Hexavalent
International Hazard
Posts: 1564
Registered: 29-12-2011
Location: Wales, UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pericyclic
|
|
UK Newspapers on Sulfuric Acid
I was unfortunate enough to come across this article in a UK newspaper today, showing how sulfuric acid is occasionally used as a street weapon and
exaggerating how easy it can be to obtain. It is somewhat worrying, as our sources are dwindling as it is. Another problem is that this is the Daily
Sun, hardly the newspaper read by academics; many people who read this are inclined to believe and fear what it tells them.
"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
|
|
Hexavalent
International Hazard
Posts: 1564
Registered: 29-12-2011
Location: Wales, UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pericyclic
|
|
I apologise that some of the text isn't entirely clear, but the main body of the article is legible.
[Edited on 4-7-2014 by Hexavalent]
"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
Right, let's just completely forget the huge number of legal and necessary uses of sulfuric acid. "The Evil Legacy" made me shake my head in wonder.
In the US, we may let lunatics run amok with semi-auto assault rifles, but at least most chemicals are still obtainable.
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by No Tears Only Dreams Now | Right, let's just completely forget the huge number of legal and necessary uses of sulfuric acid. "The Evil Legacy" made me shake my head in wonder.
In the US, we may let lunatics run amok with semi-auto assault rifles, but at least most chemicals are still obtainable. | Yeah really. I also doubt that acid attacks are really as common as this paper claims. It's all a bunch of exaggerated hype to make
money for the paper and stir people up with sensational press. Not that what happened to the people mentioned in the paper isn't horrible. It is. But
it's not a reason to put strict regulations on sulfuric acid, that's for sure.
|
|
DraconicAcetate
Harmless
Posts: 5
Registered: 3-7-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think the Daily Fail is more interesting to read on lysergic acid, actually.
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
I have heard pretty frequently of this kind of thing happening in the middle east though; An angry male throws sulfuric acid on a woman's face
basically with premise of disfiguring her forever so that she can never pursue the opposite sex. So maybe this article is just another facet of the
xenophobia that is rampant in the western world today.
|
|
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline
Mood: Incommensurately modulated
|
|
A 1000% rise is insignificant if the basal rate of occurrence is insignificant itself.
And please note that knives can be just as disfiguring, and severe knife attacks can also put you at risk for a stroke (and don't forget, they're more
likely to be fatal). So we should ban all knives, including butterknives and plastic knives. Anyone with me on this?
I've seen many, many, many cases of these kinds of "X IS SCARY, BAN IT OR AVOID IT!!1!!!!!1!!11!!111!!one!!!eleven!!eleventyone!!!" headlines. It's
even worse on talk shows.
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=20660
[edit] DraconicAcetate, you couldn't possibly be related to our own DraconicAcid, could you?
[Edited on 4.7.2014 by Brain&Force]
At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Brain&Force | A 1000% rise is insignificant if the basal rate of occurrence is insignificant itself.
And please note that knives can be just as disfiguring, and severe knife attacks can also put you at risk for a stroke (and don't forget, they're more
likely to be fatal). So we should ban all knives, including butterknives and plastic knives. Anyone with me on this?
I've seen many, many, many cases of these kinds of "X IS SCARY, BAN IT OR AVOID IT!!1!!!!!1!!11!!111!!one!!!eleven!!eleventyone!!!" headlines. It's
even worse on talk shows.
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=20660
| Yes, that is the central problem. Let's see, what else is "dangerous" that you can find around the house…
well, other types of drain cleaner like NaOH, bleach, cleaning solvents like acetone or anything flammable for that matter, like alcohols, ammonia
(toxic vapors), pool chemicals, pest poisons, weed killer, antifreeze. There's a lot of "dangerous" stuff that everyone has around their house that
could potentially be used to kill people. Despite that, 99.9% of the population doesn't try to kill people with their household chemicals. Therefore,
regulation is highly nonsensical.
The first thing that somebody would think of if they wanted to kill somebody would be a gun or a knife (or maybe a shovel). Not drain cleaner.
Haha, I was wondering the same thing when I saw that username!
|
|
DraconicAcetate
Harmless
Posts: 5
Registered: 3-7-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes- my first account got screwed up, so I needed a new one.
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
I'm somewhat hesitant to say this online but: I probably could've killed someone with the chemicals in my house before I even knew any chemistry.
|
|
Scr0t
Hazard to Others
Posts: 118
Registered: 14-1-2012
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Desiccated
|
|
@zts16
It may seem 'nonsensical' but it's not stopped them before. This is the problem, the target audience are useful idiots (i.e. Sun readers) you can't
use reason, logic and facts here as it would get in the way of a 'good' story.
Quote: | The first thing that somebody would think of if they wanted to kill somebody would be a gun or a knife (or maybe a shovel). Not drain cleaner.
|
Usually the objective behind these attacks is to scar somebody i.e. to leave a mark that fucks-up their life, the objective is not to end it
but to cause suffering/torment.
These things will probably be used with increasing frequency in response to increased public awareness and articles like this will probably increase
incidence of such attacks until it leads to another tabloid playing a key role in banning yet another chemical that they'll wear like a feather in
their cap.
[Edited on 5-7-2014 by Scr0t]
|
|
Pyro
International Hazard
Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
notice how they capitalize the word ACID to make it look scarier, then lots of pictograms to make it look like the devils fluid.
all above information is intellectual property of Pyro.
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5128
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Scr0t | @zts16
It may seem 'nonsensical' but it's not stopped them before. This is the problem, the target audience are useful idiots (i.e. Sun readers) you can't
use reason, logic and facts here as it would get in the way of a 'good' story.
Quote: | The first thing that somebody would think of if they wanted to kill somebody would be a gun or a knife (or maybe a shovel). Not drain cleaner.
|
Usually the objective behind these attacks is to scar somebody i.e. to leave a mark that fucks-up their life, the objective is not to end it
but to cause suffering/torment.
These things will probably be used with increasing frequency in response to increased public awareness and articles like this will probably increase
incidence of such attacks until it leads to another tabloid playing a key role in banning yet another chemical that they'll wear like a feather in
their cap.
[Edited on 5-7-2014 by Scr0t] |
You can disfigure someone perfectly adequately with a shovel or a rock so it hardly matters if the intent is scarring or murder.
Banning acid won't stop people being shitty to eachother.
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
I found this beauty in the Metro newspaper, UK; I quote, I can't seem to upload the photo.
''90% of all cyclists hard to spot;
nine out of ten motorists find it hard to see cyclists, a survey suggests. Half of the drivers have experienced a bicycle rider appearing from
nowhere, it adds.''
|
|
arkoma
Redneck Overlord
Posts: 1763
Registered: 3-2-2014
Location: On a Big Blue Marble hurtling through space
Member Is Offline
Mood: украї́нська
|
|
97 attacks? pfft, read this:
Quote: | Glassing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glassing is a physical attack using a glass as a weapon. Glassing can occur at bars or pubs where alcohol is served, and a drinking glass or bottle is
available as a weapon. The most common method of glassing involves the attacker smashing an intact glass in the face of the victim. However the glass
may be smashed before the attack, and then gripped by the remaining base of the glass or neck of the bottle with the broken shards protruding
outwards.
Common injuries resulting from glassings are heavy blood loss, permanent scarring, disfigurement and loss of sight through eye injury.
In the United Kingdom, there are more than 5,000 glassing attacks each year.[1]
|
Emphasis mine.
"We believe the knowledge and cultural heritage of mankind should be accessible to all people around the world, regardless of their wealth, social
status, nationality, citizenship, etc" z-lib
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
I own a car.
The Big Toe on my right foot has final say on who lives or dies.
Oh. The car contains (amongst other things) Gasoline, which is dangerous.
Ban all Evil Cars !
|
|
Pyrovus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 241
Registered: 13-10-2003
Location: Australia, now with 25% faster carrier pigeons
Member Is Offline
Mood: heretical
|
|
Or gasoline. It's much easier to acquire than sulphuric acid, probably used about as much to attack people, and does a lot more damage when it is used
as a weapon.
Never accept that which can be changed.
|
|
prof_genius
Hazard to Others
Posts: 147
Registered: 15-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I found an old polish chemophobic article:
http://krakow.gazeta.pl/krakow/1,44425,12901356,Kilo_bomby_p...
Translated:
Authorities of the University of Agriculture in Krakow examine how chemical materials ordered Dr. Bruno K., suspected of planning the attack on
Parliament. In practice, however, you do not need to be a scientist to have easy access even to dangerous measures.
Control of the UR has to answer the question of whether Bruno K. superiors had agreed to purchase chemicals and for what purposes their use.
Meanwhile, requesting anonymity university employees believe that K. - like many other teachers - getting such licenses without a problem and not
anyone's suspicions are aroused.
We tried yesterday to get information on the case from the Rector Vladimir Orchards, but he was elusive. Following the disclosure of information about
the arrest of assistant professor of UR rector assured that access to chemical agents at the university "shall be governed by strict procedures".
We checked how it looks at other universities. The Jagiellonian University all reagents are purchased by the central warehouse. - Substances are
issued with written confirmation of receipt by the person authorized by the immediate supervisor. On an ongoing basis we note their consumption,
including the date, amount and name of the person that I used - says Katarzyna Pilitowska, a spokeswoman for the Jagiellonian University. Cracow
University of Technology employees who procure dangerous substances have no quantitative restrictions, but must in the declarations explain the
purposes for which the reagent will be used.
Such rigor is no longer on the market. - Most of the reagents that can be used to construct an explosive device, is widely available. There are no
provisions that set ground rules for access to them - highlights Leszek Artemiuk, president of the Polish Association of Specialists Bomb.
It's like with axes
We call Chempur company, trading in chemicals. - We do not sell goods to individuals, but it's not a barrier. Just set up a one-person company and
place an order. We have no reason to refuse to sell, for example, 50 kg of cyanide, the more you ask of his destiny. It's like axes: the seller does
not ask whether you used to fell trees, or murder - says the director of Robert Chabrowski.
By the end of the 80s of the last century force registry of poisons, or chemicals considered as hazardous. To purchase products from this list, you
had to have permission sanepidu, and the purchase was recorded by using forms strictly accountable. - Register admittedly still exists, but is only
information about hazardous substances - selects Chabrowski.
The web is teeming with shops that provide home instruction bomb and the necessary components. - I ended technical chemicals. I know that some
graduates found various pages and sites devoted to issues of chemical. Mostly they have the character hobby, but some information appears
pyrotechnics. I know that some interested in the police - says employee UR.
Pick homegrown pyrotechnics
Malopolska police spokesman Dariusz Nowak argues that investigators monitor the internet and from time to time pick up of amateur pyrotechnics. It is
believed that the introduction of strict regulation of chemicals załatwiłoby no problem. - You can always buy something on the substituted person.
It is also difficult to restrict access to fertilizers to farmers - multiplies doubts Nowak. Draws attention to the existence of a black market of
pyrotechnic materials sourced from unexploded wartime. - We hit the man, who with a map of World War II drove to Pomerania. At the site of the old
fortifications excavated ammunition, which recovered explosives in considerable quantities - gives police spokesman.
Leszek Artemiuk admits that the load can be done even with the most common everyday substances, available even in aquarium shops. - Of course it is
impossible to save the settings that you can buy as much nitrate and other ingredients as much. Perhaps the output would be a record of purchases.
When a farmer buys fertilizer, it does not raise a suspicion, but when he does it, for example, Polish language, any, may cause. This, however, would
have to be part of the whole system, the fight against terrorism, which in my opinion in our country is not - says Artemiuk.
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
We need an anti-chemo-phobia committee on this website, promoting chemistry and putting down chemo-phobia
|
|
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline
Mood: Incommensurately modulated
|
|
You know, that's actually a great idea. If I have time, I'll start an article about chemophobia on the wiki...that's something we need to cover.
At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
Indeed! That could be a good base of operations at the least!
|
|