Okay but why most syntheses in academic papers use ethanol:water ?
On the GHB Synthesis FAQ I read:
Quote: | The reaction is equimolar, and the reaction is driven to the right more readily in a dilute ethanol solution than in a plain aqueous
soln. |
and
Quote: | the method works for ethanol solutions as dilute as 40% |
This suggests that the reaction proceeds poorly in ethanol of concentration below 40%.
And then I read:
Quote: | When the pH comes down to 7, stop the heating. This normally occurs within an hour, probably after just half an hour. If the pH isn't down to 7 after
an hour of refluxing, adjust the pH to neutral with dilute HCl or conc. citric acid. |
I've read in several sources that optimal pH of Na-GHB solution is 7.5. The pH of course depends on butyrate concentration and acidity of the
water itself (e.g. dissolved CO2).
Now all this does not make any sense if pure Na-GHB is itself more basic. Adding acid will only produce lactone and an acid salt (unwanted
impurities).
Using molar excess of GBL would solve the problem of making crude solution, but I am not after Na-GHB solution, but a pure salt. I want to
write about preparation of Na-GHB powder in low tech setup, then about making solutions of it of exact concentrations (using scale and volumetric
flask) and measure density of Na-GHB for various concentrations to plot a curve. Any excess GBL present will of course skew the results - it has a
very high boiling point so it won't be possible to just "boil it out" (or do you think it will be carried off with water vapour?); needless to say
decomposition products appear in GBL at temperatures above 130 °C (at least from my observations).
[Edited on 8-5-2019 by nimgoldman] |