Was curious if using isostatic graphite as substrate would allow a good coat of LD to form from a more impure lead nitrate bath. An identical
isostatic graphite rod was plated excactly as posted 2 posts above, using same setup and conditions. First 8 hours of plating at 30-40 mA (3-4
mA/cm2), then 1.5 hours of plating at 600 mA (50 mA/cm2), and finally, 6 hours of plating at 60 mA (4 mA/cm2). Only differences were (1) that both
Cu(II) and Pb(II) concentrations were lower, (2) that the lead nitrate used in this bath was made from fishing weights and (3) the bath had been used
several times for previous plating runs. Very little nitrite was present at the start of the run though.
The result was a visibly good, 1mm thick, coating of lead dioxide. No pinholes or large imperfections. This is probably mainly a function of the
isoelectric and smooth surface properties of the isostatic graphite. Overall the coating seemed very porous though and consisted of small spherical
nodules and/or dendrites loosely held together. When a drop of water was placed on the anode, the water would slowly migrate as through filter paper.
The anode failed after 5 days of use at 2 A (200 mA/cm2) in the cell. The part of the anode above the surface of the electrolyte was completely
intact. The part immersed in the electrolyte completely powdered and eroded away. The LD on the intact part of the anode was extremely well adhered
and could not be separated from the graphite substrate without breaking parts out of the graphite substrate. The LD was recovered as large shards at
the bottom of the cell, without any graphite still attached to it. A cross section of the LD recovered seems to indicate that the porous nature of the
LD is not limited to the surface only, so overall this seems the most likely cause of failure.
Interesting what causes this effect...The lead nitrate produced from the fishing weights always produced these grainy textures, so it seems the purity
of the lead nitrate is very important for plating. From what I've read a nodular appearance could also be due to break down products of the detergent
used or maybe iron contamination. Just shows that even a visibly good coating of LD is no guarantee, it really needs to be dense and shiny.
[Edited on 27-6-2020 by nitro-genes] |