gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What's the difference between cracking and distilling?
After reading that one can get a diesel like fuel from Waste Motor Oil (WMO), I build a crude setup to heat WMO and yesterday I tried it for the first
time. But what I got looks like new motor oil and has about the same viscosity as new motor oil as well. I think what I did was simply distilling WMO
and ended up with new motor oil instead of what I wanted to do which was "cracking" the WMO and getting a diesel like fuel. So I distilled it instead
of "cracking" it. Why? What exactly is "cracking"? I'm talking about non-catalytic cracking. I've researched the non-catalytic cracking process and I
don't see how its different from distilling. The only thing I can think of is that maybe cracking requires more heat. Is that what it is?
One more thing... can you also get gasoline from WMO? Probably not as I couldn't find any info on it but thought I'd ask just to make sure.
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
cracking is a chemical reaction ; in case of WMO it is thermal decomposition of long carbon chain to 2w or more chains having lesser number of carbon
atoms.
Distillation is a physical separation of different chemical species which is based on the difference in boiling points (and relative volatility) of
those species. If any of the species you are trying to distill-off is having higher boiling point than its decomposition temperature then you will
first have cracking of that species and then distillation of the resulting products.
gsd
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ok, so I need more heat then, to decompose it instead of distilling.
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
The beginner's guide to cracking;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_catalytic_cracking
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I quoted the text below from here http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/b85595646p38843j/
They say the aim of their study is to get a gasoline like fuel from waste motor oil by catalytic pyrolysis, and under acceptable processes
they listed distillation.
So distillation will work if I add 10% by weight of perlite to the waste engine oil? Hmm... I might try that, perlite is cheap and easy enough to get.
Quote: |
The aim of this study is to obtain gasoline like fuel from waste engine oil by catalytic pyrolysis which can be used in internal-combustion engines.
Petroleum based waste engine oil can be converted into reusable products such as gasoline and diesel fuel. The aims of waste engine oil processing are
upgrading via recycling and re-refining processes of the petroleum based wastes by converting them into reusable products such as gasoline and heavy
oil. <b>Possible acceptable processes are distillation, cracking and pyrolysis. </b>The pyrolysis liquid products of waste lubricant oil
can be used as alternative engine fuel. The yields of liquid products, they were called as "waste oil gasoline" increase increasing temperature and
catalyst amount. To investigate the effects of catalysts on the yields of distillation the purified oil samples were blended as mass basis of 2.5%,
5.0 %, and 10.0 with catalysts known as perlite and wood ash. The highest yield of liquid product was 92.5% which can be obtained from the pyrolysis
with 10% perlite. The yields of liquid products from pyrolysis of waste lubricant oil in the presence of perlite are higher than those of wood ash
catalytic runs.
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Cracking occurs at higher temperatures or harsher conditions than distillation. For instance, in the presence of catalysts, hydrogen, steam, pressure
and heat.
In lieu of high pressure distillation apparatus, you might be better off boiling the oil and directing the vapors through a heated catalyst tube,
where cracking occurs.
Tim
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by 12AX7 |
In lieu of high pressure distillation apparatus, you might be better off boiling the oil and directing the vapors through a heated catalyst tube,
where cracking occurs.
Tim |
What is this heat catalyst tube made of, do you know? Or does the material even matter, I thought it was the heat that actually does the cracking? If
it's the heat, than do you think passing the vapor through a tube, that's heated externally, filled with steel wool would work?
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You could get away with that. When I was fairly young I had a home experiments in chemistry book that including an example of cracking (we're talking
the late 1950s, goys and birls); a longer test tube had some motor oil placed in it, some steel wool stuck in a bit down from the top, the section
with the wool heated and then the bottom heated as well. The ascending oil vapours cracked on the steel wool, giving rise to a mixture of gases and
lower boiling liquids.
The problem with this simple form is that it suffers from non-selectivity and carbon build-up. With a simple acyclic alkane
C<sub>N</sub>H<sub>2+2N</sub>, it breaks down giving shorter chains of alkanes and alkenes and carbon left when, the hydrogen
one boded to the carbon fills out the smaller alkanes. To avoid rapid carbon build up hydrogen and/or steam is added, the steam reacting through the
water gases family of reactions to give H2 and carbon oxides.
The difference between cracking and pyrolysis is blurry. Pyrolysis generally being the simple heat driven decomposition, while cracking employs
steam/H2 and catalysts to favour the formation of hydrocarbons over carbon and/or to help shape the product distribution. The catalytic processes
generally still suffer from carbon buildup and need periodic treatment to remove it.
So, yeah, a steel tube stuff with steel wool and heated would work. However there'd be little selectivity in the products formed, and it would soon
become less active as carbon coated the steel.
|
|
Sedit
International Hazard
Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Manic Expressive
|
|
Cracking is heating the shit out of a hydrocarbon until it breaks into two pref with a catalyst of some sort. As you distill heat your factioning gear
with a torch.... this would equate cracking in a sence.....
Please dont try the above until you understand it.
Knowledge is useless to useless people...
"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the
fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story
before."~Maynard James Keenan
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Some other options besides iron include copper (brillo pads??), silica gel, alumina, or any of the various popular catalysts, like Pt or Pd on glass
wool. Or just glass wool, probably anything with a lot of surface area would work.
Tim
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If it gets coated with carbon quickly, I'd probably want to use whatever's cheapest.
Btw, anyone have any idea what exactly the perlite does that they talked about in the text I quoted earlier?
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's got analogous activity to zeolites, a family of commercial catalysts for cracking hydrocarbons. Both minerals are
alumino-silicates. See the link posted above by Science Squirrel.
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Picture of my setup:
Full size: http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2189/mysetup003.jpg
Here's a rough drawing of how I would make it if I were to use a catalyst:
Full size: http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/5092/catalyticcracking.jp...
With my current setup, the vapor goes right to the condenser (black arrows). The red arrows show how I would do it if I were to use a catalyst. The
vapor would go from the top, down the side of the barrel and then entering the barrel a third from the bottom or so, then going through the tube with
the catalyst, and then exiting on the other side and from there it would have to travel up to the condenser. The tube with the catalyst would get nice
and hot being right over the hot coals.
Whatcha think? Yes no maybe?
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Note that small scale cracking is a low yield process, more energy goes into it than is recovered as useful fuels. Small scale is good for
demonstration of the process, and diddling around with catalysts in attempts to control what products are formed.
Sense - to perceive (I sense a draft of cold air), or to be logical (it makes sense to me)
cents - a small denomination coin, common in the USA
scents - odors, in particular those intended to be pleasant.
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I changed my setup. Now it looks exactly like my drawing 2 posts up.
The first time I did it, I had to stop early because I noticed a leak. But the little bit that came over had about the same viscosity as gasoline and
would light just as easily as gasoline as well.
I fixed the leak and tried again. What I got at first, again had about the same viscosity as gasoline and would light just as easily as gasoline, but
this didn't last long. As the fire got hotter I guess the catalyst stopped working because what was coming over was new motor oil.
Does anyone have any idea what might have happened? If the steel wool got oxidized, would that prevent it from cracking the oil?
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ok, I think I know the answer. The steel wool got too hot. I placed some more steel wool in the tube, I placed it at the very end on both sides which
is just outside of the barrel but still plenty hot, just not as hot as the steel wool in the middle which is inside the barrel. I'm now getting
something resembling gasoline again. Low viscosity, catches fire easily. It does smoke a little though, there's probably some diesel or something in
there or perhaps uncracked motor oil.
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yeah, a simple rig such as yours is not going to give near complete conversion, and generally fractional distillation (more properly fractionating
columns) is used to pull off the desired fractions will heavies are recycled and lights often are collected to use as heating fuel for the processes.
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm going to distill the gasoline out and recrack the heavies. I wish I could do that in one step but that would make it too complicated not to
mention too expensive. I know everybody's thinking I'm wasting my time here, and I probably am, but for the moment I'm still interested in this so
I'll keep on going for a little while longer. Actually, I'm going to try it with waste plastic also.
|
|
gnitseretni
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 5-1-2007
Location: Colombia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Argh, it's like the steel wool is only good for one use!
I'm cracking more motor oil as we speak. In the beginning I got a gasoline like liquid, but soon after that nothing but motor oil.
Not_important, you mentioned the catalyst would need periodic cleaning due to carbon buildup. But after just one use? Isn't that a little fast?
Perhaps my steel wool is being poisoned another way?
I know, I know.. lots of questions, and I suppose the answer could be anything considering my crude setup. Oh well.
|
|
bquirky
Hazard to Others
Posts: 316
Registered: 22-10-2008
Location: Perth Western Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
prehaps its not hot enough.. and the steel wool is being cooled down by the oil.. or the steel wool cant conduct enough heat from the walls of the
tube.
I cant help but feeling you'd be better off running some kind of steam engine and just plain old burning your waste oil and plastic, a well designed
boiler chould probobly get close to complete combustion.
I know that some guys that are into running back yard metal founderys use used motor oil as a cheap fuel for there furnaces
|
|