| Pages:
1
2 |
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
First Rocket Candy attempt
Ok so yesterday I tried to make my first batch of rocket candy using
60g stump remover (KNO3 I hope--didn't list materials)
30g sugar
14g sugar syrup
I'm going to try and find some iron oxide today at a pigment arts and crafts store.
I think my problem was that I didn't let it cook long enough, I had it to there point where it was a very thick paste, and rolled it into a cylinder
for a burn test, but it was till a little bit sticky, and baaaarely snapped when it was cool.
I am going to try again and cook it a bit longer to drive off more water.
My only question is, if the stump remover doesn't list ingridients, how can I be sure its KNO3 or NaNO3 and not NH4NO3?
While cooking I got a whiff of some of the fumes and they immediately made my lungs close up and I had to back away.
It sort of smelled like ammonia...but I am wondering if it was something dissolving in the water in my nostrils/lungs to give it an acidic burning
smell.
Ammonium nitrate decomposes into N2 O2 + water...so maybe it isn't ammonia I"m smelling?
Any ideas?
|
|
|
Joauml
Harmless
Posts: 11
Registered: 30-7-2009
Location: Brazil
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Stump remover can be many things. Try mixing it with sugar (2 stump : 1 sugar) and try to burn it, if it's NH4NO3 it will barely burn, if it's NaNO3
it will burn with a very yellow flame and if it's KNO3, it will burn with a faint purple color or little yellow. It also can be metabisulfite or even
chlorate.
people can buy gunpowder without questions, but if I buy glycerin, people ask me if I'm going to make a bomb.
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for the reply. I found a great video by Nurdrage on youtube about testing stump remover to find out what it is. I've mixed dry powder and
sugar together, and a match wont light it. I don't have a butane torch to try it at a higher temperature though.
After i read it could be a metabisulfite in your post, I looked that up, and found that can give off sulfur dioxide, which is a pungeant harsh gas
(Fits the bill of what I've been smelling) which when mixed with water can produce sulfurous acid (which would explain the burning smell in my
nose/lungs).
I emailed the company to try and find out what it is...but now I"m leaning towards sodium metabisulfate. THanks for the help
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
If you just got crazy and posted the name of the stump remover someone here could probably tell you what it is.
The Bonide brand is metabisulfite and if you add a little vinegar to about a gram you will smell SO2.
|
|
|
Ozone
International Hazard
Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Integrated
|
|
Heating sugar with a trace of acid will ultimately give formic and levulinic acids. These will react will metabisulfite in the same way as acetic acid
(vinegar).
O3
-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
haha yes entropy51, in all the critical thinking I did, I completely forgot the most simple approach. It is Bonide, so it was sulfur dioxide I was
smelling, and it is also why the rocket candy never worked. Case solved. Thanks
|
|
|
Bismuth
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 19-12-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I know... I know...
We go through this thousands of times. But be bloody careful about making r-candy. A LOT of accidents happen when cooking it and they often result in
2nd degree burns. If I had to put money on it, it's one of the most common accidents when dealing with 'pyrotechnics'.
Recently someone on a forum I frequent had an accident making it and his burns look nasty. I also believe iron oxide lowers the activation energy of
the mixture. The quantity you're making at a time is enough to do a fair bit of damage. But enough of that... I felt obliged to just throw that out
there due to recent incidents. Back to the Science.
It might be worth recrystallizing the potassium nitrate when you acquire a source (if you plan to use stump remover) before you use it as some blends
can be rather contaminated. It's not much effort to do anyway. Happy experimenting.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination! 
|
|
A version of rocket candy was known as Paxo, after a proprietory brand of stuffing mixture available in the UK. The stuff was made by the Provisional
IRA for use in letter bombs, etc, it was notoriously unstable.
Trying to make explosives by mixing unknown materials together is madness.
|
|
|
quicksilver
International Hazard
Posts: 1820
Registered: 7-9-2005
Location: Inches from the keyboard....
Member Is Offline
Mood: ~-=SWINGS=-~
|
|
Don't waste your time. This will be closed shortly: it's lack of science is obvious, it's danger - overwhelming. Things will get back to normal in a
bit here.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
Sadly I keep on saying it but too many people ignore it.
Chemists should learn their trade with safe chemicals and reactions before moving on to things that are more challenging.
There is a significant chance that if your first organic synthesis is Triacetone triperoxide, ( TATP ), it will be your last!
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well thank you for the concern, but I make sure to wear proper safety equipment and work in small quantities before scaling up. I was under the
impression rocket candy mixes of potassium nitrate and sugar were QUITE stable, as I've seen numerous videos of people making it in their kitchen or
outside with no apparent problems.
What accidents arise that have given people burns? Would gloves have prevented the problem? (Thick gloves not nitrile or latex)
I bet some people have used their open flame stove tops for it as well, when an electric oven would be more suited to the task.
Also, I'm not following how "Trying to make explosives by mixing unknown materials together is madness."
My intention was never to make an explosive.
I'm a senior undergrad in chemistry, so I do have appreciation for safety and potential hazards, but I do not see this as an extremely challenging or
dangerous experiment.
Also thanks for the heads up about re-crystalization, although at this point with united nuclear selling kno3 for $3 I might just go that route.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
Your stump killer could have been based on sodium chlorate!
Sugar, sodium chlorate and a few odds and sods on a hundred gram scale could turn you into a mess of bits of flesh and bone that will never be
recognisable by your mum and will require shovelling in to a plastic bag in a closed coffin
Rocket fuels are explosives, they are just not explosive enough to blow you apart out right!
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Oppenheimer  | Ok so yesterday I tried to make my first batch of rocket candy using
60g stump remover (KNO3 I hope--didn't list materials)
30g sugar
14g sugar syrup
|
If that had been sodium chlorate it could have gone off with the power of a quarter of a stick of dynamite!
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This is true, it was quite stupid to start with 60g of an unknown oxidizer, it's just that all the reading I've done and videos I've watched, I've
seen people use far more then that, and the product appears to be a stable thick paste.
It's strange to me picturing a mixture of compounds actually EXPLODING with enough force in an open pan to actually cause damage.
Perhaps next time I will use only a few grams (of a known oxidizer) and see if it works.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Oppenheimer | This is true, it was quite stupid to start with 60g of an unknown oxidizer, it's just that all the reading I've done and videos I've watched, I've
seen people use far more then that, and the product appears to be a stable thick paste.
It's strange to me picturing a mixture of compounds actually EXPLODING with enough force in an open pan to actually cause damage.
Perhaps next time I will use only a few grams (of a known oxidizer) and see if it works. |
There are plenty of things that will explode in an open pan and create significant damage on a gram scale.
Try silver or copper acetylide, lead azide, iron picrate.
Or stick a gram of them in a test tube and shake in front of your eyes, instant white stick for life! :-(
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
So has anyone tried the KNO3 Sugar r-candy mix and come out unscathed?
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
If you start with known ingredients and follow a good procedure using appropriate care you may be OK.
But it really is not my first experiment!
The whole idea of practical chemistry is that the student gains experience during their career so they can handle more challenging substances safely.
Even the best chemists make mistakes but years of experience do provide some protection when handling the truly deadly like dimethyl mercury.
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I have no interest in dimethy mercury or copper acetylide or any other deflegrating/explosive agents, only rocket fuel mix. What experiments would
you do as you rfirst experiment then?
|
|
|
Ozone
International Hazard
Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Integrated
|
|
Rocket candy is FINE (many of us made it when we were kids)! Just know what the hell you are putting in the pan (and how much). And, do it outside, or
with appropriate ventillation and fire extinguishing/safety equipment/knowledge.
Your FAILURE to do ALL of these things could have led to catastrophic consequences (at the very least, being gassed with SO2 is unpleasant).
Are you functionally unable to realize that we would like for you learn how to experiment safely (or do you counter all advice defensively?) The first
step is to listen to those who are trying to help. The second is to do some research. A quick search on YouTube, for example, has several videos of
successful preparation...and several videos, perhaps more useful, of failures and accidents. See especially the deflagration which occured during a
preparation in a garage ( would have been bad news in a kitchen).
Edited for an admittedly ambiguous statement I made last night. Apologies for that.
O3
Sheesh,
O3
[Edited on 30-11-2010 by Ozone]
[Edited on 30-11-2010 by Ozone]
-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
|
|
|
Oppenheimer
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 13-11-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: |
Are you functionally unable to figure that this is the realization that the others would like for you to have?! Sheesh,
|
I don't know what that means. Does that mean other people want me to blowup?
|
|
|
Ozone
International Hazard
Posts: 1269
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Integrated
|
|
Edit: Alright. I'll retract that. It wasn't constructive.
Am I the only one who is unusually sensitive after the recent rash of frustrating posts (especially with energetics)?
[Edited on 30-11-2010 by Ozone]
-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
|
|
|
psychokinetic
National Hazard
Posts: 558
Registered: 30-8-2009
Location: Nouveau Sheepelande.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Constantly missing equilibrium
|
|
Sheesh O3. I had to read it a few times to make sure, too. o.o
No Oppenheimer, we want you to be safe, and not stupid 
Aside from the fact you stuck unknowns in, you seem to at least think about what you are doing. We've had a small rash of morons in this here
department that don't understand that safety and science go hand in hand.
Even when you're going to be unsafe, do it safely 
“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found
the object of his search.
I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor.”
-Tesla
|
|
|
Microtek
National Hazard
Posts: 871
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Online
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Candy propellant is quite safe (as energetics go). If you haven't already, take a look at James Yawn's site about "recrystallised" candy propellant.
When you mix the ingredients wet, you avoid a lot of the dangers of conventional pyrotechnics preparation. Also, when you only heat the mixture to ca.
110 C to drive off most of the water instead of melting the mixture you avoid another major risk.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
Potassium nitrate and sugar is several orders of magnitude safer than potassium or sodium chlorate and sugar or worse sulphur.
Making energetic materials, be they explosives or propellants, requires exact knowledge of what you have and a good guide to their preparation.
You want to start with a known good sample of potassium nitrate and make about 5 -10g on your first go following the instructions on James Yawn's site
exactly.
I would use a thermometer and regulate the temperature as closely as possible.
Remember at all times, you are making rocket fuel, NOT play dough! 
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
This thread starts out with an ill conceived notion that a science experiment is mixing unidentified materials and then "cooking" the mixture at an
unspecified temperature, following no detailed or monitored procedure, with the goal in mind of making rocket propellant. This isn't really a valid
science experiment. It isn't logical or safe to handle pyrotechnic compositions in a way that is foolish.
A kitchen is not a safe or proper place for making rocket fuel.
(An electric oven is not the proper tool either)
Edit: Oppenheimer sent me a U2U clarifying that the
procedure described in the original post was done outdoors
using a thermostatically controlled hotplate. Such details
should have been included in the first post describing what was being done. I'll reopen this thread and see if any useful links or discussion is
added. There are several rocketry specific pages which have extensive information.
Here is one of them
http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/
sugar rocketry links page
http://www.jamesyawn.com/sugarsites/index.html
[Edited on 4-12-2010 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
|
Thread Closed
3-12-2010 at 03:54 |
Rosco Bodine
|
Thread Opened
3-12-2010 at 23:27 |
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
