Excellent post! Given such photos and 10 different geologists, you will get 10 different opinions
I’m surprised only one smells as they look like they are part of the same rock. Are they roughly cylindrical-they look like they could be broken
pieces of diamond drill core??
As others have stated the surfaces exposed are predominantly quartz, and the dusty material looks like limonite, a common yellow iron oxy-hydroxide
mineral. Being colloidal, it is easily deposited by meteoric/ground water along fractures therefore secondary (not formed insitu). The deep red
mineral in the quartz is more interesting. I suspect it is haematite and looks to be primary i.e. co-formed with the quartz viening under likely
hydrothermal conditions.
The quartz and the dusting hides the original rock type, but as others have pointed out there appears to be a clastic texture at two of the edges.
Could hint at being of sedimentary origin, or a breccia or just a bit of crud that has become cemented onto the original rock more recently.
Not much to go on, but to me, the light-grey colouration of the non quartz portion looks like clay alteration. Having worked in epithermal
mineralised systems, This rock looks consistent with forming in such an environment. However any system with a heat source and resulting hyrothermal
fluid generation e.g. magmatic or metamorphic, could form this occurrence.
The sulphurous smell could be due to marcasite, an unstable form of iron sulphide (same formula as pyrite FeS) that breaks down under moist oxidising
conditions. The acidic reaction product could react with other sulphides to form H2S?.
Therefore as always the context of where you found the rock is important! If it looks like it came from nearby, look at a local geological map. If
they were bought in by someone, they obvious thought it worth their while, and it could be ore. The presence of quartz veining, sulphides and
potential clay alteration would get many an exploration geologists excited!! |