Farnsworth - 16-8-2012 at 19:44
A new health food coop store has opened in my area, and they stock Erythritol. I've used ETN before in boosted detonators for initiating AN-based
experimental charges for about a year now, so I have a bit of cautious experience in making it. So far though I've only ever employed it in 1-4 gram
pressed charges in pure recrystallized and neutralized form.
With a greater quantity now available I'd like to tinker with small gram amounts of plasticized ETN as a main charge, but I have some questions. (I
know I ask a lot of questions here, and I apologize for being a bother sometimes).
From the research I've done in amateur ETN plastics, not the least of which came from SM, I'd like to inquire as to the following:
1: The gold standard plastic seems to be an approximately 9% blend of polyisobutylene rubber and ETN with a percent or two of silicone oil.
This mimics the formulation of compound C4 using ETN as the energetic. The question is, is it a feasible idea to melt the ETN itself, raising the
temperature of the PiB to similar, and blending the two in a liquid state via mechanical agitation for a good homogeneous mix? I'm concerned with the
more obvious solvent method causing a loss of crystal uniformity in the ETN. I'd like a very homogeneous, uniform plastic with very uniform shockwave
propagation.
2: Following from the method used by the British to desensitize RDX back in the 1940's, a combination of ETN nine parts by weight and paraffin wax
one part by weight should form a usable plastic if combined with a viscous binder. I have in mind petroleum jelly. The question is in the method of
mixing: In theory, one would melt the ETN and the wax together and agitate for some time, allowing the mixture to cool to ensure that the ETN
crystals were well coated. Then the petroleum jelly would be added and the materials mixed through hand kneading. Or would it be better to melt only
the wax and petroleum jelly, add the ETN to the molten mixture, and agitate? Which would be more likely to give a plastic of high uniformity and
homogeneousness?
Ral123 - 16-8-2012 at 20:03
Can somebody give us idea how an explosive with 10-20% inerts performs. My best mixture so far is etn/ng/nc. I mix well and dissolve in a little
acetone. When it evaporates it gives quite constant mixture, but repeating may be necessary. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djpni2Lhehg
Physically may be I shouldn't even call it plastique. It handles badly, but I don't see any other non exotic explosive that would beat it.
Kalium - 16-8-2012 at 20:25
I'm not too sure about how to answer your second question so I'll provide some information regarding your first. I found some photos of a mix
consisting of 65g PETN, 3.1g motor oil and 4.7g PIB. I also remember reading on a a Slovenian forum that he used a small amount of acetone to help
remove the PIB from the glue trap.
Mixing the components:
http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff11/NUKEpyro/?action=vie...
http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff11/NUKEpyro/?action=vie...
http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff11/NUKEpyro/?action=vie...
http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff11/NUKEpyro/?action=vie...
The final product:
http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff11/NUKEpyro/?action=vie...
There was also a video of it detonating, which has since been removed from YouTube. I have on my computer; would anyone want to see it? It pulverised
the rock it was on top of, but I wouldn't expect any less from such a mixture.
Farnsworth - 16-8-2012 at 22:18
I've read about the NC based plastics, but to be honest, NC is probably my least favorite EM synth. I rarely distill nitric because of my poor
apparatus quality (due to lots of meth production, getting decent glassware here is VERY hard) and most of the local sources of cotton are too impure.
For me, getting the NC for such a plastic is harder than making the ETN. The in-situ synth is very simple and has always been quite enjoyable to me
for some reason.
PiB, however, is actually easy to come by around here. I don't even need to extract it, I have a source for it in ~90% pure form. And wax is wax.
hissingnoise - 17-8-2012 at 01:02
<i>"The question is in the method of mixing: In theory, one would melt the ETN and the wax together and agitate for some time"</i>
Melted ETN is dangerously shock-sensitive ─ agitating it is <b>not</b> advisable . . .
Farnsworth - 17-8-2012 at 08:10
That's exactly the type of tip I was hoping for. So it'd be best to ignore potential mixing methods that would rely on melting the ETN.
That leaves mechanical combination. What are your thoughts on the melting of wax and petroleum jelly, and adding the ETN crystals and kneading?
Or am I overcomplicating the problem trying to avoid solvents?
hissingnoise - 18-8-2012 at 02:44
That raising the temperature of an explosive will increase its sensitiveness is something that one should always bear in mind . . .
Bot0nist - 18-8-2012 at 12:10
Look into a thread or two here that discusses, in some depth IIRC, the effect that the properties (shape, meshsize, densitiy, uniformity, etc.) of the
individual crystalls of the EM employed in a plastiuqe formulation effects the preformance, functional flexability, and consistancy of said
composition.
According to those reads, fine tuning your recrystalization to produce the idea crystal may be an impactful variable.
I'll search for the threads and amend my post shortly. im on a phone,s browser currently.
Farnsworth - 19-8-2012 at 00:33
So far I've always relied on the dissolve - cold water crash method to get the smaller crystal sizes. I've never used a mesh to screen it for uniform
crystal size before, but that was already an idea for the plastic experiment.
I'm just concerned that if I dissolve the ETN and PiB together in a solvent like white gas, mix, and evaporate ala the common PETN plastic
combination, that I'll lose the uniformity of the crystals and get a product with a more irregular shockwave propagation. I'd like to see just how
consistent the stuff can be.
CaliusOptimus - 19-8-2012 at 11:51
I remember reading a thread about blending ETN for use in plastique. I think the idea was to add the ETN to a running blender 75% full with water. The
idea being that ETN dispersed beyond a certain point (10-20% by volume?) would not sustain a detonation. There were several successes and no
detonations. Keep in mind that starting the blender after the ETN has settled to the bottom would most certainly lead to detonation.
The ground product was apparently extremely fine and perfect for plastique.
If anyone decides to try this I recommend keeping yourself behind a blast shield and using very small quantities of ETN. The source of this info is no
longer available.
pyro10%school0% - 26-11-2012 at 01:42
maybe you can use the composition of 88.3% ETN (by weight) with 11.1% mineral oil, and 0.6% lecithin
Fulmen - 7-7-2016 at 15:19
I hope necro-posting isn't frowned upon, but this thread caught my attention. The main drawback of ETN is it's sensitivity, so phlegmatization seems
like a good idea. But it seems many get greedy and go straight for a plastic explosive. It so happens it's OB at appr 1% hydrocarbons, which should be
enough to phlegmatize it effectively. But I can't seem to find any references to such a composition.
markx - 8-7-2016 at 01:51
ETN is not overly sensitive (same ballpark as PETN), but yes, phlegmatization makes it number and more reliably compactable. I've used castor oil for
the purpose (5% if I remember correctly), but I see no reason why mineral oil or other hydrocarbons should not deliver a comparable result. It greatly
helps when acetone is added during the phlegmatization stage, just enough to soften the mass and partly dissolve the energetic. It will recristallise
as the solvent evaporates during gentle mixing and a very fine and uniform blend is achieved.
Fulmen - 8-7-2016 at 09:03
Sadly I'm having trouble finding much data on phlegmatization. I've attached one document (COATING OF EXPLOSIVES, HERMANN SCHMID,
Nobel Chemicals AB), seems it is far more complex than I thought.
Attachment: schmid1986.pdf (1.4MB)
This file has been downloaded 1083 times
[Edited on 8-7-16 by Fulmen]
Praxichys - 12-7-2016 at 08:18
A good way to safely distribute a binder into ETN is to use a suitable solvent.
You can easily and cheaply extract a good MW polyisobutylene from glue boards designed to trap rats and mice. Soak them in mineral spirits*, filter
the solution, and evaporate outside in the sun or with gentle heating. You will end up with an amber substance which is syrupy when hot and a tacky
solid when cool.
A known amount of this (Something like 2% of the ETN weight) is scraped out and dissolved into some more mineral spirits* along with 2% motor oil to
obtain a thin liquid. The ETN is mixed with this thoroughly to form a homogeneous paste, adding more solvent if necessary. The ETN paste is then
spread out on a pan and left out where the solvent can evaporate.
What is left will be crumbly ETN that can be kneaded into a stiff dough.
* "Mineral spirits" are simply aliphatic hydrocarbons with a specified range of boiling points. Some substitutes:
Naphtha
Petroleum ether
Charcoal lighter fluid
Zippo fluid
Toluene
"Xylene" (xylenes)
White gas
Coleman fuel
Note that the boiling ranges on these are different, so some may make the evaporation process difficult and lengthy (VM&P Naphtha) while others
can cut processing time down to less than an hour (Zippo Fluid).
Indeed the key to a good plastic is to achieve fine and consistent crystals of the starting product. This is achievable by recrystallizing the ETN
from hot methanol, first making a saturated hot methanol solution of ETN and then crashing it into at least 20x its volume in rapidly stirred ice
water with 4% sodium bicarbonate and 1% urea as a stabilizer. Crystallization in this way will ensure an acid-free, buffered product that will store
for years.