morganbw
National Hazard
Posts: 561
Registered: 23-11-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Some of the sticky's are too effing big
Who has time to read 60 plus pages on one sticky.
I am new here but if there are sticky's the crap needs to be trimmed from them
I have gone through a few of them, but leave pretty tired.
|
|
|
Zephyr
Hazard to Others
Posts: 341
Registered: 30-8-2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Many of the stickies are extremely big, but several of the large ones have shorter write ups done on them, which are good for a overview, without
having to go into the detail of the longer thread. An example of this is the benzene thread (12 pages) which has a much shorter summary. Another, more extreme example is the phosphorus thread (48 pages) which is summed up nicely in the prepublication section.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
You're right.
The important ones would benefit from a summary.
Glad to hear that you feel so strongly that you're willing to take the job on señor morganbw !
|
|
|
gdflp
Super Moderator
Posts: 1320
Registered: 14-2-2014
Location: NY, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Staring at code
|
|
Mots of the long ones already have a summary if you're willing to look. If you're planning on running an experiment though, it's very useful to have
pages of data, successful experiments, and even explained failures. The stickies have already been trimmed, and what may seem like crap to you may be
valuable information to others.
|
|
|
diddi
National Hazard
Posts: 723
Registered: 23-9-2014
Location: Victoria, Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorescent
|
|
another possibility could be to add to the SM wiki "Synthesis of phosphorus" for example which reflects the important conclusions after a 7 page
discussion on each of the many methods trialled so far. create a new sticky pointing to the wiki and "unsticky" the full thread so that if members
want to review the thread they can still browse through it and it will still pick up in searches.
|
|
|
APO
National Hazard
Posts: 627
Registered: 28-12-2012
Location: China Lake
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
I kinda like how big they are to cover multiple different syntheses and techniques, but that's just me. I also like reading talk about the subject and
stories sometimes. An up to date summary for some of the larger threads might be a good addition though.
"Damn it George! I told you not to drop me!"
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
| Quote: |
The sciencemadness.org forum just now is enough to drive one mad. It gives me the impression of a primeval forest full of the most remarkable things,
a monstrous and boundless thicket, with no way of escape, into which one may well dread to enter.
-The ghost of Friedrich Wholer |
Some of the stickys are so wide in their topic as to defeat a summary- Take a trip from end to end of "unconventional shaped charge", IF you've got a
week or so, with following all the links & even skimming the uploaded files/references. And I can STILL think of aspects that are not covered-
Every now and then I look at some projects I THOUGHT I was going to whip into shape, particularly a couple of safety related explosives testing/use
and lab procedure threads.
We could use a couple more moderators, one with training in library science would be lovely.
| Quote: |
“Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what's a heaven for?”
-The ghost of John M. Browning
|
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3254
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Sciencemadness is not a 'How To' website. We should all be so lucky as to find a thread that we can enjoy over the course of a week or month and
supplement said learning with additional research of our own to feed back into the hearth that is SM.
|
|
|
jock88
National Hazard
Posts: 505
Registered: 13-12-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's very important that the whole thing stays MAD :-|
|
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by BromicAcid  |
Sciencemadness is not a 'How To' website. We should all be so lucky as to find a thread that we can enjoy over the course of a week or month and
supplement said learning with additional research of our own to feed back into the hearth that is SM. |
On the other hand, some of those stickies are filled with off-topic discussion and a bunch of people doing the same thing over and over again. It
would be pretty nice to have them summarized.
|
|
|
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Everyone has to prioritize. You may not have time to read all the stickies, because of higher priority obligations, and that is life. Many people want
everything tied up in a neat little package so they can "imagine" to learn the material in 15 minutes. Not saying that there isn't any long windedness
or straying of course from time to time in these threads, but I wouldn't cater to the people who simply want a how to manual and easy answers. Some
separate summaries sounds like a reasonable idea though, which does offer some choice and could be used as a quick reference even for those who have
read the full thread.
"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
What we need is more restraint in posting, he said in #1501.
|
|
|
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline
Mood: Incommensurately modulated
|
|
I think we have to have an archive section for the best threads, that's not closed but hosts the best threads. It would be a great place to continue.
At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
