BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
pgm extraction
Hi i have been conducting an experiment with pgm's in catalytic converters. I took the one off my old car (80 cutlass) and it had pellets in that are
ceramic coated in platinum, palladium and rhodium.
I removed pellets and ground them down super fine in a mortar and pestle. I took 1 ounce of ground material and placed it in a 500 ml beaker and
added 200 ml of sulfuric acid(93%). Mixed thoroughly by swirling beaker. I then added 200 ml of distilled water. mixed thoroughly again.
Solution becomes extremely hot giving off vapors and immediately the solution turned a bluish grey color. I kept mixing with stir rod at this point.
i did this for about 30 minutes.
With solution still hot i poured it off into a 2000 ml beaker and added ice. enough ice to reach the 1000 ml line.
I then added another 100 ml of both sulfuric acid and water to the original reaction vessel.. kept swirling and stirring it. All that is left in the
reaction vessel now is fine white granules.
The jar i added ice too has cleared up some odd 3 hours later and dropped a bluish colored mud in the bottom.
So tell me if i am wrong here, but i am pretty sure the bluish substance is a mix of palladium and platinum? If so can i just pour off cleared up
solution and dry the mud on a hot plate? If so is the palladium/platinum in a ready form for smelting?
To further add i went back and added another 100 ml of water and 100 ml of sulfuric acid again to the white ceramic residue left. Hours later my
solution has turned a reddish brown?!?!? Rhodium perhaps?
Any input is welcome... Seems there is a major argument online that pgm's(platinum group metals) are insoluble in sulfuric acid... Well i must say
that the ceramic never dissolved and even the pgm coating on a whole(unbroken) ceramic pellet gets dissolved leaving a white pellet.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
I don't think you dissolved any PGM's - it takes the likes of aqua regia (nitric/hydrochloric acid) to dissolve them. Sulfuric acid alone won't cut
it.
No clue what the blue-gray stuff was - undissolved sludge? See if it settles out after a while.
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well i would agree with that statement but most of my minerals books say pgm's are soluble in hot concentrated sulfuric acid. That is what originally
led me to believe this would work. water and concentrated sulfuric acid make an instant exothermic reaction giving off crazy amounts of heat for
about an hour or so. I have tried dissolving many types of ceramic and failed with this solution. I have however dissolved a palladium ring in it.
Palladium and rhodium are soluble for sure in it, but platinum is a bit more resistant... if i had a loose piece of pure platinum laying around i
would give it a go...
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Oh yeah but hey if your right then those solid white pellets are pgm's!
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
My input is that you should report weight in grams (<em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units"
target="_blank">SI</a></em> <img src="../scipics/_wiki.png" />
rather than ounces (antiquated, ambiguous, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_units" target="_blank">imperial</a> <img
src="../scipics/_wiki.png" />.
[Edited on 19.8.13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Generally when sources say "hot, concentrated' when referencing sulfuric acid, they mean "near boiling, nearly free of water." Conc. sulfuric is
generally understood to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 98% acid, so if you added water then you probably didn't meet that criteria. I've never
heard of using sulfuric acid in PGM recovery - as EC1 said, it's usually aqua regia.
=====================================
Funny that this would get posted - I actually was about to post a similar topic myself! I might be getting my hands on a catalytic converter, and was
going to try my hand at recovery as well. I found a nice "beginner's guide" that I was going to base my procedure on (attached below). What it boils
down to is this:
1) Grind catalytic converter material down to a coarse powder.
2) Incinerate material in a furnace to burn off road dirt and organic residues (if it isn't a brand new converter).
3) Treat material with HCl, followed by HNO<sub>3</sub> (separately!). This removes any base metals (this step might be unnecessary).
4) Treat material with aqua regia (3:1 HCl:HNO<sub>3</sub> to dissolve
platinum and palladium. Rhodium remains insoluble. <b>(how would I separate this from undissolved ceramic?)</b>
5) Precipitate platinum from solution as the bright yellow ammonium hexachloroplatinate, using a saturated solution of NH<sub>4</sub>Cl.
6) Precipitate palladium from solution as the bright red ammonium hexachloropalladate, by adding a saturated solution of KClO<sub>3</sub>
(my source recommends sodium chlorate, but I have the potassium salt and I can't imagine that would make a difference). Technially, it is the chlorine
produced that causes this compound to form.
7) Calcine both the PGM salts in ceramic dishes to reduce them to their metals - driving off ammonium chloride. Ramp up the heat slowly to avoid
vaporizing any metals.
Here is another guide that has the same overall process, but differs a bit on terminology. e.g. it calls the brick red precipitate ammonium
hexachloropalladate rather than a chlorate salt like the attachment does. Theirs seems to make more sense, so I went with that name above.
Any comments on this method? Suggestions, things to avoid, etc.? I have no intention of making money off of this, I simply want to explore the process
and get some palladium and rhodium for my collection!
Attachment: PGM Recovery from Catalytic Converters.pdf (282kB)
This file has been downloaded 853 times
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I am still experimenting as i read sulfuric acid should eat the ceramic and some base metals online. But what really caught my interest was old
refining techniques using vitriol to refine silver?!?!? I am hoping that the bluish mud is residue left from the ceramic material and the base
metals. i was hoping that i would be left with a mix of pgm's and other possible chemical resistant elements that i could separate by density as most
vary greatly in density(but after the experiment above i dissolved palladium in the same solution and failed with ceramic{the ceramic made no
residue}). If this is the case then it would be so much easier than reverting it to salts and back to metal form. i am guessing a lot here till i
further study this... But i have plenty of material left to play with as a fellow backyard chemist has gotten more material and is helping now
explore what is exactly happening and if it is a possible means of extraction with little to no loss. I honestly believe the old methods are the
best! Everything older is absolutely better! My freezer from the 50's costs less to run than a 4 star energy one >.>....... But as far as the
technique you shared. I have no clue if it even works... I tried refining gold and silver with techniques posted on the internet and failed
massively on most of them. So there is a lot of disinformation out there on these subjects. But one thing i am sure is the bluish substance is first
to go! But then there are also red and brown muds gathering after the buish substance was poured off and process restarted. I will keep ya posted on
what i find out.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
I would imagine rhodium can be attacked by something if it's finely divided - chlorine, maybe?
Wiki quote from the RhCl3 page: | Quote: | | Anhydrous RhCl3 is prepared by reaction of chlorine with rhodium sponge at 200–300 °C |
Old things are better, but they're often less efficient - a real step forward in research would be to use only organic, non-harmful compounds to
dissolve/recover PGM's, instead of acids and such.
MrHomeScientist - A lot of jewelry is rhodium plated, and the stuff underneath is usually either base metal or sterling silver (this is plated to
offset tarnish). Simply file a piece off, dissolve everything underneath, and there's your rhodium. Just a thought. (Also: Would you have the setup to
melt the rhodium out? Likely not, considering its MP...)
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by BleepingAmazing  |
I removed pellets and ground them down super fine in a mortar and pestle. I took 1 ounce of ground material and placed it in a 500 ml beaker and
added 200 ml of sulfuric acid(93%). Mixed thoroughly by swirling beaker. I then added 200 ml of distilled water. mixed thoroughly again.
|
At the risk of sounding facetious, NEVER add water to concentrated sulphuric acid, always do it the other way around: acid to water. Distilled water
in your case is a waste of distillation: tap water would do fine.
50 % H2SO4 (or thereabouts) doesn't put a dent in PGMs. But it will also only very partially dissolve the ceramic matrix, I think.
The PGMs should remain in the insoluble residue, which could be treated one more time with conc. H2SO4. Whatever's left after that should then be
treated with Aqua Regia to dissolve the PGMs.
[Edited on 19-8-2013 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Very interesting! I think just even changing the acids into a non toxic form would work just fine and possibly receive a usable byproduct. But any
way i do have a oxy-acetylene torch setup i modified into an oven  . I would
think that would do the trick but i would prefer to break down my base metals and keep the pgm's in metal forms and separate via solution by density.
I now have in my reaction jar after over night a water clear solution and fine grains that are white, brown and silvery white with a little blue gray
mud on top. Jar 2 (the pour off with oxidized elements suspended) has turned completely clear and left a blue gray mud. The white grains surely are
ceramic in my opinion. I may be wrong. I am currently getting ready to pour off the liquid from jar 2 and experiment with my blue gray mud which i
am guessing is either palladium or some base metal. I have no idea what it is... So i figure i will dry it and try to form a solid via heat in a
crucible. If it puddles and fuses then i can take a density reading i guess. Also i redid the test above and this was my result. I think in the
first round i didn't rinse the rubbing alcohol out the jar and it contaminated the solution giving me the reddish brown liquid (possibly iodine).
First try was more of i don't care lets see what happens and just mixed w/e increments to see what the best reaction was. Second try was more
technical taking exact measurements on everything... I do believe i have the platinum and rhodium separated and undissolved with the ceramic in the
reaction jar. I also must say there is an awful lot of it. I would say about 15% by volume verses the ceramic. Now to find a way to dissolve the
ceramic leaving the other pgm's unaffected. I am really hoping my grayish mud is palladium cause then i would only require one solution of around a
density of 14-18 to separate the platinum and rhodium in metal form that won't react to them. Then i would save tons in the process and lose
absolutely nothing but sulfuric acid and water! Either way just removing all the non pgm's without any loss would be a massive help and far better
for my collection!
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I was also thinking if there is zinc, lead or copper in the base metals. my solution may be creating an electrical current as well. Still have to
test that one?!?!?! maybe i can just collect the blue gray material via a conductive wire or something?!?!?! still a lot to explore here...
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Your solution wouldn't be creating any electrical current of note, and certainly not enough to 'collect the material'. You're right that if there are
two metals such as copper and zinc in there, it would create a battery... for about a second. Then the copper/zinc would dissolve, and there wouldn't
be any ion flow.
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well wouldn't that depend on amounts in solution and for how long the reaction lasted or what form the metals are in? I can tell you soon as the
water is added it generates near boiling temperatures and gives rise to the blue gray material in solution instantly. it only takes a tiny amount of
water to get the reaction going but mixing half and half seems to generate a better exchange and produces far more heat that lasts about 1-2 hours.
Though by slowly adding water in increments the reaction would last far longer and produce a longer held electrical charge. What elements it does
dissolve, it only does it quickly with the heat, otherwise it is a very lengthy process... Tomorrow i will have results on the blue mud after
testing. I also read that stannous chloride is good for checking platinum content. But i am unsure if it would work in sulfuric acid as it does in
aqua regia?
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by BleepingAmazing | | I can tell you soon as the water is added it generates near boiling temperatures and gives rise to the blue gray material in solution instantly. it
only takes a tiny amount of water to get the reaction going but mixing half and half seems to generate a better exchange and produces far more heat
that lasts about 1-2 hours. Though by slowly adding water in increments the reaction would last far longer and produce a longer held electrical
charge. |
The addition of water to the acid (like I said for safety reasons you should really do it the other way around!) causes solvation enthalpy (heat) to
be released. It's very significant: prepare a 50 % H2SO4 solution in water staring from RT and the resulting solution will be quit near 100 C.
But produce 'electrical charge'??? Explain?
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just like a car battery... In theory even with the heat and the reaction there is the possibility of electrical discharge from the solution depending
on what metals are in the solution. I would think the heat would amplify this effect given that the solution was properly loaded with the right
metals even added possibly to try for a self sustaining electrolyte. That would bypass a lot of of need for electrical equipment if possible. not to
mention the possibilities of instant electroplating or possibly selective electroplating for that matter. Who knows there is so many possible
directions general chemistry or alchemy can go....... But as far as mixing the water and sulfuric acid, i find it more feasible to add the water to
it. If something was to go wrong then i would be dropping water and not acid as i fled the area to reevaluate the situation. Also i tried it both
ways and it does the same thing. But then there is always a risk of splatter too when pouring. so a flask may be more desirable for that. Any which
way you look at it there is tons of possibilities and unknown dangers or breakthroughs still in chemistry. In my opinion if we think we know just
about everything then we must start over...
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by BleepingAmazing | | In theory even with the heat and the reaction there is the possibility of electrical discharge from the solution depending on what metals are in the
solution. |
‘In theory’? What theory? There is no theory that supports what you so vaguely describe here.
| Quote: Originally posted by BleepingAmazing | | I would think the heat would amplify this effect given that the solution was properly loaded with the right metals even added possibly to try for a
self sustaining electrolyte. |
More gibberish. What are we to understand by a ‘self sustaining electrolyte’? Please explain in known terms.
| Quote: Originally posted by BleepingAmazing | | That would bypass a lot of of need for electrical equipment if possible. not to mention the possibilities of instant electroplating or possibly
selective electroplating for that matter. Who knows there is so many possible directions general chemistry or alchemy can go |
Alchemy? This is a SCIENCE forum. Alchemy is the historical precursor to chemistry, it’s the latter we practice here.
| Quote: Originally posted by BleepingAmazing | | ....... But as far as mixing the water and sulfuric acid, i find it more feasible to add the water to it. If something was to go wrong then i would
be dropping water and not acid as i fled the area to reevaluate the situation. |
Well, have it your way and go against decades of good practice: you’re far more likely to have to flee the area the way you do it. See e.g.:
http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/safety/faq/alwa...
Maybe but that doesn’t mean well established science has to be ditched each time someone tries to recover PGMs from a car catalyst and is getting
confusing results.
[Edited on 19-8-2013 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I sense some attitude and frustration on your end with my uneducated and ever so improper manner in the usage of terminology and chemicals.
In theory?
"In theory" it could be possible to produce a electrolyte(battery solution) that has it's own energy source. No outside electrical source via anode
and cathode. I think your living cells are good enough basis for my theoretical thought, right?
I suppose that is more gibberish though in your minds eye...
Alchemy is not just a fundamental precursor to what you believe is science. Philosophy and exploration of our environments and selves is still the
very same as it was in the past. Mind you there are many forms of alchemy... I never stated which and will leave you to assume which to keep some
sort of riddle going.
Well if i mix a tiny bit of acid into a solution of water then my acid is no longer nearly as concentrated as before. I will continue to do things
the way i have been as i want the greater amounts of heat with greater concentrations and have a reaction vessel that can withstand it. As far as
adding the water to the acid, i do use extreme caution as an accident could become a living a nightmare. I guess i could of added in some safety
issues but you ever so eloquently covered that for me. Thanks
Well established science? Please by all means define just what you "believe" that to be!!!??? I use that statement on pretty much everything i do.
If i could only count the amount of times man has failed at one thing only to learn another.....
Also for your information there is a known industrial process for refining pgm's with sulfuric acid in a kiln. I am also glad you wasn't Edison's
teacher as i may not have lights at the moment. In other words thanks for the words of "encouragement and thought" added to my experiment and if my
personal research is to um fallible for your thought process and or nature. Then by all means don't read it... It isn't like i forced you too...
Blah, any way my money, my experiments and my life. If i seem to be to reckless and a danger to others then by all means let the moderator delete my
thread and if that is the case then i must of misread the top left of the page that says "The art and science of "amateur" experimentalism". Back to
my pointless research that is just more gibberish i guess.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
I sense some attitude and frustration on your end that we disagree with you.
A chemical battery without electrodes technically is more gibberish, as that's not how electricity works. The electrodes are vital to the application:
Remove them and nothing happens.
The problem with adding the water is that the enthalpy of solvation (discussed earlier) will cause the water to boil occasionally, splashing sulfuric
acid around. Not fun. Use 98% acid in a (Ceramic?) crucible, and heat strongly for several hours - this might dissolve the PGM's.
But why try so hard when you can just add some nitric acid and have a makeshift aqua regia? Then you'd be able to dissolve them at room temperature -
you could even leave the stuff overnight if you wanted to.
We are trying to help, and I actually do want to see you achieve this. I would also prefer that we discuss things calmly, to avoid yet another thread
pruning.
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
froot
Hazard to Others
Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: refluxed
|
|
You probably have insoluble values in both vessels and all you've achieved at this point is pulled the base metals and possibly some ceramic substrate
into solution.
If I were you I'd combine both solutions again, let it settle for a day or so and then decant the liquid off to access the precipitate. Once decanted
mobilise the precipitate by adding some water and neutralise by adding NaOH solution dropwise. Settle and decant.
Once done follow MrHomeScientist's advice above.
We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com |
|
|
BleepingAmazing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 18-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Elementcollector1
It isn't gibberish as the exothermic reaction has the possibility of sustaining a pyroelectric reaction. Provided other things are added to the
solution.
froot
It is not an experiment if i follow known procedures. I am experimenting.... I have had great success with refining silver and gold with different
procedures that are not found on the internet or in books.
I am officially done with this post and will keep my "research" to myself. Make a new thread and post your known procedures and keep telling yourself
it is an experiment. Good luck to you all in your "experiments" or should i say lab projects.
*deletes account and says good riddance*
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
BleepingAmazing, it is unwise to post your distaste of the scientific method on a science forum and expect a friendly response.
[thread closed]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
