symboom
International Hazard
Posts: 1143
Registered: 11-11-2010
Location: Wrongplanet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Doing science while it is still legal since 2010
|
|
Lowering temperature of phosphorous distillisation
Would a low melting ionic salt for example calcium fluoride lower the energy needed of phosphorous production using ammonium phosphate and aluminum
[Edited on 23-2-2019 by symboom]
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2799
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
Won't ammonium oxidize aluminium?
6 NH4+ + 2 Al >> 2 Al3+ + 6NH3 (g)
|
|
|
symboom
International Hazard
Posts: 1143
Registered: 11-11-2010
Location: Wrongplanet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Doing science while it is still legal since 2010
|
|
No I don't think so if any thing the ammonium would oxidize the aluminum to aluminum nitride which is not stable in this reaction
aluminum phosphide may be a minor product though
[Edited on 23-2-2019 by symboom]
|
|
|
walruslover69
Hazard to Others
Posts: 234
Registered: 21-12-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just looking at wikipedia, the tri ammonium phosphate isn't stable, and di ammonium phosphate decomposes upon heating around 100-150C
|
|
|
fusso
International Hazard
Posts: 1922
Registered: 23-6-2017
Location: 4 ∥ universes ahead of you
Member Is Offline
|
|
Wait, do they form azeotropes with P?
|
|
|
chornedsnorkack
National Hazard
Posts: 564
Registered: 16-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Effectively all ammonium phosphates decompose to ammonia and phosphoric acid below 200 Celsius.
Phosphoric acid would oxidize Al:
2Al+2H3PO4=3H2+2AlPO4
What next?
Aluminum may reduce aluminum phosphate to phosphide:
3AlPO4+8Al=3AlP+4Al2O3
Or else phosphide might reduce phosphate to phosphorus:
5AlP+3AlPO4=4Al2O3+2P4
The second reaction might be driven by volatility of P4, where Al, AlP, AlPO4 and Al2O3 are not volatile.
How practical is it, though?
|
|
|
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Resistance
|
|
From a purely economic point of view, phosphorus manufacturing has been a necessary industrial process for a long time. Industrial processes tend to
be pretty well optimized to save money. Heat is one of the largest costs associated with P production. If the addition of a simple binary material
could cut that cost substantially, it would likely have been done unless the cost of the ingredient was itself prohibitive. Fluorspar has typically
been kind of cheap as it used in so many industries. On this basis alone, I'm not optimistic that this will pan out.
"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They
Deserve"...F. Zappa
|
|
|
Σldritch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 310
Registered: 22-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Symboom assuming you are speaking about the standard process on this forum (Al, NaPO3, NaCl) it may lower the temperature somewhat but i
think you will not get much lower than what other people on the forum has using Sodium Chloride as a flux. I doubt the current amateur process can be
improved very much reagent wise without sacrificing accessibility.
As for Ammonium Phosphate it will decompose far before you get it to react with the aluminium without a solvent. Perhaps it forms some phosphorous on
decomposition but i doubt phosphoric acid is acidic enough to hold the ammonium to a high enough temperature for that reaction to become significant.
As for the industrial processes i think heat is the most expensive part of the processes because it is the cheapest to use a lot of. It is likely much
cheaper to replace exotic reagents with more heat. And, as a bonus, the square cube law will make it easier to retain that heat the bigger you build.
|
|
|
symboom
International Hazard
Posts: 1143
Registered: 11-11-2010
Location: Wrongplanet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Doing science while it is still legal since 2010
|
|
does anyone know the copper phosphate melting point and zinc should work as a reducing agent due to the reactivity series although heating the
resulting copper phosphide to yield phosphorous which I cant find copper phosphides decomposition point either.
here is one person using ammonium phosphate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4JQDc5Eon0
another question would using bleach instead of water eliminate phosphorus hydrides reducing the phosphine gas into more phosphorous. for example it
works for hydrogen sulfide gas leaving behind sulfur
[Edited on 7-3-2019 by symboom]
[Edited on 7-3-2019 by symboom]
[Edited on 7-3-2019 by symboom]
|
|
|
Endo
Hazard to Others
Posts: 124
Registered: 5-1-2006
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cold
|
|
[Edited on 7-3-2019 by Endo]
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
That equation isn't balanced (24 H on the left, 18 H on the right).
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
