RogueRose
International Hazard
Posts: 1593
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Making the most dense solution possible - that doesn't react with Cu or Al
I'm trying to find some salts that are capable of making a "high density" solution and the ideal solution would not be reactive with copper, aluminum
and iron/steel (though steel not as necessary).
I was looking through different salts and it looks like calcium and ammonium nitrate both have a pretty high solubility but I don't know how that
would effect the density of the solution.
Anhydrous calcium nitrate - density 2.5g/ml
2710g/L @ 40C
Ammonium nitrate (density of 1.725g/ml) is listed at:
2970g/L @ 40C
4100g/L @ 60C
10240g/L @ 100C
40C is a good temp, Ideally it would be a little lower, closer to room temp, but I can work with 40C
Now comes the part I get confused with and that is calculating density b/c I'm not sure how all this comes together and I'll use the extreme NH4NO3 @
100C as an example.
Does 10240g/L mean that 10kg of AmNit dissolves into 1L of water, which is what I recall being how that works? It doesn't mean that everything
dissolved remains in a liter of space.
10240g / 1.725 (density of dry AmNit) = 5,936ml
1000g = 1000ml water
11,240g / 6,936ml = 1.62g/ml
If the above is correct, then Ca(NO3)2 would be:
2710g / 2.5g = 1,084ml
1000g = 1000ml water
3710g / 2084ml = 1.78g/ml (CalNit tetrahydrate is 1.89g/cc - so that seems possibly correct)
So I'm guessing after seeing these numbers that it's going to be pretty difficult to get a high density solution unless I find a highly soluble salt
that has a heavier metal - possibly iron or copper but I thought those might react with the aluminum.
Does anyone know of a solution that can be made that would have a density near 2.7g/ml?
[Edited on 4-6-2019 by RogueRose]
[Edited on 4-6-2019 by RogueRose]
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4333
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
Does the solution have to be aqueous? Bromoform and tribromoethane have densities in that area, and you could mix the two to get almost exactly the
density you want.
If it has to be aqueous, then you'll want heavier atoms in the ions. Something like cesium iodide, for example (but I can't find the density of that
particular solution at the moment).
[Edited on 6-4-2019 by DraconicAcid]
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
RogueRose
International Hazard
Posts: 1593
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by DraconicAcid  | Does the solution have to be aqueous? Bromoform and tribromoethane have densities in that area, and you could mix the two to get almost exactly the
density you want.
If it has to be aqueous, then you'll want heavier atoms in the ions. Something like cesium iodide, for example (but I can't find the density of that
particular solution at the moment).
[Edited on 6-4-2019 by DraconicAcid] |
Wow, those are impressive. Thanks. I should have said that it would be best if the solutions were fairly benign, meaning as little vapors, toxicity
or flammability as possible. I'm guessing this might be a tall order, but I thought I would see if anything such as this existed.
|
|
|
crystal grower
Hazard to Others
Posts: 474
Registered: 3-1-2016
Location: Os Petrosum
Member Is Offline
Mood: Puzzled
|
|
Is the ammonium nitrate really 10g/mL at 100°C? That seems a bit too much to me.
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Yes it is. However, that's not 10g/mL solution volume, it's 10g/mL water. So the actual density of the solution will be less than that of solid
ammonium nitrate.
|
|
|
crystal grower
Hazard to Others
Posts: 474
Registered: 3-1-2016
Location: Os Petrosum
Member Is Offline
Mood: Puzzled
|
|
Oh, of course... I didn't notice it was solubility data, not density.
|
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
I sell cesium-chloride. I have about 600 grams left. Goes up to 1850 g/l.
link
|
|
|
Plunkett
Hazard to Self
Posts: 96
Registered: 16-4-2017
Location: The Richest Hill on Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Why do you need the solution to not react with aluminum? Is there another metal you can use or could you coat the aluminum with something less
reactive?
If not reacting with aluminum is a requirement then I can think of three solutions: calcium bromide, caesium formate, and lithium/sodium
polytungstate. CaBr2 solutions start out with a specific gravity of 1.7 and can be increased to 1.8 with the addition of CaCl2
(source). I do not know what temperature these densities are quoted at so the solution might be even denser at higher temperatures. Caesium
formate would be a lot more expensive/harder to get, but it can get up to a specific gravity of 2.4 (source). Lithium/sodium polytungstate solutions have a specific gravity of ~2.9 at room temperature, but they also have a high viscosity and may
be difficult to obtain (source)
If the solution can react with aluminum then you could use Clerici's solution, a mixture of thallium formate and thallium malonate which gets up to
4.25 at 20°C, although this has the drawback of being exceedingly toxic (source). There is also zinc bromide solutions with a SG of 2.5 at 20°C (source). Last, and this is just an idea, is indium (III) bromide. I cannot find much documentation on it, but InBr3 has a solubility
of 571 g/100 mL of water at 20°C (source). If you assume volume additivity like you did in your ammonium and calcium nitrate calculations, a saturated InBr3 solution
would have a specific gravity of 3.0.
I do not know where you are getting your solubility data from, but Wikipedia has a solubility table which lists the solubility of several different
compounds in water at different temperatures in a easy to read format: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solubility_table
[Edited on 6-4-2019 by Plunkett]
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2787
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
Pumukli: I get the impression he's trying to gravimetrically separate aluminium powder from denser contaminants. Possibly, copper.
Caesium tungstate is reported to form a solution that floats diamond. It should be less dangerous than thallium salts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesium_tungstate
Additionally, Wikipedia reports a stunningly high solubility of 551g / 100 mL for silver perchlorate:
http://en.wikipiedia.org/wiki/Silver_perchlorate
but this will certainly oxidize aluminium, and may cause an explosion.
[Edited on 7-4-2019 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
Fulmen
International Hazard
Posts: 1716
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
CNA: That's my guess as well, separating chips/turnings. And me thinks he be boned, it's probably going to be either too expensive or too hazardous.
Something like lead or bismuth oxide suspended in oil could work for larger objects, but probably not for fine turnings.
I would consider magnetic separation.
We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
:
