Noflers
Harmless
Posts: 9
Registered: 14-2-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
CopperIISulfide
I have a few questions that have come to me, they involve alcohol fermentation, but mostly distillation of the ethanol.
Home distillers and, I would guess commercial distillers as well, us copper in their distillation apparatus due to its ability to strip ethanol vapor
of its sulfur components (which come from the fermentation process in some cases).
I am wondering what is taking place here, is Cu2S being formed? I'm guessing that it is so please correct me if I'm wrong.
In order for this reaction to take place does the ethanol need to be in gas form, or could the liquid ethanol be passed over copper mesh/stored in a
copper container?
|
|
|
Zephyr
Hazard to Others
Posts: 341
Registered: 30-8-2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
|
|
These people seem to think so: https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/forum/index.php?topic...
It appears it is actually forming the sulfate, not sure how safe that is to ingest though...
FYI Copper (II) sulfide means the copper is 2+ and so the formula for it will be CuS.
Try googling this question next time, it only took me a few minutes to find.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sure, but what have you found? A very low level site, with hardly any scientific
content.
It's generally recognised that using all-copper apparatus for the distilling of homebrew ('moonshine') removes 'sulphurous' compounds. It seems likely
that the driving force is the formation of very insoluble copper sulphides, either Cu2S or CuS.
The solubility product of CuS is about 6 x 10<sup>-37</sup>, incredibly low.
As nearly all chemical reactions are rate-promoted by temperature, the process of boiling up the wash and condensing the distillate in an all-copper
still may be an effective way of removing sulphur.
[Edited on 3-3-2016 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
Zephyr
Hazard to Others
Posts: 341
Registered: 30-8-2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yeah, I agree. Here's a pertinent patent if you were looking to go a bit deeper Noflers: http://www.google.com/patents/EP0527000A2?cl=en
Additionally, copper sulfide is likely responsible for the black coating sometimes developed on copper stills.
I am confident that cleansing of hydrogen sulfide in solution would work well with elemental copper, although you may be onto something in regards to
elevated temperatures when dealing with heterocyclic sulfur compounds.
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4334
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Online
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
I know copper(II) sulphate is used in small amounts to remove H2S from wines.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
Noflers
Harmless
Posts: 9
Registered: 14-2-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Zephyr  |
Yeah, I agree. Here's a pertinent patent if you were looking to go a bit deeper Noflers: http://www.google.com/patents/EP0527000A2?cl=en
Additionally, copper sulfide is likely responsible for the black coating sometimes developed on copper stills.
I am confident that cleansing of hydrogen sulfide in solution would work well with elemental copper, although you may be onto something in regards to
elevated temperatures when dealing with heterocyclic sulfur compounds. |
Nice find, thanks. That patent seems to describe the gas, but "preferably liquid" forms of organic compounds passing over copper or zinc oxides.
And yes, I did see that forum thread and others from the same forum, but wanted more, ya know?
Now I'm working on figuring out which is more efficient, zinc or copper.
|
|
|
Nicodem
|
Thread Moved
4-3-2016 at 09:37 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
