Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  
Author: Subject: The most funny mistake I ever saw
plante1999
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Mad as a hatter

shocked.gif posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:29
The most funny mistake I ever saw


A user of sciencemadness had a runaway during a reaction and asked my questions. It was about making bromine from sodium bromide using potassium permanganate and sulphuric acid.

He told me about a runnaway, condenser not working properly, suckback and bromine fumes everywhere.

At first from what he say, I had tough he add used conc sulphuric acid and potassium permanganate and bromide mix. Obviously sulphuric acid would react with the bromide to make bromine and SO2. Also manganese heptoxide would have bean made, and used as the oxidizer in the reaction. This was worthy of AnderHoverland pathway to simple chemical.

But then he told me he used bromide solution and added the sulphuric acid to it, I asked for a picture or a drawing, and he gave me this:




Obviously there is a problem with the setup. It was the first time I saw a sep. funnel at this place in a ground glass set-up.

So what do you think of this?




I never asked for this.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
elementcollector1
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline

Mood: Molten

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:41


That's... certainly interesting. I use a small, cone-shaped sep. funnel, so i can't imagine using mine for the same purpose (it has no sidearm)...
Oh, and see that thermometer? I'm guessing that was attached with rubber. Bad idea.
Is that an erlenmeyer at the receiving end? Why on earth is he using an erlenmeyer and not a RB flask?
Still, if this worked it would certainly be an extraordinarily good setup. Few joints, simple... Not me. I'm going to bubble chlorine through my hot sodium bromide solution (requiring a ton of stoppers and adapters and such).

Congrats to your friend for the novel attempted use of the sep. funnel, but he might want to work a little on optimizing it. ;P




Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kristofvagyok
National Hazard
****




Posts: 659
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:44


After the first explosion -if survived- the chemist is usually more careful.



I have a blog where I post my pictures from my work: http://labphoto.tumblr.com/
-Pictures from chemistry, check it out(:

"You can’t become a chemist and expect to live forever."
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
elementcollector1
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline

Mood: Molten

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:48


Quote: Originally posted by kristofvagyok  
After the first explosion -if survived- the chemist is usually more careful.

I must not be 'usual', then. XD




Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Magpie
lab constructor
*****




Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:50


That's not a separatory funnel but a pressure-equalizing funnel. I don't see why that wouldn't work if the H2SO4 was added slowly. Biggest problem is that it does not have a vent. You should always have one.

That's not to say that I would recommend that set-up, however.

[Edited on 9-12-2012 by Magpie]




The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smaerd
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1262
Registered: 23-1-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: hmm...

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:51


Yikes! Hopefully they were working on a 10mmol scale! More importantly I hope they review some literature and didn't have a hard time cleaning up.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
UnintentionalChaos
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline

Mood: Nucleophilic

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:52


The NaBr/KMnO4 mix with sulfuric acid added is my preferred method of making bromine. It generally goes very smoothly unless you were to somehow dump all the H2SO4 in at once due to the severe exotherm, but that apparatus is baffling.

[Edited on 12-9-12 by UnintentionalChaos]




Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!

'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyro
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 16:53


Hello.
I will own up :) it was me. I was trying out UC's prep. My claisen has NS14 joints at the top. and my addition funnel is NS29. i dont have an adapter for that yet, so i put it between the two.

It is a thermometer with teflon ring, so it isn't so bad.
and it is an erlenmeyer, I have ground glass erlenmeyers as wel as RBF's (All nice schott ones)

what happened was that my cooling pump failed and i didn't nitice till my scrubber started bubbling frantically. at that moment i stopped H2SO4 addition, but forgot about suckback.

You can only use a funnel like that if its pressure equalized, I had a big arument with plante as he said that the pressure of the Br2 being formed forced more H2SO4 into the flask. this isn't so according to Pascal's law (though that's physics, not chem) the only problem was my cooling pump.

Kristof, I did learn :D tomorrow i will fix my water pump, swap reciever and get all the Br2 as to not waste the NaBr

@UC i dripped it in slowly, all went well until the condenser warmed up!

It was not a small scale! the flask was 1l, funnel 500ml, condenser 400mm,...


[Edited on 9-12-2012 by Pyro]




all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smaerd
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1262
Registered: 23-1-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: hmm...

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 17:03


Always start with small scale first pyro, especially when abusing glass-ware like a red-headed step-child on a new reaction. I'm not a pro, but that's something I have learned along the way.

Two neck flask seems to make a lot more sense?




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyro
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 17:06


red headed step child? i dont get that one!
I don't have a smaller add. funnel! and I don't have a reasonable sized 2-neck flask.




all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
cyanureeves
National Hazard
****




Posts: 744
Registered: 29-8-2010
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 17:53


pyro not even if the red headed child stood out like a sore thumb among brunette parents? by the way do fumes travel up that side arm and pass the sulfuric acid and condense into the erlenmeyer? is heat involved in this set up? so is this a proper set up or not?

[Edited on 12-9-2012 by cyanureeves]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
elementcollector1
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline

Mood: Molten

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 18:24


Quote: Originally posted by cyanureeves  
pyro not even if the red headed child stood out like a sore thumb among brunette parents? by the way do fumes travel up that side arm and pass the sulfuric acid and condense into the erlenmeyer? is heat involved in this set up? so is this a proper set up or not?

[Edited on 12-9-2012 by cyanureeves]


This is not a proper setup, but a rather unorthodox one. And yes, that is what should happen to the bromine fumes.




Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Endimion17
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline

Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second

[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 18:59


Pyro, if you don't want to put the pressure equalizing funnel above the Claisen adapter, just buy the damn two necked flask... A considerable amount of bromine will end wasted inside sulphuric acid in this setup. I don't understand the neccessity of this design, nor its usefulness. I think there is none.

For the sake of this expensive and dangerous liquid, don't do experiments with large scale amount of reactants. Experiments are for solving problems, demonstration experiments are for teaching.
When you want to produce raw material, it's not an experiment anymore. It's production, and production is something you do when you know how small scale and large scale experiments work.

If you don't do these things properly, you'll end up dead. I'm not joking. You'll end up with a pulmonary oedema in that non-ventilated basement of yours.




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 8-12-2012 at 19:22


i dont know why everybody likes the H2SO4 method of producing Br2....i drop conc. NaClO (pool bleach 10% $7 a gal at walmart) in a heated HCl and saturated NaBr sol.
Bromine just flows nicely towards the cold trap where it remains solid (mostly) untill i need it!
all the chemicals are cheap and plentifull no need to waste precious sulfuric...




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Siggebo
Harmless
*




Posts: 23
Registered: 6-5-2012
Location: Sweden
Member Is Offline

Mood: Under reflux

[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 01:32


Quote: Originally posted by neptunium  
i dont know why everybody likes the H2SO4 method of producing Br2....i drop conc. NaClO (pool bleach 10% $7 a gal at walmart) in a heated HCl and saturated NaBr sol.
Bromine just flows nicely towards the cold trap where it remains solid (mostly) untill i need it!
all the chemicals are cheap and plentifull no need to waste precious sulfuric...

Usually, as far as I've understood it, because of the risk of interhalogen formation!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 02:18


Quote: Originally posted by Magpie  
Biggest problem is that it does not have a vent. You should always have one.

[Edited on 9-12-2012 by Magpie]


Yes it has.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 04:12


Siggebo the chlorine is form and used instantly in my set up(or within milliseconds), it ends up in NaCl right anway and cant distill out of the reaction mix...
Granted there will be some Cl in my bromine but trace amount




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
*****




Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 05:12


Even without KMnO4, when many ignorant chemists attempt to make anhydrous HBr they discover that their sulfuric acid has oxidized much of their bromide to elemental bromine. This usually only happens when the sulfuric acid is concentrated, or heated.



I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying lets remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 05:44


everybody has its favorite, i just hate to use conc. sulfuric acid when i have gallons of NaClO and HCl ... note that i dont even bubble the Cl2 its all happening in the mix! ...ignorance? maybe ..this just works fine for me



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Pyro
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 06:12


Endimion, I already mentioned why I didn't put it on my claisen, the top openings are 14/20 and my add. funnel is 29/42.

I don't see how any Br2 would be lost in the H2SO4 as its all going into the solution eventually. my problem was suckback.

Cyanureeves, almost all the Br2 formed goes up the arm and into the condenser, and only a tiny bit condensed into the funnel and of course the Br2 sank under the H2SO4 and went right back to the flask




all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyro
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-12-2012 at 10:19


I think i'm on to something! there is green stuff on my hotplate where the flask was touching it.
It was a 1l Laboy flask, maybe it cracked, the mix in it was too dark to see anything though.
I will let you know what i discover




all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fleaker
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1252
Registered: 19-6-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: nucleophilic

[*] posted on 14-12-2012 at 05:15


Just an aside, I really wish people who want bromine would give the H2SO4 + NaBrO3 + NaBrO3 route--it's very effective and almost quantitative. It is still necessary to de-water the bromine (after it cools!!!!) with conc. sulfuric acid in a sep funnel. If chloride contamination is tolerable, HCl and even chlorate can be used as the oxidizers.


I'm making some bromate this weekend (more useful to me than bromine).




Neither flask nor beaker.


"Kid, you don't even know just what you don't know. "
--The Dark Lord Sauron
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyro
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-12-2012 at 06:22


NaBrO3 is expensive! over here its over 15 times the cost!



all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smaerd
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1262
Registered: 23-1-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: hmm...

[*] posted on 14-12-2012 at 07:42


When I choose to generate bromine which I surely will, I am going to use woelen's electrochemical method. Electrons are cheap and theres no decontamination of glass-ware. He also has an electro-synthesis of potassium bromate on his website.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-12-2012 at 08:08


Pyro, if you don't have the correct glassware to put the addition funnel out of the distillation pathway, then do the reaction in an ice bath first, by slow addition of sulfuric acid to keep the temperature under control. Only then change the addition funnel for the claisen adapter and do the distillation with a normal setup.



…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  

  Go To Top