semiconductive
Hazard to Others
Posts: 325
Registered: 12-2-2017
Location: Scappoose Oregon, USA.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Explorative
|
|
Hydrogenation of Eugenol
I've been looking at a reaction to make elemental sodium based on menthol that proceeds fairly slowly eg: 30 hours;
See the discussion about 20 minutes into this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxPjBz_8S3c
He compares menthol with Borneol, which is much more difficult to get and expensive.
But Eugenol is ubiquitous.
I was curious, Eugenol has the double carbon bonds that aromatics have and is likely more reactive than menthol. But I've seen several articles
talking about converting Eugenol to a saturated hydrocarbon by use of ruthenium or other catalysts and high pressure hydrogen.
But my research shows nickel is likley just as effective ...
nickel sponge (raney nickel), is difficult to get ... but I can electroplate nickel onto graphite dust very easily. Several articles I've looked at
have shown successful hydrogenation of aromatic rings using nickel powdered, or mixed with graphite; Apparently only speed of hydrogenation is
affected by how spongey the catalyst is.
My expeience in organic chemistry is limited ....
but I saw, for example, an aromatic ring that I think was c6H6O3 (similar to phenol, but with 3 OH groups and not a saturated ring. ).
So, I was thinking ...
If I were to attempt to hydrogenate eugenol using hydrogen gas and a nickel catalyst, Which sites should I expect are more likely to hydrogenate
easily and which ones would be more difficult?
Would the oxygen + methyl group on eugenol cleave and become an -OH ?
Would the double carbon bond on the hydrocarbon tail likely hydrogenate -- or is only the aromatic ring most susceptible to hydrogenation ?
why/why not?
Since I'd like to do this experiment ... could anyone suggest the minimum pressure and temperature I need to maintain to have a reasonable chance of
success?
[Edited on 2-11-2020 by semiconductive]
|
|
njl
National Hazard
Posts: 609
Registered: 26-11-2019
Location: under the sycamore tree
Member Is Offline
Mood: ambivalent
|
|
Working through your post sequentially:
1. Nurdrage is using menthol because it is a secondary alcohol that is easy to obtain and works as the catalyst in his reaction.
2. Eugenol will probably not work there.
3. He compares menthol to borneol because borneol is another widely available secondary alcohol.
4. Nickel sponge and Raney nickel are not the same.
5. The double bond in the allyl group will be hydrogenated.
6. No, the ether will not be cleaved.
7. The ring is much less prone to hydrogenation.
8. Catalytic hydrogenation is well documented already. You should be able to find conditions applicable to the hydrogenation of eugenol in existing
literature.
Now, what does sodium production have to do with this? Eugenol, before or after hydrogenation, will probably not be an effective catalyst. Nurdrage
discovering menthol as an effective catalyst is great because you can't really beat it in terms of accessibility and cost.
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2283
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
The hydrogenation/saturation of aromatic rings, is achieved with difficulty. Lots of pressure, special catalysts, etc, etc, etc..
Now, under some circumstances, ethers can be cleaved by hydrogenation. But, that trick is more easily performed on Benzyl Ethers. Notably, the
technique is sometimes used in the synthesis of Psilocin.
Probably a better investment in time and money, to buy either Borneol or Menthol, and start from there.
|
|
semiconductive
Hazard to Others
Posts: 325
Registered: 12-2-2017
Location: Scappoose Oregon, USA.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Explorative
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by njl | Working through your post sequentially:
Now, what does sodium production have to do with this? |
I do have Menthol. So, repeating nurdrage's experiment is not my major purpose nor is finding a better catalyst. I do experiments to learn and
improve my chemistry knowledge.
In the video Nurdrage begins developing a scientific theory of why secondary and tertiary alcohols work in the reaction -- but primary alcohols do
not. I found his reasoning extremely interesting.
The theory has to do with the size of the alcohol molecule near the -OH bond and it's ability to replace -O/ or -OH in a magnesium oxide crystal.
Most of nurdrage's theory of what prevents incorperation is the 'nearness' of a radical to the -OH radical on the alcohol.
Primary alcohols, by definition ... don't have sites to 'widen' the molecule because the OH radiical generally appears on the end of a saturated
chain. (n-hexanol, methanol, etc. )
From my knowledge of reactivity (see past threads); primary alcohols are the least chemically reactive, followed by secondary alcohols, and finally
tertiary alcohols. This generalization was bolstered by organic chemistry texts I have read concerning fuel processing from the 1960's ( eg: college
texts and lab books from the petrol industry in that time period in the U.S.A. )
So, nurdrage's theory is interesting (to me) because his theory fits with much of what I have learned in O-chem books I have access to in the local
library. Nurdrage posits that any secondary alcohol ought to either produce a compete sodium conversion reaction or none at all. The catalyst
efficiency doesn't really depend on the 'strength' of the -OH bond in secondary alcohols, because if it did ... the reaction would not work at all in
many cases rather than work with reduced efficiency.
So, nurdrage positis an empirical criteria for selecting a secondary or tertiary alcohol based on the apparent width of the molecule near the OH
bond.
Eugenol meets this criteria for physical width, although the -O- in the ether bond was something I thought might disqualify it from nurdrage's simple
analysis.
But if the bond will not be cleaved (as you say), then Eugenol remains a single -OH radical alcohol even after hydrogenation.
Hydrogenation is simply to reduce the ractivity of the cyclic bonds and convert it to a saturated alcohol, similar to Menthol and Borneol.
So, his theory becomes testable with a substance that is only minorly different from the working catalysts.
Regarding Raney Nickel:
Only aluminum and nickel are required to make that catalyst. Other metals (promotors) are optional. According to wikipedia, the aluminaum is
structural and not chemically active in the process. So, I think a pure nickel catalyst should still work as long as it has lots of surface area and
some kind of support.
Graphite seems as good a support that would produce large amounts of nickel surface area with only a thin, inexpensive, coating of nickel. So it's
worth trying to make a conductive nickel catalyst that way.
Several of the experiments I saw used pure nickel catalysists when converting Eugenol, so I don't think Raney nickel is critical to the process of
hydrogenation.
Although I would expect many online literatures to give pressures and temperatures for hydrogenation, my initial search produced only closed shop
documents that have to be purchased before getting details. My searches have not found summaries of articles which assure me the pressure ranges and
temperatures are fully disclosed in the article. I hate buying an article only to find out it doesn't have the data after I wasted money .... I
figured I'd ask here, first; since my first searches gave no definite article I could purchase with all the necessary data.
I can buy Raney nickel (un-etched) for reasonable prices. But, it's more work to leach the metal to make a fresh batch than electroplating is.
(Aluminum after etching tends to be pyrophoric.) So I plan to try electroplated graphite first. It may not be as fast or reactive a catalyst as
Raney nickel, but nickel dust should store for a long time without degradation. Such a nickel catalyst is probably also useful in fuel cell and
battery experiments; so I have multiple ways to use the product.
Eg: A sodium-ion battery might be possible using a graphite-nickel catalyst. etc.
Such a battery would not be as efficient as lithium ion, but sodium and potasium are both extremely easy to get. Nurdrage's chemistry opens up new
possibilities to explore for potassium or sodium based fuel cells and batteries.
|
|
njl
National Hazard
Posts: 609
Registered: 26-11-2019
Location: under the sycamore tree
Member Is Offline
Mood: ambivalent
|
|
I have no idea what you are saying above the words "Regarding raney nickel" so I can't add on to that.
Raney nickel IS pure nickel (at least in theory). The aluminum is just part of the production process to make extremely fine nickel particles that can
act as a heterogeneous catalyst. It is just unsupported, finely divided nickel. I think your idea for electroplating nickel on to graphite is neat and
I would be interested in your results should you go through with the reaction. I don't know what experiments you're referring to, but "pure nickel" is
almost certainly not the required catalyst. In addition to the metal itself, it must be fine enough to stay suspended in a reaction mixture and have
enough surface area to pick up hydrogen at an appreciable rate. A lump of nickel will not work. Another support you could try is silica, where you
first etch the SiO2, then deposit a nickel salt on the surface of the silica particles, and then reduce the nickel salt with hydrogen gas to form
silica with nickel metal embedded in itself.
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2283
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Oh, there are some decent Hydrogenation Books available on line, for free.
Also, such books are available for sale, at reasonable prices. Ebay, Advanced Book Exchange, ect..
I'll take a look.
OK, try our references section. Some hydrogenation links are still active. Do you have access to our references forum?
Sometimes very expensive books are available on trial. After a limited time, they evaporate from your computer. Though if your have an economical
printer, you may be able to print yourself a binder copy, for your own use.
Organic Functional Group Hydrogenation
Robert L. Augustine
Oh, yeah.... This one ain't bad for 35 bucks. It's about a 300 dollar discount. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Handbook-of-Heterogeneous-Catalytic...
Rylander has a big rep, though I have sometimes seen them cheaper. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Catalytic-Hydrogenation-in-Org-Synt...
[Edited on 8-11-2020 by zed]
[Edited on 8-11-2020 by zed]
[Edited on 8-11-2020 by zed]
|
|
Corrosive Joeseph
National Hazard
Posts: 915
Registered: 17-5-2015
Location: The Other Place
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cyclic
|
|
'DIY Hydrogenation Resource' - https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=86...
/CJ
Being well adjusted to a sick society is no measure of one's mental health
|
|
Opylation
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 30-8-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
I’m pretty sure I heard somewhere nurdrage has a Ph. D in chemistry. He briefly went over the mechanism and his theory for those that were
interested but if you’re not sure how to do simple reactions like hydrogenations then I wouldn’t dive deep into the theory of nurdrages process.
What is your goal here? Is it a hydrogenation of Eugenol or to obtain sodium metal? If your goal is either then I would look up the process on how to
do it and then have a shot at it. If you’re truly trying to understand the mechanism and theory behind why it works though, you’re really gonna
need to work your way up to it. There are many many different concepts that tie into that sodium preparation that are not going to be able to be
conveyed over a forum. It takes many years of studying chemistry, like Gibbs energy, ordered rates of reactions, steric hinderances, affinities, etc.
to be able to truly understand what’s going on there. My advice is if you really want to be able to understand the mechanism and WHY something is
happening in chemistry you got to develop the building blocks first. You gotta crawl before you can walk
[Edited on 8-11-2020 by Opylation]
|
|
draculic acid69
International Hazard
Posts: 1371
Registered: 2-8-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Buying camphor and making borneol would be a much better idea.eugenol won't work well if at all for the sodium rxn.in the other nurdrage videos it
explains the mechanism of the rxn and what works and what does not.also aromatic groups decomposed when used for the sodium rxn(but not potassium) and
double bonds were also suspected of being a cause of decomposition of the catalyst
|
|
nora_summers
Harmless
Posts: 34
Registered: 11-11-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: I am figment of your imagination.
|
|
Link doesn't work
|
|
Corrosive Joeseph
National Hazard
Posts: 915
Registered: 17-5-2015
Location: The Other Place
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cyclic
|
|
References sub-forum..... PM admin for access.
/CJ
Being well adjusted to a sick society is no measure of one's mental health
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2283
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Personally, I just tried all of those links. I was only able to open a few of them.
It's a thing. They age out, pretty quickly.
Sorry about that Nishimura, that was for sale... dirt cheap.
I put it out there for a while. When nobody jumped on it, I bought it myself.
.........................................................................................
Nurdrage may have a Phd in Chemistry. Not unusual around here.
Though Nurdrage is actually more accomplished than many Phds.
I've known some guys outside, with Phds in Chemistry or Biochemistry....that would be lost here.
A few years, of regular interaction at SM.... broadens your
horizons.
.....................................................................................
As for actually obtaining experimental details, you either have to have an account that allows it, or you need library access.
Most college libraries have accounts that allow online access to the major chemistry journals; perhaps even hard copies of the journals themselves.
Just walk in, and sit down at a computer station. Well, if they are open during the pandemic.
In recent years, I have utilized Portland State and Reed College.
Back in the day, we used to make the pilgrimage to U.C. Berkley. Wherein, once you got inside, you could stay inside.
Provided you got inside, before they locked-up for the night....you could stay there for days, if you wanted to.
Which, of course, is what you need to do, to succeed. Most articles, are dead ends.
.......................................................................................
Oh, it occurs to me, that it might be possible to achieve this Na reaction, utilizing a secondary amine. Perhaps the product of camphor....
reductively aminated with methyl amine?
Probably stinky though.
.......................................................................................
Oh, I notice you are in Scapoose. Call Portland State Library.
Walk in, ask to use the computers, as a guest. They usually give you access for an hour or two, per day. You can access articles online, and print
them. Gotta pay for parking! Under current circumstances, don't be there after dark, or on a weekend. After dark, climatic conditions, may cause
your car windows to explode.
[Edited on 12-11-2020 by zed]
[Edited on 12-11-2020 by zed]
[Edited on 12-11-2020 by zed]
[Edited on 12-11-2020 by zed]
|
|
Bubbles
Harmless
Posts: 31
Registered: 13-7-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yesterday I made (iso)borneol from camphor with sodium borohydride. Literally the easiest organic synthesis I ever performed, loved it.
|
|