alphan
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 11-8-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How to build spacecraft
Hello There,
I have an idea about science that raises many questions for me. The idea has many levels; it begins by basic correlation on biological basis and moves
up to finding out about gravity of living organisms which in turn I believe to grant us the production of gravitational machines. At the beginning we
could take the morphology, sound and electrical data and DNA of a living organism and correlate them and form a database with as many species as
possible and in turn when looking at a new organism (even an alien organism) we could program that database to produce a DNA from just the image,
sound and electrical data (all together or exclusively). Without elaborating further I want to give you the idea for a first test: take the image,
electrical impulses and natural sounds and dna sequence of 1000 types of bacteria. When you test a different type for image, sound and electrical
impulse, the correlation data of the 1000 types of bacteria would give you a DNA sequence.
Testing a 1001th bacteria for image, electric impulse and sound for actually producing a one to one match DNA could be though the other way around
too; you already have the DNA of the 1001th bacteria so one could write an algorithm, (ask for one so to speak)to produce this DNA with only the
image, sound and electricity data as a given; asking for the unique image, electrical and sound graphs could follow. This can be almost infinitely
perfected,; each one of the 1001 bacteria's triple data could be accepted as an unknown.
Variables in living organisms are what I take as life specific traits. These traits when compiled together in a database could give us a prediction of
DNA. Also it should be possible to give the DNA and ask for the sound, the electrical impulse even the image of an organism. None of these are
mutually exclusive ; so one could have just one of these traits and ask for the rest.
The data is already in our hands, and this is the most exciting part. We have been taxonomising the species and collecting all sorts of data about
them.The first is the image and DNA but there are sound and electrical recordings of many species as well. The only problem is that this data is not
collected in one single place. I am trying to get my ideas across so that maybe a professor could consider this an apt topic to investigate herself or
maybe give this topic as an doctoral thesis to a student.
The more data is collected the more accurate the predictions will be.
The second test is to look to the sound and electrical recordings of Earth; with a database that contains as many species as possible we could search
for life specific traits in the database (the collection of image, sound and electricity data) of Earth. We could find it as margins, as in life is
only possible between these points in the graph, and we could point at a location as taking the two databases as algorithm and see where they collide.
What is more how we are to find it on Earth could provide us on knowledge about how to find it on another planet which takes us to test 3.
The moon has been found to have water in the recent NASA missions, and the moon has Sound and Electrical activity. By applying how we detect life on
the Earth to the Moon we could not only find out if there is life on moon but also what possible DNA these organisms might have.
What is more I think there are two other outcomes; AI and Universal Code. I wrote how we could try and find life specific traits in the Earth data;
well one could turn/convert that data into DNA. the result would be, I believe a universal code and a very basic way to construct AI and also figure
out the gravity of living beings and how to reconstruct life sustaining gravity. I call this the world of Love.
If you would like to read on please check my blog;http://episteme-spacecraft.blogspot.com/
this is a collection of my writings;http://www.scribd.com/doc/52022119/How-to-Make-a-Spacecraft
This is my page on facebook;http://www.facebook.com/pages/How-to-make-a-spacecraft-Uzay-...
Thank you for reading.
With Kind Regards,
Alphan Vardarlı
|
|
|
niertap
Hazard to Self
Posts: 76
Registered: 5-8-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: hyper-conjucated
|
|
So... Exactly what sound do bacteria make?
Ignorance is bliss
Outliers in life are modeled by chemical kinetics
|
|
|
alphan
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 11-8-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Like every living thing bacteria make a sound as well;
http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jgam/44/1/44_49/_article
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | The only problem is that this data is not collected in one single place. |
Ahem, data is the plural of datum!
|
|
|
DougTheMapper
Hazard to Others
Posts: 145
Registered: 20-7-2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
How do we detect sound on the moon?
Victor Grignard is a methylated spirit.
|
|
|
Panache
International Hazard
Posts: 1290
Registered: 18-10-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: Instead of being my deliverance, she had a resemblance to a Kat named Frankenstein
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by alphan  | Hello There,
I have an idea about science that raises many questions for me. The idea has many levels; it begins by basic correlation on biological basis and moves
up to finding out about gravity of living organisms which in turn I believe to grant us the production of gravitational machines. At the beginning we
could take the morphology, sound and electrical data and DNA of a living organism and correlate them and form a database with as many species as
possible and in turn when looking at a new organism (even an alien organism) we could program that database to produce a DNA from just the image,
sound and electrical data (all together or exclusively). Without elaborating further I want to give you the idea for a first test: take the image,
electrical impulses and natural sounds and dna sequence of 1000 types of bacteria. When you test a different type for image, sound and electrical
impulse, the
correlation data of the 1000 types of bacteria would give you a DNA sequence.
Testing a 1001th bacteria for image, electric impulse and sound for actually producing a one to one match DNA could be though the other way around
too; you already have the DNA of the 1001th bacteria so one could write an algorithm, (ask for one so to speak)to produce this DNA with only the
image, sound and electricity data as a given; asking for the unique image, electrical and sound graphs could follow. This can be almost infinitely
perfected,; each one of the 1001 bacteria's triple data could be accepted as an unknown.
Variables in living organisms are what I take as life specific traits. These traits when compiled together in a database could give us a prediction of
DNA. Also it should be possible to give the DNA and ask for the sound, the electrical impulse even the image of an organism. None of these are
mutually exclusive ; so one could have just one of these traits and ask for the rest.
The data is already in our hands, and this is the most exciting part. We have been taxonomising the species and collecting all sorts of data about
them.The first is the image and DNA but there are sound and electrical recordings of many species as well. The only problem is that this data is not
collected in one single place. I am trying to get my ideas across so that maybe a professor could consider this an apt topic to investigate herself or
maybe give this topic as an doctoral thesis to a student.
The more data is collected the more accurate the predictions will be.
The second test is to look to the sound and electrical recordings of Earth; with a database that contains as many species as possible we could search
for life specific traits in the database (the collection of image, sound and electricity data) of Earth. We could find it as margins, as in life is
only possible between these points in the graph, and we could point at a location as taking the two databases as algorithm and see where they collide.
What is more how we are to find it on Earth could provide us on knowledge about how to find it on another planet which takes us to test 3.
The moon has been found to have water in the recent NASA missions, and the moon has Sound and Electrical activity. By applying how we detect life on
the Earth to the Moon we could not only find out if there is life on moon but also what possible DNA these organisms might have.
What is more I think there are two other outcomes; AI and Universal Code. I wrote how we could try and find life specific traits in the Earth data;
well one could turn/convert that data into DNA. the result would be, I believe a universal code and a very basic way to construct AI and also figure
out the gravity of living beings and how to reconstruct life sustaining gravity. I call this the world of Love.
If you would like to read on please check my blog;http://episteme-spacecraft.blogspot.com/
this is a collection of my writings;http://www.scribd.com/doc/52022119/How-to-Make-a-Spacecraft
This is my page on facebook;http://www.facebook.com/pages/How-to-make-a-spacecraft-Uzay-...
Thank you for reading.
With Kind Regards,
Alphan Vardarlı
|
Any chance you could rephrase that, I'm having trouble following it.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | Any chance you could rephrase that, I'm having trouble following it. |
He's talking about making a quantum leap in 'space exploration' for the celebrated Turkish space effort!
Bacteria-powered spaceships --- jeeez, all propulsion problems solved in one fell swoop - why couldn't I have thought of it?
|
|
|
DDTea
National Hazard
Posts: 940
Registered: 25-2-2003
Location: Freedomland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Degenerate
|
|
He keeps citing himself. He should present his original references.
"In the end the proud scientist or philosopher who cannot be bothered to make his thought accessible has no choice but to retire to the heights in
which dwell the Great Misunderstood and the Great Ignored, there to rail in Olympic superiority at the folly of mankind." - Reginald Kapp.
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
Troll, anyone? You know, they've got those things on teh interwebs today...
|
|
|
ScienceHideout
Hazard to Others
Posts: 391
Registered: 12-3-2011
Location: In the Source
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Spin
|
|
Someone call Polverone! I think this person is in danger of being a detritavore!
hey, if you are reading this, I can't U2U, but you are always welcome to send me an email!
|
|
|
White Yeti
National Hazard
Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline
Mood: delocalized
|
|
I don't see what's so fun about trolling this forum.
I call troll on this one.
|
|
|
MeSynth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 29-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZltqlVuDIo
|
|
I would think that the only way we will ever REALLY TRULLY be able to go into space is after we develop efficent magnetic motors. Wait that's not it.
If you know anything about magnetic motors you will probably know that the magnetic field is kinda like gravity. Well in most designs the side of the
magnet that pulls has to have the magnetic field blocked. With that said the only way we will be able to float around in floating cars and go into
space without a million gallons of rocket fuel is to develop a way to completely block out gravity. Keeping in mind that the area you take up as you
read this is the same area that is out in space where there is hardly any gravity. Gravity is weird.
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
Well tough luck. Gravity can't be blocked, and magnets are dipoles. Magnetic field is no way near as gravity. Gravity is a thing that deals with the
fabric of spacetime, and magnetic field is a relativistic part of an electric field. Even their reaches are extremely different.
Usually the people who confuse those two are the ones mesmerized by magnets and don't know anything about them. Sorry. 
|
|
|
MeSynth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 29-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZltqlVuDIo
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Endimion17 | Well tough luck. Gravity can't be blocked, and magnets are dipoles. Magnetic field is no way near as gravity. Gravity is a thing that deals with the
fabric of spacetime, and magnetic field is a relativistic part of an electric field. Even their reaches are extremely different.
Usually the people who confuse those two are the ones mesmerized by magnets and don't know anything about them. Sorry. |
Your the type that believes that time travel is possible aren't you? It's ok we have all been in your shoes. I wont try to change you views. Enjoy
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | Your the type that believes that time travel is possible aren't you? |
I firmly believe we're all time-travellers from birth . . .
|
|
|
MeSynth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 29-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZltqlVuDIo
|
|
I also like the idea of traveling far distances in space via "space craft" with the "fabaric of space time" in mind. Using the relativistic part of an
electric field to generate electricity humans could survive on a the water they bring. Since space is said to contain hydrogen water can be made in
route to the ultimate destination. This will be needed since no mater how well you purify urine or condence the water from the air given off from our
breath our bodies break down the water molecules so eventually the original water supply will depleat. Useing the oxygen given off by the plants grown
for food and the hydogen found in space more water can be made to replace what is broken down or lost. Oxygen is produced from a special type of grass
that is said to produce the most amount of oxygen out of all.
Reaching high speeds is critical when traveling long distances in order to cut down on space time (gama rays and stuff).
|
|
|
MeSynth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 29-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZltqlVuDIo
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by hissingnoise | | Quote: | | Your the type that believes that time travel is possible aren't you? |
I firmly believe we're all time-travellers from birth . . .
|
I'm no time traveller! I find that offensive . . .
|
|
|
gutter_ca
Hazard to Others
Posts: 173
Registered: 7-6-2010
Location: California
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored at work!
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Endimion17 | Well tough luck. Gravity can't be blocked, and magnets are dipoles. Magnetic field is no way near as gravity. Gravity is a thing that deals with the
fabric of spacetime, and magnetic field is a relativistic part of an electric field. Even their reaches are extremely different.
Usually the people who confuse those two are the ones mesmerized by magnets and don't know anything about them. Sorry. |
F*cking magnets, how do they work?
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I travel forward in time at a rate of one second per
second. I'll bet you do too.
|
|
|
MeSynth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 29-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZltqlVuDIo
|
|
You travel at the speed of earth too.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
And at the speed of space-time too, too . . .
|
|
|
alphan
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 11-8-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The idea has been growing and I am currently working on a thesis entitled “Observed Weak Force Interaction Based Grand Unified Thesis - Uncertainty
principle and comprehending the weak force in interaction based on the unique and common systems of the mass interacting; ie biological systems.”
Please recheck the main blog http://episteme-spacecraft.blogspot.com/
and
http://www.singularityweblog.com/forum/shameless-self-promot...
for a more philosophical discussion, particularly the final link in the last comment.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Now we will -finally- find out where all that mooing, singing, bleating, gobbling and growling on the moon came from.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
Most distressing and most depressing that the good zingers requiring thought went right over some heads. I believe the more thoughtful insightful
people are either wasting their time or are having too much fun.
I looked at the future and decided I was on the wrong side of the light cone anyway.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
SM2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 359
Registered: 8-5-2012
Location: the Irish Springs
Member Is Offline
Mood: Affect
|
|
"MONO-HYDRAZAINE!!!"
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
