All things considered, being in GA I'd say 19/22 might be the better bet - If for no better reason than you're in meth country and if anything ever
happens the smaller 19/22 "experimental size" stuff might look better (or slightly less bad) in the eyes of the law than a "production scale" 24/40
setup. I have no idea what your intentions are, but that might be something to keep in mind - No matter what you're doing, if the cops investigate
you will get railroaded.
That said, all of my glassware is 19/22 - When I first started piecing together an order, the prices were comparable with 19/22 occasionally a bit
more expensive than 24/40 for otherwise identical items - The only thing that was definitely cheaper was a three-necked 500ml flask - That was the
dealbreaker, as there were 2-3 companies I was looking to place a single order with...
Having worked with 14/20, 19/22, and 24/40, I'd stick with 19/22 - Only gripe is that it's a pain in the ass to clean - Other than that, I found it
the perfect size for small-scale reactions. Bulk solvent distillation is a moot point, as apparatus for that sole purpose can be easily and cheaply
cobbled together from steel and copper without the need for expensive and fragile glass - My go-to solvent still was a 3' copper liebig with a
paint-can cap soldered to it - Perfect for stripping, break out the fancy glassware when the bulk of the work is already done.
If you're not overly paranoid, keep your eyes open on ebay for 19/22 gear - It's not as common, but when it pops up not many people bid on it - 24/40
seems to be all the rage. Look up DP-Glassblowing (sp?) - He deals with a lot of surplus and will let you use his buy-it-now options as a sort of
layaway, holding the items for a while until you're finished and ready to pay for one-box shipping.
...Personally, the next setup I'm pricing out is 14/20 - Fell in love with it after a couple of microscale chem labs, novel but pretty versatile when
you're primarily interested in proof-of-concept work. |