Quote: | Quote: Originally posted by CuReUS |
i thought about partition coefficeint but then i thought that it just means the same as the ability of a particular substance to dissolve in two
different solvents i.e lipophilic or lipophobic ,so i didnt mention it. |
In essence, yes. It's often used as a physico-chemical descriptor to describe where unbound drug partitions in the body in the absence of transport
proteins, metabolism, ionization, etc.
Quote: Originally posted by CuReUS | so you mean that it is made more lipophilic so that it can be easily absorbed when it is injected intra-muscularly instead of forming a blister(kind
of like a "heroin blister" in smack addicts) |
That is a result. It's primarily for tailoring the rate of distribution from the muscle into the bloodstream, which is proportional in many drugs to
the ester length (greater lipophilicity, lower hydrophilicity).
Some very polar salts are injected IM, but I believe the location and vascularization of tissue are the most important factors there. Sterility, pH,
depth of injection, ease of immune cell access to tissue/vascularization, etc. will all have some effect on this, and can lead to the blistering
effect, as well as abscess formation or Nicolau Syndrome.
Quote: | so that means that although the wiki page says that they test for testo/epitesto ratio ,they actually test for a conjugated or sulphated testo
molecule. |
I'm not sure how every lab does it (apparently LC-MS is getting more popular), but total testosterone can be corrected for mathematically as an
addition to conjugated measures, or empirically summed with the conjugated forms. Either way, it's only an estimated 3% error if you ignored it. If
you're interested, check out DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.01.027
I appreciate the compliment, but my background is complicated and I am a pretty private person.
| |