DocX
Hazard to Others
Posts: 179
Registered: 22-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Mercury(II) Nitrate to Mercury Sulfide
So if one has mercury nitrate in solution, how would one go about converting it to mercury sulfide for safe disposal?
It's cheerily advised in the wiki on mercury nitrate, but without a described reaction.
I see reactions using H2S, but that doesn't feel very safe now does it?
[Edited on 20222222/6/14 by DocX]
|
|
PirateDocBrown
National Hazard
Posts: 570
Registered: 27-11-2016
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sulfide isn't the only safe disposal, you could also do chloride. That's easy, just precipitate.
But if you're deadset on getting sulfide, try thioacetamide.
Phlogiston manufacturer/supplier.
For all your phlogiston needs.
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4579
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Or sodium sulfide
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 919
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: indisposition to activity
|
|
Page 301. Hazardous laboratory chemicals disposal guide 3rd edition
https://gprivate.com/5zj6o
Bettor world books is where i got my copy. $10 bucks
Says dissolve mercury salts(10g) as much as possible in water (100ml)
Use NaOH to bring the ph to 10
Add sodium sulfide solution until percipitate stops forming
Hg2+ + Na2S -> HgS + 2Na+
Nilered has a video showing the process
[Edited on 15-6-2022 by Rainwater]
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I would proceed by first adding NaOH, such that the liquid is neutral or just slightly acidic. No precipitate should be formed with the mercury salt.
Next, carefully add an excess amount of solution of Na2S or NaHS. Do that outside or in a fume hood, due to formation of H2S. All mercury will settle
as HgS.
The liquid can be disposed of in the drain. Just rinse it with a lot of water to get rid of the sulfide. Sulfide is very quickly oxidized in the
environment, so this can be flushed down the drain without longterm environmental consequences.
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by woelen | I would proceed by first adding NaOH, such that the liquid is neutral or just slightly acidic. No precipitate should be formed with the mercury salt.
Next, carefully add an excess amount of solution of Na2S or NaHS. Do that outside or in a fume hood, due to formation of H2S. All mercury will settle
as HgS.
The liquid can be disposed of in the drain. Just rinse it with a lot of water to get rid of the sulfide. Sulfide is very quickly oxidized in the
environment, so this can be flushed down the drain without longterm environmental consequences. |
Just clarifying that you are suggesting only the liquid is to be disposed of via the sewer? The solid HgS would need to be taken to a suitably
licensed waste facility.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Yes, only the liquid can go down the drain.
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
HgS can go down the drain. In a liter of saturated solution there will be about 10 atoms of mercury. You can safely eat HgS, it takes quite some
effort to get HgS in solution.
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
While it is one of the least toxic forms of mercury, I am not sure it is quite safe to eat. The jury is still out on an LD50 for mercury sulfide, but
it is thought to be 10 to 30 times higher than mercury chloride. Not something I would add to my diet. Interestingly though, it has been for a long
time and still is a component of a number of traditional Chinese medicines.
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
Although I wouldn't recommend to actually eat HgS, as there is absolutely no reason to do so. It was only used to illustrate a bit of HgS going down
the drain won't harm anything.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I do not fully agree with Tsjerk that having a bit of HgS down the drain is not harmful. I agree with the statement that it is extremely insoluble and
that it does not pose a severe health risk if you are exposed to it. It just exists as solid matter in your body.
However, having finely dispersed mercury-containing material in the environment is not good. If it is flushed down the drain, then it will be spread
as fine particles and finally it will settle somewhere in the sludge at water purification stations or just somewhere in nature in water or soil. Once
it is there it cannot be separated anymore. What will be the long term effect? I can imagine that HgS will be oxidized slowly over the years, when it
is finely dispersed in water and soil. Oxygen may get in contact with it and the sulfide may be oxidized to sulfate and/or a mix of sulfate and oxide.
In the long run, the mercury may become more mobile again.
So my advice would be to separate the HgS from the liquid and dispose of the HgS in a proper way. The remaining liquid, freed from HgS particles, can
go down the drain.
[Edited on 17-6-22 by woelen]
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
Trace mercury in biosolids restricts the opportunity for a beneficial reuse of the sludge produced at sewage treatment plants (in the Australian
context). This means that instead of being able to be used as fertiliser it goes to landfill.
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
You guys are absolutely right, a couple grams going down the drain in a big city might not do anything, but larger amounts in less densely populated
areas could very well.
|
|
DocX
Hazard to Others
Posts: 179
Registered: 22-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Great answers, thank you all!
Although, I won’t be eating any mercury sulfide. I’m thinking about the gastric acid which is basically concentrated HCl.
[Edited on 20222222/6/19 by DocX]
|
|
DocX
Hazard to Others
Posts: 179
Registered: 22-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
BTW, anyone knows what amounts of H2S one can expect? It's a really nasty nasty gas after all.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Depends on amount of mercury to be precipitated. You can use quite dilute solutions, the mercury sulfide is extremely insoluble. By using dilute
solutions, you probably will not even see any bubbles of H2S, but you'll definitely smell it.
If you do this outside, then you'll be safe. The gas, expelled from the dilute solutions, will be blown away quickly. You can also mix the solutions
and immediately step away and just let it settle. I would not worry too much about the H2S, unless you really have to do this in a closed room with
little ventilation.
If the quantity of mercury to be precipitated is just a gram or so, then you'll be safe anyway, even in a closed room. In that case you only need a
gram or so of Na2S and that will not produce sufficient H2S to be a direct danger, unless you stick you nose directly into the flask with the
solutions and inhale from that.
|
|
DocX
Hazard to Others
Posts: 179
Registered: 22-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by woelen |
If the quantity of mercury to be precipitated is just a gram or so, then you'll be safe anyway, even in a closed room. In that case you only need a
gram or so of Na2S and that will not produce sufficient H2S to be a direct danger, unless you stick you nose directly into the flask with the
solutions and inhale from that. |
But where in this reaction is H2S produced?
Isn't it just in the reaction between water and sodium sulphide? And isn't that reaction avoided if the solution is neutral or slightly basic?
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2786
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
Practically any cup of water exposed to the atmosphere on Earth contains dissolved carbon dioxide, which will react with sodium sulfide to release H2S
and produce bicarbonate. You can probably avoid this by basifying a little, but I think we want to ensure all of the mercury is trapped as the sulfide
and none becomes an intermediate like HgO.
|
|
DocX
Hazard to Others
Posts: 179
Registered: 22-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara | Practically any cup of water exposed to the atmosphere on Earth contains dissolved carbon dioxide, which will react with sodium sulfide to release H2S
and produce bicarbonate. You can probably avoid this by basifying a little, but I think we want to ensure all of the mercury is trapped as the sulfide
and none becomes an intermediate like HgO. |
Yes, I understand that, and still the protocol described in the book posted earlier in this thread (with the description on page 352, not 301. I
had half a mind retorting Rainwater with a condescending LMGTFY link about page numbering. But the tip was excellent, so I didn't) calls for
bringing the mercury salt solution to pH 10. Wouldn't that risk creation of mercury hydroxide?
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
That's exactly why I suggest to keep the solution slightly acidic at all times, you don't any mercury in another form than the sulfide, when it is
precipitated. With sulfide, you certainly will get some H2S in the air, but if the solutions are just slightly acidic, then you will not have strong
bubbling of H2S gas. Probably you won't see any gas formation at all, the liquid simply emits some H2S without bubbling.
|
|