Sciencemadness Discussion Board - New ETN Synthesis - Powered by XMB 1.9.11 (Debug Mode)

Is that 23g of ETN bone dry? My yield is always around 14 or 15 grams when following that exact video posted. Could you give more details about your procedure?

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=949&am...
Following the link you'll see Hennig Brand gets similar yields as me using the same procedure. His procedure can be found on page 23 of the link I posted. Id love some insight on how to get better yields.

[Edited on 25-6-2020 by Brightthermite]

Yes,23g dry etn
Use the method described in the video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XrjpCnYs7fVL/

Brightthermite - 26-6-2020 at 16:42

I believe it may but my AN, I have followed the video and also tried the "#10" trial shown at the beginning of the video and do not get these good yields. I am going to try a re-crys and see if that helps.

Petn1933 - 26-6-2020 at 21:14

I believe it may but my AN, I have followed the video and also tried the "#10" trial shown at the beginning of the video and do not get these good yields. I am going to try a re-crys and see if that helps.

re-crystal will not help you. you must use pure ingredients.

[Edited on 27-6-2020 by Petn1933]

Syn the Sizer - 27-6-2020 at 05:43

Quote: Originally posted by Petn1933

re-crystal will not help you. you must use pure ingredients.

[Edited on 27-6-2020 by Petn1933]

Recrystallizing should purify the AN so it can be more effective, that is kind of the point of a recrystallization, purification.

Brightthermite - 27-6-2020 at 15:17

I am using 93% sulfuric sourced from drain cleaner, the only additives is a pinker dye to show up against tubs. My AN was sourced as cold pack refills, not sure how pure as it has bits of rock in it. My AN my have moister who knows. If anyone else is able to replicate the results in the video I would love to hear how you did it.

Petn1933 - 27-6-2020 at 20:18

Recrystallizing should purify the AN so it can be more effective, that is kind of the point of a recrystallization, purification.[/rquote]

That's exactly right. I didn't mean ammonium nitrate. we should use pure nh4no3.

Petn1933 - 9-7-2020 at 20:35

I tested 6.75 sample with my no8 blasting cap.
The result was interesting
ETN:6.75g
Density:1.68
Iron plate thickness:6mm

B41B0784-A0D2-4D8B-A0A6-B94A72D99A4A.jpeg - 394kB

F5984C70-26FB-493D-95D3-CD1325DEBA62.jpeg - 402kB

C634BA71-6DD6-4449-8E0F-F51D26841EAB.jpeg - 494kB

[Edited on 10-7-2020 by Petn1933]

Petn1933 - 9-7-2020 at 20:37

My no8 blasting cap: 250mg sads + 1g (petn/etn 70:30)

Brightthermite - 10-7-2020 at 13:44

Looks like the sample performed well, melt-cast I am assuming. Do you have a photo of the charge?

Petn1933 - 10-7-2020 at 18:08

Looks like the sample performed well, melt-cast I am assuming. Do you have a photo of the charge?

Yes.
Sample charge

1C32BEFE-20B7-4CFC-B20A-C31A7D1EC793.jpeg - 39kB

Brightthermite - 11-7-2020 at 21:43

I would have expected a little more damage when comparing to this video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/l3h21B9vSLoU/
These of course are mixed explosives and a larger quantity but still. As I already posted I don't believe my melt cast is performing as it should.

Petn1933 - 12-7-2020 at 03:19

I would have expected a little more damage when comparing to this video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/l3h21B9vSLoU/
These of course are mixed explosives and a larger quantity but still. As I already posted I don't believe my melt cast is performing as it should.

As you can see in the video, the thickness of the iron plate is less than that of the iron I used.

Microtek - 14-7-2020 at 01:03

With that much HE, you should have spalling on the back side, if the charge went properly high order. It is hard to see from your pictures if that was the case...

Brightthermite - 14-7-2020 at 11:00

Quote: Originally posted by Microtek

With that much HE, you should have spalling on the back side, if the charge went properly high order. It is hard to see from your pictures if that was the case...

I was thinking the same, however would that not be depended on the backing of the steal?

Petn1933 - 14-7-2020 at 22:56

Unfortunately, the quality of the photo is not very high. For this reason, the effect of the explosion on the photo is not well recognizable.
In addition, the surface under the iron plate was very dense and hard

Petn1933 - 14-7-2020 at 23:09

Another test with PETN!

15g 70:30 petn/etn (10.5 petn,4.5 etn)

Cap(PETN:700mg- ETN:100mg - SADS:200mg).

0545E379-D3F2-4830-AEFD-02DAB57B0E1B.jpeg - 121kB

5CE0A1CE-A82A-4716-9678-965167D52EDC.jpeg - 129kB

FA480E4B-5EB8-4478-9269-D1F02812734A.jpeg - 124kB

E653F4A9-CF2A-4267-BCD4-D035EB20E526.jpeg - 129kB

4769D676-5CE9-4A01-874E-9878989F0110.jpeg - 155kB

[Edited on 15-7-2020 by Petn1933]

B(a)P - 15-7-2020 at 01:06

What thickness of steel is that, was it an undamaged piece of box section prior to your test?

Petn1933 - 15-7-2020 at 06:01

Quote: Originally posted by B(a)P

What thickness of steel is that, was it an undamaged piece of box section prior to your test?

A rectangular cube metal can with a thickness of 3 mm on each side.

B4501C7C-7820-4B1A-A349-009382BAD5CA.jpeg - 193kB

Microtek - 15-7-2020 at 11:49

The second test looks better IMO. I think you should consider the possibility that the detonator is perhaps not quite powerful enough for this charge, leading to inconsistent performance.

Petn1933 - 15-7-2020 at 21:44

Quote: Originally posted by Microtek

The second test looks better IMO. I think you should consider the possibility that the detonator is perhaps not quite powerful enough for this charge, leading to inconsistent performance.

It’s true, maybe my detonator isn’t quite powerful.
However, it should be noted that 6.75 g of etn was used in the first test. The 6mm iron plate was on a hard surface, which affects the impact of the blast wave on the surface below.

Brightthermite - 7-8-2020 at 14:21

I have tried this method yet again using lab grade 98% acid and lab grade ammonium nitrate. After a re-crys in acetone my final weight was 19 g. Still 4 grams shy of what other can obtain! When mixing your nitration bath do you use any sort of temperature control? I have done around 30 trials and still can not get higher yields.

fdnjj6 - 7-8-2020 at 21:12

Yea I find it weird how people have such varying degrees of success with ETN. Some claimed huge yields using KNO3. I tried for months and the highest I got was 40% and at that point, the ETN would crystallize out in the bath and almost cause a runaway. Not good. Best yield was around 70% I believe. Recrystallization seems to steal a lot of my yields though. I used tannerite grade AN and drain cleaner. I'm done wasting my lab grade H2SO4 lol. I need it for better stuff.

I haven't done anything with energetic chem for ages and actually didn't want to go back but this thread is tempting me haha.

Happy synthesizing and testing fellas!

fdnjj6 - 7-8-2020 at 21:15

And I also suspect your first test did not go high order. 10 or 15 grams of my plasticized ETN was far more brisant. Granted it's a bit more but there was a lot of inerts in there too. I prefer plastics due to ease of molding around the detonator and safety. Damn I sure miss the days where I made explosives...

The spot I had for my detonations is no more though and I also didn't like the whole super illegal part of transporting explosives as well as having these things pop up on explosives tests or bomb sniffing dogs. Man...

DennyDevHE77 - 13-8-2023 at 23:34

Where do ETH synthesis recipes come from? I mean, for example, in Urbanski there is a three-parameter diagram of the areas of formation of PETN, according to which ideal proportions have long been drawn up for which the maximum yield is achieved with a minimum of reagents. And according to ETH, both on the forum and in various scientific articles, the quantities of reagents are taken as if at random. Hasn't a similar schedule been drawn up for ETH yet?

Etanol - 14-8-2023 at 01:27

And according to ETH, both on the forum and in various scientific articles, the quantities of reagents are taken as if at random. Hasn't a similar schedule been drawn up for ETH yet?

The chemical properties of ETN are similar to nitroglicerine or hexanitromannitole. It does not have stable sulfoesters, unlike PETN, judging by scientific articles. Therefore, the acid proportion are calculated with the same force (% H2O).

for example, in Urbanski there is a three-parameter diagram of the areas of formation of PETN, according to which ideal proportions have long been drawn up for which the maximum yield is achieved with a minimum of reagents.

The description of the diagram in Urbansky for PETN is incorrectly copied from the source. Do not look at her.

DennyDevHE77 - 14-8-2023 at 02:04

Quote: Originally posted by Etanol

And according to ETH, both on the forum and in various scientific articles, the quantities of reagents are taken as if at random. Hasn't a similar schedule been drawn up for ETH yet?

The description of the diagram in Urbansky for PETN is incorrectly copied from the source. Do not look at her.

Thank you Ethyl alcohol, I somehow knew this, but I never thought that the calculation should be different. In general, ETN forms really unstable sulfonic esters, which break down even with slightly warm water, not to mention boiling in hot isopropanol or acetone.

And what do you mean by Urbansky's scheme? I did not see any description there, only a brief explanation of the regions and that's it. But nevertheless, according to this scheme, they made a calculation for a sulfur-nitrogen mixture, with high yields. And an attempt to change the proportions leads either to the waste of extra reagents or to a decrease in the yield (and sometimes oxidation).

[Edited on 14-8-2023 by DennyDevHE77]

Etanol - 14-8-2023 at 02:54

And what do you mean by Urbansky's scheme? I did not see any description there, only a brief explanation of the regions and that's it. But nevertheless, according to this scheme, they made a calculation for a sulfur-nitrogen mixture, with high yields. And an attempt to change the proportions leads either to the waste of extra reagents or to a decrease in the yield (and sometimes oxidation).

The description of the regions in Urbansky has nothing to do with the experiment.

Region 4 is a region of oxidation and zero output.

Region 1 is a region of thermally unstable nitros mixtures, in which there is little sulfoesters, but the heating of the mixture is dangerous.

Region 3 is a region of high stable mixtures in which many sulfoephirs are formed, but they can be heated for converting sulfoesters into PETN with a high output.

Line CD and to the left - is a region where the reeterification changes the direction. Nitroesters turns into sulfoesters.

The region 2 is unknown.

[Edited on 14-8-2023 by Etanol]

DennyDevHE77 - 14-8-2023 at 08:49

It turns out that the very well-known ratios of pentaerythritol (for 70 65 and 58%) of nitric acid were already established taking into account these typos?

Etanol - 14-8-2023 at 09:16

It turns out that the very well-known ratios of pentaerythritol (for 70 65 and 58%) of nitric acid were already established taking into account these typos?

It seems yes.
I could not find an original article referred by Urbansky. Therefore, I put experimental points on this diagram.
All three well-known recipes (for 70 65 and 58% nitric acid) fall into the region of thermally unstable mixtures. However, at low temperature, they provide 80-90% outputs of a stabilized PETN and in region 90-95% HNO3 - over 90%.

ManyInterests - 28-10-2023 at 10:55

I'm giving my alleged 'ammonium nitrate' cold packs that I got a while ago a try to see if they actually are AN instead of CAN. Going to try to nitrate ETN your way.

ManyInterests - 3-2-2024 at 10:17

Wow, after almost four months, I finally decided to this, I got some ammonium nitrate synthesized correctly (and very pure) and I am doing using your proportions. 10g of sulfuric acid and 4g of ammonium nitrate to 1g of erythritol. So far I washing out my yield.

I will edit my post with the yield after it dries.

Edit: Bleh. Only 18.5g of crude ETN (albeit it is extremely white and looks very pure). I think it is because I put it in a solid block of ice when I first started. from a starting 10g of erythritol. While it is obviously not as high as I wished, it is the best I have gotten so far.

Next time I will not use an ice bath, but I will keep ice handy to control heating if needed.

[Edited on 4-2-2024 by ManyInterests]

ManyInterests - 4-2-2024 at 14:13

I did another one that is scaled up. 10 times the sample described here. It was the single most boring nitration I have done. Every other step is exactly as you described. Let me see what I get.

Sir_Gawain - 4-2-2024 at 20:39

In my experience with this preparation, it doesn’t seem to scale well for some reason. I recently switched to the nitric acid method because it’s so much easier to work with, and gets better yields.

ManyInterests - 7-2-2024 at 18:21

In my experience with this preparation, it doesn’t seem to scale well for some reason. I recently switched to the nitric acid method because it’s so much easier to work with, and gets better yields.

Oh yes! I just dried the crude ETN and out of 100g of erythritol, 400g of AN, and 1000g of H2SO4 my yield was a paltry 124g

This is really, really bad. I have no idea how I could have gotten that low a yield.

I want to try again. But not with 100g, just 50g of starting erythritol...

[Edited on 8-2-2024 by ManyInterests]

Sir_Gawain - 7-2-2024 at 19:36

I’ve had bad yields with as little as 20g erythritol. This reaction really doesn’t work well above 10g.

ManyInterests - 7-2-2024 at 20:07

I’ve had bad yields with as little as 20g erythritol. This reaction really doesn’t work well above 10g.

I believe you wholeheartedly now. I did have a problem with scaling up a lot of stuff. Like with potassium chlorate last summer, I made some major upscaling of production (I got a 4 liter container) and I somehow got 50% yields on the theortical. I guess the higher up you go, the harder it gets to get good yields.

I think it ceases to be a lab scale issue and more of a chemical engineering issue.

[Edited on 8-2-2024 by ManyInterests]

Sir_Gawain - 8-2-2024 at 05:22

I think this preparation could work if someone did a lot of experimenting to optimize it for a larger scale. It’s been adjusted to produce the best yield at a 10g erythritol scale.

ManyInterests - 8-2-2024 at 16:31

I think this preparation could work if someone did a lot of experimenting to optimize it for a larger scale. It’s been adjusted to produce the best yield at a 10g erythritol scale.

I will be doing some experimentation then. Right now I will repeat the same synthesis with the same level of reagents... but I will do something a little different. Instead of doing it in a beaker, I will do it in a glass loaf pan. It's thick, borosilicate, and will give a wider surface area.

I need to mention that when I moved my thermometer around in the thick sludge it was warmer in some areas than others, this is despite as much mixing as possible (it was so thick that the stirbar did little to move the whole thing. So I had to use my thermometer adapter to move the sludge around as much as possible) there were always temperature differences.

But I think the wider surface area might help to alleviate that. On top of that, what I will do is also let it nitrate for a longer time, maybe also let it get a little warmer once everything has stabilized.

Am I being an amateur as usual or am I onto something?

fx-991ex - 8-2-2024 at 16:54

I think some people doing bigger batches will treat with sulfuric acid first then add nitrate/nitric acid.

ManyInterests - 9-2-2024 at 14:21

I remember a thread before where someone put their erythritol in sulfuric acid first but got nothing. Wouldn't the acid destroy the erythritol?

Also I need to correct myself. My previous batch was still moist when I first measured it. It was not 18.5g. Now that it is completely dry, it is actually 15g. Which only adds to my disappointment that I was expecting 22g.

On a plus note, using a nitrate salt (ammonium nitrate in this case) is no different than using regular nitric acid, which makes it a cheaper process at least.

I will try to do a 50g nitration this way. Same proportions, but I will put the erythritol in the sulfuric acid first and after cooling it I will slowly add the ammonium nitrate.

Edit: I reviewed the video and I looked at the chart used. He did have a starting 120g and ended up with with a 228g yield. Proportions were the same, but the starting temperature was at 27C. But no mention of a max temperature

This could be a way to go... simply slowly (and carefully) at the erythritol and let things cool back down. That could work. He did that with impure ammonium nitrate. I am working with purer stuff.

[Edited on 9-2-2024 by ManyInterests]

Sir_Gawain - 9-2-2024 at 15:38

I tried adding the erythritol to sulfuric acid, then adding nitric acid, and got a horrible yield. Also, using a nitrate salt isn’t the same as nitric acid. The nitric acid method works far better, and is generally worth your time. You don’t need fuming nitric acid, 70% works great. Using nitric acid, I get 20g of ETN from 10g erythritol after recrystallization.

dettoo456 - 9-2-2024 at 18:34

Would you choose the azeo HNO3 even over NH4NO3? Industry (or at least BAE systems) seems to prefer the AN/H2SO4 method over mixed acid even. And AN is generally cheaper than azeo HNO3. Though, I can procure 55gal of 68% HNO3 for $700 from a US supplier, but I cannot find any supplier of NH4NO3 in bulk or semi bulk at a cheaper price (on a $/NO3 mole basis).

Sir_Gawain - 9-2-2024 at 18:44

Quote: Originally posted by dettoo456

Would you choose the azeo HNO3 even over NH4NO3?

Definitely. It’s much easier. The reaction mixture is much less viscous, and magnetic stirring works. I did the math, and it’s about the same price for me for both methods. I don’t mind distilling nitric acid though, and not everyone has a good distillation apparatus.

[Edited on 2-10-2024 by Sir_Gawain]

ManyInterests - 9-2-2024 at 19:17

In all honesty, azeotropic HNO3 is superior. I did all my previous ETN synthesis using 65 to 80% HNO3. My yields were never super good. I think my absolute best was getting around 85g from 50g starting erythritol (1.7g per 1g) which was great. I was never able to get 20 from 10g. I simply wanted to give NH4NO3 a chance at this. HNO3 is good because while the ETN nitration solution will turn milky white and will thicken, it will never become the sludge that it is in liquid HNO3. Stirring through it in the end was tough because it was like churning butter.

I am thinking of just one more attempt with this method. I got a borosilicate bowl that I intend to use as a nitration vessel. I will make a similarly large nitration like last time. If I get similarly poor yields. I won't bother with NH4NO3 for ETN anymore.

I am also thinking of simply not doing my intended PETN synthesis with NH4NO3. I will do it once or twice, but if I get yields like I am getting now, I will bite the bullet and simply make WFNA for it. It would be easier. I can make an abundance of NaNO3 very cheaply to make a lot of nitric acid to make the PETN I want using 90-99% HNO3.

Quote:

I tried adding the erythritol to sulfuric acid, then adding nitric acid, and got a horrible yield. Also, using a nitrate salt isn’t the same as nitric acid. The nitric acid method works far better, and is generally worth your time. You don’t need fuming nitric acid, 70% works great. Using nitric acid, I get 20g of ETN from 10g erythritol after recrystallization.

What are your proportions of 70% HNO3 and sulfuric acid (mine is from 95-98%) to what erythritol? I used 6ml of sulfuric acid, 4ml of nitric acid, to 1g of erythritol previously. Got that from Ballard's videos.

[Edited on 10-2-2024 by ManyInterests]

DennyDevHE77 - 10-2-2024 at 00:41

That's just the same PETN is more profitable to get on azeotrope. The costs of sulfuric acid there are small.

24 ml of sulfuric acid 34 nitric acid 65% and 10g of pentaerythritol give a stable yield of 90-92%.

93-99% nitric acid yields 95-98% of the pure product immediately, and not after cleaning, yes.

But azeotrope and sulfuric acid are bought, and nitric acid >90% must be distilled. It's at least a long time. This is justified for a lot of explosives, where it is simply impossible or unproductive to use azeotropic nitric acid. But this is clearly not a PETN.

ManyInterests - 13-2-2024 at 10:18

OK I believe I dried my crude ETN sufficiently to get a decent weighing. This time the result was much much better. I received 220.5g out of a starting 120g erythritol.

So this does give me reason to maybe experiment a little more with ammonium nitrate for for ETN, but not PETN.

Quote:

But azeotrope and sulfuric acid are bought, and nitric acid >90% must be distilled. It's at least a long time. This is justified for a lot of explosives, where it is simply impossible or unproductive to use azeotropic nitric acid. But this is clearly not a PETN.

I cannot buy any nitric acid, sadly. If I could buy azeotropic nitric acid as cheaply as I could buy drain opener grade sulfuric acid (which can be purified and concentrated further easily with some H2O2 and boiling), it would be a whole different thing for me, I wouldn't bother with this process, and making high concentration 90+% HNO3 would be even easier by just distilling it again with more sulfuric acid or magnesium nitrate.

But like I said, I gotta make most things from scratch.

pjig - 6-3-2024 at 08:44

Quick question on stabilization of the final product. As literature claims, ETN stores poorly. Even if the materials are washed and stabilized with nitrogen scavenger, how long can this material safely bee stored? I know it’s big brother PETN store's indefinitely once re-crystallized and purified. I guess if stored properly cool location could years be possible for ETN?

Sir_Gawain - 6-3-2024 at 08:54

I’ve never had problems with ETN stability. If properly neutralized and stabilized it will last years.

dettoo456 - 6-3-2024 at 09:02

Yes, recryst from slightly basic NH4OH or Urea sol, air dry, and add Diphenylamine, centralite, curcumin, or guaiacol. ETN PBXs will store even better.

ManyInterests - 6-3-2024 at 15:39

Quote: Originally posted by pjig

Quick question on stabilization of the final product. As literature claims, ETN stores poorly. Even if the materials are washed and stabilized with nitrogen scavenger, how long can this material safely bee stored? I know it’s big brother PETN store's indefinitely once re-crystallized and purified. I guess if stored properly cool location could years be possible for ETN?

ETN actually stores remarkably well. I would suggest two or three recrystalizations and add some urea to your dunk bucket. My suggestion is to use different solvents each time. ETN is soluble in acetone, methanol, and isopropyl alcohol. My suggestion is to recrystalize in acetone first, and then crystalize in methanol or isopropyl alcohol next. The reason for that is acetone gives a 'crunchy' texture to the ETN crystals while methanol and isopropyl give a much finer powder texture, which is safer to handle and use.

I will need to give a third recrystalization to my ETN down the line because I forgot to add urea to the dunk water! But even without that, two recrystalizations, along with the aggressive washing I did should have eliminated just about any acid residue. I still always want to be sure.

pjig - 6-3-2024 at 22:57

Excellent ideas. I like it, never heard of this method, but makes sense how you explained it. What amount of urea approximately are you using in your crash water ? What’s your vessel size for this (I assume ice crash bath in a glass bowl or large beaker.) Some have claimed better success with a wide surface area to crash…. Maybe a large cooking glass Pyrex? I’m sure it al depends on the starting materials volumes of course :cool:

ManyInterests - 11-3-2024 at 08:44

Quote: Originally posted by pjig

Excellent ideas. I like it, never heard of this method, but makes sense how you explained it. What amount of urea approximately are you using in your crash water ? What’s your vessel size for this (I assume ice crash bath in a glass bowl or large beaker.) Some have claimed better success with a wide surface area to crash…. Maybe a large cooking glass Pyrex? I’m sure it al depends on the starting materials volumes of course :cool:

you can use 0.3% by weight of urea in the water you are crashing it into. But I did see in Dugan Boomfax's video (it is on youtube) that he used a 5% urea solution for the crash.

For crashing I use a 2 gallon plastic (HDPE) mop bucket. It has a nice spout at the end to allow for easy pouring. I stir the water to make some nice whirlpool action before dumping the stuff in and stir the stuff before starting to filter. With acetone it will chunk up, but with methanol (and I assume isopropyl) it will be much more powdery.

pjig - 15-4-2024 at 07:18

Nice and simple… :cool:

Nowortimore - 29-4-2024 at 13:14

Regarding stabilizing ETN. Has anyone tried crashing out the initial mixed acid into a solution ox NOX scavenger (Urea for example)? Wouldn't it create many side products?

fx-991ex - 29-4-2024 at 13:33

Quote: Originally posted by Nowortimore

Regarding stabilizing ETN. Has anyone tried crashing out the initial mixed acid into a solution ox NOX scavenger (Urea for example)? Wouldn't it create many side products?

Urea nitrate?

Sir_Gawain - 29-4-2024 at 14:10

No, just urea. It absorbs nitrogen oxides and residual acid.

fx-991ex - 29-4-2024 at 15:00