EU sidesteps Reach to ban paint stripping solvent
The ban, already adopted by the European Commission, received final approval from the European Parliament on 14 January, which overwhelmingly
supported the resolution (674 votes in favour, 17 against and 8 abstentions).
However, Wolfgang Marquardt, manager of the Brussels-based European Chlorinated Solvent Association (ECSA), told Chemistry World that the industry
believes dichloromethane (DCM) should have been considered within the EU's new Reach framework for assessing chemical safety, which would have first
required comparative risk assessments of alternatives before such a far-reaching ban could have been instituted across Europe. Marquardt says
alternative paint stripping substances and methods, such as blow torches and sand-blasting, might be just as hazardous as DCM.
But Carl Schlyter, a Swedish member of the European Parliament who helped draft of the DCM resolution, told Chemistry World that he and other
supporters of the DCM ban specifically wanted to avoid referring the issue to the new Helsinki-based European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), responsible for
administering Reach.
The agency has been swamped with around 2 million chemical registrations, 10 times more than expected , says Schlyter, a member of the Green party. If the proposed DCM ban had been referred to ECHA, it would take 'several
years' to reach an outcome, he says, adding: 'We should ban DCM now.'
[Critical evaluation]Get t' fuck Schlyter. One rule for me, one for everyone else eh? How could they be so confident in their ability to regulate the
market, yet misjudge it's audience by an order of magnitude?[Critical evaluation] |