| Pages:
1
2 |
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Strenght of oxidizers
As we frequently use several oxidizers, react them with eachother and synthesize them, I thought it would be useful to compile a table of strength of
oxidizers.
First of all, there are a few classification problems. We could just take the redox potential and sort according to that, but that doesn't always
correctly predict behaviour and also is rather confusing to work with (mmkay, this get's oxidized then that is reduced and..err. oh..or is this the
oxidizer?).
Secondly, the reaction situation has to be determined. I was thinking of the strength in solution, simply by testing which oxidizer would be capable
of oxidizing the other.
These are the compounds I'd like to see classified (I've classified them according to what I think, starting with the strongest):
Mn2O7
HClO4
S2O8 2-
Cr2O7 2-
MnO4 2-
ClO2 -
ClO -
ClO3 -
H2O2
ClO4 -
Remember that this is all in solution regarding cold chemical oxidation.
Waiting for your corrections/comments...
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The H2O2 should be listed above ClO3-
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
You're right that different oxidizers have different behavior depending on conditions. H2O2 can serve as a reducing agent or an oxidizer, for example.
We're often interested in oxidizers in high-temperature anhydrous conditions (combustion) as well as aqueous solution. Ammonium perchlorate is a much
better high-temperature oxidizer than sodium hypochlorite, but sodium hypochlorite will react with many more chemicals in solution.
I think that I would add HNO3 to your list somewhere in the upper half.
I'd also add a few mild oxidizers: Cu2+, Pb4+, and MnO2. They would probably fall near the bottom of the list.
As far as your ordering goes, I think that persulfate salts are considerably less aggressive than permanganates and dichromates in aqueous solution.
Also I think that chlorates are far less active than H2O2.
There are also perchromates and manganates, which are powerful oxidizers (the perchromate especially).
Somewhere on that list should go the halogens, although none of us is very likely to be using fluorine or astatine in the lab.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
persulfates are very strong oxidizers, when moist, they will spontaneously decompose into O2 with a high O3 percentage. Also, it is known that
persulfate will oxidize chlorate to perchlorate. My attempts with MnO4 - to do this have failed so far.
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
shadeT
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 3-8-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
is there any safe synthesis of Mn2O7 ? where can i find information about it ?
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3241
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Ive heard that BiO3- is a plenty powerful oxidizing agent. My inorganic text book has this to say
"One of the few oxidizing agents even more powerful then permanganate is the bismuthate ion [BiO3]- A test for manganese (II) ion is the addition
of sodium bismuthate to a sample under cold, acidic conditions. The purple permanganate ion is produced, thereby indicating the presence of
manganese."
Descriptive Inorganic Chemistry [Third Edition] Geoff Rayner-Canham Tina Overton
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
thats interesting (the BiO3- bit). Although it's off topic, how would I go about making it? Assuming my starting point is Bi metal?
|
|
|
JustMe
Hazard to Others
Posts: 111
Registered: 7-8-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
According to my old (1961), but very useful Textbook of Inorganic Chemistry (Partington)... On fusing Bismuth Trioxide with Potassium Hydroxide in
air, a brown mass of Potassium Bismuthate, KBiO3, is formed. It is hydrolyzed by water, but with cold solutions of Manganous salts in dilute nitric
acid it gives a purple solution of Permanganic Acid. So there you go.
Bismuth Trioxide, Bi2O3 is formed by heating the metal, hydroxide, basic carbonate or nitrate to redness in air. Hmm, just noticed... it also says
that Bismuth Trioxide is used to produce an iridescent white glaze on porcelain. Perhaps it is available through a pottery supply company???
Not mentioned in your list, but leave us not forget the supreme oxidizing power of Xenon Difluoride!
|
|
|
chloric1
International Hazard
Posts: 1135
Registered: 8-10-2003
Location: GroupVII of the periodic table
Member Is Offline
Mood: Stoichiometrically Balanced
|
|
bismuth
You know with an ebay and all Bismuth is readily available and it is not a hazardous material. And yes it is tricky on figuring outoxidizer strength.
ClO3 is stronger than H2O2 in the respect that ClO2 oxidizes H2O2 to clorous acid and oxygen gas; but peroxysulfates can oxidize chlorates to
perchlorates. I always regarded peroxysulfates as hydrogen peroxide adducts. Confusing indeed.
Fellow molecular manipulator
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3241
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
| Quote: |
Not mentioned in your list, but leave us not forget the supreme oxidizing power of Xenon Difluoride!
|
I always thought that the oxidizing power of Xenon Difluoride came from it releasing free fluorine in the reaction mixture. For the list, at the very
top, I would just put F2 fluorine has been described as the "Tyrannosaurus Rex" of the periodic table.
I mean, how else am I going to make perbromic acid?
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5122
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
IIRC CoF3 decomposes to F2 and CoF2 on heating. This means that Co (III) is a stronger oxidant than F2
(Yes, I know that's blasphemous).
OTOH Co(OH)2 is oxidised by air to give Co(III) so O2 is a better oxidant than Co(III)
This means that O2 must be a stronger oxidant than F2. The trouble is that we know it isn't.
This serves to ilustrate the fact that what is a good oxidant depends on circumstances to such a great extent that putting them in order is going to
be a bit of a non starter unless you use some sort of standard conditions. If you do that, you might as well use the electode potentials.
Add to this the problem of kinetic versus thermodynamic stabillity (Fe(II) perchlorate shouldn't exist) and the list won't really help very
much.
BTW if you react peroxide with acetic anhydride you get peracetic acid. This will oxidise Mn(II) to permanganate, even in slightly acid conditions.
(Peracetic acid is rather unstable and I wouldn't use it if I were you)
|
|
|
blip
Hazard to Others
Posts: 133
Registered: 16-3-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: absorbed
|
|
| Quote: |
Add the H2O2 to the beaker(or drop reactant into H2O2) and test for gas bubbles.
If there are any trap in a test tube and test for any explosive peroxides using a lighted splint.
|
Are you saying that the organic peroxides will certainly be in the gas phase with any oxygen produced? I don't think so... oxygen is the gas
produced from H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> decomposition (assuming that's all that's occurring) and it lights a
smoldering splint. I don't think that would be a good test at all considering the common production of oxygen would cause a false positive. Did
you mean to say something completely different and typed out the wrong thought?
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3241
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
I was looking around the internet for a table listing the electrochemical series and found one that has a number of enteries in that that would be
considered extrenuous on a normal table, this one has 536 enteries on it and the top ones are whoppers such as:
XeF + e<sup>-</sup> = Xe + F<sup>-</sup> 3.4V
Cf<sup>4+</sup> + e<sup>-</sup> = Cf<sup>3+</sup> 3.3V
And <b>many</b> more interesting enteries (ferrates, fluorine/oxygen compounds...), see what I mean at:
http://www.efunda.com/materials/corrosion/electrochem_list.c...
[Edited on 11/27/2005 by BromicAcid]
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
WOW Bromic . I have been looking for such a giant table for a long time. Thank
you.
Pr4+, Tb4+ !! I gotta get me some more lanthanides
EDIT: AArg, I got through perhaps the first 200, and it wants me to subscribe
[Edited on 27-11-2005 by rogue chemist]
|
|
|
Phel
Hazard to Self
Posts: 72
Registered: 20-11-2004
Location: Scandium
Member Is Offline
Mood: viscous creep
|
|
| Quote: |
EDIT: AArg, I got through perhaps the first 200, and it wants me to subscribe
|
Yes, I was looking forward to see some exotic reducing agents when I recieved the same thing. I will add the electrochemical series listed in the CRC
to Madhatters FTP when I find it. Same content, but as a PDF.
Edit: (Madhatters FTP) Upload -> CRC_SRPotentials.pdf
[Edited on 27-11-2005 by Phel]
|
|
|
Pommie
Hazard to Self
Posts: 70
Registered: 6-2-2005
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | AArg, I got through perhaps the first 200, and it wants me to subscribe
|
When you get this problem, go to BugMeNot and enter the site name. For this site (efunda) it comes up with:-
Username mrx
Password xyz
Mike.
[Edited on 27-11-2005 by Pommie]
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
I had tried that already, aparently mrx dident pay for this years subscription. Oh well, you have access again in around an hour and by modifing the
url you can get to the later pages. I have got to around 300 saved now.
|
|
|
nitroglycol
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 28-10-2005
Location: close to the centre of North America
Member Is Offline
Mood: curious
|
|
Hmm. Interesting that that site lists oxygen difluoride below fluorine; I'd expect it to be higher.
|
|
|
Dr. Beaker
Hazard to Others
Posts: 132
Registered: 9-9-2005
Location: between the med red and dead
Member Is Offline
Mood: Shaken, not stirred
|
|
I think a powerfull, possibly the strongest oxidizer might be KrF2 since the Kr-F bonds are even weaker then in elemental F2 (and are among the
weakest known covalent bonds to exist).
weaker, less "exotic" (and more safe) oxidizer are perxenates: XeO4-2 (XeO3 and XeO4 are explossivly unstable). the big advantage of using
them is that the byproduct is Xe, hence no need for seperation and purification of products (like H2O2 but much stronger)
|
|
|
Dr. Beaker
Hazard to Others
Posts: 132
Registered: 9-9-2005
Location: between the med red and dead
Member Is Offline
Mood: Shaken, not stirred
|
|
and some more on the subject...
some time ago I heard a seminar in our department and what catched my attention (between snors...) was a certain lithium complex of an organic
molecule that undergo disproportionation to...
Lithium metal and a some other specie
the lithium precipitate as a shining miror on the flask's wall...
i.e - this molecule is a stronger reducer then metallic Li.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5122
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
" this molecule is a stronger reducer then metallic Li."
So, it's about as far off-topic as you can get.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8011
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I have made my own classification of oxidizer in speed of reaction. Speed of reaction is not the same as strength of oxidation. E.g. persulfate is the
strongest oxidizer I have, but also a rather sluggish one.
Mn2O7 (not aqueous, but very reactive)
MnO4(-)
ClO(-)
Cl2
HNO3 concentrated
H2O2
Cr2O7(2-)
Br2
H2SO4 concentrated
S2O8(2-) (sluggish but potent in aqueous media)
BrO3(-) (sluggish in aqueous media, works only in acidic media)
I2
ClO3(-) (sluggish in aqueous media, works only in acidic media)
HClO4 (hardly works as oxidizer, not at 60%, just a nice clean strong acid)
ClO4(-) (not oxidizing at all, totally inert)
So, my list is not an electrochemical series, but more like a series of observed reaction speeds. Mn2O7 is very fast acting and HClO4 (up to 60%) and
ClO4(-) are so slow, that they cannot be considered oxidizers anymore.
I took some 60% HClO4 and added solid KI. This does not give any reaction (besides dissolving some KI). Even when heated close to boiling, the liquid
only becomes a little yellow/brown, that's all.
With a mix of HClO4 and NaCl, only when heated to boiling, a very faint smell of chlorine can be observed. From these observations I conclude that
HClO4 (at least not at 60 .. 70%) is not useful as oxidizer at all, despite all the strong stories on the Internet about the dangers of HClO4.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5122
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Phone NASA and tell them to cancel the next shuttle- perchlorates aren't fast oxidisers any more.
There is probably less hope of getting a valid list of oxidisers (fast to slow) than there was of getting one (strong to weak).
At best you would need the pre- exponential and the activation energy terms for an Ahrenius type equation. I think that means you would need a veactor
for each oxidant and I'm not sure how you could put those in order.
|
|
|
Dr. Beaker
Hazard to Others
Posts: 132
Registered: 9-9-2005
Location: between the med red and dead
Member Is Offline
Mood: Shaken, not stirred
|
|
unionised,
what is your problem?
have you mixed your medications today?
have'nt the nurse told you to take the blue pills?
|
|
|
nitroglycol
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 28-10-2005
Location: close to the centre of North America
Member Is Offline
Mood: curious
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by unionised
" this molecule is a stronger reducer then metallic Li."
So, it's about as far off-topic as you can get. |
Not really, given that oxidation and reduction are two sides of the same coin.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
