| Pages:
1
2 |
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Question for a machinist
I have a question for a machinist.
I need a 9 square inch 1/4" thick aluminum plate that's as flat as possible. McMaster Carr sells a 12 square inch 1/4" thick aluminum plate that's
flat to within 0.002". Thing is I need it to be 9 square inch. The only tool I have available that I can use to cut the plate is a jigsaw. Is a jigsaw
fine to cut the plate or will it mess up my flatness?
|
|
|
bahamuth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 384
Registered: 3-11-2009
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Under stimulated
|
|
If you are very gentle and careful it shouldn't damage the flatness.
But why not get someone to cut it on a laser, or a waterjet. Every good machineshop has those things nowdays..
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
|
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't know any local shop that uses laser, waterjet but not laser. The waterjet shop has a $50 minimum. I'd like to save me those 50 buckaroos if I
can cut it myself without messing up the flatness. I think I'll do it myself and just go real sloooooooow! 
|
|
|
bahamuth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 384
Registered: 3-11-2009
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Under stimulated
|
|
Remember to get a blade for the saw that works good for Al, and get e spare or two. In my experience worn tools are the usual cause for failure when
doing precision work..
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
|
|
|
m1tanker78
National Hazard
Posts: 685
Registered: 5-1-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
1/4" Al plate should easily survive a jigsaw, distortion-free. As suggested, use a quality new blade. Just to be sure, you can also spray some cutting
fluid on it periodically as you move along. I have some blue stuff that's GREAT for cutting and drilling but the label is history so I don't know the
name. Don't forget to bevel the cuts or at least file down the burrs to keep it flat as possible.
Tank
Chemical CURIOSITY KILLED THE CATalyst.
|
|
|
bbartlog
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Only real risk IMO is if the material has internal stresses already (from rolling or whatever methods were used to manufacture it), in which case
there's a chance that cutting it will allow it to warp slightly. Otherwise, as long as the blade is sharp and you have a good flat support while
cutting, it shouldn't cause a problem. Of course if you need the edges to be flat you will also need to do some careful deburring.
The less you bet, the more you lose when you win.
|
|
|
cyanureeves
National Hazard
Posts: 744
Registered: 29-8-2010
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
tap magic oil works great and you can easily cut 1/4 aluminum with a hacksaw.you can cut 4" into the material on all four sides leaving just one inch
of meat in the middle which you can cut with the blade alone. oops! no you cant,i see you will start with a 12" square.the jigsaw should eat it like
butter.noisy butter!
[Edited on 5-3-2012 by cyanureeves]
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by gnitseretni  | | I need a 9 square inch 1/4" thick aluminum plate that's as flat as possible. McMaster Carr sells a 12 square inch 1/4" thick aluminum plate that's
flat to within 0.002". Thing is I need it to be 9 square inch. The only tool I have available that I can use to cut the plate is a jigsaw. Is a jigsaw
fine to cut the plate or will it mess up my flatness? |
"As flat as possible" is a dangerous phrase to give to
a machinist. With scraping, you can easily get to 0.0002", ten times the accuracy you specify. Regardless of your expected tolerance, do you plan to
actually measure the flatness?
If you use hand tools to cut the plate, you won't be adding any distortion that wasn't already there. 1/4" aluminum will cut quickly with a hacksaw,
although you'll have to be tricky about cutting from each side. You can cut aluminum in that dimension with a table saw, for that matter.
If you know what alloy you have, you can look up a heat treatment schedule for stress relief. For certain common alloys, you shouldn't need more than
a bake in your home oven.
As always, if we knew the application, it would be easier to assist.
|
|
|
Morgan
International Hazard
Posts: 1694
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Maybe a finer tooth blade would be better so that it doesn't grab as easily.
|
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The plate will be used as a bed on a 3D printer. I need a bed with a flatter surface than the one I have now to achieve better accuracy and a better
surface finish on my printed parts.
@watson.fawkes: I'm not familiar with scraping. Care to elaborate? Is this something I would do myself or is it done by a machine?
I did a quick search myself. Are you talking about laying the work on a surface plate that transfers a dye onto the work piece to reveal high spots,
which are then scraped off, and then simply repeat the process until the work piece is flat?
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by gnitseretni | The plate will be used as a bed on a 3D printer. I need a bed with a flatter surface than the one I have now to achieve better accuracy and a better
surface finish on my printed parts.
[...]
Are you talking about laying the work on a surface plate that transfers a dye onto the work piece to reveal high spots, which are then scraped off,
and then simply repeat the process until the work piece is flat? |
Yes, that's the scraping I'm talking about.
What's the planarity of your current bed? Is just warped, or does it change under temperature? You can estimate planarity with a surface plate and a
dial test indicator mounted on a surface gage.
Are you sure it's the bed that's the problem with the printer? What kind of printer is it?
|
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I found a website of a guy that does alot of scraping. I contacted him to see if he'd be interested in scraping my current bed. I mentioned that I can
get a plate that's flat to within 0.002" but that I wanted a plate that's flatter. He said he didn't think he could do better.
Did some more research and I think I'll look for a local shop that has a surface grinder and have them grind my current bed. Wikipedia says that most
surface grinders (depending on usage) should get the surface flat to within .0001". But even if it's .0005", it's good enough for me
The printer is a Botmill Glider 3.0.
|
|
|
condennnsa
Hazard to Others
Posts: 217
Registered: 20-4-2010
Location: Romania
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you want flat, use a piece of float glass.
All window glass is float glass.
Due to the production process it comes out extremely flat and parallel .
I use 3 pieces of float glass on top each other (each 4mm thick) glued together with double sided sticky tape,
these 3 on top of a granite 50*50cm flooring slab, as a poor man's surface plate. it is extremely accurate.
[Edited on 6-3-2012 by condennnsa]
|
|
|
Wizzard
Hazard to Others
Posts: 337
Registered: 22-3-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Granite makes and excellent CNC surface, it's very flat and hard!! Glass is my second choice, though.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Although getting a flat plate is probably the best way, I have always wandered why you could not correct for inperfections like this in software on
CNC machines. The nozzle height could be adjusted for the height of the plate.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
bahamuth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 384
Registered: 3-11-2009
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Under stimulated
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by phlogiston | | Although getting a flat plate is probably the best way, I have always wandered why you could not correct for inperfections like this in software on
CNC machines. The nozzle height could be adjusted for the height of the plate. |
If you think a little about it it would not do any good...
Imagine the printer bed is "convex" on the middle with an increase i height of 0.2 mm, would it do any good to move the nozzle up in that area? You
would get a convex product...
IMO the glass-plate idea seems like the best option, cheap aso.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by gnitseretni | Did some more research and I think I'll look for a local shop that has a surface grinder and have them grind my current bed. Wikipedia says that most
surface grinders (depending on usage) should get the surface flat to within .0001". But even if it's .0005", it's good enough for me
The printer is a Botmill Glider 3.0. |
The biggest problem you have is that you have a machine that's has
plastic connectors as part of its basic structure. This limits its inherent accuracy merely through its flexibility. It's not visible flexibility, but
it's a fools game to try to strive for ten-thousandths on a machine like that. I'm guessing that the stock plate you were looking at ordering will be
just fine without further processing.
If you want more accuracy, I'd worry about the parallelism of ways on which the axis rests, and the parallelism of the mounting from those ways to the
output platform. Unfortunately, there's no built-in way to adjust those ways, although you could use shims. But before even that, you need a way to
measure it, which is the traditional surface plate + dial test indicator + surface gage combination. So unless you want to spend on that (or have a
friend at a machine shop that will lend you access), there's just so sense in bolting a very flat plate onto an axis that doesn't travel in parallel
and'/or has significant skew or parallelism issues. The bed is only a single step in the metrology chain, and without measuring it, there's no
particularly good reason to believe it's the worst problem.
I doubt glass will work for you. While it comes out of the factory flat, there are any number of ways that it can deform. In the design of your
printer, the bed is bolted to a movable frame. If you use glass, you've still got to mount it. You could drill the glass, I suppose, but if you don't,
you'll have to make a sub-bed for it, and that will be just as good for that machine.
Lastly, surface grinding isn't magic. The biggest problem is that the workpiece generally deforms under the mounting force. With ferromagnetic pieces,
the typical problem is that a magnetic chuck will pull a warped piece flat. After grinding, it's flat while still mounted, then springs back after
demounting from the chuck. The solution, no surprise, is to scrape. You make one side perfectly flat; that side goes face down on the chuck. The piece
then doesn't deform on the chuck and it comes out parallel without any spring-back. Grinding aluminum plate has all these problems, plus difficulty in
chucking it. Thin plate like 1/4" is likely to deform if simply put down in a clamp. You can laminate to a ferromagnetic plate with superglue and then
dissolve it out, but you then have to ensure that the plate is flat and parallel and the mounted side of the Al is flat. This all seems like overkill
for your application.
|
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I understand why you question the rigidity of the machine. I don't like the plastic parts either, nor do I like the threaded rods. Getting a new bed
is only one of the modifications I plan on making. I plan to turn my printer into something more like the one on this page http://www.hydraraptor.blogspot.com/ - And instead of rods for the y-axis, I plan on using shafts that have a support rail.. the one halfway down
this page http://www.mcmaster.com/#linear-shafts/=gjplb4 - and I'll get larger diameter rods for the x and z-axis. But those mods are for later, new bed
first, which will be an improvement already.
I have thought of glass as well, btw. If I wanted to use it, I could secure it to my current bed with bulldog clips, like others have done.
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
There are methods of electroless plating of low melting bright mirror finish bismuth tin solder alloy coatings which could be useful for this sort of
thing.
Some of these coatings are fusible in place by heat treating and basically leave a surface mirror which is close to optically flat ......which should
be flat enough...
on the flitter flatness index of course 
Silver/tin 4/96 solder leaves a mirror and integrates / alloys with many substrates ......solid copper would work best instead of aluminum if you
decided to go with a mirror plating scheme
The same techniques used for making telescope mirrors could be applied to what you are doing.
[Edited on 7-3-2012 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sounds interesting. I'll look into it.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Rosco Bodine | There are methods of electroless plating of low melting bright mirror finish bismuth tin solder alloy coatings which could be useful for this sort of
thing. [...]
The same techniques used for making telescope mirrors could be applied to what you are doing. |
Optically
reflective is a kind of flatness that's called surface finish. This is a rather different notion of flatness than needed here. Surface finish has to
do with flatness across a small patch of surface, say, 1 sq. mm. The kind of flatness needed for machine fabrication is flatness across the whole of
the platter. The example of local flatness for a focusing mirror is a perfect illustration of the difference.
In particular, using an adhesive material (like molten metal that solidifies) will do nothing to improve total flatness for this application. There
are a few high-tech materials, like special filled epoxies, use to restore flatness in machine tool reconditioning, but they require a reference flat
to work. And they give you one flat part at the end, not an entirely-parallel metrology chain.
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
A pool of mercury is pretty flat. You could try that. You can get flatness and surface finish at the same time on something as small as a 3X3 inch
piece.
Seriously, a 3X3 1/4" inch aluminum plate could be hand lapped to probably a thousandth or less with a little elbow grease simply using successive
grits of emery paper secured on a piece of float glass and then wet lapping with polishing grits and with rouge. An orbital motion buffer with double
sticky mounting tape could be used as a motor drive to make the job go faster.
|
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A pool of mercury? I think I'll pass up on that 
Btw, it's 9 square inch, not 3 square inch.
|
|
|
Neil
National Hazard
Posts: 556
Registered: 19-3-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Speaking from my experience; watson.fawkes has the dead right of it. Lapping to perfect flatness is very difficult, without a lot of practice, no
mater how smooth you think you've lapped something you'll find you are off when you start scraping.
As soon as you add a motor to the issue it gets worse...
Personally I'd look into the run out of the mechanism before worrying about the plate.
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
Ummm yeah I was thinking of lapping 9 square inches not 81 square inches
9X9 should be called 9 inches square, and that much area would require machining and could be expensive.
Sheet lucite or cycolac might be a better and cheaper way to go.
What material are you printing, for which such accuracy is needed
for the base underneath? Unless you have vacuum holding down
whatever you are printing, and that material is exceedingly thin,
then that material will be laying across irregularites in the surface
rather than conforming perfectly to the bed surface on which it lays.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
