Originally posted by chemoleo
Oh I think you got a few facts wrong.
Why is energetic chemistry 'outlawed' just because it could be abused? How many things could you possibly abuse, and not
get into trouble for it because it is so common (Knives, bats, guns (US), etc)? Did you know that many chemists of past ages did exactly research
nitrogen-rich compounds, knowing that some might be energetic? Why is there an association of juvenility or even terrorism with respect to
experiments that tend towards the energetic direction? Why is it ok to play with a bow and arrow, but why is it NOT ok to play with cellulose, and
the nitrated form, nitrocellulose?
Anyone who's censoring a discussion thereof is, in my humble opinion, just playing into the hands of big brother. 1984. You obey, you lost. What
do you prefer?
As long as we aren't proven to do something utterly immoral, we got the benefit of the doubt, right? So why should the
'lawmaker' impose upon us that playing with EM's is against the law even if intentions aren't unlawful at all?
|