j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6322
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Blowing 100k on science equipment
I am fishing for some advice here.
Yesterday I received an interesting phone call from my boss informing me of a budget of $100 000 AUD which he wanted to spend on "science equipment"
and asking me for ideas on how it could be spent.
A little background:
I work for a school of distance education. The school has been in existence for 8 years and has run on a shoestring budget for all of that time,
while undergoing rapid growth. It now has a roll of some 1200 students. A year ago the school was finally recognised by the federal government and it
was acknowledged that it should legitimately receive government funding similar to other comparable schools. This has enabled the school to expand
and consolidate in ways that previously were just not possible. Several milliion dollars has been spent in the past couple of months bringing our
resources, systems and staffing levels up to speed.
So to the present dilemma.
The boss wants to expand science resources but without a particularly clear sense of what the needs or possibilities are. My responsibility includes
overseeing high school sciences: physics, chem, biology, psychology and junior high science. Being distance education we have some materials that we
mail out for students to use. We also conduct group workshops in the various regions. We have recently acquired some mobile library vans which could
easily be used as mobile labs simply by switching out some trolleys. Additionally we now have some leased facilities that are being fitted out with
all manner of equipment so that students can come in for extended periods and receive training. Thus far we have a video and media studio with
editing facilities, a commercial kitchen, and we have purchased gear for a full woodworking shop, metalworking shop and textile facility. It seems
that a multipurpose lab may be next on the list.
One of the consequences of the way we run is that these facilities may be used only intermittently by students. My boss has expressed the desire to
fit out these areas with high quality, industry-standard equipment that can then be leased out to small operators who would otherwise not have access
to them. Thus we have CNC machines and embroidery machines that can be used for training students but also can be made available to the wider
community in a number of ways.
So, I can put together a wish list for equipment that has educational value: both transportable and fixed. I should cover all applicable science
fields. And there is value in having equipment that can be leased out. My initial thoughts are that some good analytical gear would fit the brief,
maybe some microscope equipment, maybe something technical in the bio area. My thing is that I have always had near zero budget and have focussed
entirely on those things that are extremey visual for the purposes of demonstrating principles to high school students. I really don't know what kind
of equipment would best meet the brief. Would a SEM find uses? (I know that students would find it interesting but I also see difficulties from a
practical standpoint in using high vacuum devices.) Would it be worth getting a NMR? or maybe a GCMS? Or good IRS equipment or electrophoresis
equipment for analysing DNA. Maybe we make our own liquid nitrogen. Or maybe I simply outfit some trolleys with lasers, signal generators,
oscilloscopes, masses and pulleys for a suite of high impact physics demonstrations.
Consider this thread an open brainstorm. $100k is not necessarily the upper limit.
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1247
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
that's wonderful news!
i would invest in good microscopes, they keep their value pretty well.
an electronic microscope uhh, maybe an used one, a new one could blow your budget in one hit.
nmr? mh if you are not university or college i would say no, they are expensive to begin with, but keeping one working is already quite expensive
(nitrogen and helium refills+deuterated solvents)
a gas chromatograph would be good, you can make quick analysis of many types of samples.
if you want to expand/add a bio lab area you could start with simple centrifuges, micropipettes, autoclave, incubator, pcr. the thoughtemporium made
lots of videos about bioengineering, they could give you an idea.
oscilloscopes, optic tables, lasers. surely a liquid nitrogen generator, you are going to need it for many chemistry/physics/biology experiments.
maybe i would also invest in a good calculating system, like a remote powerful server where students could log and do experiments (molecular dynamics
simulations, and anything that needs to crunch big numbers quickly)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
That is great news, congratulations! You should contact Domenico Caridi at Vic Uni. Dom put together a mobile analytical lab which was used for
workshops at high schools around Victoria. Not sure if they are still doing it, but he has the experience to be able to guide you. He had Shimadzu
HPLCs, GC, UV-vis spectro, etc. domenico.caridi@vu.edu.au
|
|
|
draculic acid69
International Hazard
Posts: 1371
Registered: 2-8-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Congratulations on your achievement.sounds like you have definitely earned it. Maybe a few test tubes and beakers for all students.watching and doing
are two different things and having the ability to do when you want to can make a big difference
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6322
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Chemetix  | | That is great news, congratulations! You should contact Domenico Caridi at Vic Uni. Dom put together a mobile analytical lab which was used for
workshops at high schools around Victoria. Not sure if they are still doing it, but he has the experience to be able to guide you. He had Shimadzu
HPLCs, GC, UV-vis spectro, etc. domenico.caridi@vu.edu.au |
Thanks. I will definitely follow this one up.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
A very nice addition could be some electronics equipment, demonstrating basic principles of modern electronics. There are kits for making oscillators,
flashing devices, solar-powdered devices, so-called joule thieves, and so on, which demonstrate basic concepts of electronics (such as switching,
oscillating, power conversion, production of light). For a certain group of students this can be very interesting.
The electronics devices should be big, e.g. big transistors, resistors and other components, built into blocks, which can easily be connected and can
be used to make oscillators and switching devices, which operate in the Hz and tens of Hz ranges and powers of tens or hundreds of mW. This makes the
effects visible (blinking, flashing). You then can explain that in real production circuits, the components are several orders of magnitude smaller
and the frequencies in modern computers, smart phones and multimedia equipment is in the GHz range, but the basic concepts remain the same.
|
|
|
MountainMan
Harmless
Posts: 20
Registered: 6-4-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A high quality light microscope with video camera to transmit live images over the internet.
Stereo microscope with same video camera system.
Biological safety cabinet.
Chemical fume hood.
Portable video camera system to transmit experiments performed in the hoods.
High quality UV-vis spectrophotometer.
Arduino and common accessory shields and/or accessory integrated circuits.
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2734
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I was going to say microscope with camera, so that scores high. Some petri dishes, 96 well plates, and pipettors to do simple biology experiments.
Some DNA extraction kits and analysis kits, simple ones.
The electronics ideas are great, I had some kits for simple electronics when I was a kid (when Radio Shack still existed), and that was a fun time. A
variac, some lights, transformers, etc, maybe build some simple electronic items.
I would stay away from big science tools, I know several schools that spent on NMRs, MS, etc, and had no money to pay for maintenance, cryogens,
gases, power, vacuum pumps, etc. If you really want an NMR, get a PicoSpin type one, there is someone on here with one. TLC, paper chrom, silica
columns, and electrophoresis (old, large stuff, if you can find it) are all visible systems if you use nitro compounds, dyes, or other colored
compounds. UV lamp (254 and 365 nm) for TLC and other stuff.
A simple centrifuge, oven and stir/hotplates. Some basic glassware for the lab. There are some good physics demos that have basic kits for high
school/college labs for inertia, momentum, gravity, etc. An electroscope, ion chambers, and other basic physics instruments are great. Repeating
old experiments like isolating elements (gases are easiest) are great and don;t require too much stuff.
For chemistry, a rotovap maybe, dist. system, maybe a few more interesting pieces like Dean Stark or Sohxlet extractor. If you want to make drugs a
simple 2L soda bottle will do (that is a joke...). Pyrotechnics are always fun, so showing a few experiments like that, filmed outside, might be
good, just try to avoid things the students can do inside at home... Calcium carbide and water, zinc and sulfur solid rocket, burning mg inside a
block of dry ice, and so many more...
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I agree with Dr.Bob that it is best to stay away from the bigger tools. These tools of course are fantastic things and have brought us a lot in the
past decades, but I have severe doubt that they serve the purpose of your setup. You work at a high school level. What is most important in that area
is making scientific concepts visible in a striking and appealing way. I remember from my time as a young boy that I was most impressed by simple
things, which demonstrated a certain principle. That's why I do experiments with very basic electronics:
https://woelen.homescience.net/science/physics/exps/relaxati...
https://woelen.homescience.net/science/physics/exps/inductio...
https://woelen.homescience.net/science/physics/exps/inductio...
https://woelen.homescience.net/science/physics/exps/little-l...
The above things are really basic and the cost is low, but they can be used for explaining theory and demonstrating that in practice. I actually use
these things every now and then just to raise interest in kids (and sometimes also grown ups).
I also added a little more things (transistors, high power MOSFETs, high voltage capacitors and inductors) and some basic integrated circuits (opamps,
analog multipliers). These things also can be used for demonstrating interesting concepts, like harmonic oscillators and chaos in physical systems:
https://woelen.homescience.net/science/math/exps/rossler_cha...
The electronic circuit from this experiment I soldered on a little PCB with some switches and LEDs to make a more permanent setup, which can be
tweaked in interesting ways.
Try to find things of high educational value. Highly advanced equipment and electronics burns up even a budget of $100000, but frequently has a hard
time demonstrating the core concepts. And indeed, cost of operation and maintenance can also be a serious issue.
[Edited on 3-7-20 by woelen]
|
|
|
DavidJR
National Hazard
Posts: 908
Registered: 1-1-2018
Location: Scotland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Tired
|
|
Maybe an FT-IR spectrometer or raman spec? Minimal maintenance requirements for those.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm tempted to suggest spending half the money on gold bullion.
Then, next year, when you find yourself thinking "Damn! I wish I had bought a such and such", you can sell some gold and buy it.
Seriously, is there a requirement that the money is spent this year? ( organisational accounting often means that there is).
If not, I suggest that you see how things go before you spend all of it.
Also, put a few bucks aside for getting on the phone and asking others about their experience. With luck you can avoid repeating their mistakes.
One point (which others have already made) which I would emphasise, maintenance/ running costs will kill you if you aren't careful.
And SEM is a great idea- as long as you can afford to pay a dedicated technician to keep it running.
|
|
|
Harristotle
Hazard to Others
Posts: 138
Registered: 30-10-2011
Location: Tinkerville
Member Is Offline
Mood: I tink therefore I am
|
|
Hi j_sum1, this is the space that I work in.
I reckon a class set of colourimeters and pipettes are a useful addition. Scientrific can help with the mystrica colorimeters - they are only about
$400 ish and really open up a lot of STEM activities. A lot of old labs, and newer ones run well on this, from colorometric determination of iron in
cereal to protein assays, all using reagents approved for school such as thiocyanate, or alkaline copper sulfate / tartrate.
Micropipettes are a great option. Dragon make good stepped (as opposed to gilsen continuous) for $25 USD each. These from ebay/alibaba. If you need an
Au supplier, they go for down to 75 AUD through one of the supply houses Southern Biological or others.
I'd put some thought into kits and courseware. Plasticware, and glassware that is robust, will survive a round in the post, or at least a rough
primary beating on it. Some form of easily washable bunding or tray, perhaps a returnable waste system too (think detergent sink, but with a lid and
leakproof, that can be returned to base).
I reckon some money on chromatography would be nice. The kind of remote indigenous community might be interested in tlc on their favourite bush
medicine (think Eremophilla in meths) plant. Liase with the Coolgardie baptist mob that CSIRO is supporting in WA to do this for the BHP Billiton
Science Talent projects for ideas and contacts.
Microscopes are nice, but go robust. The biggest issue with 'scopes in schools is that teachers don't know how to use them - even down to adjusting
condenser irises to get sharp images. As for phase contrast or other wow style systems, forget it. Once the lenses get out of alignment and the turret
gets lost they are gone.
In your situation, I'd spend some time collecting some resources and courseware. What are they going to do with the stuff? A few good books in your
library, from which you can extract and work up labs that are easy and engaging and road tested would be a big help.
Why don't you make contact with SciTech in WA who have a well established touring lab/ program and may be able to give you some tips and help.
Finally, whatever you do, build some redundancy into it. Kids kill kits! Buy maybe twice as many as spares so that you con maintain the fleet once
they hit the roads. Think of your glass and instruments as consumables, and try to estimate a half life. Then purchase enough to keep the fleet
operational for a couple of years, or at least until you are promoted !
Best, Harristotle.
[Edited on 3-7-2020 by Harristotle]
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I thought that was my idea :-)
|
|
|
SWIM
National Hazard
Posts: 970
Registered: 3-9-2017
Member Is Offline
|
|
Congratulations.
The effort and enthusiasm you put into your work shows in your posts, but it was'nt clear that you've been involved in building a science department
from scratch over the last few years.
This must be an exciting time.
It's clear reading this thread that you've gotten advice from a number people who really know what they're talking about.
I'd just comment that you're playing a long game here.
Even if you don't end up staying there your imprint on the department will still influence it strongly in the future..
Be like Churchill: build the foundations for a castle and be secure in the knowledge that even if only a cottage gets built there that it will have an
unassailable foundation.
(Hey, I'm from California. People in earthquake country REALLY like strong foundations.)
|
|
|
andy1988
Hazard to Others
Posts: 135
Registered: 11-2-2018
Location: NW Americus ([i]in re[/i] Amerigo Vespucci)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How to use a microscope hands-on was something I would've liked to have had in my secondary school education.
On the microscope subject maybe this may be worth considering. I don't know if the smartphone needs an optical zoom, a manual focus feature, so that it has the right focal length
for a clear image (not relying on autofocus).
|
|
|
wg48temp9
National Hazard
Posts: 784
Registered: 30-12-2018
Location: not so United Kingdom
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1 | I am fishing for some advice here.
Yesterday I received an interesting phone call from my boss informing me of a budget of $100 000 AUD which he wanted to spend on "science equipment"
and asking me for ideas on how it could be spent.
|
If you have not already done so talk to other distance education organisations.
The OU in the UK started with half hour programmes on the TV at night which had impressive graphics along with printed material and home experimental
kits.
https://www.open.ac.uk/contact/
I am wg48 but not on my usual pc hence the temp handle.
Thank goodness for Fleming and the fungi.
Old codger' lives matters, wear a mask and help save them.
Be aware of demagoguery, keep your frontal lobes fully engaged.
I don't know who invented mRNA vaccines but they should get a fancy medal and I hope they made a shed load of money from it.
|
|
|
Yttrium2
Perpetual Question Machine
Posts: 1104
Registered: 7-2-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
everyone check out phet.colorado.edu
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6322
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Bumping this.
My boss asked me today where things are up to. He is keen for a decision. I know I have some research to do. But if there are any additional ideas, I
would be keen to hear them.
Two additional questions: What would you expect to pay for a benchtop ftir? What about a GCMS with all necessary attachments?
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2734
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The costs depend a huge amount on brand, features, computer hookup, and more. They range over an entire magnitude. You will want to find items
with good support and a long warranty, if at all possible. I do think the small permanent NMRs are pretty cool, but not sure if useful enough for
your work.
For a GC, a new Agilent with a PC could cost anywhere from $20-50,000 I would think, used ones are about 1/4 of that. If you get a FID detector, it
is pretty simple, not sure they even do simple GCs with thermal detectors now, like the old Gomacs, but they were simple and cheap, and now could be
run via a cell phone, I bet. One example that looks simple is a GC for biodiesel testing, https://www.srigc.com/home/product_detail/biodiesel-gc that is only $10,000, they also sell units for cannabinoid analysis. Shimatzu might also
be good for you, given your closeness to Japan, https://www.ssi.shimadzu.com/products/gas-chromatography/gc-... .
I do agree that a simple spec20 or similar type spectrophotometer might be useful, as would be an IR, but I know nothing of current choices there.
Wish had had your problems, we can barely afford test tubes were I work now, I bring in much of my own glassware from home to have anything good. We
had someone spend a huge chunk of money on a very expensive (to buy and maintain) specialized item that used up our budget for several years and is
barely used, so I really understand the importance of not spending too much on one or two expensive items. I also do like the idea of buying common
or commodity items that you may be able to trade with other schools in the future to barter for stuff once the money stops coming (it always does).
I have been doing that with a few school instructors who got huge donations or purchases of items that they did not really need, so they trade me
their surplus items for things that they can use and I sell their surplus. That is where I got a few of the items in my stock, trading glassware for
things like stirbars, which someone gave them cases of. Speaking of that, a good collection of stirbars is worth buying, you can often get them in
bulk for much less.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3696
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
I suppose that you will find that 100,000 is not as much as it sounds,
Basic equipment and consumables for each discipline,
Video enabling technologies,
Then, If time permits, making links with local businesses, that may pay for specific services.
e. g. Business - equipmemt
Mining - xrf
Agricultural - pest/didease/pathogen detection and analysis
Chemical - gc/ms
The above is just a quick idea - your local needs are an opportunity.
i. e. try to spend on something to help local business and pay for itself.
We always forget stuff, so keep a good portion for contingencies.
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
RedDwarf
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 16-2-2019
Location: UK (North West)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Variable
|
|
I think you need to start from a different perspective, in terms of what you're trying to achieve (learning objectives etc). I'm not clear what age
group and abilities you teach (this probably means that I haven't read enough of your posts for which I apologise!) but there's a huge difference in
what you might use to develop skills in 18 year olds who already love science and are going off to uni to study science further and 11 - 15 year olds
who've already decided that they hate science! Once you've decided which learning objectives for which group you need to address then you can move to
the next stage of deciding whether you're looking for demo or participation equipment. What might be of use to the wider community should only be a
question you ask yourself afterwards if you need to choose between multiple options that all deal equally well with your learning objectives.
As others have said the need for support, repairs and maintenance etc means that higher price items probably won't be financially viable ( could you
afford a full time gc-ms technician if you decided to go this route etc?).
I hope all this doesn't feel too much like a bucket of cold water!
One piece that I think is useful in terms of both developing interest in science and being useful going further is a a decent thermal camera.
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
BUGSS relies on membership fees, admission tickets, grants and donated equipment
All I know is $100,000 buys a lot more used science equipment than new.
Open it to bored titans of industry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chemists%27_Club
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
