j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Fusion breakthrough claimed
https://newatlas.com/energy/hb11-hydrogen-boron-fusion-clean...
I am calling bunk. Especially the bit where lasers magnetically stabilise plasma. But I don't have time for more than a skim read.
I look forward to reactions from you guys.
|
|
|
fusso
International Hazard
Posts: 1922
Registered: 23-6-2017
Location: 4 ∥ universes ahead of you
Member Is Offline
|
|
No pun intended
[Edited on 200223 by fusso]
|
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
No more Whimsy for you?
Edit: I thought you would stay in Whimsy.
[Edited on 23-2-2020 by Tsjerk]
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Interesting read, but it raises some questions. Indeed, how can a laser magnetically stabilize a plasma? Of course, a laser is an electromagnetic
field and this has effect on charged particles, but I do not see the stabilization part. Another thing is that they say that bare/naked helium nuclei
are produced and there is only positive charge, causing a current to flow. But where does the negative charge go? I assume, initially, that the
boron-11 pellet is electrically neutral.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Yes, many questions. The article does not describe the discovery well enough in proper technical terms to really understand how it works.
That suggests that the writer does not understand it well enough, which could be because the writer is not equipped to understand it or it was not
explained well to him.
Its suspicious, considering the magnitude of the claim, with only just enough vague technical details to make it sound somewhat plausible to the
majority of people.
Giving it the benefit of the doubt for a minute, my best interpretation of what the article describes is this: Two laser pulses are used to accelerate
protons to high enough energies that they fuse with boron-11. This yields alpha particles, which are used to generate electrical energy by
electrostatic direct conversion. The laser pulses are specially shaped ('Chirped Pulse Amplification'), which is suggested between the lines to
dramatically increases their effectiveness. There is also mention of an "‘avalanche’ fusion chain reaction" which apparently is important for the
unprecedented fusion yields, but it is not explained at all. Honestly, that just seems like pure technical-sounding bullshit to me.
[Edited on 28-2-2020 by phlogiston]
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
yobbo II
National Hazard
Posts: 762
Registered: 28-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"Honestly, that just seems like pure technical-sounding bullshit to me."
Whether or not it's bullshit is irrelevant so long as the share price goes up
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Here's a video explanation. Not sure it adds anything that the article doesn't but interesting nonetheless.
https://youtu.be/OlGzt9ur1bY
|
|
|
anti
Harmless
Posts: 32
Registered: 17-2-2020
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood: Mood:
|
|
Fusion is the technology of the future, and will always be.
Signature:
HTML is On
BB Code is On
|
|
|
wg48temp9
National Hazard
Posts: 783
Registered: 30-12-2018
Location: not so United Kingdom
Member Is Offline
|
|
It adds almost nothing to how the protons are accelerated or how the plasma is confined with a single laser. Given the name of the video is Nuclear
Fusion: Revolutionary new breakthrough. I thought it may have spent a bit more than about 20s in 12 minute video on the explanation of the
breakthrough. Just more fodder for investors to up the share price.
Has anybody found the the patents? I need some light entertainment the pandemic and lock down here is depressing.
I am wg48 but not on my usual pc hence the temp handle.
Thank goodness for Fleming and the fungi.
Old codger' lives matters, wear a mask and help save them.
Be aware of demagoguery, keep your frontal lobes fully engaged.
I don't know who invented mRNA vaccines but they should get a fancy medal and I hope they made a shed load of money from it.
|
|
|
Assured Fish
Hazard to Others
Posts: 319
Registered: 31-8-2015
Location: Noo Z Land
Member Is Offline
Mood: Misanthropic
|
|
Im rather skeptical of this as well but i have found more information than the rest of you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneutronic_fusion
So it would seem the reaction between B11 and protium is not as far fetched as it looks, it may even seem plausible. Esspecially given french
researches repeated it.
https://www.fusenet.eu/node/575
It seems the reaction is not suitible for conventional confinement type fusion set ups so they instead opt for use of Chirped pulse amplification. (no i dont know what this is either)
Here is mr Heinrich Hora's patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170125129A1/en
From what i can tell the main reason for us not being able to find much detailed information regarding this is because its quite recent technology but
pretty much all of this goes well over my head. Im still confused about accelerating particles through a laser beam, hopefully somebody more educated
can elaborate further.
Sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from madness.
|
|
|
wg48temp9
National Hazard
Posts: 783
Registered: 30-12-2018
Location: not so United Kingdom
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Assured Fish  | Im rather skeptical of this as well but i have found more information than the rest of you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneutronic_fusion
So it would seem the reaction between B11 and protium is not as far fetched as it looks, it may even seem plausible. Esspecially given french
researches repeated it.
https://www.fusenet.eu/node/575
It seems the reaction is not suitible for conventional confinement type fusion set ups so they instead opt for use of Chirped pulse amplification. (no i dont know what this is either)
Here is mr Heinrich Hora's patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170125129A1/en
From what i can tell the main reason for us not being able to find much detailed information regarding this is because its quite recent technology but
pretty much all of this goes well over my head. Im still confused about accelerating particles through a laser beam, hopefully somebody more educated
can elaborate further. |
As far as I can tell there is nothing far fetched about the B10 H+ reaction as it only requires the H+ be accelerated by 123kV which could even be
achieved with a home built Tesla coil and an evacuated tube one meter long.
The power balance section of the wiki article gives some insight in to the technical difficulties of Aneutronic_fusion. It requires 500 times the
temperature density product of conventional fusion approaches, such as the Tokamak and laser pellet fusion.
I read the patent. Apparently the confinement magnetic field for the plasma is created by a two singles turn coils powered by a discharge between to
plates created with a laser. I certainly do not understand it.
The patent also describes the fuel pellet and how its irradiated from one side with a very narrow at least 1 petawatt peak power laser pulse. I did
not understand that either not that my not understanding it means its not possible.
I was surprised that its a version of laser pellet fusion.
I am wg48 but not on my usual pc hence the temp handle.
Thank goodness for Fleming and the fungi.
Old codger' lives matters, wear a mask and help save them.
Be aware of demagoguery, keep your frontal lobes fully engaged.
I don't know who invented mRNA vaccines but they should get a fancy medal and I hope they made a shed load of money from it.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
