| Pages:
1
2 |
crazyboy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 436
Registered: 31-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Marginally insane
|
|
Tritium and nuclear chemistry
I was browsing Wikipedia when I stumbled upon an article on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium_illumination. In short the radioactive isotope of hydrogen, tritium, is composed of one proton and two
neutrons. It occurs naturally in the atmosphere in trace amounts where it is produced by the interaction between atmospheric nitrogen and high energy
cosmic rays.
Tritium decays into beta particles (electrons), as well as helium-3, and electron antineutrinos. Tritum has a half life of ~12.32 years. Radiation
from tritium sources are not particularly dangerous because the relatively low energy particles cannot penetrate tissue.
Anyway, tritium can be used for illumination by using the process of radioluminescence whereby the beta particles produced by the tritium excite a
phosphor such as zinc sulfide causing them to emit light. This property is utilized in some gun sights as well as exit signs to produce a long lived
light source that does not require power.
I was just curious how feasible it would be to produce tritium by neutron bombardment of lithium-6 (a naturally occurring and stable isotope ~7.5%
abundant in natural lithium) From a neutron source of americium/beryllium or polonium/beryllium.
I do not plan to attempt this process but it has peaked my interest. Anyway lithium-6 doesn't make up a very large percentage of lithium and the
amount of neutrons produced by a pellet of the proposed neutron source would be very slight.
Some relevant links
Tritium
Americium as a neutron source
Radioluminescence
Polonium/beryllium neutron source
[Edited on 31-1-2012 by crazyboy]
[Edited on 31-1-2012 by crazyboy]
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
a succesfull feasable activation with neutrons depand on different factors mainly the neutron cross section of the target element and the
"temperature" of the neutrons,
6Li has a cross section of 0.045 barns compare with 10B 3837 barns!
neutrons from a Am/Be source are a little hot and need to be slow down to about 2Km/s to have a chance to activate anything ,this can be done by
immersing the source and the target in an hydrogenated material (water ,wax etc..)
tritium like other beta emitters are not very toxic outside the body, inside ,its a different story.
they can seriusly dammaged tissues and bones , and it all come down to the biological half life and how well the element enter and stay in the
biological system,
3H is not the only radioisotope capable of low energy beta rays and semi long half life , other can also be evacuated biologicaly by the body in case
of injestion.
|
|
|
crazyboy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 436
Registered: 31-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Marginally insane
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by neptunium  | a succesfull feasable activation with neutrons depand on different factors mainly the neutron cross section of the target element and the
"temperature" of the neutrons,
6Li has a cross section of 0.045 barns compare with 10B 3837 barns! neutrons from a Am/Be source are a little hot and need to be slow down to about
2Km/s to have a chance to activate anything ,this can be done by immersing the source and the target in an hydrogenated material (water ,wax etc..)
|
Actually
| Quote: |
the large neutron absorption cross-section of 6Li (941 barns, thermal) versus the small neutron absorption cross-section of 7Li (0.045 barns, thermal)
make strict isotopic separation of lithium a requirement for fluoride reactor use.
|
Isotopes of lithium
And:
| Quote: |
Tritium is produced in nuclear reactors by neutron activation of lithium-6. This is possible with neutrons of any energy
|
| Quote: |
High-energy neutrons can also produce tritium from lithium-7 in an endothermic reaction, consuming 2.466 MeV
|
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
i copied the wrong value of Li7 instead sorry about that...
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
there is other isotope easier to produce than 3H ...but i guess it could be salvage from nuclear power plant thats a fact tritium is usually released
in the atmosphere
[Edited on 31-1-2012 by neptunium]
|
|
|
Wizzard
Hazard to Others
Posts: 337
Registered: 22-3-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It would be much easier to just purchase tritium in small vials, on Ebay 
But an americium 241/Be foil could generate some tritium gas from lithium, albiet in an insignificant quantity. I would get a Be foil, strap a mess of
Am241 smoke detector buttons to it, and put a rather thick slice of Lithium on the other end of the foil. Li7 will not absorb the neutrons, but Li6
will. Perhaps make sure the tritium can escape the lithium, also... Put the whole apparatus in a sealed glass vessel/vacuum (but also cool it, the
Lithium will evaporate).
I think it could be figured out how many Am241 buttons would be needed to generate enough Tritium that it would not degenerate faster than it is made
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Wizzard | | I think it could be figured out how many Am241 buttons would be needed to generate enough Tritium that it would not degenerate faster than it is made
|
8,435,627 would be needed.
Well, a lot. A smoke detector contains only about a microcurie of Am241. I think the neutron yield from a microcurie on Be would only be of the
order of 100 neutrons per second if intimately mixed with Be powder.
Anyone thinking of taking the Am out of smoke detectors should Google David Hahn aka Radioactive Boy Scout. Beryllium powder presents its own
toxicity problems as well.
I won't even bother to mention that taking the Am out of smoke detectors violates NRC regulations and they are not a forgiving bunch.
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
not only its illegal but worse! its useless!
|
|
|
aliced25
Hazard to Others
Posts: 262
Registered: 31-7-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
LiBeD4, now strap some Americium buttons on that sucker Especially
if one enriches lithium by distillation to get Li6
From a Knight of the Realm: "Animated movies are not just for kids, they're also for adults who do a lot of drugs." Sir Paul McCartney
|
|
|
Solomon
Hazard to Self
Posts: 82
Registered: 24-6-2013
Location: Ancient Mines
Member Is Offline
Mood: FOR SCIENCE!
|
|
is there a way to measure the temperature of neutrons? And also, how could someone isolate radium from it's salt?
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Solomon | | is there a way to measure the temperature of neutrons? And also, how could someone isolate radium from it's salt? |
Yes, but I think that's way outside the scope of pretty much anyone at home, unless you've got a lot of money to build sophisticated machinery.
Radium can be isolated by electrolysis of the molten chloride, or I think by the reduction with calcium, to name the most famous ways. Both things are
incredibly dangerous outside specialized equipment (think about Sellafield) and would certainly result in the painful death of the person isolating it
and anyone living in the same apartment because of the contamination and hard radiation going everywhere.
That's a furiously radioactive earth alkali metal low in the periodic group, meaning it's very chemically reactive. Think of it as very dense metal
similar in reactivity to sodium or lithium, but with its oxidized surface faintly glowing blue in the dark because it's radiating so much energy it
would kill you in no time. It releases a lot of alpha rays, its daughter nuclei release an ample amount of beta, and all together they release pretty
hard gamma rays.
You really can't work safely with it without a hot cell. It's a scary metal.
|
|
|
Solomon
Hazard to Self
Posts: 82
Registered: 24-6-2013
Location: Ancient Mines
Member Is Offline
Mood: FOR SCIENCE!
|
|
I am sure I could get that amount of money if necessary. Even if I can't, I would still be interested in learning how an apparatus measuring neutron
speed (heat or energy) is made. Also if you were to do this, I am guessing that an advanced vacuum chamber would be necessary.
[Edited on 7-3-2013 by Solomon]
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
One of these
http://www.sii.co.jp/jp/segg/files/2013/03/file_PRODUCT_MAST...
and some sort of neutron detector would let you measure the speed of the neutrons.
In principle, it's a very simple piece of equipment.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8013
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Are you joking or do you seriously mean this?
Suppose you have 1 gram of heavy water based on tritium (T2O) in a small vessel. What energy output do you expect? It would instantly explode in a
white hot fire ball, simply due to the release of tremendous amounts of energy from its redioactive decay. Commercial samples of tritium, used for
lighting purposes contain the material in nanogram or maybe microgram quantities at dilutions of 1 to a million or even more.
Just to get an idea of the intensity of the energy, coming from this. If you have a piece of plutonium, the size of a tennis ball, then that piece
will be luke warm to the touch, due to the energy released by radioactive decay. Plutonium has a half life of appr. 25000 years. What do you expect
from something with a half life of 12.5 years? I have seen pictures on internet of a compound with a half life of 500 years. It emits red/orange
light, simply because of the intense heat released due to its radioactive decay.
What you probably have seen are ampoules of heavy water, containing deuterium instead of tritium. Such ampoules can be obtained for prices of a few
tens of dollars or euros per 10 ml or so. I myself have a nice gas tube, filled with D2, which emits a nice salmon light when submitted to high
frequency high voltage. But again, this is deuterium, not tritium. Deuterium is a stable isotope of hydrogen.
[Edited on 3-7-13 by woelen]
|
|
|
Wizzard
Hazard to Others
Posts: 337
Registered: 22-3-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I have two 'vials' of Tritium - They are pretty common on Ebay, although mine came from a private collection.
I apologize for the quality - My camera is pitiful at low light.
[Edited on 7-3-2013 by Wizzard]
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Solomon | | is there a way to measure the temperature of neutrons? And also, how could someone isolate radium from it's salt? |
Educate yourself, young one: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_temperature" target="_blank">Neutron
temperature</a> <img src="../scipics/_wiki.png" />.
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium#Radioactivity" target="_blank"> | Quote: | | Radium is three million times as radioactive as the same mass of uranium. <img src="../scipics/_wiki.png" /> |
</a>We cannot overemphasize how dangerous radium is! If you attempt to isolate it, you <em>will</em> die as a
direct result. It's not a matter of if, but a matter of when.
If you're interested in radium, let me suggest reading about it, rather than attempting to experiment with it. I thoroughly enjoyed reading and
highly recommend <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/Deadly_sunshine.html?id=5UkfAQAAIAAJ" target="_blank"><em>Deadly Sunshine:
The History and Fatal Legacy of Radium</em> by David I. Harvie</a> <img src="../scipics/_ext.png" />.
[Edited on 7/9/13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
Solomon
Hazard to Self
Posts: 82
Registered: 24-6-2013
Location: Ancient Mines
Member Is Offline
Mood: FOR SCIENCE!
|
|
I have seen this wikipedia page bfesser, but knowing the temperatures of different neutrons is useless unless I knew the temperature of the ones I was
dealing with. Perhaps if I knew the temperatures of the neutrons of different radioactive materials when their alpha rays go through beryllium. EX:
when alpha rays from these compounds react with beryllium they produce neutrons of: Radium = ?ev, Americium = ?ev, Thorium = ?ev, Uranium = ?ev,
tellurium = ?ev, polonium = ?ev, etc.... Perhaps if I had a chamber that could measure neutrons and I put it lets say 500 feet from a neutron source
and had a sensor attached to it that detected major neutron fluxes. So I have the neutrons shielded and then when I want to measure their sped, then
simply remove the barrier and measure how many millionths of a second it took for the neutrons to reach the detection chamber and thus measure the
speed (temperature) of the neutrons.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
| Quote: | | perhaps if I had a chamber that could measure neutrons and I put it lets say 500 feet from a neutron source and had a sensor attached to it that
detected major neutron fluxes. So I have the neutrons shielded and then when I want to measure their sped, then simply remove the barrier and measure
how many millionths of a second it took for the neutrons to reach the detection chamber and thus measure the speed (temperature) of the neutrons.
|
Yes, that is definately easier than looking it up.
http://www.safetyoffice.uwaterloo.ca/hse/radiation/rad_seale...
Additionally, there may be some commercial value in the incredibly fast shutter you will develop to open/close the neutron shielding.
Please do be a bit careful with a neutron source powerfull enough to be detectable 500 feet away, especially in an amateur science setting.
[Edited on 4-7-2013 by phlogiston]
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
I have been working for sometimes at this particle accelerator that would produce neutron at desired temperature and flow (more or less controllable
via electron gun and high voltage)it is increadibly difficult and tidius for one and some energy are out of reach for the home scientist..i dint give
up on my ideas but after 10 years of very little results I am loosing patience and money is always an issue ...
however I find it so interesting cant help my self!
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by woelen |
Are you joking or do you seriously mean this?
Suppose you have 1 gram of heavy water based on tritium (T2O) in a small vessel. What energy output do you expect? It would instantly explode in a
white hot fire ball, simply due to the release of tremendous amounts of energy from its redioactive decay. Commercial samples of tritium, used for
lighting purposes contain the material in nanogram or maybe microgram quantities at dilutions of 1 to a million or even more.
Just to get an idea of the intensity of the energy, coming from this. If you have a piece of plutonium, the size of a tennis ball, then that piece
will be luke warm to the touch, due to the energy released by radioactive decay. Plutonium has a half life of appr. 25000 years. What do you expect
from something with a half life of 12.5 years? I have seen pictures on internet of a compound with a half life of 500 years. It emits red/orange
light, simply because of the intense heat released due to its radioactive decay.
What you probably have seen are ampoules of heavy water, containing deuterium instead of tritium. Such ampoules can be obtained for prices of a few
tens of dollars or euros per 10 ml or so. I myself have a nice gas tube, filled with D2, which emits a nice salmon light when submitted to high
frequency high voltage. But again, this is deuterium, not tritium. Deuterium is a stable isotope of hydrogen.
[Edited on 3-7-13 by woelen] |
I haven't been able to find much info on T<sub>2</sub>O, only that it's corrosive (how much?) due to self radiolysis.
I found that PerkinElmer sells vials of what is obviously a solution of T<sub>2</sub>O in water.
As usual, MSDS is a rampant celebration of idiotic uselessness, but there's this interesting info that its radioactivity is approximately 2.5 x10e6
DPM, which is a bit over 41.6 kBq. (1 disintegration per minute = 60 becquerels)
Let's do a calculation.
Radioactivity of pure <sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub> at standard conditions is 357 TBq/g, therefore 1 g of it has 357 TBq.
Let's assume we have a vial with 1 g of pure T<sub>2</sub>O. Tritium's weight percentage in it is 13.689%, so 1 g can yield 0.273 g of
<sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub>.
Radioactivity of 0.273 g of <sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub> is 0.273 g * 357 x10e12 Bq/g = 97.416 TBq
and that's the total radioactivity of 1 g of fresh, pure T<sub>2</sub>O.
If the tritiated water sample that PerkinElmer sells contains 41.666 kBq/g of radioactivity, 1 g of their sample would contain 4.2771 x10e-10 g of
T<sub>2</sub>O, or 0.4277 ng of it.
Needless to say, if my calculations are correct, such samples are almost completely harmless. They're used for various purposes in life sciences and
do not require shielding. Decay energy (beta) is 5.7 keV which reaches 5 mm in air and 5 μm in water.
Pure sample of T<sub>2</sub>O, with its halftime of decay 12.3 years would probably be a contamination hazard in the sense that it would
heat itself and evaporate at an elevated rate.
I'm not sure how much, given the fact its decay energy is only 5.7 keV.
For example, <sup>239</sup>Pu decays by alpha particles and the energy is 5.245 MeV.
Alpha particles are much more massive than electrons and bump into matter easily, transferring energy, so it's understandable that, with even
24100 years of half life, the sample is warm to the touch.
<sup>3</sup>H releases wimpy electrons. Even with only 12.3 years of halftime, I doubt that if some kind of deus ex machina replicator
would create a blob of T<sub>2</sub>O, it would explode because of sudden overheating in a ball of luminous plasma.
I presume it would be warm, outgassing slowly due to evaporation and radiolysis. The sample would effectively destroy itself, and if left sealed,
there'd be a large buildup of oxygen, hydrogen, tritium in various isotopic combinations.
In short words, such ampule would be very dangerous as it would burst one day.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Solomon | | I have seen this wikipedia page bfesser, but knowing the temperatures of different neutrons is useless unless I knew the temperature of the ones I was
dealing with. Perhaps if I knew the temperatures of the neutrons of different radioactive materials when their alpha rays go through beryllium.
|
If you way you've seen that page, I have to conclude you must not have read that page. Iit's certainly not
apparent that you've read it from the questions you're asking. It's also fairly apparent that you've hardly read anything linked on that page,
particularly about neutron detectors.
If you want to do something productive, propose (to yourself) an actual experiment of pretty much any sort, work out as much of it as you are able,
and then ask questions.
Frankly, you need starter projects. Build a Geiger counter first, if you're interested in radiation. I suspect that will take you a few months to work
out something relatively simple like that all by itself.
|
|
|
Solomon
Hazard to Self
Posts: 82
Registered: 24-6-2013
Location: Ancient Mines
Member Is Offline
Mood: FOR SCIENCE!
|
|
Thank you watson.fawkes... I missed that before. "Detection software consists of analysis tools that perform tasks such as graphical analysis to
measure the number and energies of neutrons striking the detector." Apparently a standard detector is fine if altered with some detection equipment.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sillymon, I wonder, do you have any chemistry interests outside of radioactive and energetic materials? Perhaps we could suggest other experiments or
avenues of research for you. I, myself, have been thinking about purchasing and putting together one of these <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger%E2%80%93M%C3%BCller_tube" target="_blank">Geiger–Müller tube</a> <img
src="../scipics/_wiki.png" /> based radiation counter <a href="http://mightyohm.com/blog/products/geiger-counter/"
target="_blank">kits</a>, for use as a practical tool in my mineral collecting. I've also thought about connecting it to a <a
href="http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs" target="_blank">Raspberry Pi</a> or an <a href="http://arduino.cc/en/"
target="_blank">Arduino</a>, along <a
href="http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2013/01/24/adafruit-ultimate-gps-on-the-raspberry-pi-raspberry_pi-raspberrypi/" target="_blank">with a GPS
receiver</a> so I can map local background radiation on my rock-collecting hikes.
[Edited on 7/9/13 by bfesser]
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Read more. This advice will
benefit everyone. Neutron detection is significantly more complicated that you are aware.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
