j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6323
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
In the news – new lens technology
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-36438686
Really cool concept. It looks really practical too -- potential for large cheap high-quality lenses with no chromatic aberration and better focussing
ability combined with the ability to design for niche applications.
I am not fully sure I understand how it works: seems like an extension of a diffraction grating concept. But if it works (as it seems to) then this
could revolutionise a lot of things.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If the way it works is anything like a diffraction grating (and it looks like it might be) then the chromatic aberration will be much worse than a
conventional lens.
That may not matter much in some applications.
|
|
|
Bert
|
Thread Moved
5-6-2016 at 05:29 |
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Seems to play with various effects:
-diffraction grating
-refractive index through 2 or 3 different materials
-Young's slit diffraction experiment
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
joeweller
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 5-6-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
yes a really cool concept, this will be so helpful if it hit the markets soon
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Looks like classic fresnel with a layer of a second material to adjust for chromatic dispersion.
[Edited on 5-6-2016 by macckone]
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3696
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
I suppose that one lens / sensor pair per wavelength would be practical and cost-effective,
maybe we can have VERY wide spectrum cameras ?
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6323
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Well the article (admittedly journalism rather than a scientific report) mentions that there is less aberration. Chromatic aberration is the most
likely thing being referred to. They also suggest the first use may be in cellphone cameras -- an application where you would not want chromatic
aberration. So, while I agree with you, unionised, it appears that they may have found a solution to that issue. Which is what makes me wonder if I
understand the mechanism at all.
No time to research right now, but if anyone has come across a more detailed explanation that would be good.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There are lots of lens aberrations so you could still have one of them but claim to have removed some.
You can get by with chromatic aberrations if you can refocus the camera and take three pictures- G, G and B.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
