Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Am I missing something here ?
devongrrl
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 91
Registered: 28-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: Nucleophilic

shocked.gif posted on 10-12-2009 at 14:15
Am I missing something here ?



Ok I am now officially very confused. :o

By way of information I used to work shipping chemicals/fuels/gases around the globe for the military.

I was at that time fully conversant with ADR rules as well as dangerous air cargo and sea cargo rules too.

Having explained that , here is why I am confused.

I recently went to my usual supplier of acids & alkalis on the web and went to purchase some distilled water.

The page said "We cannot ship this item by road transport due to ADR rules." :o

Now, I know rules can change and things get re-classified etc but how come my supplier will cheerfully send me acids and bases by courier but distilled water is a no-no ?

Am I missing something here ?

If so I would dearly love to be corrected with an explanation.

Unless some one stands up and says that this is indeed correct I am likely to believe that the company ticked the wrong box for that item in their e-commerce system.

Has anyone come across this before ?

View user's profile View All Posts By User
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 10-12-2009 at 15:13


It's chemophobia rampant, devongrl. . .

http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/the-science-reader/uns...

View user's profile View All Posts By User
psychokinetic
National Hazard
****




Posts: 558
Registered: 30-8-2009
Location: Nouveau Sheepelande.
Member Is Offline

Mood: Constantly missing equilibrium

[*] posted on 11-12-2009 at 13:45


Yep. Welcome to the madhouse.



“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search.
I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor.”
-Tesla
View user's profile View All Posts By User
devongrrl
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 91
Registered: 28-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: Nucleophilic

[*] posted on 12-12-2009 at 01:00



I got a reply from the company, it was as I thought just a case of a wrong field on that item's entry on their database.

Phew ! A minor reprieve.

I'd hate to get taken to court for procuring transport of dihydrogen monoxide - a dangerous substance, by road. :P

After all it has killed people and tests reveal in it our water and sewerage systems at an alarming level.

It is even present now in the human body, OMG.

*LOL*
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Contrabasso
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 277
Registered: 2-4-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-12-2009 at 07:46


Half the chemophobic general public will cite an obscure reg as bovine excrement just to confuse you.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 12-12-2009 at 09:38


Yes, that is confusing. . . ?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kilowatt
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 322
Registered: 11-10-2007
Location: Montana
Member Is Offline

Mood: nitric

[*] posted on 13-12-2009 at 20:22


Dude, people, it ended up being a simple mistake. I think some of you are ignoring the other posts and just using this as a chance to ramble about regulations. There are definitely a lot of ludicrous rules and regulations, but fortunately this is not one of them!

[Edited on 14-12-2009 by kilowatt]




The mind cannot decide the truth; it can only find the truth.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top