staying alive'.
|
|
|
Dariusrussell
Hazard to Self
Posts: 70
Registered: 27-6-2013
Location: Southie
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organometallics
|
|
I could see CO2 being useful, though in the U2U he mentioned being able to get the halon for cheap. I think nitrogen would be a waste for fire
suppression, seeing how easy it is to get CO2 and other suppressants.
Anyways I'm linking in two articles on fire suppression from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_fire_suppression
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaseous_fire_suppression
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2735
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Online
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Halon is pretty expensive in most cases these days. If you are in a shed or separate garage, it is not worth building a fire system, if you are in
your house, it would be nice, or even just put a sprinkler system in the whole house. They are much less expensive now. Unless you are
manufacturing large quantities of sodium metal, water should put out most lab fires. A few fire extinguishers are great to have, almost any are
useful for certain fires. For paper/wood, water is best, CO2 is great for fuels, and for most others a ABC powder one is great. I still have a few
Halon ones from long ago, but they are near impossible to refill now.
|
|
|
bw4229x
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 15-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
And @ the shop-vac one, long ago me and my buddy had to improvise so we where able to get by using a hood with a modified hose, and the output of the
vac was modified to run a hose outdoors, wasn't really working with anything too toxic just mainly used to remove most of the fumes for short periods,
in the before times where we were broke but still had a desire to learn and worked with what we had =P
We as a society seem to try and create something profound in our desperate struggle to be more than we are - clothed animals just 'staying alive'.
|
|
|
MichiganMadScientist
Hazard to Self
Posts: 55
Registered: 22-7-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Definately spend some time on these boards researching other chemical suppliers. UnitedNuclear is a good place to start, but I find that they are a
bit expernsive on the glassware-kits, etc...
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Dr.Bob  | | A few fire extinguishers are great to have, almost any are useful for certain fires. For paper/wood, water is best, CO2 is great for fuels, and for
most others a ABC powder one is great. |
I agree with Dr.Bob that being prepared for fire suppression is a very wise thing to do. I have never had a fire but it is at the top of my list of
concerns, along with accidental poisoning or other serious bodily damage.
The big problem with a fire is that it can not only endanger you and your loved ones but will call in the local authorities to determine the cause.
And then it is very likely that your homeowner's or renter's insurance will not cover the damage due to the limitations in your insurance policy.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halomethane#Fire_extinguishing" target="_blank">Halon</a> <img src="../scipics/_wiki.png" />
systems are fine in server centers, but you probably don't want one in a chemistry laboratory. Fluorocarbons (<em>et al.</em> would cause real problems if you had a fire involving alkali metals. I'm a proponent
of just being cautious and having a fully charged fire extinguisher & bucket of sand/borax/carbonate on hand.
[Edited on 17.12.13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
I have often toyed with the idea of teeing in a large CO2 fire extinguisher to the ducting of my fume hood. This would give me the capability of
extingushing any fire in the ducting as well as any fire in the hood. A 3/4" or 1" port would probably be all that is needed. I don't know why I
haven't done it yet.
| Quote: Originally posted by bfesser | | I'm a proponent of just being cautious and having a fully charged fire extinguisher & bucket of sand/borax/carbonate on hand.
|
I have that but still feel I should do more.
[Edited on 17-12-2013 by Magpie]
[Edited on 17-12-2013 by Magpie]
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
bfesser
|
Threads Merged
17-12-2013 at 12:00 |
bw4229x
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 15-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Local authorities are a huge problem where i live along with nosy neighbors, everyone in the area is so ignorant and chemiphobic that they think if
you have a lab in your garage, you must be a meth producer or plotting to take over the world with nuclear devices, authorities on the other hand
being local police im sure if tipped off or responded to a accident would like to have at-least a walk though to make sure its not any of the things
listed above,(needless to say it inst) but id like to kinda have the cutting edge prevention and suppression to mainly keep my family safe, and if any
questions from the law or fire inspector came up id slide right under the radar
We as a society seem to try and create something profound in our desperate struggle to be more than we are - clothed animals just 'staying alive'.
|
|
|
confused
Hazard to Others
Posts: 244
Registered: 17-3-2013
Location: Singapore
Member Is Offline
Mood: tired
|
|
my (possibly misguided) concern about gaseous fire suppressant is that it displaces the oxygen of the surrounding, so in the event that one gets
trapped/ becomes unconscious, there would be no oxygen to breathe.
also, the fact that all of the gaseous fire suppressant systems I've seen involve the evacuation of the area immediately after the system is
activated.
So would a supplied air/SCBA system be advised for such a setup?
or am i just being paranoid/overly cautious? 
|
|
|
Dariusrussell
Hazard to Self
Posts: 70
Registered: 27-6-2013
Location: Southie
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organometallics
|
|
No your not, I suggested when talking to bw4229x that if he does this, he should install an oxygen meter/alarm in the lab in case of leaks, as well as
have a wireless, or portable one to determine when its safe to assess the damage after the gas has been released (and room air reintroduced).
I think supplied air/SCBA might be a bit much, since they aren't much use if you have a oxygen level warning.
|
|
|
Random
International Hazard
Posts: 1120
Registered: 7-5-2010
Location: In ur closet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
Perhaps the first thing would be taking safety precautions and then storing the solvents and other flammable stuff in the right cabinet for it then
securing that area with something more strongly. It may be a better choice than setting up whole systems for fire suppression.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
