Sciencemadness Discussion Board

A science/chemistry show

Jylliana - 15-12-2014 at 01:36

Greetings fellow forum members :)

For my work and to attract new student to our school, I get to perform a chemistry show 4 times in one day. I know there are tons of good reactions and things to show for such a thing, almost too many to choose from, but I was wondering what you guys would really like for a crowd of 30 12-year-olds and their parents. Keep in mind that my audience usually has no to very little knowledge about chemistry, so the reactions need to be visual and kind of exciting/spectacular.
I don't want just explosions and fire and so on, I partly want to show that chemistry is more than blowing everything up.

What I've come up with so far:

- Letting conc. sulfuric acid burn a hole through a filter paper
- Hitting a tiny(safe) amount of Armstrong's Mix(red P with KClO4 - EDIT: KClO3) with a hammer(any sugesstions about what amount I could use?)
- Conc. sulfuric acid and sugar
- Cremating a gummybear with molten KClO4 - EDIT: KClO3
- Cobalt or manganese chameleon
- Nitric Acid and copper
- Oscillating/clock reaction
- Formation of lead(II) iodide from two colourless liquids(potassium iodide and and lead(II) nitrate).
- Showing why you should not try to put out an (frying) oil fire with water.
- pH indicators in nature(spraying a flower with ammonia solution, Hydrangeaceae/Hortensia maybe?).
- Making 'fireflies' with ammonium dichromate and conc. ammonia(maybe, still debating whether this may be too hazardous).
- Milk and cola(makes the fosfates in cola precipitate out)
- Creating ammonium chloride clouds by putting a beaker with conc. hydrochloric acid and conc. ammonia next to eachother).
- Fluorescein in UV-light.

Any more suggestions? Ideas on how to 'bring the message' to my audience?
I have to fill roughly 45minutes with the show.






[Edited on 15-12-2014 by Jylliana]

[Edited on 15-12-2014 by Jylliana]

[Edited on 15-12-2014 by Jylliana]

woelen - 15-12-2014 at 02:32

I have written some pages on doing experiment with children. I have done these experiments with them and let some of these experiments do themselves.

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/child/index_...
http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/child/index2...

These pages are in dutch (they are made for children, hence my choice to write them in dutch). For Jylliana this shoud be no problem. For all other members, a somewhat stripped down version of these two pages is available in english.

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/child/index....

My favorite from these pages is the red cabbage experiment.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In your list of experiments I see two errors. Red phosphorus with KClO4 does not form Armstrongs mix and you will have a hard time getting that mix ignited with a hammer. You need a very heavy hammer and need to give a hard blow, not something you want to do inside.

You need KClO3 instead. When you use that, then the mix is INSANELY sensitive. You do not need a hammer, just using a little stick, or a glass rod and gently tapping the mix is enough to ignite it. Have a look at this webpage:

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/raw_material...

BE VERY CAREFUL WITH THIS, USE THE SMALL AMOUNTS AS SHOWN IN THE WEBPAGE, NOT MORE!! Try this experiment yourself before doing it in front of an audience!


Another error I see in your list is the use of KClO4 with the gummy bear. Again, KClO4 will not work and is not sufficiently reactive to give a good result. You need to use KClO3 instead of KClO4. However, I advice against the KClO3/gummy bear experiment. KClO3 can, if overheated or if somewhat impure, decompose very violently, spraying around molten KClO3 and oxygen and I myself never took the risk of doing experiments with this in a test tube. What if the test tube with molten KClO3 breaks?? The experiment with the red P, as shown above, also is very nice and is a lot safer, because of the very small amounts used.

If you want another replacement demo for the gummy bear, then try this one:

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/chlorine_fla...

The kids will love it. Do this in a fume hood, because of the Cl2. Do not prepare the Cl2 with an open container of red P nearby and also keep the prepared mix away from the Cl2! Do not store the prepared mix for more than a few hours, make it just before your show and set it aside for immediate use in your show.

[Edited on 15-12-14 by woelen]

Oscilllator - 15-12-2014 at 02:32

The elephant toothpaste is an oldie but a goodie - be sure to use a high concentration of H2O2 though and a narrow necked flask (volumetric is ideal) if you want the foam to spout up into the air. For a really good reaction, you may even want to warm up the peroxide first.

Generally though, you want to be doing large experiments - colour changes in a test tube just aren't going to hold a 12 year old's attention. This means that I think you can rule out nitric acid and copper, as well as sulfuric acid burning a paper towel.
However spraying a flower with ammonia solution sounds great, as does big clouds of NH4Cl. They might even get a whiff of ammonia if you do that, a real introduction into chemistry! The oil + water fireball could be spectacular however you can't do this inside, and doing it outside can be ruled out if there is much of a breeze, as the students could get covered in horrible greasy stuff.

One other thing that I have found to be particularly impressive is to ignite nitrocellulose on someones hand. You could get someone up from the audience and ignite it on their hand, I'm sure that would get a good reaction. If you can't make nitrocellulose though, a good substitute is to use an unlit propane lamp to blow bubbles on someones soapy hand, then ignite them.

And lastly, don't forget to try all the experiments before you show them to the children! The elephant toothpaste especially can be a flop unless it's prepared correctly.

j_sum1 - 15-12-2014 at 02:32

Making NO2 is always good. Capturing the gas in two test tubes and putting one in ice and the other in warm water shows the NO2 / N2O4 equilibrium.
Also BaOH with NH4Cl solids stirred together in a beaker. You can stir with a temp probe and if you do it in a puddle of water on a block of wood you get the beaker frozen to the wood.

both ideas and many more from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti_E2ZKZpC4&
(Hope I got the link right using my phone. Search for "Chemical curiosities" if that doesn't work.)

I have a demo where water is electrlysed. Two electrodes inserted through the top of a coke bottle cap. A tube collects the gases. If you blow detergent bubbles in a water bath you get a very satisfying bang. [Edit- when ignited. Don'let too much foam build up. It can be a bit percussive on the ears. A set of ear muffs is a good idea for the person igniting it. This can be a student.]

Pure H2 can also make a nice detergent foam that burns quite safely on wet hands.

Hot copper held over a conc ammonia solution catalyses the reaction with O2 to form N2 and H2O. This is quite exothermic and is enough to melt the copper.

On the subject of copper and ammonia, that complex is too good to miss out.

Flame tests are always good. You can get some pretty colours burning in petri dishes in a darkened room.

Blowing flour or cornstarch into a bunsen flame really shows the effect of surace area. Fit a tube onto a funnel, fill with flour and blow.

Iodine and aluminium is a dramatic classic. Lots of purple vapour. Bromine Aluminium is good too. Depending on your budget.

Calcium carbide (1 gram) dropped into a 500ml conical flask half-filled with water produces a nice amount of acetylene. Let the gas build up for a while and touch the mouth with a lighted splint. Lovely whoosh sound and a room full of floating soot particles. Usually you are left with a flame dancing on top of the flask.

There's a couple of ideas.

[Edit. In the time it took me to write that there are a bunch of other great ideas.]

[Edited on 15-12-2014 by j_sum1]

diddi - 15-12-2014 at 02:49

and I have used liquid nitrogen with great effect with that age group. eg frozen flower/rubber tube/ball etc. cooling inflated balloon and it warms to reinflate again. splashing it on the floor.

the KI / PbNO3 reaction will also occur in solid phase. so carefully layer one on top of the other. shake and it changes colour.

confused - 15-12-2014 at 08:14

any hands on experiments/demonstrations more along the lines of fluorescence/bioluminescence?

Jylliana - 15-12-2014 at 08:25

I just made fluorescein today. Tomorrow i'm going to try to write something with it and make it appear with my blacklight. If that doesn't work I'll just show it in a large beaker.
Bioluminescence is something i've never looked into. I'm open to suggestions.

Thanks for all the advice. I corrected the mistakes in my OP. I will definitely include a few demonstrations you have suggested.
I don't have acces to liquid nitrogen :(



[Edited on 15-12-2014 by Jylliana]

gdflp - 15-12-2014 at 09:21

The blue bottle demonstration is an interesting one, and it can easily be scaled up so that it's visible to a large crowd.

gardul - 15-12-2014 at 11:19

" barking dog" experiment is an oldie but fun one.

4 NO + CS2 → 2 N2 + CO2 + SO2 + 1/8 S8

Or the simpler version you could use 70% to 91% alcohol.

Could even use colorants like copper or boric acid.

Could even do multiple different % of alcohol to sure different rates of combustion.

MrHomeScientist - 15-12-2014 at 12:11

This is a great opportunity! I do science outreach for my job actually - we bring a science stage show to local elementary schools to show them cool stuff in chemistry, electricity, and physics. Your age group is just slightly older than ours, so our lineup would still be great for your event. Our show is also 45 minutes long. The chemistry experiments I do are:

- Chemical traffic light (a variation on the blue bottle)
- Elephant toothpaste (everyone's favorite)
- Glow stick reaction
- Sulfur hexafluoride's effect on the voice
- Barking Dog reaction

These make up about half the show. Let me know if you have any questions on these and I can send you detailed preparation and demonstration procedures.

Important points for such an event:
- The key for this age group is to keep it simple, flashy, and big.
- Keep in mind that, depending on how your room is set up, kids may excitedly run up to your table after the demos. For me, this rules out anything overly hazardous that they may pick up or knock over.
- Make sure your demo is easily visible to someone in the back of the room.
- Have an explanation ready that is simple enough for your audience to get the gist of.
- Your venue determines the experiments you can do. Small classroom (small demos ok) or large auditorium/cafeteria (small demos bad)? What sort of ventilation? Do you have a stage to physically separate you from your audience? Outdoors or indoors? If anything must be done outdoors, weather may affect or cancel your demos.
- Do your demos need the lights off? Do you have a helper that can control the lights for you?
- Be sure to have safety equipment and highlight its importance to the kids - goggles, gloves, lab coat. Also have a fire extinguisher for fires and any neutralization materials for spill control (baking soda for acids, vinegar for bases, etc.).

The main goal of our program is to get them interested in science by showing them cool stuff, so they will go back to their classroom and ask the teacher for more science. A link to our website: www.sciencebrothers.org


Some constructive criticism on your ideas:

- Letting conc. sulfuric acid burn a hole through a filter paper
>> Cool, but very small scale that will be hard to see from far away.

- Hitting a tiny(safe) amount of Armstrong's Mix(red P with KClO4 - EDIT: KClO3) with a hammer(any sugesstions about what amount I could use?)
>>A little unpredictable for my taste, but I don't have experience with this mix.

- Conc. sulfuric acid and sugar
>>Very cool, but produces a lot of steam and could spatter concentrated acid around. I wouldn't do this indoors.

- Cremating a gummybear with molten KClO4 - EDIT: KClO3
>>This is a big hit. Also produces lots of smoke and steam - must be done outside.

- Cobalt or manganese chameleon
>>Haven't actually heard of this one.

- Nitric Acid and copper
>>NOx fumes mean this must be done outside. Also this is likely too small scale.

- Oscillating/clock reaction
>>Great demo but tough to explain to kids. Also produces iodine vapor near the end which must be dealt with.

- Formation of lead(II) iodide from two colourless liquids(potassium iodide and and lead(II) nitrate).
>>Definite winner! High visibility and easy to explain. Be sure to quickly cap and hide away the toxic lead solution in case kids run up to your table.

- Showing why you should not try to put out an (frying) oil fire with water.
>>Sounds terribly dangerous with young kids around. Obviously this is an outside-only demo.

- pH indicators in nature(spraying a flower with ammonia solution, Hydrangeaceae/Hortensia maybe?).
>>Is the color change instantaneous? I thought this was more a slow change based on pH of the soil.

- Making 'fireflies' with ammonium dichromate and conc. ammonia(maybe, still debating whether this may be too hazardous).
>>Conc. ammonia fumes would be my only concern. These can fill up a room pretty quick.

- Milk and cola(makes the fosfates in cola precipitate out)
>>Great! Quick, easy to explain, and is something they can try at home.

- Creating ammonium chloride clouds by putting a beaker with conc. hydrochloric acid and conc. ammonia next to eachother).
>>Good as long as fumes are controlled and the lighting is right. They need to be able to see the wisps of smoke from the back of the room. Black backdrop and a spotlight would be a good idea.

- Fluorescein in UV-light.
>>Great! High visibility and another one they can try at home.



To highlight the importance of proper ventilation, I have an anecdote. We used to do the standard barking dog gardul mentions, but as you can see it produces SO2 as a product. This would almost always give the presenters headaches, since we are right next to it. At one show, these fumes wafted out into the audience and there were lots of coughing kids. I put a stop to that demo after that experience, until I could make it safer. We now use a little boric acid dissolved in methanol instead of CS2, which produces almost no fumes. Far safer for the audience, and much easier to clean the tube out afterward (no sulfur)!

Praxichys - 15-12-2014 at 12:56

Burn some steel wool in air using a battery. You can walk around and show it burning on a metal pan, and how it intensifies when waved gently through the air. Do it again inside an inverted glass aquarium filled with pure oxygen. There will be a brief and intensely white flame.

Burning magnesium ribbon is also neat, but do so behind an opaque screen, holding it up briefly for everyone to see. Be aware that this produces a good amount of MgO smoke and may not be suitable for small indoor rooms.

Nitrocellulose also makes a great demo. Burn sheets of well-nitrated tissue, string, or cotton wool, showing how your hand remains untouched. A cannon can be made from a steel plate and pipe, and will shoot a ping-pong ball violently with a standard size (~25mm) nitrated cotton ball as fuel and a bit of nitrated cotton string as a fast fuse. the ping pong ball loses velocity rapidly in air, so as long as you have about 10m to the nearest object, the ball will bounce harmlessly off the far wall. (Across the stage, NOT at the audience!)

There is the standard hydrogen balloon experiment. Make sure the ceiling is high enough, and that there are no fire sprinklers in the vicinity.

As an extension of the methanol "whoosh bottle" experiment, you can shoot plastic beverage bottles across the room with a bang if you make a launcher for them.


diddi - 15-12-2014 at 13:43

how about you make nylon? its easy to draw into a thread, which is the same material half the kids clothing is made from.
nitric acid and ethanol makes an interesting time delayed reaction producing copious amounts of NO2 (outdoors)

Jylliana - 15-12-2014 at 23:11

Quote: Originally posted by MrHomeScientist  
This is a great opportunity! I do science outreach for my job actually - we bring a science stage show to local elementary schools to show them cool stuff in chemistry, electricity, and physics. Your age group is just slightly older than ours, so our lineup would still be great for your event. Our show is also 45 minutes long. The chemistry experiments I do are:

- Chemical traffic light (a variation on the blue bottle)
- Elephant toothpaste (everyone's favorite)
And terribly messy. Not a problem for once, but 4 times a day is something to be taken into consideration.

- Glow stick reaction.
Good one. I'm not sure if I have the right chemicals for it, but I'll keep it in mind.
- Sulfur hexafluoride's effect on the voice
I don't have SF6, unfortunately. Otherwise I would've done it :)
- Barking Dog reaction
See below.

These make up about half the show. Let me know if you have any questions on these and I can send you detailed preparation and demonstration procedures.

Important points for such an event:
- The key for this age group is to keep it simple, flashy, and big.
- Keep in mind that, depending on how your room is set up, kids may excitedly run up to your table after the demos. For me, this rules out anything overly hazardous that they may pick up or knock over.
- Make sure your demo is easily visible to someone in the back of the room.
- Have an explanation ready that is simple enough for your audience to get the gist of.
- Your venue determines the experiments you can do. Small classroom (small demos ok) or large auditorium/cafeteria (small demos bad)? What sort of ventilation? Do you have a stage to physically separate you from your audience? Outdoors or indoors? If anything must be done outdoors, weather may affect or cancel your demos.
- Do your demos need the lights off? Do you have a helper that can control the lights for you?
- Be sure to have safety equipment and highlight its importance to the kids - goggles, gloves, lab coat. Also have a fire extinguisher for fires and any neutralization materials for spill control (baking soda for acids, vinegar for bases, etc.).

The main goal of our program is to get them interested in science by showing them cool stuff, so they will go back to their classroom and ask the teacher for more science. A link to our website: www.sciencebrothers.org
Thanks for the advice :) the classroom is of average size. Wider than it is deep. The ceiling is about 3m high and the space is roughly 10m wide and 8m deep. I'll think of spill control solutions. I didn't intend for the kids to actively participate in the show. I expect it to be more of a watch-only thing.


Some constructive criticism on your ideas:

- Letting conc. sulfuric acid burn a hole through a filter paper
>> Cool, but very small scale that will be hard to see from far away.

- Hitting a tiny(safe) amount of Armstrong's Mix(red P with KClO4 - EDIT: KClO3) with a hammer(any sugesstions about what amount I could use?)
>>A little unpredictable for my taste, but I don't have experience with this mix.
It's something I would love to try, especially the way someone showed me made an impression I won't forget for a while.

- Conc. sulfuric acid and sugar
>>Very cool, but produces a lot of steam and could spatter concentrated acid around. I wouldn't do this indoors.
Fumehood. I have a lot of space and a great working fumehood. I'll close the 'window' right after the H2SO4 is added.

- Cremating a gummybear with molten KClO4 - EDIT: KClO3
>>This is a big hit. Also produces lots of smoke and steam - must be done outside.
Fumehood + closed window as a safety shield.
- Cobalt or manganese chameleon
>>Haven't actually heard of this one.

- Nitric Acid and copper
>>NOx fumes mean this must be done outside. Also this is likely too small scale.
A 1liter beaker in a fumehood schould do the trick. I've done that before and the scale was good.

- Oscillating/clock reaction
>>Great demo but tough to explain to kids. Also produces iodine vapor near the end which must be dealt with.
Good point. Am going to think about this one.

- Formation of lead(II) iodide from two colourless liquids(potassium iodide and and lead(II) nitrate).
>>Definite winner! High visibility and easy to explain. Be sure to quickly cap and hide away the toxic lead solution in case kids run up to your table.
I don't expect they will, but I'll keep it in mind.

- Showing why you should not try to put out an (frying) oil fire with water.
>>Sounds terribly dangerous with young kids around. Obviously this is an outside-only demo.
Fumehood. Have done this one before on imo safe scale. There is a hazard, but not that much and I'll keep a special fire exinguisher close by.

- pH indicators in nature(spraying a flower with ammonia solution, Hydrangeaceae/Hortensia maybe?).
>>Is the color change instantaneous? I thought this was more a slow change based on pH of the soil.
This one I've never tried myself, but Steve Spangler on Youtube once showed an instant colour change on a flower. Unfortunately can't find the video anymore. It wasn't the one where he first dipped the flower in phenolphtalien.

- Making 'fireflies' with ammonium dichromate and conc. ammonia(maybe, still debating whether this may be too hazardous).
>>Conc. ammonia fumes would be my only concern. These can fill up a room pretty quick.
The carcinogenity of the hexavalent chromium is my biggest concern. Especially because the demo itself can be quite messy and if you're not careful you'll cover you fumehood with Cr(VI).

- Milk and cola(makes the fosfates in cola precipitate out)
>>Great! Quick, easy to explain, and is something they can try at home.

- Creating ammonium chloride clouds by putting a beaker with conc. hydrochloric acid and conc. ammonia next to eachother).
>>Good as long as fumes are controlled and the lighting is right. They need to be able to see the wisps of smoke from the back of the room. Black backdrop and a spotlight would be a good idea.
Doing this in a closed environment. A glass bell to be precise.

- Fluorescein in UV-light.
>>Great! High visibility and another one they can try at home.



To highlight the importance of proper ventilation, I have an anecdote. We used to do the standard barking dog gardul mentions, but as you can see it produces SO2 as a product. This would almost always give the presenters headaches, since we are right next to it. At one show, these fumes wafted out into the audience and there were lots of coughing kids. I put a stop to that demo after that experience, until I could make it safer. We now use a little boric acid dissolved in methanol instead of CS2, which produces almost no fumes. Far safer for the audience, and much easier to clean the tube out afterward (no sulfur)!
I don't have CS2 on hand, so it'll be done with methanol or ethanol. Probably with boric acid for the colour.


I just saw your show promo! Amazing! You're using a very different approach than I intended.
This is where I got my inspiration from. One of my former teachers and an awesome role model :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha61ApJMiTk
I made the video myself, so it's not so 'promo-y' as yours. It's just to give you an impression ;).






[Edited on 16-12-2014 by Jylliana]

Jylliana - 15-12-2014 at 23:17

Thanks everyone for all the good advice and suggestions. I think I can make a nice 'show script' with it. Also it's nice to read about safety precautions or ways to show stuff to my audience in a way I hadn't thought of myself, yet.

:D

j_sum1 - 16-12-2014 at 00:08

If you haven't done so already, the chemical curiosities video I linked to is worth a look. The audience looked to be 8-12 year olds with parents. The script was great although probably pitched slightly high for the audience. I learned a lot from it particularly about presenting. There were a lot of good demos. You really see the value of an assistant and if you don't have one and are doing four shows a day you will want to consider practicalities. Reusable set ups and ease of cleaning will be vital. Also consider disposable containers etc.

Let us know how it goes.

Jylliana - 16-12-2014 at 00:13

I watched the entire show, JSum. It was cool and I wrote down some of the demonstration that man did. It was a bit too much explanation for me and it was definitely designed to actually teach the kids something. Although learning things can be great, what I intend is more to show the chemistry and make them want to learn about it later at our school. Getting them excited about the subject.

[Edited on 16-12-2014 by Jylliana]

diddi - 16-12-2014 at 04:35

I just watched the whole show too. I see that he did a nylon demo. :)

MrHomeScientist - 16-12-2014 at 07:27

Thanks, Jylliana! It's lots of fun. Those videos are a bit old and we should probably update them - our 'stage presence' is much better now and we have a new gigantic (~3 ft) tesla coil that plays music.

Since you're doing this in a science classroom, that makes things a lot easier. We have to restrict what we do because we travel, and never know where they'll have us set up. Access to a fume hood removes a lot of my concerns about the demos you want to do. Definitely do the gummy bear experiment! I always tell the kids that this is what happens in your stomach if you eat too much candy :)

The way I do elephant toothpaste is to put the peroxide in a tall 500mL plastic graduated cylinder, and put this in a wide, shallow Rubbermaid container to catch the foam. Adding the KI solution causes the foam to shoot straight up a couple feet, then fall back down into the plastic tub (usually). Makes cleanup pretty simple, if you have an assistant! Our formula is 125mL 35% H2O2 plus some liquid dish soap in the cylinder and ~13g KI dissolved in ~12mL H2O in a small beaker.

The old science show that we modeled ours on used to buy lots of regular glow sticks from the party supply store and carefully cut them open to gather the two liquids inside. They'd pour these into separate containers and combine during the show. Really tedious and time consuming, but it's an idea for you. We buy our chemicals direct from the manufacturer now.

Have someone take pictures or video!

Jylliana - 4-2-2015 at 09:58

I did my show today and it went great! Video to come!

gardul - 4-2-2015 at 23:32

Can't wait to see it. :D

Jylliana - 5-2-2015 at 00:41

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92RydZDDe_8
Video, with english subtitles :)


...funny that the show didn't end up with a single one of the ideas I opened this topic with :P

...also I had to cut it down to 15 minutes. The organizer thought 45 minutes was far too long.. :(

[Edited on 5-2-2015 by Jylliana]

Shivachemist - 5-2-2015 at 00:59

A good one Jylliana, thanks for sharing with us.

Brain&Force - 5-2-2015 at 11:26

Nice video!

I work with a campus group, SPARK, which is part of the ACS Student Affiliates.

Our show is organized as follows:

A play with a mad scientist, chemical superhero, and a confused principal who knows absolutely nothing about chemistry (I played the mad scientist last time because I have the best evil laugh :D) It has plenty of demos and audience participation.

Then we have demo tables that show different concepts in chemistry. At our last show we had pH, polymer formation, and supersaturation with sodium acetate.

We're going to be doing a show for 500-1000 kids in March, which we need to figure out how to organize.

Also, there will be a show tomorrow (I get to play the mad scientist again!) and one next week. The one next week may be structured more like Jylliana's show, as we're going to have the same type of audience.

Morgan - 7-12-2015 at 13:06

Yesterday I was misting some methanol into a gallon glass jug and lighting it to see what kind of whoosh it would make. It was a gallon jug such as this and I was using a finger pump sprayer on the mist setting. It makes a pretty good whoosh.
http://www.uline.com/Product/Detail/S-18034/Jugs/Glass-Jugs-...
After that I decided to get out my platinum on alumina powder 1%. What happened next was quite impressive. I took the smallest amount of the talc-like gray powder and placed it on a small piece of aluminum foil. Then I sprinkled the dust into the top of the methanol vapored jug. For two or three seconds the particles floated down and into the jug glowing like a dozen or so red hot fireflies, seemingly weightless and twinkling in a most mesmerizing fashion. It reminded me of carbon particles burning. And then it happened, the most terrific bang occurred blasting the tiny piece of foil from my fingers like a bomb went off. Luckily the bottle didn't rupture but it was really impressive. It makes a big difference I guess if you light the jug from the inside instead of at the opening and maybe multiple ignitions points played a part as well. It was so sudden and deafeningly loud, from disarming fireflies to a flat out bomb. Not a hint of a rev up or pressure wave forming.

Keith Fletcher - 7-12-2015 at 13:30

when you demonstrate something to people a bang and ringing ears sticks in peoples minds and could spur them into a chemistry career. You will all crucify this but make 100mg of HMTD and show them how powerful chemistry really is. I'm 18 and HMTD made me interested in chemistry when I was 13, so I suspect it will work for others. Decomposition is a important reaction. if this is dumb just ignore it.

Deathunter88 - 7-12-2015 at 16:25

Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
Yesterday I was misting some methanol into a gallon glass jug and lighting it to see what kind of whoosh it would make. It was a gallon jug such as this and I was using a finger pump sprayer on the mist setting. It makes a pretty good whoosh.
http://www.uline.com/Product/Detail/S-18034/Jugs/Glass-Jugs-...
After that I decided to get out my platinum on alumina powder 1%. What happened next was quite impressive. I took the smallest amount of the talc-like gray powder and placed it on a small piece of aluminum foil. Then I sprinkled the dust into the top of the methanol vapored jug. For two or three seconds the particles floated down and into the jug glowing like a dozen or so red hot fireflies, seemingly weightless and twinkling in a most mesmerizing fashion. It reminded me of carbon particles burning. And then it happened, the most terrific bang occurred blasting the tiny piece of foil from my fingers like a bomb went off. Luckily the bottle didn't rupture but it was really impressive. It makes a big difference I guess if you light the jug from the inside instead of at the opening and maybe multiple ignitions points played a part as well. It was so sudden and deafeningly loud, from disarming fireflies to a flat out bomb. Not a hint of a rev up or pressure wave forming.


Please don't use a glass vessel when doing the whoosh bottle, there is a high risk of explosion from the pressure and the sudden heat change. Also, the loud bang might had just been because you did not add enough methanol into the bottle. If the oxygen concentration inside is too high, you will get a bang no matter if you added the platinum/alumina or not. <-just a theory form personal experience

Morgan - 8-12-2015 at 06:06

Quote: Originally posted by Deathunter88  
Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
Yesterday I was misting some methanol into a gallon glass jug and lighting it to see what kind of whoosh it would make. It was a gallon jug such as this and I was using a finger pump sprayer on the mist setting. It makes a pretty good whoosh.
http://www.uline.com/Product/Detail/S-18034/Jugs/Glass-Jugs-...
After that I decided to get out my platinum on alumina powder 1%. What happened next was quite impressive. I took the smallest amount of the talc-like gray powder and placed it on a small piece of aluminum foil. Then I sprinkled the dust into the top of the methanol vapored jug. For two or three seconds the particles floated down and into the jug glowing like a dozen or so red hot fireflies, seemingly weightless and twinkling in a most mesmerizing fashion. It reminded me of carbon particles burning. And then it happened, the most terrific bang occurred blasting the tiny piece of foil from my fingers like a bomb went off. Luckily the bottle didn't rupture but it was really impressive. It makes a big difference I guess if you light the jug from the inside instead of at the opening and maybe multiple ignitions points played a part as well. It was so sudden and deafeningly loud, from disarming fireflies to a flat out bomb. Not a hint of a rev up or pressure wave forming.


Please don't use a glass vessel when doing the whoosh bottle, there is a high risk of explosion from the pressure and the sudden heat change. Also, the loud bang might had just been because you did not add enough methanol into the bottle. If the oxygen concentration inside is too high, you will get a bang no matter if you added the platinum/alumina or not. <-just a theory form personal experience


I've seen a few glass bottles explode and plastic ones as well but never one that "exploded" but still held together like the smallish gallon jug I used. While I can't say for certain, it seems that even if I got a perfect methanol fuel/air ratio in the gallon jug, that it wouldn't go bang if I lit it from the top and the glass didn't fatigue. There may be some influence of having the opening blocked by cold, dense air and ignition from the interior as opposed to lighting the jug from the neck where initially there is less confinement.
The other day I was thinking about trying some methanol barking dog experiements where the flame front is initiated/sparked from various points inside the tube instead of at the traditional exhaust end to see what would happen or what the proclivity is.

One site, Flinnscientific even goes so far to say never to use methanol. And plastic bottles should only be used a certain number of times. I agree glass is not the best thing to be using.
Danger Will Robinson!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLB_oVPaW10#t=1m10s

I liked this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnHL_UlbUaI
Others
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYj0U9AMBZc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7HzLO4eags

[Edited on 8-12-2015 by Morgan]

Morgan - 27-4-2016 at 14:24

I came across this application of the ammonia/hydrochloric acid smoke reaction that was put to good use.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95mCNQnyiBk

Morgan - 21-7-2016 at 17:40

I had seen this demonstration before in several forms.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5EWVXrW28o#t=3m55s
But this one really buzzes before the big bang.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snIv6uSeodU

[Edited on 22-7-2016 by Morgan]

Morgan - 24-7-2016 at 09:22

Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
I had seen this demonstration before in several forms.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5EWVXrW28o#t=3m55s
But this one really buzzes before the big bang.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snIv6uSeodU

The previous clip with the buzzing hydrogen bomb reminded me of a foot long valved pulsejet I made using a washer and some .003ths blue tempered spring steel for a single petal valve that covered the hole of the washer. I sanded the washer to a mirror smooth finish and the petal valve was perfectly centered and sanded too to removed any burrs. I held the petal valve on with a tiny screw and nut. I'd prime the engine with methanol, coating the insides with a squirt or two and one in the intake for good measure, but careful to not wet the reed too much. I then would light the tail end. A curious thing happened, the flame front WOULDN'T instantly advance down the 1/4 inch plumbing pipe exhaust tube of the pulsejet. On several occasions it would merely buzz ever so quietly for many seconds like a bee inside the tube, then out of nowhere it would kick in and the jet would whine full grease, screaming loud in an instant. Sometimes though the jet would just backfire loudly or just instantly start up as well. And still other times you could hear the flame walking up the tube, building in intensity until it hit the combustion chamber volume I guess which would set it off running.

It was really fun to anticipate when the buzzing/gurgling would finally stop and the jet kick in. Sometimes it was almost whisper quiet, the petal valve perhaps moving ever so slightly responding to the bubble/dome of fire residing in the tube, unable to advance down/up the tube. It was a little purring kitten that out of nowhere killed your ears -- in an instant-on pulsejet fashion, much like the hydrogen bomb bee sound, before setting itself off.

The tiny pulsejet used 3/4 inch pipe for the combustion chamber necking down to a 1/2 inch section and finally a 1/4 inch exhaust tube sort of like this valveless pulsejet I tinkered with with the same diameter combustion chamber but shorter. When you coat the inside of a narrow diameter tube with alcohol it is often fussy about the flame front wanting to travel the length unless the mixture and air temperature and humidity are just right.

Anyway I suppose you could also start a hobby size pulsejet using hydrogen and a stopper in the tailpipe with a pinhole in it and the tail end angled up. Then you could listen to a buzzing delayed bang start ignition and have some methanol fuel feed take over and aspirated in the intake after ignition on the negative pressure phase. It would be a little bit of work to set it up but funny to hear a buzzing hydrogen bomb effect suddenly transition into a buzz bomb burning methanol - a two in one demonstration.

Similar in simplicity sans side port and front intake bell reducer and washer petal valve.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3mtr6DuXD0
And a bang start impulse example without the need of starting air to draw in liquid fuel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU3cQ8_upWk
Or do a delay hydrogen buzz ignition to fire a can - hydrogen would probably be awfully perky though, I've had the bottom of the can deform just using propane, from concave to convex and it's loud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCppEmcRGCE

Hydrogen bomb eggs - a small scale no buzz but a delay effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L03LHMXrda4


[Edited on 24-7-2016 by Morgan]

Morgan - 25-7-2016 at 08:13

"Formally it was thought carbon dioxide was poisonous but now the opinion is that it causes death by excluding oxygen."
So thumbing through this book from 1921 there was the topic of the combustible being the supporter of combustion and vice versa. It was an interesting demonstration how the flame could leave one tube and come over to the other or be teased to be somewhere in the middle, and that they used platinum foil to keep the glass tubes from fusing.
And there's this other page 1,857 if you scroll down another page where they used coal gas to illustrate the same thing, having a glass sphere where out the top is a flame of coal gas burning and simultaneously inside the sphere you see a flame of air burning in coal gas.
Anyway, if you scroll down a few pages you can see illustrations of the designs. I guess if you weren't careful setting it up, the sphere would be like one of those hydrogen bomb demonstrations.
Audels engineers and mechanics guide
https://books.google.com/books?id=CPxYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PT104&...

050217075919.jpg - 738kB 050217081959 (1).jpg - 733kB

[Edited on 25-7-2016 by Morgan]

Morgan - 1-6-2017 at 13:49

Unplanned outcomes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP9WkNVcmxo
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/19/men-burned-wash-state-m...

Morgan - 11-6-2017 at 17:40

"I have no idea what's even going to happen."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUKiw75pWy8#t=5m26s
Two more flying lids.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUKiw75pWy8#t=12m6s


[Edited on 12-6-2017 by Morgan]

Morgan - 13-6-2017 at 15:25

Patio Heater Glass Tube VS Quartz Tube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyUtriix_N0

Morgan - 16-6-2017 at 15:35

In an old chemistry manual there was mention of dry ammonia gas dissolving so fast in water that it can crack a flask. Here's something similar that demonstrates the sudden affinity for water around the 25 second mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgBe0fsPcjk

mayko - 16-6-2017 at 17:41

The Riejke Tube, also called the Hoot Tube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pncG3lJUOdY

Morgan - 19-6-2017 at 14:42

Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
Patio Heater Glass Tube VS Quartz Tube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyUtriix_N0


Bored, I took a 25mm X 1000mm quartz tube with an inside diameter of 19mm and heated one end with a TS4000 Bernzomatic propane torch for over a minute getting the end ~7.5cm of length as hot as possible. Then it was quickly submerged in a pot of cold water. In addition the tube had been scratched/scored about 7.5cm from the end in a vague attempt to see if it would make a clean break if thermally shocked. The 3mm walled fused quartz refused to crack and merely boiled the water fiercely around the glass. It was just sort of uncanny because I was inclined to think it would have a good chance of cracking, recalling the above video in which sprinkling the quartz heater tube with water seemed kind of iffy.
Here's a piece of the tubing carrying light from my leveling laser - old photos. (Yawn)
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=13694&...
The 15 tube box for sale that I bought on eBay.
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=10539&...
Toying with piece of it and a quartz crucible.
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=13710&...

[Edited on 19-6-2017 by Morgan]

Praxichys - 23-6-2017 at 07:37

@ Morgan - It looks like maybe you were setting up a quartz pulsejet in that last pic?

I used to be really involved with those back when aardvark.co.uk was big, before his government thing.

Morgan - 23-6-2017 at 12:11

It was just something to dabble with, to see how it would gurgle or flutter if held in the vertical supplied with some alcohol for fuel. It didn't have much confinement. The annular pulsejet thought crossed my mind although I didn't really give it much more than a few tries.

http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=13711&...
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=13716&...
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=13715&...

Here's an example of one someone made that works.
"This engine is unique because the intake is annular--that is, it surrounds the exhaust tube."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHDTxfiZXyc

This one is kind of different/more complex the way the airflow works if you enlarge the top diagram/figure 1 and follow the arrows.
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=14227&...

It's sort of fun to just play with quirky shapes putting them all out on a table and wonder what might come about or emerge by placing certain parts in proximity, little fragments with their own unique properties or proclivities.
http://www.pulse-jets.com/phpbb3/download/file.php?id=12783&...


Morgan - 23-6-2017 at 13:25

Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
Patio Heater Glass Tube VS Quartz Tube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyUtriix_N0


Here's a few tests I did akin to the above.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWDlfrOAw0E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHnM3fIhntA



[Edited on 23-6-2017 by Morgan]

Morgan - 24-6-2017 at 08:31

Bologna Bottle and Glass Demonstration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc1whrZGOZI

Triggered with SiC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAmNmWpxo8Q
(Perhaps a single tiny particle of SiC would be enough)

I remember watching a show on PBS with Dale Chihuly in Seattle where they were making large artistic pieces of glass in a very spacious high ceiling building with music playing as they worked. He was miffed they had made a work of art for Elton John and he offhandedly asked the students if they had stress-relieved the piece and apparently not which meant it could explode sometime in the future out of the blue. I can't recall if it had been shipped or just waiting to be packed or packed already.

[Edited on 24-6-2017 by Morgan]

Morgan - 24-6-2017 at 16:24

Bologna Flasks
"Bologna flasks (or bottles) are blown with the glass pipe like an ordinary small thick walled flask. The only difference is that instead of putting the red hot flask into the lehr to anneal it free from strains, it is left out in the cold air. This works in a similar way as intentional quenching on the outside, but much less so in the interior. Therefore, the flask is toughened only on the outside, while even a tiny scratch with a hard tip on the interior walls leads to explosion. German encyclopaedias (Meyer 1885) ascribe the invention to a Mr. Asmadei in 1716. It must have been discussed all over Europe in the 1740s, as the list of early literature in Krünitz (1780) shows. It was presented to the Bolognese Academy of Sciences and Art by Balbi in 1745. ‘Bologneser Flaschen’ are also known in German as ‘Springkolben’ (literally ‘shatter flasks’)."

Modern Thermally Toughened Glass
"De la Bastie’s invention was of no great practical use because the glasses could not be quenched evenly. The resulting stresses often lead to failure after months without apparent external cause. Even the modern technique of working with a stream of cold air can only toughen open forms like sheets (e.g. car side windows), plates, or cups. The French glass company Arcoroc (2007) produces such a ‘verre trempé’ which can be used to demonstrate the increased fracture strength."

EXPERIMENT 3
"A plate of ‘verre trempé’ resists blows with a hammer. The tip of a normal nail gets flattened on trying to hammer it into the plate. Even hardened nails often do not suffice to crack the glass. It needs special pointed hammers (no nails) such as those provided to create emergency exits
through windows in cars or buses to shatter such a plate."
(From reference 3 in Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bologna_bottle

"Theses glasses when they have received the first injury do not always crack immediately, but remain whole sometimes a few minutes, sometimes for hours, and then suddenly give way."
https://books.google.com/books?id=Yt8_AQAAIAAJ&pg=PA158&...

[Edited on 25-6-2017 by Morgan]

Morgan - 30-6-2017 at 08:13

I wouldn't normally post whistling bottles but this amped-up version probably improves the speed to some extent by confining the exhaust in the barrel. One time though when I was using a 3 liter bottle and methanol the bottle shot so fast you couldn't follow it with your eye with just a hole in the cap and no launcher. So you can get some high speed without a launcher but here he's using smaller bottles and rubbing alcohol which could be ethanol or more probably isopropyl alcohol which isn't quite as zippy/fast as methanol, maybe 80 or 90 percent as good perhaps. The fire as the bottle leaves the launcher is kind of a nice effect.
How to Build a 4 Barrelled Rocket Launcher
http://con.ca/view/news/12042-How-to-Build-a-4-Barrelled-Roc...


[Edited on 30-6-2017 by Morgan]

Morgan - 6-5-2018 at 07:32

Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
"Formally it was thought carbon dioxide was poisonous but now the opinion is that it causes death by excluding oxygen."
So thumbing through this book from 1921 there was the topic of the combustible being the supporter of combustion and vice versa. It was an interesting demonstration how the flame could leave one tube and come over to the other or be teased to be somewhere in the middle, and that they used platinum foil to keep the glass tubes from fusing.
And there's this other page 1,857 if you scroll down another page where they used coal gas to illustrate the same thing, having a glass sphere where out the top is a flame of coal gas burning and simultaneously inside the sphere you see a flame of air burning in coal gas.
Anyway, if you scroll down a few pages you can see illustrations of the designs. I guess if you weren't careful setting it up, the sphere would be like one of those hydrogen bomb demonstrations.
Audels engineers and mechanics guide
https://books.google.com/books?id=CPxYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PT104&...



[Edited on 25-7-2016 by Morgan]


I noticed this video with similar subject matter.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=KTZcnCqqfG4
If you scroll up the page to my original post, there's better pictures of the demonstrations than in the link provided. I would have liked to run a jam jar jet reversing the rolls of the combustible becoming the supporter of combustion.
Or here ...
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/files.php?pid=455934&...
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/files.php?pid=455934&...

[Edited on 6-5-2018 by Morgan]

Morgan - 14-8-2018 at 08:31

This whoosh bottle caught my attention unique for its simplicity and snowy rain. I suppose/obviously you could make a gun using a kind of simple "'guncotton" impulse effect. Or maybe it would be possible to construct a spritely barking dog tube variation on a theme if the fibers didn't dampen feedback too much. Get professor Poliakoff and staff to work on it.
Other corridors of exploration might lead to other novel uses for cotton flambe' as ideas evolve - whatever entertaining niche springs to life, meager or not.
Cotton and pure oxygen whoosh bottle
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ms62lnFVGaY

[Edited on 14-8-2018 by Morgan]

symboom - 14-8-2018 at 20:00

Refering to texiums post
He bring up good points.
We made close to all of the elements
On the periodic table.
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=87955

Quote by texium
The only journal I truly desire to publish in is the one we're going to make right here.
Aga would be proud. Saying we dont do chemistry.


[Edited on 15-8-2018 by symboom]

Morgan - 15-8-2018 at 09:10

Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  
This whoosh bottle caught my attention unique for its simplicity and snowy rain. I suppose/obviously you could make a gun using a kind of simple "'guncotton" impulse effect. Or maybe it would be possible to construct a spritely barking dog tube variation on a theme if the fibers didn't dampen feedback too much. Get professor Poliakoff and staff to work on it.
Other corridors of exploration might lead to other novel uses for cotton flambe' as ideas evolve - whatever entertaining niche springs to life, meager or not.
Cotton and pure oxygen whoosh bottle
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ms62lnFVGaY

[Edited on 14-8-2018 by Morgan]


A few other sources of cellulose. Might be fun to try a Cattail Barking Dog with pure O2.

Anyway here's this ...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=m4tV1LCy0jk
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Bh--nnGdwX0
https://youtube.com/watch?v=sXxqz4BfLhA

Another source of fuel - cottonwood seeds
https://youtube.com/watch?v=v7G_5hzWqms
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yL8Y4-FsZlg

Morgan - 18-8-2018 at 08:57

On this topic of the Cotton and pure oxygen whoosh bottle
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ms62lnFVGaY

I was wondering if pure oxygen would diffuse into kapok fibers over time time so that you could load the fibers up with enough O2 to be used as a whoosh bottle or simple primitive rocket fuel of sorts, providing a quick burst or impulse without the need for additional oxygen - the idea being to just stuff some into a bottle or tube and light it.
The fibers are quite flammable as is.
"The kapok fiber once used in floatation vests and has been used as building insulation has a hollow fiber and looks like glass fiber under the microscope. The hollow fiber has air inside allowing combustion deep inside the material. Smoldering fire and open flame travel quickly within the material."
"Typical analyses indicate that the Kapok fibers comprise 64% cellulose, 13% lignin and 23% pentosan. Besides these constituents, they also contain wax cutin on the fiber surface which makes them water repellent notwithstanding they are preponderantly composed of cellulose."
https://www.textileschool.com/amp/183/kapok-or-capok-fibres

Wiki
Native tribes along the Amazon River harvest kapok fibre to wrap around their blowgun darts.
Kapok fibre is light, very buoyant, resilient, resistant to water, but it is very flammable.

It is inflammable: the trapped air makes kapok highly inflammable, and if it catches fire it is difficult to put the fire out. Special precautions are needed to transport kapok in the hull of ships. One advantage of this characteristic is that kapok can be used as tinder.
http://www.wildfibres.co.uk/html/kapok.html?redirect=false

"The fibres contains approx. 80% air, it has thin walls of cellulose with many cavities.
Kapok fibre is 8 times lighter than cotton."
http://www.ceiba.dk/?page_id=214&lang=en

Or maybe try storing kapok in a hydrogen atmosphere to see if H2 would permeate the hollow fibers. Then after a week take it out and see how it burns.

[Edited on 18-8-2018 by Morgan]

Morgan - 17-8-2019 at 07:06

It's funny you can buy a jam jar jet ready-made and not have to make the hole in the lid due to the advent of drinking jars. These jars come with a straw and little grommet that can be easily removed leaving a hole adequate for jam jarring. I saw some yesterday like this jar with straw but without the handle for $2.00 at a dollar store. There are a million colors if you search Google, metalized silver, gold, titanium oxide hues, etc.
https://www.deadrockers.net/products/glass-skull-drinking-ja...
Another examples
https://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/store/product/skull-shaped-...
https://www.popsugar.com/smart-living/photo-gallery/44057691...


When I bought a couple of the jars sometime back, they came with lids without holes that were ill-fitting, having no gasket to seal around the rim of the glass, so I used spaghetti jar lids to get them to not leak air pressure or fuel, like when putting your finger over the hole and shaking the jar before ignition to prime it for starting. In this clip the lighter was placed over the holes to stop them prematurely, to avoid cracking.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z-oOYF7EDYk

In summary, there's not much easier if you wanted a jam jar jet without drilling a hole, it's even centered if you wanted to widen it for a slower running jar or for energetic cool dry air where a smaller hole is too restrictive and the jar too perky and suddenly flames out.


Lots of shapes to toy with
https://perfectplants.co.uk/retro-jam-jar-glass-drinking-jar...
https://dhgate.com/product/4pcs-creative-color-gradient-glas...
https://dhgate.com/product/new-style-glass-cactus-mason-jar-...
https://www.amazon.com/Twos-Company-Drinking-Bottles-Straws/...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=KJidOHrPpEo

[Edited on 17-8-2019 by Morgan]

Morgan - 4-11-2019 at 06:17

Here's some ready-made jam jar jets you could use for a classroom demonstration of pulsating combustion. The little jars were 1 dollar purchased at Target stores. I noticed them just as you walk in the store, where they have dollar objects mostly for kids and craft items and such.

Store-bought Jam Jar Jets
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GEgXyf2NevM

Day of the Dead Jam Jar Jets
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vY8vpUiFins

Morgan - 25-9-2023 at 07:25

Discovered when heating a glass tube intended for a mercury trap ...
Knipp's singing tube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJOaBlkCIdo