Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Is this an aromatic compound ?
red_heat_cat
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 16-10-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 01:57
Is this an aromatic compound ?


Is this compound an aromatic? I donĀ“t think so because there are 7 pi electrons in the ring. Is that right?

1.jpg - 46kB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 02:16


No, this is not an aromatic compound. It is not derived from a benzene ring (or a benzene ring with a C replaced by N).



The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Nerro
National Hazard
****




Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Whatever...

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 03:06


Neither is THF woelen but that's aromatic :)

This molecule is not aromatic simply because it has no space for the third pi bond, the p orbital that is directed perpendicular to the plain is already full, if it has been empty (if there had been a B there) the ring would have been aromatic.

[Edited on Mon/Oct/2006 by Nerro]




#261501 +(11351)- [X]

the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally

courtesy of bash
View user's profile View All Posts By User
garage chemist
chemical wizard
*****




Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 04:01


THF is not aromatic.

Perhaps you meant Furan, Nerro?

[Edited on 16-10-2006 by garage chemist]




www.versuchschemie.de
Das aktivste deutsche Chemieforum!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nerro
National Hazard
****




Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Whatever...

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 04:55


yes I did. (5 ring with 4 carbons and 1 nitrogen. between the carbons there are two double bonds.)



#261501 +(11351)- [X]

the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally

courtesy of bash
View user's profile View All Posts By User
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 06:43


Nerro, I indeed should have been more clear in my answer. I was referring to the benzene ring because of the six-membered ring in the molecule, presented by red_heat_cat.

But aromaticity is a more general concept, e.g. the ion C5H5(-) also is aromatic, while it is not a six-membered ring. No classical model of this ion can be written, 5 electrons are delocalized over the 5 C-atoms.




The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Nerro
National Hazard
****




Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Whatever...

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 07:01


not true, the ring has 4 + 2 electrons in its ring which complies with the rule.

C5H5- is a lot like pyrrole really, only nitrogen has a lone pair naturally while carbon only has it when its an anion.



[Edited on Mon/Oct/2006 by Nerro]

[Edited on Mon/Oct/2006 by Nerro]




#261501 +(11351)- [X]

the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally

courtesy of bash
View user's profile View All Posts By User
solo
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3975
Registered: 9-12-2002
Location: Estados Unidos de La Republica Mexicana
Member Is Offline

Mood: ....getting old and drowning in a sea of knowledge

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 07:29


Reference Information



Introductory Organic and Biochemistry -What does "aromatic" really mean?



http://www.geocities.com/athens/thebes/5118/obc/arom.htm




It's better to die on your feet, than live on your knees....Emiliano Zapata.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 09:18


Solo, thanks for that nice link. I again learnt something new and this is quite an interesting thing to learn and helps me understand things.



The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Pyrovus
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 241
Registered: 13-10-2003
Location: Australia, now with 25% faster carrier pigeons
Member Is Offline

Mood: heretical

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 16:26


That compound is aromatic. By redrawing it like this it should become apparent. Hopefully this image displays properly:




[Edited on 17-10-2006 by Pyrovus]

aromatic.gif - 2kB




Never accept that which can be changed.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
*****




Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: crystalline

[*] posted on 16-10-2006 at 16:39


Thanks for clarifying this Pyrovus. Precisely my thinking. This should make a nicely reactive species. The NO2 group acts as an electron acceptor (similar to picric acid) making this species more stable. Remember, styrene is also reactive, not only for polymerisation but also to form the seperate charge species which are stabilised by resonance/pibonding.

Thought first this might be for 'Beginnings' but due to the discussion it'd might be just right here in org chem :)




Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnWW
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-10-2006 at 17:17


Separation of charges, in this instance to form a combined quaternary oxy-ammonium salt (two benzenoid resonance structures) and aliphatic carbanion, takes a fair amnount of energy. To contribute to the overall structure, the overall gain in stability through this would have to be significant compared to the other non-aromatic resonance structure shown at the start of this thread.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nerro
National Hazard
****




Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Whatever...

[*] posted on 22-10-2006 at 00:59


Quote:
Originally posted by JohnWW
Separation of charges, in this instance to form a combined quaternary oxy-ammonium salt (two benzenoid resonance structures) and aliphatic carbanion, takes a fair amnount of energy. To contribute to the overall structure, the overall gain in stability through this would have to be significant compared to the other non-aromatic resonance structure shown at the start of this thread.
precisely my thinking.



#261501 +(11351)- [X]

the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally

courtesy of bash
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top