Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trimethyl phosphate"
From Sciencemadness Wiki
(Added new discussion) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There seems to be something missing in the safety section. In the last sentence, it says: "Being non-volatile" and nothing more. How could the sentence be continued, or should it be removed? | There seems to be something missing in the safety section. In the last sentence, it says: "Being non-volatile" and nothing more. How could the sentence be continued, or should it be removed? | ||
--[[User:Draeger|Draeger]] ([[User talk:Draeger|talk]]) 21:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | --[[User:Draeger|Draeger]] ([[User talk:Draeger|talk]]) 21:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Oh damn, how did I miss that the first time! Sorry about that. I must have accidentally deleted it when I was fast typing. The complete sentence was: "Being non-volatile, its vapors do not accumulate in any significant amount in a closed environment at standard conditions, and thus it does not pose a significant fire or explosion hazard." I'll complete the sentence myself. --[[User:Mabus|Mabus]] ([[User talk:Mabus|talk]]) 11:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:32, 28 December 2020
Unfinished safety section
There seems to be something missing in the safety section. In the last sentence, it says: "Being non-volatile" and nothing more. How could the sentence be continued, or should it be removed? --Draeger (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oh damn, how did I miss that the first time! Sorry about that. I must have accidentally deleted it when I was fast typing. The complete sentence was: "Being non-volatile, its vapors do not accumulate in any significant amount in a closed environment at standard conditions, and thus it does not pose a significant fire or explosion hazard." I'll complete the sentence myself. --Mabus (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
