Wolfram
Hazard to Others
Posts: 133
Registered: 13-10-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Aging in unicellular organisms?
Unicellular eucaryots reproduce often by dividing. When a yeast cell divides one of the yeast cells is the old "parrent" yeast cell and the
new one is the "child" yeast cell which is identical to its parrent. When the "parrent" yeast have devided a number of times it
looses its ability to divide and dies.
Is it like this also for other unicellular eucaryots (for example protozoa)? I mean is it like this that one of the cells could be said to be old
"parant" and one the new one "child"? At least one of the cells must have the old genome and one the new one so do the old cell
"age" and die?
[Edited on 15-2-2004 by Wolfram]
|
|
|
If_6_was_9
Unregistered
Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline
|
|
amoeba
I read something about amoebas being immortal. When one divides both are sort of like identical twins the way I understand it. DNA is made up of two
strands bound together like a zipper by hydrogen bonds. When its duplicated, the DNA starts to unzip while new nucleotides form on the open strands.
Eventually two new strands form which are identical as long as no mistake was made. Each new strand has half the nucleotides of the original DNA.
Enzymes control the process.
[Edited on 16-2-2004 by If_6_was_9]
|
|
|
Wolfram
Hazard to Others
Posts: 133
Registered: 13-10-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
hmmm..
hmmm.. still one of the amoebas (at least to the genome) must be the oldone and the other the newone.. dont you think? So for how long can the old
amoeba live, and divide.
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Hmm, I thought all eukaryotes have a finite number of cell divisions. This is called the Hayflick limit by the way, so if you look that up you can get
lots of more info.
Prokaryotes (bacteria), conversely, don't have this limit.
The reason why there is this limit, is, as far as I remember, because bacteria have a circular genome. That means, there are no ends, and thus no need
for telomerases etc. that stop the ends from degrading.
I don't know if there are eukaryotes with circular genomes - if, then they are some of the most simple ones.
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
Wolfram
Hazard to Others
Posts: 133
Registered: 13-10-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Answer
Man, unicellular eucaryots like yeast or protozoa can not have a limited number of celldivisions because they would be extinct even before they
started. They don´t have circular genome eighter, but they have active telomerase that elongates the telomeres. Telomerase knockout yeast stops to
reproduce (divide) after a number of cell divisions.
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
| Quote: | | Man, unicellular eucaryots like yeast or protozoa can not have a limited number of celldivisions because they would be extinct even before they
started. |
Interresting. where did you hear that from?
All somatic cells from multicellular eukaryotic organisms have a limit to their number of cell divisions. This is called the Hayflick limit. Check it
if you don't believe me.
Germline cells such as oocytes/sperm don't divide by themselves, as the two have to combine in order to divide! There are reasons why
germline cells don't have shortened telomers, although I fail to remember why that was again (also, telomerases are not perfect in maintaining
the chromosome ends - so old people DO have shorter telomers. Conversely, an overly efficient telomerase activity (like an additional gene encoding
it, i.e. in transfected mice) produces cancer. So telomerase is by no means the solution to aging and such).
Anyway, at the time of sperm/oocyte fusion, the Hayflick limit is set to zero once again (if it was ever offset in sperm-producing cells).
Only cancerous cells from multicellulars divide indefinitely, like the cells from Henrietta Lacks, which are used today, 50 years later, for
experiments (HeLa cells).
As to circular genomes - they do indeed explain the lack of telomerases in prokaryotes (bacteria). As I said I am unaware of eukaryotes with circular
genomes, but I couldnt exclude some simple ones exist.
At last - there has been debate about it: Man, even if it could extend its lifespan by nutrition, health, cures for age related diseases and such, the
ultimate death would still come when all cells stopped dividing (which would be around the age of 200 IIRC). So in fact noone dies because the
Hayflick limit, as problems set in way before that!
[Edited on 16-3-2004 by chemoleo]
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
If_6_was_9
Unregistered
Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline
|
|
Cancer appears to be immortal
| Quote: |
In his earlier work, Dr. Shay found that the enzyme telomerase was present in specialized reproductive cells and in most cancer cells that appear to
divide indefinitely. Thus, the gene which codes for telomerase has been nicknamed the "immortalizing gene". Telomerase works by adding back
telomeric DNA to the ends of chromosomes, thus compensating for the loss of telomeres that normally occurs as cells divide. Most normal cells do not
have this enzyme and thus they lose telomeres with each division.
|
http://www.accessexcellence.org/LC/ST/st10bg.html
http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SUA04/telomerase.html
[Edited on 17-3-2004 by If_6_was_9]
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3253
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
http://www.news.wisc.edu/story.php?id=5528
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/medicine/article/0,12543,188371...
I read about this a long time ago and searched it in google (Immortal skin cells cancer burn) and got a crap load of hits. Turns out a bunch of
researchers were trying to figure out how to best grow skin when one of their cultures suddenly didn't die off. The same culture has been spread
to hundreds of thousands of other plates and been researched, it does not appear to be cancerous yet they do not seem to give a damn for the Hayflic
limit.
|
|
|
gil
Unregistered
Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline
|
|
Let's close the books and look at THE REAL WORLD :
HOW BIG WAS THE BIGGER SPECIMEN YOU REMEMBER?
Wath was the final appearance? like what material?
WHATH ARE YOUR REAL EXPERIENCE WHITH IT? ANY PARTICULAR SEASON, WHITH hiGHER INCIDENCE?
CAN A CATARR(SPUTUM,SCRACCHIO,SINUS MUCUS) MOVE ON IT' S OWN?
WHY EXACTLY SINGAPORE PROHIBITED CHEWING GUMS?
[Edited on 19-1-2007 by gil]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
